Ugly Bikes

User avatar
schroeds
Posts: 862
Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2009 9:58 pm

Re: Ugly Bikes

Postby schroeds » Fri Oct 25, 2013 4:43 pm

I find 90% of TT bikes ugly. That's just me.

But perhaps no TT bike anywhere is quite as offensive as this nasty little booger

Image
Not so much a cyclist...more of a sit down comedian

Uncle Just
Posts: 655
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 4:54 pm

Re: Ugly Bikes

Postby Uncle Just » Fri Oct 25, 2013 6:06 pm

What a great find! Pays homage to almost everything bike, but fails on so many levels that it's ....ugly, impractical and oh so silly. :lol:

User avatar
schroeds
Posts: 862
Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2009 9:58 pm

Re: Ugly Bikes

Postby schroeds » Fri Oct 25, 2013 6:26 pm

as if it wasn't bad enough, they had to have the saddle right down on the top tube bleeeuch! :evil:
Not so much a cyclist...more of a sit down comedian

Uncle Just
Posts: 655
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 4:54 pm

Re: Ugly Bikes

Postby Uncle Just » Fri Oct 25, 2013 7:38 pm

No,no, no! It's a new trend... slam that saddle. :lol:

jasonc
Posts: 8758
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2011 3:40 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: Ugly Bikes

Postby jasonc » Fri Oct 25, 2013 7:49 pm

^ gold
Image

User avatar
il padrone
Posts: 22823
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
Location: Heading for home.

Re: Ugly Bikes

Postby il padrone » Fri Oct 25, 2013 7:54 pm

"Impractical"

Hey, he's got a rack to carry his running shoes. So very practical :lol:
Mandatory helmet law?
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."

User avatar
il padrone
Posts: 22823
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
Location: Heading for home.

Re: Ugly Bikes

Postby il padrone » Fri Oct 25, 2013 8:03 pm

warthog1 wrote:
Le Mong wrote:
They look to perch on there ring gear.


:lol: It does look that way. Probably on their perineum, but either way not good for you.

For that very reason there are MTB saddles made with a big wide flat nose. Steep rocky climbs on a MTB demand the same type of 'nose-in-the-ring' seating position :( :oops:


Image
Mandatory helmet law?
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."

User avatar
Aushiker
Posts: 21675
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:55 pm
Location: Fremantle, WA
Contact:

Re: Ugly Bikes

Postby Aushiker » Tue Dec 17, 2013 5:30 pm

Image

Background at MTBR

Andrew
Andrew
~ Aushiker.com

User avatar
thecaptn
Posts: 1606
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 8:28 pm
Location: Deloraine Tasmania

Re: Ugly Bikes

Postby thecaptn » Sat Jan 04, 2014 9:04 am


User avatar
Mulger bill
Super Mod
Super Mod
Posts: 28370
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 2:41 pm
Location: Sunbury Vic

Re: Ugly Bikes

Postby Mulger bill » Sat Jan 04, 2014 11:54 am

^^ Expensive way to buy stem and bars...
...whatever the road rules, self-preservation is the absolute priority for a cyclist when mixing it with motorised traffic.
London Boy 29/12/2011

jasonc
Posts: 8758
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2011 3:40 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: Ugly Bikes

Postby jasonc » Sat Jan 04, 2014 1:41 pm

Mulger bill wrote:^^ Expensive way to buy stem and bars...


Is it bad that when I saw it my first thought was "those wheels aren't worth that"
Image

User avatar
Mulger bill
Super Mod
Super Mod
Posts: 28370
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 2:41 pm
Location: Sunbury Vic

Re: Ugly Bikes

Postby Mulger bill » Sat Jan 04, 2014 6:41 pm

jasonc wrote:
Mulger bill wrote:^^ Expensive way to buy stem and bars...


Is it bad that when I saw it my first thought was "those wheels aren't worth that"


Seems like an 'orrible thing to do to Columbus tubes too...
...whatever the road rules, self-preservation is the absolute priority for a cyclist when mixing it with motorised traffic.
London Boy 29/12/2011

User avatar
schroeds
Posts: 862
Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2009 9:58 pm

Re: Ugly Bikes

Postby schroeds » Tue Jan 07, 2014 8:03 pm

Future collectors item. There, I said it

Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk
Not so much a cyclist...more of a sit down comedian

lucky7
Posts: 468
Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 8:54 am

Re: Ugly Bikes

Postby lucky7 » Tue Jan 07, 2014 8:27 pm

DoubleSpeeded wrote:
ldrcycles wrote:
DoubleSpeeded wrote:
Thats pretty clever with the integrated hydration.


I've been wondering since I first saw that new frame with the internal bladder thing, how do you get it out if it springs a leak or needs cleaning?

And whether TT or Tri, bikes with aerobars need deep dish wheels to look "right" to me


im sure the guys at Specialized would've had that in mind and designed something that shouldn't leak.
The flexible drink hose that runs into the frame, im assuming the join is something simple and can be accessed via the filler cap area.

yea without deep dish, the frame looks out of place as its real thick-looking.

but disc looks the best.. as you can see the Super 9 on the black s-works

lucky7
Posts: 468
Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 8:54 am

Re: Ugly Bikes

Postby lucky7 » Tue Jan 07, 2014 8:29 pm

DoubleSpeeded wrote:
ldrcycles wrote:
DoubleSpeeded wrote:
Thats pretty clever with the integrated hydration.


