The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...
-
- Posts: 6180
- Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2014 12:06 pm
- Location: Mill Park
Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...
Postby fat and old » Fri Apr 29, 2016 12:53 pm
-
- Posts: 375
- Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2011 7:02 pm
Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...
Postby tubby74 » Fri Apr 29, 2016 1:47 pm
I was over by the river with my toddler changing the rail points and thought it would be over before i could do anything. I mean who would actually stop riding to force an argument when there was almost no inconvenience? He was the very picture of the entitled mamil the tabloid comments section like to refer to.tez001 wrote: I know the area well and thats just not on and I agree with the others. I would have given old mate a mouthful if I heard that.
-
- Posts: 114
- Joined: Sat May 02, 2015 10:15 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...
Postby tgdavies » Thu May 05, 2016 11:19 pm
-
- Posts: 14413
- Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 4:40 pm
- Location: Bendigo
Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...
Postby warthog1 » Sun May 08, 2016 12:26 pm
-
- Posts: 12224
- Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2011 3:40 pm
- Location: Brisbane
Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...
Postby jasonc » Sun May 08, 2016 12:37 pm
Wrong thread?warthog1 wrote:http://road.cc/content/review/65840-shu ... dynamo-hub
- biker jk
- Posts: 7012
- Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 6:18 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...
Postby biker jk » Sun May 08, 2016 12:42 pm
Probably supposed to be this link.jasonc wrote:Wrong thread?warthog1 wrote:http://road.cc/content/review/65840-shu ... dynamo-hub
http://road.cc/content/news/188894-vide ... -first-bmw
-
- Posts: 14413
- Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 4:40 pm
- Location: Bendigo
Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...
Postby warthog1 » Sun May 08, 2016 12:45 pm
No .Tg said he ran out of juice on his rear light.(not that I'm saying Tg is dumb)jasonc wrote:Wrong thread?warthog1 wrote:http://road.cc/content/review/65840-shu ... dynamo-hub
If you have a commuter a dyno hub lighting system is the greatest single asset IMO.
That is not the me of a few years ago. I'm getting old
-
- Posts: 14413
- Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 4:40 pm
- Location: Bendigo
Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...
Postby warthog1 » Sun May 08, 2016 12:48 pm
biker jk wrote:Probably supposed to be this link.jasonc wrote:Wrong thread?warthog1 wrote:http://road.cc/content/review/65840-shu ... dynamo-hub
http://road.cc/content/news/188894-vide ... -first-bmw
Plenty of dumb and moron on both sides there.
- uart
- Posts: 3214
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 9:15 pm
- Location: Newcastle
Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...
Postby uart » Sun May 08, 2016 7:08 pm
LOL, I love the way that the story (and headline) try to make out that the cyclist is responsible for the turn of events by doing something stupid. And then when you watch the video it's the car that drives on the wrong side of the road and straight into the cyclist (who was not expecting the car there and was traveling fairly quickly so couldn't quite manage to stop).biker jk wrote: Probably supposed to be this link.
http://road.cc/content/news/188894-vide ... -first-bmw
Maybe a tiny bit of blame on the cyclist for not noticing a bit sooner that the car was moving, but seriously that was 99% the car on the wrong side of the road in my mind.
- biker jk
- Posts: 7012
- Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 6:18 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...
Postby biker jk » Sun May 08, 2016 8:33 pm
True but if you watch where you're cycling it could save your life. No point claiming it was 99% the motorist's fault when you're dead.uart wrote:LOL, I love the way that the story (and headline) try to make out that the cyclist is responsible for the turn of events by doing something stupid. And then when you watch the video it's the car that drives on the wrong side of the road and straight into the cyclist (who was not expecting the car there and was traveling fairly quickly so couldn't quite manage to stop).biker jk wrote: Probably supposed to be this link.
http://road.cc/content/news/188894-vide ... -first-bmw
Maybe a tiny bit of blame on the cyclist for not noticing a bit sooner that the car was moving, but seriously that was 99% the car on the wrong side of the road in my mind.
- uart
- Posts: 3214
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 9:15 pm
- Location: Newcastle
Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...
Postby uart » Sun May 08, 2016 8:42 pm
Yes the rider could definitely have noticed the car and braked a bit sooner, but remember that he's probably not expecting that car on the wrong side of the road to be moving. So it's gotta be pretty easy to misjudge that, if say you look down for just a couple of seconds and then all of a sudden that car is 40 meters closer than what you were expecting.biker jk wrote:uart wrote:biker jk wrote:True but if you watch where you're cycling it could save your life. No point claiming it was 99% the motorist's fault when you're dead.
-
- Posts: 114
- Joined: Sat May 02, 2015 10:15 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...
