The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...

open topic, for anything cycling related.

Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...

Postby biker jk » Wed Feb 19, 2014 8:06 pm

Lukeyboy wrote:


I didn't know that Stephen Hawking was in Australia. Must be colour blind.
User avatar
biker jk
 
Posts: 3346
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 5:18 pm
Location: Sydney

by BNA » Wed Feb 19, 2014 8:11 pm

BNA
 

Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...

Postby Myrtone » Wed Feb 19, 2014 8:11 pm

If you guys are looking for trouble, you've probably found it, what has he got to do with this?!?
Myrtone
 
Posts: 85
Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2010 7:12 pm

Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...

Postby Lukeyboy » Wed Feb 19, 2014 8:52 pm

Yeah just try me you....
Image

Just an FYI, this isn't my video. It popped up in my youtube feed.
Image
User avatar
Lukeyboy
 
Posts: 2611
Joined: Tue May 29, 2012 2:38 am

Re: Do you know this Sydney cyclist ?

Postby duncan16v » Thu Feb 20, 2014 9:11 am

find_bruce wrote:Do you know this Sydney cyclist ?
Image

If so can you give him a hug, it appears he has caught MGIF & is far too important to wait a couple of seconds for the downhill cyclist to pass before passing the pedestrian at a well known pinch point. Those unfamiliar with the area will note the pole in the middle of the path
Image

He thinks the appropriate way to win friends and influence people is to insult them & then to top it off, felt the need to close shave me as well
Image


Probably a good thing he's on a bike. With that awesome attitude, he'd be one of the featured stars on Moron Motorists #3.
Image
User avatar
duncan16v
 
Posts: 249
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:09 am
Location: Melbourne

Re: Do you know this Sydney cyclist ?

Postby find_bruce » Thu Feb 20, 2014 9:33 am

duncan16v wrote:Probably a good thing he's on a bike. With that awesome attitude, he'd be one of the featured stars on Moron Motorists #3.

Yep, I would definitely prefer him to be on a bike than behind the wheel of two tonnes of steel. He wasn't so much dumb as angry & impatient - hence the give him a hug comment
Image . . . . . . . Image
User avatar
find_bruce
 
Posts: 4427
Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 8:42 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...

Postby human909 » Thu Feb 20, 2014 10:31 am

jindydiver wrote:I of course expressed my amazement at her stupidity and pointed out what she did was stupid and illegal to be told that "you are wrong, in the ACT I can ride onto the crossing" as if her belief (which isn't supported by the road rules) would confer some magical protection from injury.


As a cyclist I would have been quite annoyed at somebody driving a 2 tonne cage trying to tell me that I should not be riding on a pedestrian crossing. Seriously dude, don't make yourself another rude motorist.
human909
 
Posts: 5797
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 10:48 am

Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...

Postby CXCommuter » Thu Feb 20, 2014 10:58 am

Had 2 idiots today- first was at the overpass on the PSP at Stirling- some gumby dropped rubbish blocking 2/3 of the path where it enters the road. I pulled over and started to clear the rubbish away as it was dangerous- whilst doing this about 6 cyclists rode down- none stopping to help, Mr in a hurry yelled loudly to get off the f*&^ing bike path. Real intelligent it is a shared path and I was actually clearing the rubbish out of his and others way. If I had a chance I would have thrust some of the cactus I was clearing in his front wheel :x
Second one was a moron motorist- I am too lazy to tell over int he MM thread though- I claimed the lane and this young lady advised me in a very courteous manner to quote
"get off the f***ing road you are holding everyone up" (as I re-overtook her and all the other MGIF's as they got held up at a set of lights)
Image
User avatar
CXCommuter
 
Posts: 1305
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2013 11:18 am
Location: Perth WA

Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...

Postby wellington_street » Thu Feb 20, 2014 11:06 am

human909 wrote:
jindydiver wrote:I of course expressed my amazement at her stupidity and pointed out what she did was stupid and illegal to be told that "you are wrong, in the ACT I can ride onto the crossing" as if her belief (which isn't supported by the road rules) would confer some magical protection from injury.


As a cyclist I would have been quite annoyed at somebody driving a 2 tonne cage trying to tell me that I should not be riding on a pedestrian crossing. Seriously dude, don't make yourself another rude motorist.


