Great Thread on Vo2Max

For Roadies

Great Thread on Vo2Max

Postby CoffeeNut » Mon Sep 17, 2007 9:12 pm

CoffeeNut
 
Posts: 233
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 11:43 pm
Location: Toowoomba

by BNA » Tue Sep 18, 2007 8:28 am

BNA
 

Re: Great Thread on Vo2Max

Postby toolonglegs » Tue Sep 18, 2007 8:28 am


you have just reminded me that i won a testing session with a coach,to do a max / lactate threshold test.mmmm,won it in December 2005,wonder if he will still honor it :roll: .
User avatar
toolonglegs
 
Posts: 14383
Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 7:49 pm
Location: Somewhere with padded walls and really big hills!

Postby CoffeeNut » Tue Sep 18, 2007 8:37 am

great detail in there about the value of the 60-70% exercise zone
CoffeeNut
 
Posts: 233
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 11:43 pm
Location: Toowoomba

Postby toolonglegs » Tue Sep 18, 2007 8:51 am

my max is 195 so 60%-70% is 117-136,pretty much where I spent 5.5 hours on Sunday,not on purpose but because I was nursing a mate :wink: for 3 hours of that.Would be good to visit a coach and get a training schedule,from friends who have they do seem to spend a lot of time in those lower zones.But I do always put it off thinking that being 20kilos overweight I should lose that 1st before bothering!.
User avatar
toolonglegs
 
Posts: 14383
Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 7:49 pm
Location: Somewhere with padded walls and really big hills!

Postby CoffeeNut » Tue Sep 18, 2007 9:01 am

From my recent reading, staying in the 60-70 zone for a good portion of your exercise time trains your body to burn fat rather than Glycogen. This is good for weight loss, and also gives you endurance as you maximise your ability/efficiency at pulling out fat for energy rather than Gly.
CoffeeNut
 
Posts: 233
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 11:43 pm
Location: Toowoomba

Postby DavidH » Tue Sep 18, 2007 9:36 am

I'd bought a book a few years ago called the "Lance Armstrong Performance Program" which has a seven week training program (I'm sure most of you have seen this book). Earlier in the year I decided to get a HRM and have a go at the Intermediate version of this program.

The first thing I noticed was how slow I had to travel to keep my HR low enough to maintain an aerobic training session. I felt like these sessions were a waste of time...but at the same time I was arriving home with a smile on my face since I was actually enjoying the riding and watching the scenery roll by for a change. Some of the other sessions involving high cadence riding, sprints etc were HARD but I still felt that the aerobic sessions were kind of pointless.

And now to point of my post...after the fifth week I began to notice that I had lost a bit of weight. When I started the program I weighed 84kg. At the end of the seven weeks I tipped the scales at 76kg, a weight that I have maintained for the rest of the year. Was the training program a "success"? Depends on your definition, but even if I'm not fitter I'm just happy to lose the extra 8kg...and this I attribute to the long, slow (60-70% max HR), and I guess fat burning, aerobic sessions.

As an added bonus I've learnt not to go out and wreck myself every time I get on the bike. Sometimes it's not "all about the bike" (thanks Lance) :wink:
User avatar
DavidH
 
Posts: 346
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 10:54 am
Location: Kaleen, ACT

Postby CoffeeNut » Tue Sep 18, 2007 5:18 pm

from what I can gather, 'training' your body to be good at fat burning is essential to the longer range stuff.
CoffeeNut
 
Posts: 233
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 11:43 pm
Location: Toowoomba


Return to Road Biking

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users



Popular Bike Shops
Torpedo 7 Torpedo7 AU
Ground Effect Ground Effect NZ
Chain Reaction Cycles CRC UK
Wiggle Wiggle UK
Ebay Ebay AU

“Bicycles BNA Twitter
“Bicycles BNA Facebook
“Google+ BNA Google+
“Bicycles BNA Newsletter

> FREE BNA Stickers
> BNA Cycling Kit