Postby tgdavies » Sun May 08, 2016 9:09 pm
I should look at one, although I would like to use it to charge a battery rather than run the lights directly -- is that possible?warthog1 wrote:No .Tg said he ran out of juice on his rear light.(not that I'm saying Tg is dumb)
If you have a commuter a dyno hub lighting system is the greatest single asset IMO.
At present I have a HotShot Micro, which I really like, but (partly because it has good battery life) don't always remember to recharge.
My front light is a MagicShine with an external battery pack, which has a handy indicator to tell you when it is running low, and I carry a spare pack. I was planning to run a MagicShine rear, off the same pack as the front, so that I would have one fewer thing to charge, but on buying an MJ-818 I decided that it is way too bright and misses the opportunity for much better flash patterns
So I either need to make some sort of diffuser for the 818 or find another rear light which runs off a 2S LiPo, (or get a hub dynamo, but I actually want a battery on my bike as I'm planning to run my camera(s) from the same LiPo)
-
- Posts: 14413
- Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 4:40 pm
- Location: Bendigo
Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...
Postby warthog1 » Sun May 08, 2016 11:06 pm
P=vi so 0.5a which is not much to charge a battery with.
There are some pretty good front and rear dyno lights available with much better optics thsn a magic shine that just sprays light everywhere.
Thst is the way to go I reckon.
My B&M luxos u has a usb charge facility but I've never used it.
Hopefully some more knowledgeable dynohub punters can chime in with battery charging.
Ronk and ilpadrone are 2 that do so whilst touring I believe.
-
- Posts: 9810
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:48 am
Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...
Postby human909 » Sun May 08, 2016 11:13 pm
As far as charging anything else it really depends on the light and the charger used. High powered lights may refuse to charge if they can't get enough juice from the input. But every light/battery has different circuitry so you can't say for sure.
- find_bruce
- Moderator
- Posts: 10611
- Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 8:42 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...
Postby find_bruce » Mon May 09, 2016 4:50 pm
That would be a good way to let the smoke out.human909 wrote:It should deliver enough juice to be able to charge anything that is USB rechargeable. The max spec for USB is 5W at 5V, though some things do like to draw more if they can. Most likely you could make it work just by wiring it up to a USB plug..
1) bicycle dynamos are AC, USB is DC
2) while hub dynamos are notionally 6V at 0.5A, this is only true at a particular speed - usually ~12 km/h. A dynamo is basically a constant current device - below 12 km/h it will produce a lower voltage, above that speed the voltage will be higher - they can deliver more than 50V if your legs are good enough.
-
- Posts: 9810
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:48 am
Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...
Postby human909 » Mon May 09, 2016 5:46 pm
You are quite correct. Forgive me in thinking that a something called a dynamo (which by definition puts out DC), puts out a DC current. An alternator would be the more correct name (again by definition) if it is putting AC. But like I said you are correct, the incorrect nomenclature mislead me.find_bruce wrote:That would be a good way to let the smoke out.
1) bicycle dynamos are AC, USB is DC
My recommendations are wrong but there are appropriate rectifiers on the market to convert & smooth the power for USB charge.
-
- Posts: 825
- Joined: Sun Jun 28, 2015 10:57 am
Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...
Postby Trevtassie » Mon May 09, 2016 8:20 pm
-
- Posts: 6180
- Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2014 12:06 pm
- Location: Mill Park
Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...
Postby fat and old » Tue May 10, 2016 6:18 am
Damn fools at Siemens, using nomenclature that's deliberately misleadinghuman909 wrote:Forgive me in thinking that a something called a dynamo (which by definition puts out DC), puts out a DC current. An alternator would be the more correct name (again by definition) if it is putting AC.
- foo on patrol
- Posts: 9071
- Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 11:12 am
- Location: Sanstone Point QLD
Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...
Postby foo on patrol » Fri May 13, 2016 3:13 pm
Foo
Goal 6000km
-
- Posts: 1808
- Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2009 12:21 am
- Location: Perth, Western Australia
- Contact:
Notable events of Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...
Postby eldavo » Sat May 14, 2016 2:23 pm
It was a nice ride and I took a moment to enjoy the sunset, never know when it will be your lastfrom YouTube description wrote: Pretty young ladies throwing themselves before me vulnerably. I could be Jamie from Outlander... or Batman... my wife only wishes. A cathartic video getting some personal entertainment value from the pants filling moment this young woman popped out onto the path like a rabbit out of a hat... it felt like at least. I only saw her when she was right in front when I reacted with a twitch on the bike, "Ooh" verbally and the freewheel ratcheting sounds as I coast and the brain processes the shock.
After watching the video I see she crossed from the road median strip, past the nature strip and onto the shared path before looking up to see what was on the shared path (me). I was looking through the bend to pick up oncoming traffic issues early, and didn't see her chameleon movement on the left.
I thought maybe sun in the eyes behind me, but really just her not looking. I run my two day light strobe flashing lights. Just luck I didn't collide with her, or unlucky it was this close.
