Cycle Chic

User avatar
Mulger bill
Super Mod
Super Mod
Posts: 29060
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 2:41 pm
Location: Sunbury Vic

Re: Cycle Chic

Postby Mulger bill » Mon Feb 15, 2010 10:26 pm

No I didn't Baldy, I'm a shiftworker so have been exposed to the "delights" of daytime soap. I wish the whole cast could do it to each other...

Not everybody has tho', that's the problem. I understand that it was posted in jest and as comment on the pic you quoted.

Maybe I'm a little sensitive on the whole issue. If other members think that depictions of violence to women in a general audience forum are fine and tell me so I'll let you know and you can repost it.

Back the the pictures.
Shaun
...whatever the road rules, self-preservation is the absolute priority for a cyclist when mixing it with motorised traffic.
London Boy 29/12/2011

User avatar
hartleymartin
Posts: 5153
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 6:56 pm
Location: Fairfield, NSW

Re: Cycle Chic

Postby hartleymartin » Mon Feb 15, 2010 10:55 pm

il padrone wrote:Image
My idea of the perfect family outing, although I have to admit that I'd be wondering what are my chances that the wife would produce three daughters in a row.
Martin Christopher Hartley

http://raleightwenty.webs.com - the top web resource for the Raleigh Twenty

Baldy
Posts: 1669
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 4:55 pm

Re: Cycle Chic

Postby Baldy » Mon Feb 15, 2010 11:19 pm

Nah Its ok Shaun, its not worth the bother ....it was just a silly joke.

Last time a saw it was maybe late 80's :lol: Poor impressionable young teen Ive been scarred for life :mrgreen: But I can see now that it was hard to "get", I wasnt that clear....sometimes trying to have a laugh and be pc on an open forum is a delicate line to walk eh :wink:

I agree, back to the photos of people far more attractive than us 8)

User avatar
il padrone
Posts: 22931
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
Location: Heading for home.

Re: Cycle Chic

Postby il padrone » Mon Feb 15, 2010 11:32 pm

Image
Mandatory helmet law?
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."

User avatar
Mulger bill
Super Mod
Super Mod
Posts: 29060
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 2:41 pm
Location: Sunbury Vic

Re: Cycle Chic

Postby Mulger bill » Tue Feb 16, 2010 6:25 pm

I hope this don't catch on... thanks Gizmag
Image
...whatever the road rules, self-preservation is the absolute priority for a cyclist when mixing it with motorised traffic.
London Boy 29/12/2011

User avatar
il padrone
Posts: 22931
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
Location: Heading for home.

Re: Cycle Chic

Postby il padrone » Tue Feb 16, 2010 6:29 pm

That ain't Cycle chic, that's Cycle doofus :P :roll: !
Mandatory helmet law?
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."

User avatar
Pax
Posts: 1277
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 5:23 pm
Location: Sunshine Coast, Qld

Re: Cycle Chic

Postby Pax » Tue Feb 16, 2010 6:46 pm

il padrone wrote:That ain't Cycle chic, that's Cycle doofus :P :roll: !
:lol: :lol: :lol:
his tyres are low on air too...d'oh!!!!!

User avatar
18htan
Posts: 731
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2008 4:22 pm

Re: Cycle Chic

Postby 18htan » Fri Feb 19, 2010 10:03 am

For those that like to get off road on the way to the shops...

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

User avatar
18htan
Posts: 731
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2008 4:22 pm

Re: Cycle Chic

Postby 18htan » Fri Feb 19, 2010 10:14 am

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

User avatar
18htan
Posts: 731
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2008 4:22 pm

Re: Cycle Chic

Postby 18htan » Fri Feb 19, 2010 10:22 am

Back to some Chic...

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

User avatar
norbs
Posts: 2314
Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2009 11:20 am
Location: Shoalhaven. NSW

Re: Cycle Chic

Postby norbs » Fri Feb 19, 2010 10:44 am

I am not sure if these qualify. Taken in Vietnam a few years back.