If you're going to ride across a pedestrian crossing, don't obstruct cars. I thought that would be pretty common sense?
wellington_street
 
Posts: 1182
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2011 12:25 pm

Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...

Postby CXCommuter » Thu Feb 20, 2014 11:11 am

human909 wrote:
jindydiver wrote:I of course expressed my amazement at her stupidity and pointed out what she did was stupid and illegal to be told that "you are wrong, in the ACT I can ride onto the crossing" as if her belief (which isn't supported by the road rules) would confer some magical protection from injury.


As a cyclist I would have been quite annoyed at somebody driving a 2 tonne cage trying to tell me that I should not be riding on a pedestrian crossing. Seriously dude, don't make yourself another rude motorist.


I am sorry what!!! You break the law and get advised of it by someone anyone and you get annoyed- all I see from that comment is just another self important twit driving, riding, walking around believing their illegal behavior is justified in this case because they are on a bike not in a 2 tonne steel cage. If you break the law suffer the consequences including being run over by a 2 tonne steel cage that could not stop in time (which is probably why the law you broke is in place in the first instance)
Image
User avatar
CXCommuter
 
Posts: 1305
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2013 11:18 am
Location: Perth WA

Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...

Postby human909 » Thu Feb 20, 2014 11:37 am

CXCommuter wrote:I am sorry what!!! You break the law and get advised of it by someone anyone and you get annoyed- all I see from that comment is just another self important twit driving, riding, walking around believing their illegal behavior is justified in this case because they are on a bike not in a 2 tonne steel cage. If you break the law suffer the consequences including being run over by a 2 tonne steel cage that could not stop in time (which is probably why the law you broke is in place in the first instance)


Wow. Your really are a charming person. Lets try to make the roads more pleasant rather than less. At the same time that rule infringer is busy justifying their minor infraction, you are busy justifying your rudeness.
human909
 
Posts: 5797
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 10:48 am

Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...

Postby CXCommuter » Thu Feb 20, 2014 11:48 am

Your post above indicated that rudeness to another legal road user outlining a "minor' infraction is justified due to their personal mode of transport- pot calling the kettle black. I am only responding to what I see as a general rule of humanity- "everyone else is the cause of all my problems".
Image
User avatar
CXCommuter
 
Posts: 1305
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2013 11:18 am
Location: Perth WA

Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...

Postby human909 » Thu Feb 20, 2014 11:52 am

WTH!? You make no sense.
human909
 
Posts: 5797
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 10:48 am

Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...

Postby CXCommuter » Thu Feb 20, 2014 12:11 pm

human909 wrote:WTH!? You make no sense.

Okay very slowly- you indicate that getting annoyed at being told off about breaking the law is justified as the other person is in a car, a. I see this every day- people called out on breaking the law and their response is the get angry and often threaten violence- that to me is rudeness.

As far as I see it this forum is NOT about some personal vendetta against cars and/or their users regardless of their environmental impact etc. As to poor behavior/attitudes, I see the exact same behavior of drivers repeated in riders (often in greater numbers percentage wise) and would suggest the vast majority of drivers do a good job of trying to ensure my safety when I am riding on the road.
Image
User avatar
CXCommuter
 
Posts: 1305
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2013 11:18 am
Location: Perth WA

Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...

Postby outnabike » Thu Feb 20, 2014 3:28 pm

Hi CXCommuter ,Too much aggro for me.....
Just as a casual observation, I am reading more and more posts of wanting to inflict violence on the part of cyclists, or advocating it, in bicycle forums such as ours.
An illegally parked car...”maybe he wouldn’t like it keyed with a bell” or “smear it with dog poo”
A ped crossing illegally..... “He deserves to be run over” or “suffer the consequences including being run over by a 2 tonne steel cage”

On that other bike forum some two good cyclists advocate if done wrong too... “ring the authorities and tell them you spotted the driver throwing out rubbish”
Some think it is good to see cars in a certain street with lots of their side mirrors damaged.

