The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...
- silentC
- Posts: 2442
- Joined: Mon May 05, 2014 5:24 pm
- Location: Far South Coast NSW
Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...
Postby silentC » Mon Dec 29, 2014 9:36 am
A group of cyclists joining the bike track, there is a family of five with toddlers who have just commenced their walk and are spread out across the track, with Mum and youngest on the right. They see us coming and to their credit realise they need to give us some room to get past (this is actually fairly unusual behaviour for this time of year) but toddler starts stamping his feet and screaming 'no' when Mum says 'we need to move over to let the big bikes go past'. This goes on for some time as we all come to a standstill. She finally drags him to the grass on the right hand side as the rest of the mob, who up to this point had been standing flat-footed in the middle of the path, go to the left.
Is there now some law against picking up your child?
- Me
- Gordonhooker
- Posts: 683
- Joined: Mon May 06, 2013 9:11 pm
- Location: Redlands
Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...
Postby Gordonhooker » Mon Dec 29, 2014 10:34 am
You people (the group concerned) make it very difficult for us courteous riders out there.
-
- Posts: 9810
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:48 am
Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...
Postby human909 » Mon Dec 29, 2014 10:52 am
While the exact circumstances aren't clear, that seems like the sensible and safe way for a cyclist to approach and negotiate a roundabout. Take the lane well beforehand and hold the lane through the entire roundabout. It is certainly how I generally ride through roundabouts. I totally ignore any bike lanes provided as they are accidents waiting to happen.Gordonhooker wrote:the moron in maroon jersey decides to sit in the middle of road so that I cannot safely pass the group before they go around the round-about (which our council had spent our rates to provide a clearly marked bicycle lane around), the moron in the maroon jersey decides not to use.
Interestingly enough the Queensland road authorities agree. They are now changing the laws to make it explicit that cyclists are allowed to take the appropriate lane in roundabouts AND cyclists will no longer be required to ride in bicycle lanes both on roundabouts and regular roads.
- Gordonhooker
- Posts: 683
- Joined: Mon May 06, 2013 9:11 pm
- Location: Redlands
Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...
Postby Gordonhooker » Mon Dec 29, 2014 10:59 am
I would not have written the post if the rider didn't have enough distance from the roundabout to enable a car to pass safely.human909 wrote:While the exact circumstances aren't clear, that seems like the sensible and safe way for a cyclist to approach and negotiate a roundabout. Take the lane well beforehand and hold the lane through the entire roundabout. It is certainly how I generally ride through roundabouts. I totally ignore any bike lanes provided as they are accidents waiting to happen.Gordonhooker wrote:the moron in maroon jersey decides to sit in the middle of road so that I cannot safely pass the group before they go around the round-about (which our council had spent our rates to provide a clearly marked bicycle lane around), the moron in the maroon jersey decides not to use.
Interestingly enough the Queensland road authorities agree. They are now changing the laws to make it explicit that cyclists are allowed to take the appropriate lane in roundabouts AND cyclists will no longer be required to ride in bicycle lanes both on roundabouts and regular roads.
- biker jk
- Posts: 7001
- Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 6:18 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...
Postby biker jk » Mon Dec 29, 2014 11:11 am
Why did you need to pass before the roundabout? What's your hurry?Gordonhooker wrote:I would not have written the post if the rider didn't have enough distance from the roundabout to enable a car to pass safely.human909 wrote:While the exact circumstances aren't clear, that seems like the sensible and safe way for a cyclist to approach and negotiate a roundabout. Take the lane well beforehand and hold the lane through the entire roundabout. It is certainly how I generally ride through roundabouts. I totally ignore any bike lanes provided as they are accidents waiting to happen.Gordonhooker wrote:the moron in maroon jersey decides to sit in the middle of road so that I cannot safely pass the group before they go around the round-about (which our council had spent our rates to provide a clearly marked bicycle lane around), the moron in the maroon jersey decides not to use.
