Sock height ???

User avatar
il padrone
Posts: 22730
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
Location: Heading for home.

Re: Sock height ???

Postby il padrone » Sun Apr 07, 2013 7:48 pm

find_bruce wrote:Nice try BFV, what is the safety benefit to the correct length white socks ? :D

Knife-edge tan-lines make it easier for the doctor to ID the melanomas ???

:P
Mandatory helmet law?
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."

User avatar
bychosis
Posts: 4250
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2012 1:10 pm
Location: Lake Macquarie

Re: Sock height ???

Postby bychosis » Sun Apr 07, 2013 7:55 pm

find_bruce wrote:Nice try BFV, what is the safety benefit to the correct length white socks ? :D


Makes it easier for your team car and doctor to pick you out of the pile up - quicker medical attention.
bychosis (bahy-koh-sis): A mental disorder of delusions indicating impaired contact with a reality of no bicycles.

Baldy
Posts: 1669
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 4:55 pm

Re: Sock height ???

Postby Baldy » Sun Apr 07, 2013 8:28 pm

Image

User avatar
London Boy
Posts: 668
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2010 3:43 pm

Re: Sock height ???

Postby London Boy » Sun Apr 07, 2013 8:30 pm

il padrone wrote:Pride in appearance is all fine. 'Nose-in-the-air' nitpicking is entirely a different thing.

Sock height? :roll:



I realise it is TIC, yes, but there is more than a grain of truth in the attitudes behind it.

Is there anything so wrong in la bella figura? A little pride in your appearance? A desire to fit in?

Maybe it is just fashion, but as shallow as it is, fashion drives a large part of our economy. People are tribal, after all.

Sure, there are people who don't follow fashion, or even an approximation of it. I'd guess that of those who do not follow fashion, it is a minority who simply don't care. The rest are making a statement, oddly enough similar in intent and result as those who do follow the latest trends.

User avatar
il padrone
Posts: 22730
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
Location: Heading for home.

Re: Sock height ???

Postby il padrone » Sun Apr 07, 2013 8:49 pm

London Boy wrote:Is there anything so wrong in la bella figura? A little pride in your appearance? A desire to fit in?

But we're hardly talking about good looks - la bella figura :| Good looks never had anything to do with whether your socks are 4cms long or 15cms, whether your Rudy Projects' temple-pieces are inside or outside your helmet straps :roll:

As I said earlier rampant nit-picking about irrelevancies. Good luck to you if this really matters to you.
Mandatory helmet law?
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."

User avatar
bigfriendlyvegan
Posts: 3903
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 2:18 pm
Location: Denistone, NSW
Contact:

Re: Sock height ???

Postby bigfriendlyvegan » Sun Apr 07, 2013 9:54 pm

find_bruce wrote:Nice try BFV, what is the safety benefit to the correct length white socks ? :D


Our club socks come in two heights, the longer ones (which everyone wears) have the club colours and LACC on it. Perfect identification for when you're lying in a ditch with your legs sticking out, when you're in the morgue and your loved one can pick you out, and, and ....more material to make make-shift bandages out of? I'm stretching here, I know.


Ooh, the tan lines will distinguish you from runners who wear ankle socks?

vbroom
Posts: 19
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2012 1:42 am

Re: Sock height ???

Postby vbroom » Sun Apr 07, 2013 10:04 pm

back in primary school long socks were uncool.
now they're cool? i'm confused!

User avatar
il padrone
Posts: 22730
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
Location: Heading for home.

Re: Sock height ???

Postby il padrone » Sun Apr 07, 2013 10:36 pm

Most MTBers wear short socks, and in black.

Less dirt shows on them, less material for washing :P
Mandatory helmet law?
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."

User avatar
sumgy
Posts: 1487
Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 10:58 pm
Contact:

Re: Sock height ???

Postby sumgy » Mon Apr 08, 2013 9:58 am

il padrone wrote:Most MTBers wear short socks, and in black.

Less dirt shows on them, less material for washing :P


Black or any colour that is not light.
Most I know wear longer socks and I actually wear knee high socks from time to time.

TTar
Posts: 336
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 4:41 pm

Re: Sock height ???

Postby TTar » Mon Apr 08, 2013 11:11 am

il padrone wrote:
Oh yes there is also my one trade team retro jersey :wink:

Image


Never mind team jerseys and socks, what about that saddle bag!?

Clearly, it's the only saddle bag one would deem appropriate to fit to one's bike.

I feel thoroughly ashamed and pathetic for not having one.
Sent from my fortified compound

User avatar
bigfriendlyvegan
Posts: 3903
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 2:18 pm
Location: Denistone, NSW
Contact:

Re: Sock height ???

Postby bigfriendlyvegan » Mon Apr 08, 2013 11:27 am

TTar wrote:Never mind team jerseys and socks, what about that saddle bag!?

Clearly, it's the only saddle bag one would deem appropriate to fit to one's bike.

I feel thoroughly ashamed and pathetic for not having one.


Carradice bags are also acceptable on Brooks saddles.

TTar
Posts: 336
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 4:41 pm

Re: Sock height ???

Postby TTar » Mon Apr 08, 2013 11:42 am

bigfriendlyvegan wrote:
Carradice bags are also acceptable on Brooks saddles.


Is there a place in the pantheon of saddle bags for something more befitting my station in life? ;

http://www.bigw.com.au/sports-leisure/b ... -qr-holder
Sent from my fortified compound

User avatar
il padrone
Posts: 22730
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
Location: Heading for home.

Re: Sock height ???

