Sock height ???

User avatar
il padrone
Posts: 22654
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
Location: Heading for home.

Re: Sock height ???

Postby il padrone » Mon Apr 08, 2013 7:58 pm

Image
Image

Cowbell
Image
Mandatory helmet law?
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."

Baldy
Posts: 1669
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 4:55 pm

Re: Sock height ???

Postby Baldy » Mon Apr 08, 2013 8:12 pm

This thread needs more Nobody.

The fact is the person wearing matching team kit is wearing whatever they want, even knowing what people like you might think of them.

Whereas you wear what you think everyone should be wearing. You know, to get your image juuust right. Your "trade team" needs to be retro and probably merino and made by Rapha, lycra is ok but only when you deem it so.

Now who is the [mod=mikesbytes]Bad language removed[/mod] :roll:

User avatar
il padrone
Posts: 22654
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
Location: Heading for home.

Re: Sock height ???

Postby il padrone » Mon Apr 08, 2013 8:30 pm

Baldy wrote:This thread needs more Nobody.

The fact is the person wearing matching team kit is wearing whatever they want, even knowing what people like you might think of them.

Whereas you wear what you think everyone should be wearing. You know, to get your image juuust right. Your "trade team" needs to be retro and probably merino and made by Rapha, lycra is ok but only when you deem it so.

Hey, what ever is the beef? Please show me where I have ever said that nobody should wear team kit?


I'm happy for other cyclists to wear whatever suits them (suits included). I just don't tolerate any "holier-than-thou", velomnati-elitist 'rules', especially when used to belittle or exclude others. Simple really.... but you seem to be missing my point :|

And norbs seems to have a few things to say about such "rules police".



Waiting for that quote.
Mandatory helmet law?
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."

User avatar
il padrone
Posts: 22654
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
Location: Heading for home.

Re: Sock height ???

Postby il padrone » Mon Apr 08, 2013 8:51 pm

Personal attacks and lies like the above tend to make me feel very glad I'm off overseas for the next 3 months. Maybe a lot on here will be glad that they'll hear a lot less from me :?

Not sure whether I'll bother posting again :roll: :x



Pffft!!!!
Mandatory helmet law?
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."

User avatar
MarkG
Posts: 2147
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2011 2:02 pm
Location: Perth, Australia

Re: Sock height ???

Postby MarkG » Mon Apr 08, 2013 9:01 pm

il padrone wrote:Personal attacks and lies like the above tend to make me feel very glad I'm off overseas for the next 3 months. Maybe a lot on here will be glad that they'll hear a lot less from me :?

Not sure whether I'll bother posting again :roll: :x



Pffft!!!!


Ever? Or just this thread?
Proudly "a hater of academics with helmet cams"

User avatar
norbs
Posts: 2314
Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2009 11:20 am
Location: Shoalhaven. NSW

Re: Sock height ???

Postby norbs » Tue Apr 09, 2013 10:17 am

il padrone wrote:
Baldy wrote:This thread needs more Nobody.

The fact is the person wearing matching team kit is wearing whatever they want, even knowing what people like you might think of them.

Whereas you wear what you think everyone should be wearing. You know, to get your image juuust right. Your "trade team" needs to be retro and probably merino and made by Rapha, lycra is ok but only when you deem it so.

Now who is the w@nker :roll:

Hey, what ever is the beef? Please show me where I have ever said that nobody should wear team kit?


I'm happy for other cyclists to wear whatever suits them (suits included). I just don't tolerate any "holier-than-thou", velomnati-elitist 'rules', especially when used to belittle or exclude others. Simple really.... but you seem to be missing my point :|

And norbs seems to have a few things to say about such "rules police".



Waiting for that quote.



I wont be kicking the hornets nest that is the Velominazi's any time soon. :)

My thoughts are in the link above.

User avatar
Ross
Posts: 4485
Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2009 8:53 pm

Re: Sock height ???

Postby Ross » Tue Apr 09, 2013 10:22 am

il padrone wrote:Personal attacks and lies like the above tend to make me feel very glad I'm off overseas for the next 3 months. Maybe a lot on here will be glad that they'll hear a lot less from me :?

Not sure whether I'll bother posting again :roll: :x



Pffft!!!!


I like reading your contributions even if I don't agree with everyrthing you say.

User avatar
Kwaichang
Posts: 151
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 6:51 pm

Re: Sock height ???

Postby Kwaichang » Tue Apr 09, 2013 10:57 am

jules21 wrote:saw a good one this morning for the bike snobs - a guy in lycra with shaved legs, commuting on a Dura-Ace equipped carbon roadie. I was riding about 50m behind him - on my MTB at 25 km/h. he was carrying a few extra kg around the middle and was wearing sand shoes with rubber pedals!

personally, I say well played that man. he wasn't concerned about sock height, that's for sure. he was just enjoying his cycling.