Interestingly enough the Queensland road authorities agree. They are now changing the laws to make it explicit that cyclists are allowed to take the appropriate lane in roundabouts AND cyclists will no longer be required to ride in bicycle lanes both on roundabouts and regular roads.
-
- Posts: 9810
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:48 am
Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...
Postby human909 » Mon Dec 29, 2014 11:47 am
It is all irrelevant. There is one lane for traffic and there was traffic in front of you. Your job is to stay behind that traffic and pass safely when you are able to. You do not have a greater right to go ahead simply because you are driving a car. Nor is it ever rude having a vehicle being "stuck" behind you for 20s or a few hundred metres.
(If you are stuck behind another vehicle for 5 or 10 minutes and they neglected a good opportunity to let you pass then I would consider that to be rude/thoughtless. But I've only encountered such behavior from other motorists, never from cyclists.)
- ColinOldnCranky
- Posts: 6734
- Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 4:58 pm
Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...
Postby ColinOldnCranky » Mon Dec 29, 2014 11:53 am
I assume that the video title is rhetorical. Just as jasonc stated, it belongs in th is thread.herzog wrote:http://vimeo.com/114838006
- bychosis
- Posts: 7250
- Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2012 1:10 pm
- Location: Lake Macquarie
Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...
Postby bychosis » Mon Dec 29, 2014 11:56 am
There's your dumb part.Gordonhooker wrote: I am almost to a crossing when a group of about 6 riders on road bikes come the wrong way out of one way street look me in the eye and pull straight out in front of me
- silentC
- Posts: 2442
- Joined: Mon May 05, 2014 5:24 pm
- Location: Far South Coast NSW
Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...
Postby silentC » Mon Dec 29, 2014 12:09 pm
- Me
- ColinOldnCranky
- Posts: 6734
- Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 4:58 pm
Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...
Postby ColinOldnCranky » Mon Dec 29, 2014 12:11 pm
As many here will know I find many cyclists to not be anywhere near as responsible as they like to pretend to be. But I also see motorists as the substantial problem, not cyclists.fat and old wrote:Mr smart Alec ped decided to tell me all about cyclists while I peacefully having a coffee this morning.....unsolicited! This was new. He felt that using the rego argument was his best attack. " I have 2 cars, a trailer, a M/C and a boat" he claims. "What gives you the right to use the road"? I replied my 4 cars, 2 4wd's, 3 trailers, 4 mobile plant trailers, M/C, boat, caravan, forklift, 3 pieces of mobile plant and 14 trucks, at a total of 20k per annum of rego covered me.
Remarkably friends and aquaintenances treat me as a cyclist (which I consider myself substantially to be) so they often bail me up to make their point that cyclists should be disallowed from the road as they get in the way of motorists.
After responding to all of their issues (rego, red lights, filtering, two abreast, long lines etc) that are trotted out one after the other as each is countered the remaining argument often gets down to "cyclists on the road annoy or frustrate me". At which point I will restate that along the lines of "So, cyclists on the road annoy you? Do you really expect that that is sufficient to remove them from riding on roads or to justify drivers passing dangerously?" Such a stupid proposition even to the original protaginist that occasionally said person and others in the conversation will reconsider their POV.
I may also follow up suggesting that if that annoyance affects them that severely then perhaps they are not the person who should be in control of a fast heavy object on the public roads.
- CXCommuter
- Posts: 1885
- Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2013 12:18 pm
- Location: Lane Cove NSW
Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...
Postby CXCommuter » Mon Dec 29, 2014 12:23 pm
Human909- fixed for you and I used bold, italics, underline and UPPERCASE to get MY message across.
Though I do agree with your original statement it is a bit unjustified angry, ignoring 3/4 of what is in the original post is fairly poor form even for you.
-
- Posts: 9810
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:48 am
Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...
