So I've just picked up a Polar CS600 and Im itching to get into some workouts based upon lactate threshold heart rate. Once a good value for LTHR has been determined it is then possible to train in zones around this value. The problem with the Polar is that it wants to use max HR to base training zones on.
How should I go about entering the data so I can best train as %'s around LTHR?
Training with LTHR using a HRM
-
- Posts: 152
- Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 4:58 pm
- Location: Naremburn, Sydney
Training with LTHR using a HRM
Postby stretch » Sat Nov 01, 2008 10:54 am
“Pain is temporary. It may last a minute, or an hour, or a day, or a year, but eventually it will subside and something else will take its place. If I quit, however, it lasts forever.”
- Alex Simmons/RST
- Expert
- Posts: 4997
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 3:51 pm
- Contact:
Postby Alex Simmons/RST » Sat Nov 01, 2008 12:19 pm
Well since one can sustain riding at LT for several hours, your HR at LT is probably not a good place to start.
There are two broad options:
1. Use training levels/zones based on Max HR (provided you have reasonable confidence on what that is).
2. Use training levels/zones based on your average HR for a well paced time trial of say 25-60 minutes. I say average because for a well paced TT, HR will steadily rise through the course of the ride. If HR remains flat, that typically indicates poor pacing.
Here's a quick summary of HR zones I have, based on % of Max HR and a guide as to the typical duration of efforts:
<70% Recovery (up to 90 min)
75-80% - Core endurance (1 to 6 hours)
80-85% - Tempo (30-120 minutes)
85-92.5% - Sub-TT to TT (5-60 minutes)
>92.5% - Maximal Aerobic (2-8 minutes)
I actually have them broken down a bit more than that but from a basic training guide perspective, these are a reasonable compromise between being broad enough to be simple to use and specific enough to be targeting the major physiological elements of aerobic fitness.
If you want to use your avg HR while TTing as the anchor for zones, rather than reproduce them, they are described as a HR estimation/proxy next to power training levels here:
http://www.cyclingpeakssoftware.com/power411/levels.asp
There are two broad options:
1. Use training levels/zones based on Max HR (provided you have reasonable confidence on what that is).
2. Use training levels/zones based on your average HR for a well paced time trial of say 25-60 minutes. I say average because for a well paced TT, HR will steadily rise through the course of the ride. If HR remains flat, that typically indicates poor pacing.
Here's a quick summary of HR zones I have, based on % of Max HR and a guide as to the typical duration of efforts:
<70% Recovery (up to 90 min)
75-80% - Core endurance (1 to 6 hours)
80-85% - Tempo (30-120 minutes)
85-92.5% - Sub-TT to TT (5-60 minutes)
>92.5% - Maximal Aerobic (2-8 minutes)
I actually have them broken down a bit more than that but from a basic training guide perspective, these are a reasonable compromise between being broad enough to be simple to use and specific enough to be targeting the major physiological elements of aerobic fitness.
If you want to use your avg HR while TTing as the anchor for zones, rather than reproduce them, they are described as a HR estimation/proxy next to power training levels here:
http://www.cyclingpeakssoftware.com/power411/levels.asp
-
- Posts: 152
- Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 4:58 pm
- Location: Naremburn, Sydney
Postby stretch » Sat Nov 01, 2008 1:08 pm
Thanks Alex. But isn't it true that different people will go anaerobic at different %'s of max HR. Therefore, if you are training based on max HR you may be riding in an aerobic state when in fact you are attempting to train at an anaerobic intensity (and vice versa)?
I am going to conduct a LTHR test as described by Joe Friel to find a rough estimate. Basically it is the average heart rate in the last 20 mins of a 30 min TT.
I am going to conduct a LTHR test as described by Joe Friel to find a rough estimate. Basically it is the average heart rate in the last 20 mins of a 30 min TT.
“Pain is temporary. It may last a minute, or an hour, or a day, or a year, but eventually it will subside and something else will take its place. If I quit, however, it lasts forever.”
- Alex Simmons/RST
- Expert
- Posts: 4997
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 3:51 pm
- Contact:
Postby Alex Simmons/RST » Sat Nov 01, 2008 5:13 pm
Well the question really doesn't make sense because HR response is far too slow when talking about anaerobic efforts.stretch wrote:Thanks Alex. But isn't it true that different people will go anaerobic at different %'s of max HR.
If you mean perhaps when the Onset of Blood Lactate Accumulation (OBLA) occurs, then sure, that will occur at different relative HR to HR Max for different people but even then for an individual it will vary from day to day and upon the protocol of the ramp test used to assess it.
Unlikely. If you were riding anaerobically, you would be forced to slow down significantly after only a very short time.stretch wrote:Therefore, if you are training based on max HR you may be riding in an aerobic state when in fact you are attempting to train at an anaerobic intensity (and vice versa)?
You can only sustain an anaerobic effort for a couple of minutes at most (and even then quite a lot of your energy is supplied by aerobic sources)*, so I think you are getting confused by what's anaerobic and what's aerobic.
Anaerobic efforts are very short and very hard. HR response is way too slow to be of any value for guiding such training. Even a maximal effort of 90-seconds duration is still dominantly powered by aerobic metabolism.
* how long, for instance, could you swim hard while under water holding your breath?
Here's some data to help explain what I mean. It shows the relative total energy contributions from the three main energy production pathways during maximal efforts at various durations.
Which is essentially the same thing I suggested in point 2. of my original post.stretch wrote:I am going to conduct a LTHR test as described by Joe Friel to find a rough estimate. Basically it is the average heart rate in the last 20 mins of a 30 min TT.
The exception being that Friel has a tendency to bastardise many terms (e.g. LT and Critical Power).
Jump to
- General Australian Cycling Topics
- Info / announcements
- Buying a bike / parts
- General Cycling Discussion
- The Bike Shed
- Cycling Health
- Cycling Safety and Advocacy
- Women's Cycling
- Bike & Gear Reviews
- Cycling Trade
- Stolen Bikes
- Bicycle FAQs
- The Market Place
- Member to Member Bike and Gear Sales
- Want to Buy, Group Buy, Swap
- My Bikes or Gear Elsewhere
- Serious Biking
- Audax / Randonneuring
- Retro biking
- Commuting
- MTB
- Recumbents
- Fixed Gear/ Single Speed
- Track
- Electric Bicycles
- Cyclocross and Gravel Grinding
- Dragsters / Lowriders / Cruisers
- Children's Bikes
- Cargo Bikes and Utility Cycling
- Road Racing
- Road Biking
- Training
- Time Trial
- Triathlon
- International and National Tours and Events
- Cycle Touring
- Touring Australia
- Touring Overseas
- Touring Bikes and Equipment
- Australia
- Western Australia
- New South Wales
- Queensland
- South Australia
- Victoria
- ACT
- Tasmania
- Northern Territory
- Country & Regional
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
- All times are UTC+10:00
- Top
- Delete cookies
About the Australian Cycling Forums
The Australian Cycling Forums is a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.
Bicycles Network Australia
Forum Information
Connect with BNA
Brought to you by Bicycles Network Australia | © 1999 - 2024 | Powered by phpBB ®
This website uses affiliate links to retail platforms including ebay, amazon, proviz and ribble.
This website uses affiliate links to retail platforms including ebay, amazon, proviz and ribble.