I know that guy... He refuses to clip in because needs to dismount at an instant to land a chuck Norris type round house to the chin of fixie riding hipsters who wear NO socks and quite often sport vintage moustache's.
It's a crazy world...

User avatar
g-boaf
Posts: 6852
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 6:11 pm

Re: Sock height ???

Postby g-boaf » Tue Apr 09, 2013 11:54 am

il padrone wrote:Personal attacks and lies like the above tend to make me feel very glad I'm off overseas for the next 3 months. Maybe a lot on here will be glad that they'll hear a lot less from me :?

Not sure whether I'll bother posting again :roll: :x



Pffft!!!!


And anyone could see that this topic was going to end in tears.

User avatar
Marx
Posts: 272
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 12:36 pm
Location: Flemington Melbourne Australia

Re: Sock height ???

Postby Marx » Tue Apr 09, 2013 12:37 pm

Nothing about stockings? :roll:
-----------------------
A bike and a place to ride.

TTar
Posts: 336
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 4:41 pm

Re: Sock height ???

Postby TTar » Tue Apr 09, 2013 1:19 pm

g-boaf wrote:
And anyone could see that this topic was going to end in tears.



Except this topic shows no signs of ending.
Sent from my fortified compound

User avatar
Summernight
Posts: 2073
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 3:40 pm
Location: Melbourne

Re: Sock height ???

Postby Summernight » Tue Apr 09, 2013 2:44 pm

TTar wrote:
g-boaf wrote:
And anyone could see that this topic was going to end in tears.



Except this topic shows no signs of ending.


Another 16 pager? :lol:

User avatar
brentono
Posts: 3687
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 12:33 pm
Location: Perth DubyaEh.

Re: Sock height ???

Postby brentono » Tue Apr 09, 2013 2:51 pm

Sock it to me :D
White, just above the ankle, simple (if you have to) :wink:
:mrgreen:

Image
Lone Rider- I rode on the long, dark road... before I danced under the lights.

Scarfy96
Posts: 455
Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2010 9:56 am

Re: Sock height ???

Postby Scarfy96 » Tue Apr 09, 2013 3:04 pm

MattyK wrote:
il padrone wrote:BTW, I wear my glasses inside the helmet straps because I like to take my helmet off and still see clearly...... so you can just p'sorf!

Never understood this myself. I do as you do, if I don't I forget and take my helmet off and send my glasses flying


Amazed no-one has picked up on this.

Come off your bike ONCE with your glasses under the straps and if you don't destroy your eyes you will change your mind.

Glasses under the straps mean they stay in place as you fall, your head hits and bounces on the ground and your glasses held firmly against your face dig into your face and potentially damage your eye socket or eyeball. If you are lucky you will just end up with scars across your face, if you are unlucky you will lose an eye.

If the glasses are on the OUTSIDE of the helmet straps there is a much better chance they will bounce free and you get to save your eyesight/face.

Choice is yours.

It isn't about look, it is simple, logical, safety advice.

User avatar
Lukeyboy
Posts: 3161
Joined: Tue May 29, 2012 2:38 am

Re: Sock height ???

Postby Lukeyboy » Tue Apr 09, 2013 3:18 pm

Scarfy96 wrote:
MattyK wrote:
il padrone wrote:BTW, I wear my glasses inside the helmet straps because I like to take my helmet off and still see clearly...... so you can just p'sorf!

Never understood this myself. I do as you do, if I don't I forget and take my helmet off and send my glasses flying


Amazed no-one has picked up on this.

Come off your bike ONCE with your glasses under the straps and if you don't destroy your eyes you will change your mind.

Glasses under the straps mean they stay in place as you fall, your head hits and bounces on the ground and your glasses held firmly against your face dig into your face and potentially damage your eye socket or eyeball. If you are lucky you will just end up with scars across your face, if you are unlucky you will lose an eye.

If the glasses are on the OUTSIDE of the helmet straps there is a much better chance they will bounce free and you get to save your eyesight/face.

Choice is yours.

It isn't about look, it is simple, logical, safety advice.


What about full face helmets and googles? Haha. For that reason I too wear my sunnies on the outside of the strap.

User avatar
bigfriendlyvegan
Posts: 3894
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 2:18 pm
Location: Denistone, NSW
Contact:

Re: Sock height ???

Postby bigfriendlyvegan » Tue Apr 09, 2013 3:38 pm

Scarfy96 wrote:
MattyK wrote:
il padrone wrote:BTW, I wear my glasses inside the helmet straps because I like to take my helmet off and still see clearly...... so you can just p'sorf!

Never understood this myself. I do as you do, if I don't I forget and take my helmet off and send my glasses flying


Amazed no-one has picked up on this.

Come off your bike ONCE with your glasses under the straps and if you don't destroy your eyes you will change your mind.