I've been wondering since I first saw that new frame with the internal bladder thing, how do you get it out if it springs a leak or needs cleaning?

And whether TT or Tri, bikes with aerobars need deep dish wheels to look "right" to me


im sure the guys at Specialized would've had that in mind and designed something that shouldn't leak.
The flexible drink hose that runs into the frame, im assuming the join is something simple and can be accessed via the filler cap area.

yea without deep dish, the frame looks out of place as its real thick-looking.

but disc looks the best.. as you can see the Super 9 on the black s-works


Something of a topic resurrection, but the hydration system is a fully removable bladder. Taller and thinner than a Camelback, but same thing. Fully removable for cleaning/drying (or when not needed).

Works well for long course racing.

User avatar
rangersac
Posts: 1321
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 11:01 am
Location: Snug, Tasmania

Re: Ugly Bikes

Postby rangersac » Thu Jan 09, 2014 3:38 pm

Image
De Rosa Macro | Trek Superfly 100AL Elite | Claud Butler Sovereign | Titus Motolite

User avatar
singlespeedscott
Posts: 4931
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2008 4:35 pm
Location: Elimbah, Queensland

Re: Ugly Bikes

Postby singlespeedscott » Thu Jan 09, 2014 4:32 pm

rangersac wrote:Image

Yeap, ugly BSO.
Image

User avatar
Aushiker
Posts: 21675
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:55 pm
Location: Fremantle, WA
Contact:

Re: Ugly Bikes

Postby Aushiker » Thu Jan 09, 2014 5:39 pm

Image

Furniture brand Thonet commissioned this bicycle concept and it will set you back USD$70,000. Made from Beech timber steam-bent into shape. - Bike Exchange

Andrew
Andrew
~ Aushiker.com

User avatar
singlespeedscott
Posts: 4931
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2008 4:35 pm
Location: Elimbah, Queensland

Re: Ugly Bikes

Postby singlespeedscott » Thu Jan 09, 2014 6:13 pm

Aushiker wrote:Image

Furniture brand Thonet commissioned this bicycle concept and it will set you back USD$70,000. Made from Beech timber steam-bent into shape. - Bike Exchange

Andrew

Saw that today.

"Man you ugly"
Image

duds2u
Posts: 683
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2010 1:24 pm
Location: Sunshine Coast QLD

Re: Ugly Bikes

Postby duds2u » Thu Jan 09, 2014 8:16 pm

Aushiker wrote:Image

Furniture brand Thonet commissioned this bicycle concept and it will set you back USD$70,000. Made from Beech timber steam-bent into shape. -
Andrew


Like the idea of bent beech BUT it won't set me back $70K. Bent beech should stay as furniture.

User avatar
outnabike
Posts: 1848
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 2:53 pm
Location: Melbourne Vic

Re: Ugly Bikes

Postby outnabike » Fri Jan 10, 2014 4:06 pm

thecaptn wrote:Anyone going to bid on this? :lol:
http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/Allsop-Softr ... 8fd&_uhb=1


I see what you mean , it is too easy to get hurt sliding down the banister. I reckon I have fixed it with a cushion.... :)

Image
Vivente World Randonneur complete with panniers

jasonc
Posts: 8758
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2011 3:40 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: Ugly Bikes

Postby jasonc » Fri Jan 10, 2014 4:24 pm

outnabike wrote:
thecaptn wrote:Anyone going to bid on this? :lol:
http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/Allsop-Softr ... 8fd&_uhb=1


I see what you mean , it is too easy to get hurt sliding down the banister. I reckon I have fixed it with a cushion.... :)

Image


don't start that game.
Image

User avatar
Dragster1
Posts: 1522
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 9:46 pm
Location: Eluding motorist

Re: Ugly Bikes

Postby Dragster1 » Sun Jan 12, 2014 5:47 pm

twizzle wrote:
Duck! wrote:
twizzle wrote:That's a Tri bike, not a TT bike.

Which further validates its existence in this thread.


Awwwww.... There are *some* nice Tri-specific bikes out there. And it's hard to be pretty with Tri geometry - although in the case of this bike they really didn't make an effort.

(This message is brought to you by steroid induced insomnia. Thanks, asthma! :evil: )

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

I am confused now, Why does the manufacturer say it is a TT with tri geometry

Featuring a stiff FACT monocoque frame engineered with Triathlon Geometry, the Transition Sport is a bona fide stopwatch slayer. With integrated aerodynamic brakes and a carbon bladed seatpost the Transition is the perfect time trialing weapon that won't break the bank.

User avatar
Aushiker
Posts: 21675
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:55 pm
Location: Fremantle, WA
Contact:

Re: Ugly Bikes

Postby Aushiker » Wed Jan 22, 2014 2:40 pm

Image
Andy Forey's Correx-faired Moulton

Sorry Andy :)

Andrew
Andrew
~ Aushiker.com

insightt47
Posts: 441
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2011 8:31 am

Re: Ugly Bikes

Postby insightt47 » Thu Jan 23, 2014 1:51 am

[quote="Jean"]A pretty ordinary looking bike made downright awful by a terrible colour. My stomach turns every time they show Radio Shack Leopard Trek rider at this year's TdF - and it's not because it's usually Andy Schelck in one of their see-through jerseys. I'm not sure I could even watch Jens ride :?

Image

That is the ugliest head tube i have ever seen. What were Trek thinking, the previous Madone had perfect asthetics.

Return to “General discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Feedfetcher, MaxCloutier