Postby human909 » Mon Dec 29, 2014 12:43 pm
Cxcommuter, I don't think anybody here was arguing otherwise. I certainly wasn't.CXCommuter wrote:It is all irrelevant. There is a one way lane for traffic and the cyclists chose to ignore this and cut in front of traffic that has right of way. CYCLISTS DO NOT HAVE A GREATER RIGHT TO IGNORE THE ROAD RULES SIMPLY BECAUSE THEY ARE ON A BIKE.
- Gordonhooker
- Posts: 683
- Joined: Mon May 06, 2013 9:11 pm
- Location: Redlands
Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...
Postby Gordonhooker » Mon Dec 29, 2014 1:07 pm
-
- Posts: 14305
- Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 4:40 pm
- Location: Bendigo
Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...
Postby warthog1 » Mon Dec 29, 2014 1:10 pm
fat and old wrote:
Sheesh....its holiday time man! What makes people think they can start canning you with impunity? I blame that Rapha top with the pink trim!
- Xplora
- Posts: 8272
- Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2010 12:33 am
- Location: TL;DR
Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...
Postby Xplora » Mon Dec 29, 2014 1:54 pm
I also like asking people if they've ever been involved in a serious car accident... reality is that being in a car prang can hurt a lot, and the metal skin doesn't do that much to protect you at 40+kmh. Many of the "true believers" defending the car falsely believe the car protects them (it does very little) and that a bike somehow hurts more (a couple grazes isn't that bad, kids get them every day).ColinOldnCranky wrote:.....trotted out one after the other as each is countered the remaining argument often gets down to "cyclists on the road annoy or frustrate me". At which point I will restate that along the lines of "So, cyclists on the road annoy you? Do you really expect that that is sufficient to remove them from riding on roads or to justify drivers passing dangerously?" Such a stupid proposition even to the original protaginist that occasionally said person and others in the conversation will reconsider their POV.
The arguments against are BS, but you've got to take the time to deal with them. The fact that the person is someone you would otherwise believe cares about you as a human suddenly treats you as the "Other" just reinforces the reality that it's a stupid argument. People don't become trash just because they do something different to you occasionally.
- biker jk
- Posts: 7001
- Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 6:18 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...
Postby biker jk » Mon Dec 29, 2014 2:04 pm
Gordonhooker wrote:I am not sure if some of the people who post in here are trying to be funny or are just plain dumb cyclists... and I am not referring to the last poster either.
Nobody disagrees that those cyclists were morons to ride the wrong way down a one-way street and enter the road in front of you. However, their behaviour after that point (claiming the lane well before a roundabout) was perfectly fine. Suggesting that posters taking that view are "dumb cyclists" is simply name calling without offering any rebuttal.
- g-boaf
- Posts: 21318
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 6:11 pm
Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...
Postby g-boaf » Mon Dec 29, 2014 2:38 pm
You can just wait 30 seconds and be on your way without bother as far as roundabouts are concerned.Gordonhooker wrote:I would not have written the post if the rider didn't have enough distance from the roundabout to enable a car to pass safely.
Nobody excuses their behaviour of going the wrong way down a one way street, but claiming the lane ahead of a roundabout is a matter of safety. Bicycle lanes (or is that council convenience lanes**) at the edge of roundabouts are an extremely bad idea. I don't know how much riding you do on the road, but I will never, ever use those lanes. I'm going to claim the lane 200m ahead of the roundabout and get through there without having someone in a car trying to run me into the gutter in their rush to get ahead.
**Council convenience lane: The usually narrow lane a council or authority paints on the road to show they are doing something for cycling, when in fact said lane is near useless or is unsafe to use.
-
- Posts: 14305
- Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 4:40 pm
- Location: Bendigo
Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...
Postby warthog1 » Mon Dec 29, 2014 2:49 pm
+1 they are worse than useless. Their presence actually makes life harder for cyclists as it creates the expectation that we should be in that woefully unsafe position on the road.g-boaf wrote: Bicycle lanes (or is that council convenience lanes**) at the edge of roundabouts are an extremely bad idea. I don't know how much riding you do on the road, but I will never, ever use those lanes. I'm going to claim the lane 200m ahead of the roundabout and get through there without having someone in a car trying to run me into the gutter in their rush to get ahead.
