Terms which differentiate between cyclists
-
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Mon May 28, 2018 8:30 pm
- Location: Instagram Terra Roams
- Contact:
Terms which differentiate between cyclists
Postby EvaTheDiscTrucker » Thu Jun 07, 2018 11:24 pm
This might seem like a stupid question but I've been away from the cycling scene for nearly 30yrs and not up to date. Back in my day a 10 speed bike was a "racer". Over the next 2 years I will be writing extensively and making vlogs about my ride, so I just thought I better get the correct terminology down early
What terminology do you use to say what kind of cyclist you are?
I'm taking off on a 2yr ride around Australia in summer (Tassie first) and have been wondering if the pannier outback kinda touring cyclist has a more specific or succinct name.
What other types of terms are used for other forms of cycling?
Is there an easy way of talking about being a cyclist without always needing to say bicyclist so not to be confused with motor cyclists? Or is bicyclist a perfectly acceptable generic name to establish i am human-powered?
Cheers!
- AUbicycles
- Site Admin
- Posts: 15583
- Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2005 2:14 am
- Location: Sydney & Frankfurt
- Contact:
Re: Terms which differentiate between cyclists
Postby AUbicycles » Fri Jun 08, 2018 4:54 am
If you are decribing bikes, on the drop bar / performance side you generally talk about road bikes, TT bikes, gravel bikes and CX bikes. For road bikes you may talk about an endurance or Gran Fondo bikes and use terms like relaxed geomtry and comfort bike for road bikes suited for longer distances. For shorter distances and race performance you could use terms like aggressive or crit bike.
Road style bikes for touring can be called touring bikes but a touring bike can also be a flat bar bike. Looking in the Touring Australia section - there are a couple if brands like Surly and Vivente with bikes well suited, but discussions there will help you with context.
- andrewjcw
- Posts: 197
- Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2015 12:56 pm
- Location: Newcastle, NSW
Re: Terms which differentiate between cyclists
Postby andrewjcw » Fri Jun 08, 2018 7:56 am
Recreational cyclist - Sunday ride to the jetty with flowers in the front basket
Regular cyclist - lights/shoes riding to work or training for a charity ride
Club cyclist - club lycra with group training rides. Weekend racing or training for a big ride
Competitive/elite racer - Goes to state/national meets and has a coach/training plan
- outnabike
- Posts: 2455
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 2:53 pm
- Location: Melbourne Vic
Re: Terms which differentiate between cyclists
Postby outnabike » Fri Jun 08, 2018 8:31 am
We see the pedelec which is a bike with a motor on it....So it is a pedelec right?
If a bike has a petrol motor even though it operates to the same parameters as a pedelec, ie. speed etc and needs to be peddled it is a motor bike person that has gone cycling.
Hence the blurring of the terms, and is responsible for Vespas and Harlie's in the bike lanes. When traffic is busy , I find even motor cars turn into bicycles and come into the bike lanes erroneously, not realizing they are in a motor car.
Similarly car drivers do not realise that a bicycle is a vehicle...Probably why they keep screaming "gid orrf da road" That is why they try to clarify a cyclist with signs that have a picture of this vehicle thingo with two wheels telling other vehiclist persons to "Share the road"
"Share the road" is a common term to ensure that the two wheeled vehiclists ride in the gutter.
Of course I might be wrong .....
- P!N20
- Posts: 4032
- Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 6:50 pm
- Location: Wurundjeri Country
Re: Terms which differentiate between cyclists
Postby P!N20 » Fri Jun 08, 2018 9:11 am
Well that explains all the 'racer' ads on Gumtree.EvaTheDiscTrucker wrote:Back in my day a 10 speed bike was a "racer".
Bike Snob's guide to cycling tribes: https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyl ... ing-tribes
-
- Posts: 1133
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 7:07 pm
- Location: Mornington Peninsula
Re: Terms which differentiate between cyclists
Postby Arbuckle23 » Fri Jun 08, 2018 11:13 am
- Thoglette
- Posts: 6605
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 1:01 pm
Re: Terms which differentiate between cyclists
Postby Thoglette » Fri Jun 08, 2018 2:00 pm
Three things happened since then. In order, roughly by decade.EvaTheDiscTrucker wrote: Back in my day a 10 speed bike was a "racer".
a) MTB and racing bikes ruled the Anglosphere. Everything else went extinct, or nearly so. Racing tyres got down to 19mm, with bikes designed around a 23mm training tyre. The UCI banned "funny" bikes. As a result tri-bikes evolution diverged away from road bikes.
