Old school.human909 wrote:No.sogood wrote:Riding on road then deliberately stop and obstruct (even 1 mins) is not a bullying behaviour?
Critical Mass
- sogood
- Posts: 17168
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
- Location: Sydney AU
Re: Critical Mass
Postby sogood » Thu Nov 29, 2012 2:53 pm
RK wrote:And that is Wikipedia - I can write my own definition.
- il padrone
- Posts: 22931
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
- Location: Heading for home.
Re: Critical Mass
Postby il padrone » Thu Nov 29, 2012 4:53 pm
CM is not a protest movement, just a bunch of people who get together to go for a ride. There are no causes, policies nor representatives - just a love of riding bikes.sogood wrote:Well, then CM can get on with the time and protest to those who are in charge.
.
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."
- sogood
- Posts: 17168
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
- Location: Sydney AU
Re: Critical Mass
Postby sogood » Thu Nov 29, 2012 8:11 pm
That's a terrible way to present the group Pete. I understand from their movement site that they do have an objective. If they didn't and also deliberately cause traffic delay, then they really have no more defence of their action.il padrone wrote:CM is not a protest movement, just a bunch of people who get together to go for a ride. There are no causes, policies nor representatives - just a love of riding bikes.
RK wrote:And that is Wikipedia - I can write my own definition.
- find_bruce
- Moderator
- Posts: 10581
- Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 8:42 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: Critical Mass
Postby find_bruce » Thu Nov 29, 2012 10:12 pm
In among the tumbleweedssogood wrote:That's a terrible way to present the group Pete. I understand from their movement site that they do have an objective. If they didn't and also deliberately cause traffic delay, then they really have no more defence of their action.il padrone wrote:CM is not a protest movement, just a bunch of people who get together to go for a ride. There are no causes, policies nor representatives - just a love of riding bikes.
In short, critical mass don't set out to achieve anything & so far they have met that objective, much like "occupy Sydney".http://www.bikesarefun.org/faq.html wrote:What are the aims of Critical Mass?
Every participant rides in Critical Mass for their own reasons, and there are almost as many reasons as there are participants. However, some common reasons to ride are:
Having fun. (Seriously, would we keep turning up on the last Friday of every month if it wasn't!)
Meeting up with friends and making new ones.
Getting to enjoy bicycling/rollerblading/skateboarding on the smooth city roads, without the cars.
Showing off flashy and unusual bikes and clothes.
Being seen and vocal about creating a vision and experience of a possible future.
Networking with like minded people and organising similar activities.
Educating people about sustainable transport - cycling, roller blading, walking, public transport.
Show that all sustainable forms of transport can be used in the city, and that we need to sharing the road with each other.
Campaign for safe, use able cycling facilities.
To create a space that is Car-free in the centre of our city.
To reclaim the space street space for people
To encourage thought on Clean Air and healthier living.
The list goes on and on ... Turn up and ask some of the people
Perhaps we should ask Nobody, apparently he organises it in Sydney
http://www.bikesarefun.org/faq.html wrote:Who are the organisers?
Nobody organises Critical Mass ...
-
- Posts: 10322
- Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 12:10 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: Critical Mass
Postby Nobody » Thu Nov 29, 2012 10:28 pm
Well, you can tell why I didn't want to be part of this debate.find_bruce wrote:Perhaps we should ask Nobody, apparently he organises it in Sydneyhttp://www.bikesarefun.org/faq.html wrote:Who are the organisers?
Nobody organises Critical Mass ...
- Red Rider
- Posts: 1024
- Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 5:44 pm
- Location: Perth
Re: Critical Mass
Postby Red Rider » Thu Nov 29, 2012 10:29 pm
I can't believe he's associated with them, but then again Nobody's perfect!find_bruce wrote:Perhaps we should ask Nobody, apparently he organises it in Sydneyhttp://www.bikesarefun.org/faq.html wrote:Who are the organisers?
Nobody organises Critical Mass ...
- sogood
- Posts: 17168
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
- Location: Sydney AU
Re: Critical Mass
Postby sogood » Thu Nov 29, 2012 10:42 pm
Occupy doesn't interfere with the general public (apart from their use of space and visual impact) and has a clear message. It's also a sore for the wealthy and ruling elites in the society. CM is not in the same league.find_bruce wrote:In short, critical mass don't set out to achieve anything & so far they have met that objective, much like "occupy Sydney".
RK wrote:And that is Wikipedia - I can write my own definition.
