
From Seattle Bike Blog
Logic wins out for this Washington lawmaker
27 posts
• Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Logic wins out for this Washington lawmakerRiding bikes in traffic - what seems dangerous is usually safe; what seems safe is often more dangerous.
Re: Logic wins out for this Washington lawmakerWow. I'm selling my bikes and driving the car everywhere from now on. Had no idea I was polluting the whole time.
Re: Logic wins out for this Washington lawmakerOne word comes to mind and it starts with W and ends in R.
Foo I don't suffer fools easily and so long as you have done your best,you should have no regrets.
Goal 6000km ![]()
Re: Logic wins out for this Washington lawmakerSomebody oughta tell this bloke that The Gooier Male and Terday termorrer are not valid reference sources for anything.
...whatever the road rules, self-preservation is the absolute priority for a cyclist when mixing it with motorised traffic.
London Boy 29/12/2011
Re: Logic wins out for this Washington lawmaker2012 Oppy A4 | 200x Hard tail Kona Blast Deluxe
Re: Logic wins out for this Washington lawmaker
Yes he does sound like a bit of a winger. Lemme guess what's next - in addition to taxing cyclists for their CO2 emissions, climate change is a hoax and carbon taxes should be repealed
Re: Logic wins out for this Washington lawmaker
One of the most bizzare truths of that particular page, is that in the USA, here and the UK, the excess food required by the cyclist for fuel is also eaten by the motorists (ie essentially cancelling out any effect of cycling). the motorists just get fat.
Re: Logic wins out for this Washington lawmaker
Aaaaand then a fat motorist is more of a burden on the health system than a thin cyclist which uses yet more resources. Additionally damage to road infrastructure has been shown to be proportional to the mass of the vehicle to the power of 4 so vehicles as light as bicycles cause essentially zero damage to roads during normal use.
Re: Logic wins out for this Washington lawmakerEmail him to tell him what intellect he is showing
I've sent mine. Riding bikes in traffic - what seems dangerous is usually safe; what seems safe is often more dangerous.
Re: Logic wins out for this Washington lawmaker
Ssshhh - if they realise that, being fat will be calling it carbon capture & storage I was going to buy a fast, stylish bike, but I looked in the mirror & thought "you're not fooling anyone, you know"
Re: Logic wins out for this Washington lawmakerCarbon emissions, irrelevant.
Cyclists run exclusively on renewable biofuel.
Re: Logic wins out for this Washington lawmakerI'm guessing the dude is a Republican.
Some days you are a big, strutting rooster, some days you are a bit chicken and some days you are just a complete cocque. Roger Ramjet: 2009 Giant CRX3 Spockette: 2009 Trek FX 7.3 (WSD, property of Mrs Monsoon) Lady Penelope: 2011 Avanti Cadent 1.0 TdF
Re: Logic wins out for this Washington lawmakerYep..... he's a Republican
Unsurprisingly, he seems to have gone to ground. Riding bikes in traffic - what seems dangerous is usually safe; what seems safe is often more dangerous.
Re: Logic wins out for this Washington lawmaker
Now I have no problem with that. would be a good comback for the ferals that scream about not paying for the road.
Re: Logic wins out for this Washington lawmakerI pay taxes .... and get my 2%
![]()
Bike tax/rego won't do a single thing to stop the bogan cat-calls Riding bikes in traffic - what seems dangerous is usually safe; what seems safe is often more dangerous.
Re: Logic wins out for this Washington lawmakerIf rego covered road building and maintenance in Australia your average annual fee would be about $1,500 instead of $350.
That's $1,500 before insurance.
Re: Logic wins out for this Washington lawmakerWow! They sting you $350 in the ACT. Vic rego is only $232.
And I reckon to fully cover road construction and maintenance costs it'd be even more than $1500 for the registration charge. Riding bikes in traffic - what seems dangerous is usually safe; what seems safe is often more dangerous.
Re: Logic wins out for this Washington lawmakerThe $1500 rego fee estimate is based on annual figures of about $14.5 billion on roads and maintenance, and $3.5 billion in rego fees, which I found on the internets, originally from the ABS.
Roads spending looks like it will go up with the announcement of the new freeway in Western Sydney, costing $1 billion just for that. If that's to be paid for by rego fees - which it isn't - the $1,500 fee would be only a base level.
Re: Logic wins out for this Washington lawmakerRepresentative Ed Orcutt has evidently had a substantial flood of comment and emails. He has made a very humble apology for his poorly phrased email and misguided ideas about cyclists on the roads.
Riding bikes in traffic - what seems dangerous is usually safe; what seems safe is often more dangerous.
Re: Logic wins out for this Washington lawmaker
It seems $25 for a bike is quite high in a state where the annual car rego fee is... $30. In other (depressing) news from the US, the state of Virginia recently passed a $100 fee on hybrid cars. Apparently hybrids don't use enough fuel and therefore owners weren't paying enough "gas tax".
Re: Logic wins out for this Washington lawmaker
565 comments and from reading the first 3 pages not one in support of this morons dumb idea
Re: Logic wins out for this Washington lawmaker
Do I honestly think paying "rego" in any way shape or form would get us respect? Hell NO. You can't change a bigots mind. Without the rego furphy it'd be red lights/lycra/lack of flouro or any damn thing you can think of to vilify the minority. If I thought it would, I wouldn't quibble about $50 pa per bike. ...whatever the road rules, self-preservation is the absolute priority for a cyclist when mixing it with motorised traffic.
London Boy 29/12/2011
Re: Logic wins out for this Washington lawmaker
They should pay lots more ! Partly for the battery production. Partly for the coal fuelled electrickery they use and partly for thinking its a clean way to use a vehicle. Muppets !
Re: Logic wins out for this Washington lawmaker
Hybrid vehicles need not be fuelled by coal sources. This is the key question at the heart of climate change strategies - motivating the population and authorities to move to alternative sources, some of which are very plentiful. You can power you hybrid batteries by wind and/or solar. The batteries are probably not too much more of an issue than any current automotive power source - and likely to improve greatly with technological improvements. Look at how bicycle light batteries have changed in the past 10 years. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hybrid_veh ... reductions
Riding bikes in traffic - what seems dangerous is usually safe; what seems safe is often more dangerous.
Re: Logic wins out for this Washington lawmakerHybrid vehicle are powered by petrol. Mostly.
On the topic of whether cyclists should pay for road maintenance costs... I haven't done a calculation, but since most road surface damage occurs during the wet - potholes getting eroded away by wave action from tyres, etc - I'd wager that the majority of road surface damage caused by regular cyclists occurs when it's raining and they decide to drive the car instead.
27 posts
• Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: JohnJoyner, MarkG, nickobec, sumgy |
Top Bikes & Gear
Exclusive: BNA 10% discount for ProBikeKit |