On the upside I liked adding the audio to the footage to chill out Aimee Mann from Magnolia soundtrack tracks 1 and 2.
https://www.instagram.com/p/BFV5dnOtklV/
-
- Posts: 450
- Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 7:40 pm
Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...
Postby citywomble » Sat May 14, 2016 5:26 pm
The rules for riding on shared paths in WA would, if there had been a collision between you and the girl, have made you liable. When riding a bike you are required to Give Way to any pedestrian who is on or crossing the shared path. This is to cover just the circumstances that you encountered and you should have been looking for and aware of any pedestrian crossing the road and entering the path.
This is also the reason why Austroads specifies that shared paths are only suitable for bike speeds up to 20 km/h. Because you appeared to be travelling at about 28 km/h this meant that you spent valuable pedestrian scanning time looking ahead to scan the vehicle crossing coming up.
That said, 28 km/h at that location was not overly excessive considering that many of the more reckless cyclists are up in the high 30's and 40's along this path.
-
- Posts: 1808
- Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2009 12:21 am
- Location: Perth, Western Australia
- Contact:
Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...
Postby eldavo » Sat May 14, 2016 6:46 pm
As pedestrians we also have responsibilities of what we should or should not do, my kids are learning this as "look right, look left, then right again" before crossing a path for self preservation.
Like for a cyclist you stated:Road Traffic Code 2000 Pedestrians Part 14 General Division 1 r. 201 wrote: 201. Pedestrians not to cause obstruction
(1) A person shall not unreasonably obstruct or prevent the free passage of any other pedestrian or a vehicle upon a path or carriageway.
Modified penalty: 2 PU.
It's nice as a vulnerable pedestrian to have strict liability, shame that road cyclists don't enjoy a similar vulnerable privilege amongst motor vehicles. That coastal area is interesting as you can see the two scenarios live between the shared path, then scaled up to the highway but the same standards don't apply for cyclist/motor vehicle conflict.Road Traffic Code 2000 Part 15 Additional provisions for bicycle riders wrote: 216. Shared paths and separated footpaths
(2) The rider of a bicycle who is on a separated footpath or a shared path shall give way to a pedestrian who is on, or is crossing, the
separated footpath or shared path.
Modified penalty: 1 PU
For the shared path design maximum 20kph is 5.5m/s, I wonder how my reaction time with this design stacks up.
- bychosis
- Posts: 7272
- Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2012 1:10 pm
- Location: Lake Macquarie
Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...
Postby bychosis » Mon May 16, 2016 11:32 am
- g-boaf
- Posts: 21490
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 6:11 pm
Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...
Postby g-boaf » Wed May 18, 2016 9:28 pm
And especially not when another rider is coming towards you on the road at the general speed of the road traffic.
This week I've seen a stack of riders at night with no lights of any sort. And one the total opposite with an enormous front light so incredibly bright I could barely see anything ahead, it was absolutely blinding.
-
- Posts: 6180
- Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2014 12:06 pm
- Location: Mill Park
Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...
Postby fat and old » Thu May 19, 2016 7:34 am
I had one of those this morning. As it got closer I was getting ready to give it to them when I realised it was a jogger with a headlamp. He couldn't really dip his head aye? And at least I could see him, so kudos to the fellag-boaf wrote: And one the total opposite with an enormous front light so incredibly bright I could barely see anything ahead, it was absolutely blinding.
Return to “General Cycling Discussion”
- General Australian Cycling Topics
- Info / announcements
- Buying a bike / parts
- General Cycling Discussion
- The Bike Shed
- Cycling Health
- Cycling Safety and Advocacy
- Women's Cycling
- Bike & Gear Reviews
- Cycling Trade
- Stolen Bikes
- Bicycle FAQs
- The Market Place
- Member to Member Bike and Gear Sales
- Want to Buy, Group Buy, Swap
- My Bikes or Gear Elsewhere
- Serious Biking
- Audax / Randonneuring
- Retro biking
- Commuting
- MTB
- Recumbents
- Fixed Gear/ Single Speed
- Track
- Electric Bicycles
- Cyclocross and Gravel Grinding
- Dragsters / Lowriders / Cruisers
- Children's Bikes
- Cargo Bikes and Utility Cycling
- Road Racing
- Road Biking
- Training
- Time Trial
- Triathlon
- International and National Tours and Events
- Cycle Touring
- Touring Australia
- Touring Overseas
- Touring Bikes and Equipment
- Australia
- Western Australia
- New South Wales
- Queensland
- South Australia
- Victoria
- ACT
- Tasmania
- Northern Territory
- Country & Regional
- All times are UTC+10:00
- Top
- Delete cookies
About the Australian Cycling Forums
The Australian Cycling Forums is a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.
Bicycles Network Australia
Forum Information
Connect with BNA
This website uses affiliate links to retail platforms including ebay, amazon, proviz and ribble.