Glasses under the straps mean they stay in place as you fall, your head hits and bounces on the ground and your glasses held firmly against your face dig into your face and potentially damage your eye socket or eyeball. If you are lucky you will just end up with scars across your face, if you are unlucky you will lose an eye.

If the glasses are on the OUTSIDE of the helmet straps there is a much better chance they will bounce free and you get to save your eyesight/face.

Choice is yours.

It isn't about look, it is simple, logical, safety advice.


I already said that and people thought I was taking the micky. At a junior race I was managing the comm made everyone put the arms outside because they'd seen this very thing the night before.
Last edited by bigfriendlyvegan on Tue Apr 09, 2013 3:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
RonK
Posts: 8042
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 2:08 pm
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
Contact:

Re: Sock height ???

Postby RonK » Tue Apr 09, 2013 3:41 pm

bigfriendlyvegan wrote:I already said that and people thought I was taking the micky. At a junior race I was managing the comm made everyone put the straps outside because they'd seen this very thing the night before.

:?: :?: :?: Are you sure this is what you meant to say?
Cycle touring blog and tour journals: whispering wheels...

User avatar
RonK
Posts: 8042
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 2:08 pm
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
Contact:

Re: Sock height ???

Postby RonK » Tue Apr 09, 2013 3:44 pm

Scarfy96 wrote:If the glasses are on the OUTSIDE of the helmet straps there is a much better chance they will bounce free and you get to save your eyesight/face.

Choice is yours.

It isn't about look, it is simple, logical, safety advice.

Ahhhh, but then it appears you are observing "The Rules", and we can't have that, can we.
Last edited by RonK on Tue Apr 09, 2013 3:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Cycle touring blog and tour journals: whispering wheels...

User avatar
mikesbytes
Super Mod
Super Mod
Posts: 16803
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:42 pm
Location: Tempe, Sydney
Contact:

Re: Sock height ???

Postby mikesbytes » Tue Apr 09, 2013 3:45 pm

il padrone wrote:More typical attire (ice creams at Monegeeta)

Image


Disgraceful, there isn't a single coffee in that photo

Is that what happens to you if you wear the wrong length socks?
If the R-1 rule is broken, what happens to N+1?

User avatar
bigfriendlyvegan
Posts: 3894
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 2:18 pm
Location: Denistone, NSW
Contact:

Re: Sock height ???

Postby bigfriendlyvegan » Tue Apr 09, 2013 3:46 pm

RonK wrote:
bigfriendlyvegan wrote:I already said that and people thought I was taking the micky. At a junior race I was managing the comm made everyone put the straps outside because they'd seen this very thing the night before.

:?: :?: :?: Are you sure this is what you meant to say?


No, I meant to say put the arms outside the straps. Will go back and amend. Thanks for the catch.

User avatar
m@
Super Mod
Super Mod
Posts: 4986
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 12:20 pm
Location: Northlandia
Contact:

Re: Sock height ???

Postby m@ » Tue Apr 09, 2013 4:38 pm

il padrone wrote:Most MTBers wear short socks, and in black.

Less dirt shows on them, less material for washing :P

But I'd rather wash the dirt out of my socks than my leg hair! :wink:

Hmm, have a feeling that may disqualify me from further comment on this topic... :mrgreen:
ALL THE ABOVEIS TRUE

User avatar
jules21
Posts: 9938
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 11:14 pm
Location: deep in the pain cave

Re: Sock height ???

Postby jules21 » Tue Apr 09, 2013 4:50 pm

mikesbytes wrote:Disgraceful, there isn't a single coffee in that photo

not just any coffee - should be espresso

User avatar
BandedRail
Posts: 526
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 12:31 am
Location: Bayswater, Perth WA

Re: Sock height ???

Postby BandedRail » Tue Apr 09, 2013 9:40 pm

The only way socks could help me look good is if they were long enough for me to pull over my head :P

Nobody
Posts: 7627
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 12:10 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: Sock height ???

Postby Nobody » Tue Apr 09, 2013 10:51 pm

Baldy wrote:This thread needs more Nobody.
I don't see why. You guys are doing a fine job at winding each other up about nothing, all by yourselves. :P

Hmmm. I just re-read the post which may imply that I'm some kind of tribal Fred egomaniac...Oh well, so what? Ya gotta 'ave a t'ick skin to be hangin' 'round these dem forims. :mrgreen:

moosterbounce
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 2611
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 8:06 pm
Location: Rivervale WA

Re: Sock height ???

Postby moosterbounce » Wed Apr 10, 2013 12:54 am

BandedRail wrote:The only way socks could help me look good is if they were long enough for me to pull over my head :P


:D :D :D

Although technically not allowed, there is a time and a place for making exceptions. Continue with your sock regime Mr Rail :wink:

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Duck!, InTheWoods, jindydiver, Steve_F, tomness