I am the same as everyone else and get angry at times and I too have had my share of incidents with cars and peds. But we are saying they are perhaps dumb peds in this thread, and just as we have dumb cyclists, why are some writers wishing harm on other people or hoping for it to occur?
Or indeed implying that others deserve injury. Yet when a cyclist gets a good turn done by a motorist, would you like that motorist to say “Wow he made an error, lucky I braked” or to think “look at that idiot I should have given him a good bump for his trouble?”
We see so many pretty ordinary instances of just plain ebb and flow of traffic both here and on MM that are really just human error and not intentional.
Trouble is some seem to take it to heart as intentional (and it sometimes is) and then start seeing wrong in every minute of their ride.
User avatar
outnabike
 
Posts: 1262
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 1:53 pm
Location: Melbourne Vic

Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...

Postby human909 » Thu Feb 20, 2014 3:41 pm

I agree there is too much aggro.

CXCommuter wrote:Okay very slowly- you indicate that getting annoyed at being told off about breaking the law is justified as the other person is in a car,

That is not what I indicated.
human909
 
Posts: 5797
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 10:48 am

Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...

Postby CXCommuter » Thu Feb 20, 2014 3:45 pm

Can someone point out anywhere I am advocating violence- I am not advocating violence, I am in fact solidly against it- what I am aggro about is people thinking they can break the law, that being either cyclists, pedestrians or drivers- get pulled up on it and then get annoyed/aggro/angry because they did get pulled up on it- which is a very common experience IMHO. I do not want to see anyone injured or any property damaged.

BTW I do not see riding across a busy pedestrian crossing with no warning, forcing drivers to brake hard as a minor infraction. The reason why dismounting is required is in part so drivers can see and react to what is expected at a pedestrian crossing ie a pedestrian not a cyclist.
Image
User avatar
CXCommuter
 
Posts: 1305
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2013 11:18 am
Location: Perth WA

Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...

Postby jindydiver » Thu Feb 20, 2014 3:56 pm

human909 wrote:
jindydiver wrote:I of course expressed my amazement at her stupidity and pointed out what she did was stupid and illegal to be told that "you are wrong, in the ACT I can ride onto the crossing" as if her belief (which isn't supported by the road rules) would confer some magical protection from injury.


As a cyclist I would have been quite annoyed at somebody driving a 2 tonne cage trying to tell me that I should not be riding on a pedestrian crossing. Seriously dude, don't make yourself another rude motorist.


It is not the riding on the crossing that is the issue, it was the squirting onto the road with no warning (that the rule is supposed to address)..
The rider was less than safe regardless of the rules. I believe I was far less rude than the rider. I only yelled out because of the adrenal response after stopping my car inches from someone my son later called a "darwin award candidate".
jindydiver
 
Posts: 95
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 4:16 pm

Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...

Postby human909 » Thu Feb 20, 2014 3:59 pm

CXCommuter wrote:what I am aggro about is people thinking they can break the law, that being either cyclists, pedestrians or drivers- get pulled up on it and then get annoyed/aggro/angry because they did get pulled up on it- which is a very common experience IMHO.


You don't see how that is rude and antisocial? I had a friend who used to always yell out "Where's your helmet!?" every time she saw a cyclist without a helmet. It is unpleasant and rude. If somebody makes a mistake that warrants pointing out then sure point that out. But pointing out the rule infraction rather than the mistake is not productive.

Most people fragrantly breaking rules know they are doing it. Telling them that they are doing it doesn't achieve anything. Pointing out the problems could however be productive. If I had a chance to speak/yell at the moron I saw run a red light yesterday I would tell him "You shouldn't run red lights". I would like to point out that he almost he 4 school kids at high speed.

jindydiver wrote:It is not the riding on the crossing that is the issue, it was the squirting onto the road with no warning (that the rule is supposed to address)..
The rider was less than safe regardless of the rules. I believe I was far less rude than the rider. I only yelled out because of the adrenal response after stopping my car inches from someone my son later called a "darwin award candidate".


Fair enough. I do agree with you.
human909
 
Posts: 5797
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 10:48 am

Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...

Postby jindydiver » Thu Feb 20, 2014 4:08 pm

outnabike wrote:A ped crossing illegally..... “He deserves to be run over” or “suffer the consequences including being run over by a 2 tonne steel cage”



My yelling was a hope to educate someone and help them live longer, not in any way a violent act :roll:
jindydiver
 
Posts: 95
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 4:16 pm

Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...

