BianchiCam wrote:Well I went to the cop shop last night and handed everything in again with another statement regarding my conversation with the Sen Const. Seems the desk jockeys suggested it goes to the Sen Sgt not Super as I have been informed. Apparently the Sen Sgt looks after all uniformed officers at the station. Believe it is a female which may be more useful considering I have kids et all.
Just waiting for a response. I even put my latest vid (considerate v inconsiderate) on the disc along with measurements from the scene.
Now we wait.
Cam
Update.
10-2-16
Off to the cop shop after work today at 5pm as I was on the Moto.
Wanted to find out the name of the Sen Sgt whom the Constable told me would be better to go to than the Superintendent.
Sooooo, I rocks up and after waiting a while for someone to appear, ask the the Sen Constable, "I am trying to find out which Sen Sgt was on duty last Friday Night to see if they received some paperwork"
Big mistake!
Why, how and when followed for a good 10 mins. What happened blah blah blah.
He went off to try and find out. Meanwhile, trying to verbalise all that had happened was getting a tad tiring.
"no nothing back here showing any paperwork", Great here we bloody go I think.
"what date were you hit again"? Goodness, I wasn't hit. It was a very near miss. "No legislation ad nauseam.
A fair bit of tooing and froing ensures.
Says he will get the Sgt. A nice enough lady.
Go through everything again. With her telling me there is nothing they can do, what do I want out of this, blah blah blah.
Utter BS.
Says she will contact the Const that I gave the 2nd lot of disc and cover letter to.
Get home and there is a message telling me that a Sgt (Female) is my contact. Apparently she has the info. At least it wasnt thrown in the bin as I suspected.
When I gave the info to the Snr Const to take further. He said he would pass it onto the Sen Sgt, not Sgt. Said 'she' would look at it.
Really feel that I am coming across as a whinger as far as I call tell from their responses.
Asked the nice lady today, "what is the difference between 'reckless and dangerous' driving,' "oh maybe fiddling with the radio, or maybe spilling coffee and swearving a bit" I say, "oh so nothing like shaving a bike rider then" No it seems.
Me, "so I can be fined for riding too close to a car"
Her, "yes"
Me, "But a car can pass as close as they like"?
"you dont ride , do you," I asked?
She makes a face, "oh no"
Pretty much sums up the situation.
Funny thing is, whilst waiting for service at the cop shop I happened upon a nice little booklet for bike riders from the Law Foundation, Called Bike Law. A Bike riders guide to road rules in Vic.
How very thoughtful. Lots of regulations and rules for the rider, but buggerall in the way of others being responsible when passing.
Give my details again but didn't have the disc with letters so pretty pointless. You cannot put in a nutshell the events.
bikelaw.org.au
Details of 'careless driving'
Careless driving
Being charged with an offence of careless driving means the police allege that you did not drive with the care and attention that a reasonable driver would.
Often the police charge people with careless driving because the police say the person has caused an accident. However, there does not have to be an accident for this charge to apply.