Postby il padrone » Mon Apr 08, 2013 11:49 am

TTar wrote:
il padrone wrote:
Oh yes there is also my one trade team retro jersey :wink:

Image


Never mind team jerseys and socks, what about that saddle bag!?

Clearly, it's the only saddle bag one would deem appropriate to fit to one's bike.

I feel thoroughly ashamed and pathetic for not having one.




Same bike.... same hat. Carradice is good :mrgreen:

Image
Mandatory helmet law?
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."

TTar
Posts: 336
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 4:41 pm

Re: Sock height ???

Postby TTar » Mon Apr 08, 2013 11:58 am

il padrone wrote:

Same bike.... same hat. Carradice is good :mrgreen:

Image


Obviously the hat matches everything, but excellent work on matching the handlebar tape and saddle bag straps.

I would imagine you wear the same colour socks when riding that configuration?
Sent from my fortified compound

User avatar
jules21
Posts: 9998
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 11:14 pm
Location: deep in the pain cave

Re: Sock height ???

Postby jules21 » Mon Apr 08, 2013 12:03 pm

saw a good one this morning for the bike snobs - a guy in lycra with shaved legs, commuting on a Dura-Ace equipped carbon roadie. I was riding about 50m behind him - on my MTB at 25 km/h. he was carrying a few extra kg around the middle and was wearing sand shoes with rubber pedals!

personally, I say well played that man. he wasn't concerned about sock height, that's for sure. he was just enjoying his cycling.

User avatar
London Boy
Posts: 668
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2010 3:43 pm

Re: Sock height ???

Postby London Boy » Mon Apr 08, 2013 12:16 pm

il padrone wrote:
London Boy wrote:Is there anything so wrong in la bella figura? A little pride in your appearance? A desire to fit in?

But we're hardly talking about good looks - la bella figura :| Good looks never had anything to do with whether your socks are 4cms long or 15cms, whether your Rudy Projects' temple-pieces are inside or outside your helmet straps :roll:

As I said earlier rampant nit-picking about irrelevancies. Good luck to you if this really matters to you.

My my. You do get wound up easily...

User avatar
il padrone
Posts: 22730
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
Location: Heading for home.

Re: Sock height ???

Postby il padrone » Mon Apr 08, 2013 12:24 pm

London Boy wrote:My my. You do get wound up easily...

You think so???

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Mandatory helmet law?
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."

User avatar
sumgy
Posts: 1487
Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 10:58 pm
Contact:

Re: Sock height ???

Postby sumgy » Mon Apr 08, 2013 1:13 pm

il padrone wrote:
Image


Are you running away from home?? :D

User avatar
bigfriendlyvegan
Posts: 3903
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 2:18 pm
Location: Denistone, NSW
Contact:

Re: Sock height ???

Postby bigfriendlyvegan » Mon Apr 08, 2013 3:49 pm

TTar wrote:
bigfriendlyvegan wrote:
Carradice bags are also acceptable on Brooks saddles.


Is there a place in the pantheon of saddle bags for something more befitting my station in life? ;

http://www.bigw.com.au/sports-leisure/b ... -qr-holder


It depends on whether you have a beard or not.

TTar
Posts: 336
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 4:41 pm

Re: Sock height ???

Postby TTar » Mon Apr 08, 2013 6:04 pm

bigfriendlyvegan wrote:
TTar wrote:
bigfriendlyvegan wrote:
Carradice bags are also acceptable on Brooks saddles.


Is there a place in the pantheon of saddle bags for something more befitting my station in life? ;

http://www.bigw.com.au/sports-leisure/b ... -qr-holder


It depends on whether you have a beard or not.


An ironic hipster's beard or recumbent rider's beard?
Sent from my fortified compound

User avatar
jules21
Posts: 9998
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 11:14 pm
Location: deep in the pain cave

Re: Sock height ???

Postby jules21 » Mon Apr 08, 2013 6:18 pm

TTar wrote:An ironic hipster's beard or recumbent rider's beard?

they're the same thing! one is just recognisable by its wearer being in his 20s, hanging around bohemian cafes and riding a fixie :)

User avatar
Bob_TAS
Posts: 253
Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2013 8:39 pm
Location: Liverpool

Re: Sock height ???

Postby Bob_TAS » Mon Apr 08, 2013 6:39 pm

jules21 wrote:
TTar wrote:An ironic hipster's beard or recumbent rider's beard?

they're the same thing! one is just recognisable by its wearer being in his 20s, hanging around bohemian cafes and riding a fixie :)


Wow, this explains why everyone (incorrectly) presumes I ride a fixie!

Personally, outside of track I don't see the attraction. Gimme gears any day :D

User avatar
bigfriendlyvegan
Posts: 3903
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 2:18 pm
Location: Denistone, NSW
Contact:

Re: Sock height ???

Postby bigfriendlyvegan » Mon Apr 08, 2013 6:41 pm

I posted this in another thread, but it's relevant here too. This is a fixed version. Most people who ride with a Brooks and Carradice saddle bag (and who doesn't?) will understand.
Image

User avatar
il padrone
Posts: 22730
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
Location: Heading for home.

Re: Sock height ???

Postby il padrone » Mon Apr 08, 2013 7:10 pm

Image








Oh, you said bikes to beard ratio :oops: :roll: :wink:
Mandatory helmet law?
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."

User avatar
Bob_TAS
Posts: 253
Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2013 8:39 pm
Location: Liverpool

Re: Sock height ???

Postby Bob_TAS » Mon Apr 08, 2013 7:33 pm

This thread has reached an appropriate level of cowbell.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: christophers94, Google [Bot], jindydiver, mikedufty, Waccofozzy