Postby CXCommuter » Thu Feb 20, 2014 4:17 pm

I would rather be perceived as being rude and anti social than having to pull a cyclist out from underneath a car or have saved someones life otherwise because they ignored basic laws that are put in place to protect them. If people think their own disregard of the law only impacts upon themselves they need a wake up- the above scenario impacts on the cyclist, the driver and those witnessing/assisting the cyclist who has been run over, all as a result of one persons selfish behaviour.

I have had several instances where people (cyclists, pedestrians and drivers) were pulled up on infractions and were actually grateful they got pulled up on the issue as their understanding of the law was lacking, unfortunately this response is so often lacking.
Image
User avatar
CXCommuter
 
Posts: 1305
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2013 11:18 am
Location: Perth WA

Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...

Postby ColinOldnCranky » Thu Feb 20, 2014 9:50 pm

Lukeyboy wrote:

MIght explain how he wound up in the chair.

Some people are just so much more important than the rest of us. :?
Unchain yourself-Ride a unicycle
Image
User avatar
ColinOldnCranky
 
Posts: 5086
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 3:58 pm

Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...

Postby g-boaf » Sun Feb 23, 2014 5:10 pm

Not really dumb, but probably just new to cycling I guess. I was passing another cyclist on the M7 and announced passing right. He looked behind and veered right at the same time. :shock: no incident occurred and I didn't say anything.

If that was you, no harm done and sorry if I scared you.
g-boaf
 
Posts: 5093
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 6:11 pm

Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...

Postby Myrtone » Sun Feb 23, 2014 5:49 pm

CXCommuter wrote:I am sorry what!!! You break the law and get advised of it by someone anyone and you get annoyed- all I see from that comment is just another self important twit driving, riding, walking around believing their illegal behavior is justified in this case because they are on a bike not in a 2 tonne steel cage. If you break the law suffer the consequences including being run over by a 2 tonne steel cage that could not stop in time (which is probably why the law you broke is in place in the first instance)


If you don't observe the law and get run over by a 2 tonne steel cage, which may contain many more people than a bike can carry, you have suffered the consequences of your own actions, even if they could stop or swerve in time. Now if they were on the wrong side of the road and/or over the speed limit, they must necessarily be at least paritly responsible becasue they what they did was illegal irrespective of the presence of any pedestrian. But if on the correct side of the road and no greater than the speed limit, chances are, they did nothing (irrespectively) wrong, but if they pedestrian was say crossing on a red ped signal they did do something irrespectively wrong.
Myrtone
 
Posts: 85
Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2010 7:12 pm

Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...

Postby Tomca74 » Mon Feb 24, 2014 1:32 pm

I rode home from the city today around 11, for the first time. (never go in there if I can help it)
10km/h speed limit on the Goodwill bridge and I am riding nicely, a few walkers meandering all over the place, no problem, a little ding ding, they shuffle over. Get just past the coffee stand and 2 guys walking right in the middle of everything, ding ding, look over their shoulders and the left guy moves over, the right guy moves right. I slowly edge between them and the guy on the right puts his arm out and strikes me, not hard but makes contact. Say What??? Oh wait, he is wearing a flanno and beanie, my bad. He starts abusing me. Really?
Dropped the bike and grabbed him by the throat and spun him around and pointed at the councils camera on the path and explained the concept of assault, provocation and the level of force I am entitled to use in my defence because there are two of them. Fortunately his mate wanted no part of it so no one was hurt and he apologised for his actions as I released pressure and I explained that if he chose to continue when I let him go I would take him to ground and call 000. He didn't get tough again until I was 20m away.
I have to deal with these 'tards at work, I shouldn't be doing freebies on my day off.
Tomca74
 
Posts: 127
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2013 9:28 pm
Location: Oxley, Qld

Re: The Dumb Cyclists and Pedestrians thread...

Postby Lukeyboy » Mon Feb 24, 2014 1:45 pm

:D :D
Image
User avatar
Lukeyboy
 
Posts: 2611
Joined: Tue May 29, 2012 2:38 am

PreviousNext

Return to General discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: zero



Popular Bike Shops
Wiggle Wiggle UK
Ground Effect Ground Effect NZ
Ebay Ebay AU
Chain Reaction Cycles CRC UK

“Bicycles BNA Twitter
“Bicycles BNA Facebook
“Google+ BNA Google+
“Bicycles BNA Newsletter
“Bicycles BNA on Strava

> FREE BNA Stickers