Image


Image


Image

User avatar
Aushiker
Posts: 22395
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:55 pm
Location: Walyalup land
Contact:

Re: Cycle Chic

Postby Aushiker » Fri Feb 26, 2010 7:54 pm


bigs
Posts: 90
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 3:12 pm
Location: SW, Western Australia

Re: Cycle Chic

Postby bigs » Fri Feb 26, 2010 8:19 pm

Some of these posts are anything but chic

hexrunt
Posts: 96
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 11:09 pm

Re: Cycle Chic

Postby hexrunt » Fri Feb 26, 2010 9:53 pm

bigs wrote:Some of these posts are anything but chic
Ahh but to some they may be. These sort of discussions always amuse me as my dictionary defines chic as "elegance by virtue of being fashionable". But so very often I find that argument is flawed as fashion is often far from elegant. Add to that considering fashion is relevant to many social factors as well.

I'd probably agree in some cases that they're not very stylish in some of the posts.... The girl in the pink bikini trackie dak combination and the fellow with the dead animal don't really scream style to me.
Last edited by hexrunt on Fri Feb 26, 2010 10:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Aushiker
Posts: 22395
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:55 pm
Location: Walyalup land
Contact:

Re: Cycle Chic

Postby Aushiker » Fri Feb 26, 2010 10:02 pm

bigs wrote:Some of these posts are anything but chic
Well why don't you post what you think should be here? :roll:

Personally, I am enjoying what is being shared ...

Andrew

User avatar
mikesbytes
Super Mod
Super Mod
Posts: 22161
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:42 pm
Location: Tempe, Sydney
Contact:

Re: Cycle Chic

Postby mikesbytes » Fri Feb 26, 2010 10:08 pm

bigs wrote:Some of these posts are anything but chic
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I don't consider all of those pics to be chic either, but they are all pictures worth posting.

Post some that you like
If the R-1 rule is broken, what happens to N+1?

yurl
Posts: 34
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 6:10 pm

Re: Cycle Chic

Postby yurl » Sat Feb 27, 2010 10:58 am

Mulger bill wrote:I hope this don't catch on... thanks Gizmag
Image
haha does this qualify as a helmet?

User avatar
trailgumby
Posts: 15469
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 5:30 pm
Location: Northern Beaches, Sydney
Contact:

Re: Cycle Chic

Postby trailgumby » Mon Mar 01, 2010 7:40 pm

Something to wear with your hipster jeans...

The bottom one is a well used Maxxis Larsen TT. Can anyone identify the top one?

Image

User avatar
xavdav
Posts: 236
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2008 4:37 pm
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: Cycle Chic

Postby xavdav » Mon Mar 01, 2010 7:49 pm

Should we rename the thread "cycle chicks"
18htan wrote:Back to some Chic...

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

User avatar
toolonglegs
Posts: 15463
Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 7:49 pm
Location: Somewhere with padded walls and really big hills!

Re: Cycle Chic

Postby toolonglegs » Thu Mar 11, 2010 4:24 am

Image

User avatar
greyhoundtom
Posts: 3023
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 6:28 am
Location: Wherever the sun is shining
Contact:

Re: Cycle Chic

Postby greyhoundtom » Thu Mar 11, 2010 8:17 am

Cycle Chic ...........No not exactly .......... but the dog is female :lol:

Image

User avatar
carrotspoke
Posts: 81
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 7:38 pm

Re: Cycle Chic

Postby carrotspoke » Thu Mar 11, 2010 10:57 pm

Cycle chic? Some of those photographs appear to be cycle soft core...

User avatar
greyhoundtom
Posts: 3023
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 6:28 am
Location: Wherever the sun is shining
Contact:

Re: Cycle Chic

Postby greyhoundtom » Fri Mar 12, 2010 1:53 pm

Just a simple misunderstanding by some members between Cycle Chic and Cycle Chick :shock:

User avatar
carrotspoke
Posts: 81
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 7:38 pm

Re: Cycle Chic

Postby carrotspoke » Fri Mar 12, 2010 4:13 pm

greyhoundtom wrote:Just a simple misunderstanding by some members between Cycle Chic and Cycle Chick :shock:
That photo of yours with the dog was pretty cute though :D Dogs in bicycles are always cute, but I've never seen one that big being carted along! Usually they're microdogs, i.e. puppy chihuahuas or something.

User avatar
FacePlant
Posts: 48
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 11:53 pm

Re: Cycle Chic

Postby FacePlant » Fri Mar 12, 2010 5:16 pm

AUbicycles wrote: Image
I was digging through some old cycling gear I had in storage the other week and found these. :lol:

Image

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], Anrai, Geemol