- AUbicycles
- Site Admin
- Posts: 15587
- Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2005 2:14 am
- Location: Sydney & Frankfurt
- Contact:
Re: Critical Mass
Postby AUbicycles » Thu Nov 29, 2012 10:59 pm
In short, it can be enjoyable, it can be ruined by idiots, conceptually it needs to evolve.
- sogood
- Posts: 17168
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
- Location: Sydney AU
Re: Critical Mass
Postby sogood » Thu Nov 29, 2012 11:19 pm
And respected for it!Nobody wrote:Well, you can tell why I didn't want to be part of this debate.
RK wrote:And that is Wikipedia - I can write my own definition.
-
- Posts: 9810
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:48 am
Re: Critical Mass
Postby human909 » Fri Nov 30, 2012 1:08 am
They are not loonies. I am starting to get less and less amazed at how conservative and how different and cohort is found on BNA forums vs the actual cyclist cohort. These aren't loonies involved in critical mass, these are regular cyclists. There is a whole another world of cycling out there beyond the constrained cohort of road cycling. It is sad that there is such a rift, you can see this on MHLs and other such topics.AUbicycles wrote: I still picture loonies who go beyond the principles of making a stance to being aggresive and putting themselves in dangerous situations, ' standing infront of oncoming traffic on the habour bridge to make a point' rather then keeping to one or two lanes.
Just saying...
-
- Posts: 645
- Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2010 11:23 pm
Re: Critical Mass
Postby diggler » Fri Nov 30, 2012 1:45 am
- Alien27
- Posts: 252
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 5:59 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: Critical Mass
Postby Alien27 » Fri Nov 30, 2012 7:33 am
He didn't say they were loonies, he said "I still picture loonies" and I think he has hit the nail on the head. If you assume that Critical Mass has evolved and is no longer what it was, then it still has a major problem with how it is perceived. The fact is people still picture loonies being aggressive and disruptive. If CM wants to help cycling rather than hinder it then they need a re branding, their past is inescapable.human909 wrote:They are not loonies. I am starting to get less and less amazed at how conservative and how different and cohort is found on BNA forums vs the actual cyclist cohort. These aren't loonies involved in critical mass, these are regular cyclists. There is a whole another world of cycling out there beyond the constrained cohort of road cycling. It is sad that there is such a rift, you can see this on MHLs and other such topics.AUbicycles wrote: I still picture loonies who go beyond the principles of making a stance to being aggresive and putting themselves in dangerous situations, ' standing infront of oncoming traffic on the habour bridge to make a point' rather then keeping to one or two lanes.
Just saying...
- il padrone
- Posts: 22931
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
- Location: Heading for home.
Re: Critical Mass
Postby il padrone » Fri Nov 30, 2012 8:00 am
CM is not a public relations firm or large corporation. 'Branding' doesn't really enter the picture.Alien27 wrote:The fact is people still picture loonies being aggressive and disruptive. If CM wants to help cycling rather than hinder it then they need a re branding, their past is inescapable.
"Loonies being aggressive and disruptive" = any cyclist who doesn't stick to singe file (in the minds of most drivers)
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."
- g-boaf
- Posts: 21352
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 6:11 pm
Re: Critical Mass
Postby g-boaf » Fri Nov 30, 2012 9:06 am
That perception I think is what the chief of this site was hinting at. This topic even suggests that CM still polarises opinions, given the robust debate on the issue here.
-
- Posts: 9810
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:48 am
Re: Critical Mass
Postby human909 » Fri Nov 30, 2012 9:19 am
What topic doesn't around here?g-boaf wrote:his topic even suggests that CM still polarises opinions, given the robust debate on the issue here.
Saying that CM suffers from a image or branding problem silly. As long as you are appealing to your target market then their is no branding problem. (Their target market is NOT all cyclists, it simply cannot cover that range.) It is like saying that Bathurst (the car race) suffers from an image problem. Those that love the culture don't see a problem. Those that dislike the culture perceive a problem. I'm sure many would CM would find lycra clad culture not appealing.
- AUbicycles
- Site Admin
- Posts: 15587
- Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2005 2:14 am
- Location: Sydney & Frankfurt
- Contact:
Re: Critical Mass
Postby AUbicycles » Fri Nov 30, 2012 9:23 am
There were always the odd few people who I call loonies who went to far, the specific example when the Critical Mass went over the Habour Bridge and 99% of cyclists were content to keep left, these are the ones who felt it necessary to stop oncoming traffic - i.e. without the critical mass.
