biker jk wrote:191925632
Was that through a red light straight up the road the wrong way?
Postby warthog1 » Fri Nov 18, 2016 2:53 pm
biker jk wrote:191925632
Postby biker jk » Fri Nov 18, 2016 3:02 pm
He went through a "Don't Walk" signal to cross the road (so traffic left and right had a green light) then proceeded up the road (between the two trucks) the wrong way. He was wearing a bright jacket though.warthog1 wrote:biker jk wrote:191925632
Was that through a red light straight up the road the wrong way?
Postby warthog1 » Fri Nov 18, 2016 3:06 pm
Postby MisuVir » Tue Nov 22, 2016 6:54 pm
Postby Mulger bill » Tue Nov 22, 2016 8:45 pm
Regular occurence in Melbs CBD. It seems that you stopping on the green for them just encourages more to step out.MisuVir wrote:Just watched a cyclist be forced to stop in the middle of an intersection because pedestrians were jaywalking like idiots. Cyclist had a green light straight through. Pedestrians had a red light. Didn't stop them from streaming across the crossing, even when the cyclist came to a stop inches away from them.
I bet he wishes he had an air horn.
Postby find_bruce » Wed Nov 23, 2016 8:18 pm
Postby Bunged Knee » Wed Nov 23, 2016 10:08 pm
Postby redsonic » Wed Nov 23, 2016 10:09 pm
I lent a bike to a friend who lost his licence, and found it chained up like thatRoss wrote:
Postby jules21 » Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:31 am
Postby tez001 » Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:42 am
Postby BenGr » Wed Nov 30, 2016 1:29 pm
I wouldn't use Google maps as evidence. If it's not signed it is likely only a footpath.tez001 wrote:
Originally I thought that it was just a foot path (and prefer to ride this section for safety), but checking on googlemaps, its marked as a share path. Ive told him this a couple of times, but still he yells at me every time I see him, telling me I shouldn't be riding there.
I think I need to print off a few copies of the map and hand it to him next time.
Postby human909 » Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:54 pm
True regarding google as evidence. But there are countless examples of shared paths which are not signed appropriately. (Shared paths as in part of a continuous network, council demarcation, occasional but insufficient signage.)BenGr wrote:I wouldn't use Google maps as evidence. If it's not signed it is likely only a footpath.
Postby fat and old » Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:10 pm
On the CCT? They're not used to cyclists?jules21 wrote:encountered completely bat poo crazy pedestrian family on my commute this morning. all 3 of them broke out into profanities and hysterical shouting as I rolled past on the Capital City Trail.
Postby fat and old » Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:12 pm
I know that crossing, and the reasoning....is it legal to ride your bike across the ped crossing on Brunswick Rd though?human909 wrote:True regarding google as evidence. But there are countless examples of shared paths which are not signed appropriately. (Shared paths as in part of a continuous network, council demarcation, occasional but insufficient signage.)BenGr wrote:I wouldn't use Google maps as evidence. If it's not signed it is likely only a footpath.
Not that I'm blaming lack of signage, as the rules are absurd if you choose to be pedantic about them. Here is an example of a 4m long shared footpath! It would seem the signage though allows for ~15m of travel because it was more convenient to attach the signs to existing poles.
Postby antigee » Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:54 pm
some ped's are people that have sort of accidentally got out of their carsjules21 wrote:
encountered completely bat poo crazy pedestrian family on my commute this morning. all 3 of them broke out into profanities and hysterical shouting as I rolled past on the Capital City Trail.
Postby human909 » Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:03 pm
It is legal to ride across the bicycle crossing with the bicycle lanterns.fat and old wrote:I know that crossing, and the reasoning....is it legal to ride your bike across the ped crossing on Brunswick Rd though?
Postby fat and old » Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:34 pm
Never noticed them. Coolhuman909 wrote:It is legal to ride across the bicycle crossing with the bicycle lanterns.fat and old wrote:I know that crossing, and the reasoning....is it legal to ride your bike across the ped crossing on Brunswick Rd though?
Postby hamishm » Wed Dec 07, 2016 12:12 pm
Postby CycloTron » Wed Dec 07, 2016 1:18 pm
Postby CXCommuter » Wed Dec 07, 2016 6:26 pm
I thought they were MOBILs (miserable old bastards in lycra).CycloTron wrote:Attended funeral yesterday at the cemetery.
On the way from the chapel to the burial grounds, the mourners were crossing one of the cemetery roads on a marked zebra pedestrian crossing when a ROWMIL (retired old white male in lycra - there I've coined a new term ) simply rode on through without even slowing. I had to physically stop a very frail and elderly woman from stepping out and getting clean up.
Firstly, just because it's a cemetery doesn't mean the signs and road rules don't apply.
Secondly, even if there was no signage (which there was), how about a little common courtesy and empathy, acknowledging that for some in the procession, it would be a very difficult time and they don't need to add being buzzed by a bicycle to the list of stressors.
Postby cp123 » Thu Dec 08, 2016 3:04 pm
Postby jules21 » Sat Dec 10, 2016 2:22 pm
Postby outnabike » Sat Dec 10, 2016 4:08 pm
Return to “General Cycling Discussion”
The Australian Cycling Forums is a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.