**Council convenience lane: The usually narrow lane a council or authority paints on the road to show they are doing something for cycling, when in fact said lane is near useless or is unsafe to use.
-
- Posts: 9810
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:48 am
Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...
Postby human909 » Mon Dec 29, 2014 3:00 pm
-
- Posts: 6179
- Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2014 12:06 pm
- Location: Mill Park
Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...
Postby fat and old » Fri Jan 02, 2015 10:51 am
No comment on the "safety" or otherwise of these things.
-
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2014 10:55 pm
Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...
Postby weldin_mike_27 » Fri Jan 02, 2015 11:02 am
- Spaniel
- Posts: 159
- Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2011 9:28 am
Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...
Postby Spaniel » Fri Jan 02, 2015 11:45 am
Yep, a couple of days back: narrow cycle lane, long blind corner, cars passing on my right , up ahead a mob of five runners heading straight at me in the cycle lane. I had no choice but to stop, some squeezed by, others climbed into the scrub.weldin_mike_27 wrote:Anyone encounter those "boot camps" or fitness groups running on bike tracks. I think they teach them to run on the right. Or else they are going along like Brown's cows.
I think it was just a mixed group of friends, not a boot camp. Becoming more common, especially in the holiday season. We can expect a New Years Resolution tsunami of them.
-
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2014 10:55 pm
Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...
Postby weldin_mike_27 » Fri Jan 02, 2015 12:33 pm
-
- Posts: 1062
- Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2013 11:30 pm
- Location: Bundoora, Melbourne
Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...
Postby nezumi » Fri Jan 02, 2015 1:21 pm
On the flipside of this, I have encountered a running group across the bridge of the Yarra while the pontoon repair was occurring - they had "run leader" hi vis vests front and rear, and when these people saw me approaching they called out "bicycle behind" and everyone made room for me - very much appreciated!weldin_mike_27 wrote:Anyone encounter those "boot camps" or fitness groups running on bike tracks. I think they teach them to run on the right. Or else they are going along like Brown's cows.
2015 Merida Scultura 5000
-
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2014 10:55 pm
Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...
Postby weldin_mike_27 » Fri Jan 02, 2015 4:53 pm
Return to “General Cycling Discussion”
- General Australian Cycling Topics
- Info / announcements
- Buying a bike / parts
- General Cycling Discussion
- The Bike Shed
- Cycling Health
- Cycling Safety and Advocacy
- Women's Cycling
- Bike & Gear Reviews
- Cycling Trade
- Stolen Bikes
- Bicycle FAQs
- Serious Biking
- Audax / Randonneuring
- Retro biking
- Commuting
- MTB
- Recumbents
- Fixed Gear/ Single Speed
- Track
- Electric Bicycles
- Cyclocross and Gravel Grinding
- Dragsters / Lowriders / Cruisers
- Children's Bikes
- Cargo Bikes and Utility Cycling
- Road Racing
- Road Biking
- Training
- Time Trial
- Triathlon
- International and National Tours and Events
- Cycle Touring
- Touring Australia
- Touring Overseas
- Touring Bikes and Equipment
- Australia
- Western Australia
- New South Wales
- Queensland
- South Australia
- Victoria
- ACT
- Tasmania
- Northern Territory
- Country & Regional
- The Market Place
- Member to Member Bike and Gear Sales
- Want to Buy, Group Buy, Swap
- My Bikes or Gear Elsewhere
- Cycling Brands
- Cannondale
- Garmin
- Giant
- Shimano
- Trek
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
- All times are UTC+11:00
- Top
- Delete cookies
About the Australian Cycling Forums
The Australian Cycling Forums is a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.
Bicycles Network Australia
Forum Information
Connect with BNA
This website uses affiliate links to retail platforms including ebay, amazon, proviz and ribble.