In my view the grassroots action was probably more effective - we would print hundreds of flyers and hand them out to drivers - this starts a dialogue where we would briefly explain that we won't be too long 'thanks for their patience' and would more often than not is a friendly encounter - it is a protest.
- Alien27
- Posts: 252
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 5:59 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: Critical Mass
Postby Alien27 » Fri Nov 30, 2012 12:11 pm
Its not silly when the question I'm trying to answers was the OP's original one; "Are they (CM) helping or hindering cycling?" they need a re-branding if they are going to help cycling, otherwise their past and the public perception of them just makes it near imposable for them to get their message through. i would also imaging that no cyclists are their primary target market. Targeting cyclists would preaching to the converted wouldn't it?human909 wrote:...Saying that CM suffers from a image or branding problem silly. As long as you are appealing to your target market then their is no branding problem. (Their target market is NOT all cyclists, it simply cannot cover that range.) It is like saying that Bathurst (the car race) suffers from an image problem. Those that love the culture don't see a problem. Those that dislike the culture perceive a problem. I'm sure many would CM would find lycra clad culture not appealing.
Whether CM's branding enterers the picture or not in their eyes doesn't mean its not a problem for them.il padrone wrote:CM is not a public relations firm or large corporation. 'Branding' doesn't really enter the picture.Alien27 wrote:The fact is people still picture loonies being aggressive and disruptive. If CM wants to help cycling rather than hinder it then they need a re branding, their past is inescapable.
-
- Posts: 1669
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 4:55 pm
Re: Critical Mass
Postby Baldy » Fri Nov 30, 2012 1:03 pm
The point is to turn up, enjoy yourself. Its nice having a chat to people, it can be a good grapevine to what is going on with cycling issues around the place. We get more positive response than negative on the road. The fact that 15people riding bikes together around the city stands out so much that peds will stop to watch or point phones. That's all we are trying to change, that groups of bikes on the road is an unusual sight. Well apart from roadies in training bunches but they don't count because they wear lycra
Like the Penguins at the end of Madagascar.....Just smile and wave boys...smile and wave
- sogood
- Posts: 17168
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
- Location: Sydney AU
Re: Critical Mass
Postby sogood » Fri Nov 30, 2012 1:32 pm
You are presently making a PR statement defending CM. PR is everywhere and does not have to be a firm or large corporation.il padrone wrote:CM is not a public relations firm or large corporation. 'Branding' doesn't really enter the picture.
"Loonies being aggressive and disruptive" = any cyclist who doesn't stick to singe file (in the minds of most drivers)
RK wrote:And that is Wikipedia - I can write my own definition.
-
- Posts: 9810
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:48 am
Re: Critical Mass
Postby human909 » Fri Nov 30, 2012 1:45 pm
We all have different perceptions of what "cycling" is and what "helping cycling is". Sometimes I don't think the obsession with lycra, strava, speed and bunch helps the "cycling brand".Alien27 wrote:Its not silly when the question I'm trying to answers was the OP's original one; "Are they (CM) helping or hindering cycling?" they need a re-branding if they are going to help cycling, otherwise their past and the public perception of them just makes it near imposable for them to get their message through. i would also imaging that no cyclists are their primary target market.human909 wrote:...Saying that CM suffers from a image or branding problem silly. As long as you are appealing to your target market then their is no branding problem. (Their target market is NOT all cyclists, it simply cannot cover that range.) It is like saying that Bathurst (the car race) suffers from an image problem. Those that love the culture don't see a problem. Those that dislike the culture perceive a problem. I'm sure many would CM would find lycra clad culture not appealing.
Who said they are trying to preach to non cyclists? Who said they are trying to preach?Alien27 wrote:Targeting cyclists would preaching to the converted wouldn't it?
- Alien27
- Posts: 252
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 5:59 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: Critical Mass
Postby Alien27 » Fri Nov 30, 2012 3:14 pm
I dont disagree with any of thathuman909 wrote:We all have different perceptions of what "cycling" is and what "helping cycling is". Sometimes I don't think the obsession with lycra, strava, speed and bunch helps the "cycling brand".
Its a figure of speech... you suggested that their target market was cyclists, I was just making the point that considering one of their broader aims seems to be educating people about sustainable transport and sharing the road, then you would imagine that their target audience wouldn't be bikes as that would be say educating the educated, no?human909 wrote:Who said they are trying to preach to non cyclists? Who said they are trying to preach?Alien27 wrote:Targeting cyclists would preaching to the converted wouldn't it?
I may have become aware of them and made my mind up about them when they were at their 'worst' as it were. It may have been just a bad period in their history with a few outliers causing a lot of trouble and giving them a bad name. I didn't even know they were still active and I'm willing to give them the benefit of the doubt that now they are a much better behaved group. I still think they would do well to drop the Critical Mass name though, there's a lot of baggage out there associated with that name.
I think i have had more than my fair 2c here and will bow out now.
-
- Posts: 1358
- Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 5:58 pm
Re: Critical Mass
Postby boss » Fri Nov 30, 2012 3:59 pm
Branding isn't necessarily a concept limited to business.Alien27 wrote:Whether CM's branding enterers the picture or not in their eyes doesn't mean its not a problem for them.il padrone wrote:CM is not a public relations firm or large corporation. 'Branding' doesn't really enter the picture.Alien27 wrote:The fact is people still picture loonies being aggressive and disruptive. If CM wants to help cycling rather than hinder it then they need a re branding, their past is inescapable.
Branding is an abstract idea that essentially relates to public perceptions combined with the story behind the name. You have a personal brand. Where you work has a corporate brand. Charities have brands. You can appropriate a brand to almost anything.
CM certainly does have a brand. Whether or not they are in need of a re-brand: I don't know, probably. I know very little about CM and I'm a cyclist. I can't help but think that your average person knows nothing about CM.
One would think they need a refresh, to go back to their values and goals and think about how to actually achieve them. Then create a brand surrounding it, one that both appeals to cyclists and makes sense to the general public.
- greyhoundtom
- Posts: 3023
- Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 6:28 am
- Location: Wherever the sun is shining
- Contact:
Re: Critical Mass
Postby greyhoundtom » Fri Nov 30, 2012 4:50 pm
As in getting enough cyclists riding together to form a “critical mass” of sufficient numbers of cyclists to cause maximum effect on other traffic on their route.
I therefore see no problem with their brand, as it describes what they do........just can’t see how their actions benefit cycling.
However I can see how their actions could make more motorists dislike cyclists as a group.
-
- Posts: 1358
- Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 5:58 pm
Re: Critical Mass
Postby boss » Fri Nov 30, 2012 5:20 pm
That is all part of their brand. Brand isn't just about name. It's about the story behind the name, the public perception, etc.greyhoundtom wrote: I therefore see no problem with their brand, as it describes what they do........just can’t see how their actions benefit cycling.
However I can see how their actions could make more motorists dislike cyclists as a group.
Most brand names mean nothing or very little when separated from the brand. Nike, Vans, Trek, Colnago, etc. Each have different stories.
The story that CM is trying to tell is pretty fragmented. Sure they are trying to achieve a critical mass - but how, why. And how will it benefit people -why should people get involved.
ETc etc so on and so forth.
- sogood
- Posts: 17168
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
- Location: Sydney AU
Re: Critical Mass
Postby sogood » Fri Nov 30, 2012 6:23 pm
RK wrote:And that is Wikipedia - I can write my own definition.
Return to “General Cycling Discussion”
- General Australian Cycling Topics
- Info / announcements
- Buying a bike / parts
- General Cycling Discussion
- The Bike Shed
- Cycling Health
- Cycling Safety and Advocacy
- Women's Cycling
- Bike & Gear Reviews
- Cycling Trade
- Stolen Bikes
- Bicycle FAQs
- The Market Place
- Member to Member Bike and Gear Sales
- Want to Buy, Group Buy, Swap
- My Bikes or Gear Elsewhere
- Serious Biking
- Audax / Randonneuring
- Retro biking
- Commuting
- MTB
- Recumbents
- Fixed Gear/ Single Speed
- Track
- Electric Bicycles
- Cyclocross and Gravel Grinding
- Dragsters / Lowriders / Cruisers
- Children's Bikes
- Cargo Bikes and Utility Cycling
- Road Racing
- Road Biking
- Training
- Time Trial
- Triathlon
- International and National Tours and Events
- Cycle Touring
- Touring Australia
- Touring Overseas
- Touring Bikes and Equipment
- Australia
- Western Australia
- New South Wales
- Queensland
- South Australia
- Victoria
- ACT
- Tasmania
- Northern Territory
- Country & Regional
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot]
- All times are UTC+11:00
- Top
- Delete cookies
About the Australian Cycling Forums
The Australian Cycling Forums is a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.
Bicycles Network Australia
Forum Information
Connect with BNA
This website uses affiliate links to retail platforms including ebay, amazon, proviz and ribble.