The TdF is haunted by doping scandals. Australia introduces MHLs
b) In the next decade, hipsters climbed out of some primordial soup, somewhere, bringing their fixies along with them. MTBs evolved from 26" to 29er, becoming a diverse phylum (hard/soft, XC/downhill, dropper, single). With race bikes being, like, bloody useless for anything other than racing, "hybrid" bikes evolved from MTBs.
This prompted a whole bunch of people to re-evaluate their biking needs, looking to Holland, Copenhagen & Tokyo and wondering about bikes for the rest of us. Small manufacturers proliferated and small businesses started importing stuff direct from Europe, Japan and Taiwan. The words "650B" were no longer just whispered in dark corners. The S24O takes off.
Grant Peterson says "I told you so".
The TdF is haunted by doping scandals. People ask: If we need MHLs, why aren't the Dutch dying in droves?
c) The MTB crowd discovered 650B and promptly renamed it 27.5. Rear cassette cogs start climbing above 40T, and MTBs grow clutched derailleurs, remote droppers and more. Bikepacking becomes a "thing" with yet more specialist brands and bloggers.
With the UCI minimising innovation (and thus reason to buy a new bike) the big brands and their associated advertising revenue start hunting other pastures. Suddenly, one needs disc brakes on road bikes to allow wide (28mm) tyres. One needs electric shifting and 11 speeds (that's 2 x11). Oh, and road tubeless is going to be mainstream this decade
Eventually someone in head office discovered that a) race bikes and MTBs aren't the whole world and b) market leadership had moved to a whole pile of upstarts. And so "The Industry" discovers "gravel grinders" and "heritage bikes" and "cruisers" and everything else. We now have new categories every week.
Meanwhile, the TdF is haunted by doping scandals. The British Medical Journal says MHLs don't work[1]. Australian bureaucrats aren't listening[2].
[1] Goldacre, B; Spiegelhalter, D (2013) Bicycle helmets and the law. BMJ (Clinical research ed), 346. f3817. ISSN 0959-8138 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.f3817
[2]Hansard, ECONOMICS REFERENCES COMMITTEE, "Personal choice and community impacts" Monday, 16 November 2015
(post script, please discuss MHLs in the MHL thread)
"People are worthy of respect, ideas are not." Peter Ellerton, UQ
-
- Posts: 675
- Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2014 5:08 pm
- Location: Sydney
- Contact:
Re: Terms which differentiate between cyclists
Postby tcdev » Fri Jun 08, 2018 2:06 pm
2011 Schwinn Sporterra Comp
2021 Giant Contend AR1
- Thoglette
- Posts: 6605
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 1:01 pm
Re: Terms which differentiate between cyclists
Postby Thoglette » Fri Jun 08, 2018 3:08 pm
Very kind of you.tcdev wrote:This ^^^ needs to be a full-blown article!!!
Now I wait for the fact checkers! e.g. I've already realised that Grant published his book (and got press coverage for his ideas) in 2012, which means I should really move the reference to him to c)
But as they say, give a good story a day's head start and the truth will never catch up!
"People are worthy of respect, ideas are not." Peter Ellerton, UQ
-
- Posts: 2435
- Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2013 5:45 pm
Re: Terms which differentiate between cyclists
Postby Calvin27 » Fri Jun 08, 2018 4:48 pm
Give this man/woman a beer.Thoglette wrote:Three things happened since then. In order, roughly by decade.EvaTheDiscTrucker wrote: Back in my day a 10 speed bike was a "racer".
a) MTB and racing bikes ruled the Anglosphere. Everything else went extinct, or nearly so. Racing tyres got down to 19mm, with bikes designed around a 23mm training tyre. The UCI banned "funny" bikes. As a result tri-bikes evolution diverged away from road bikes.
The TdF is haunted by doping scandals. Australia introduces MHLs
b) In the next decade, hipsters climbed out of some primordial soup, somewhere, bringing their fixies along with them. MTBs evolved from 26" to 29er, becoming a diverse phylum (hard/soft, XC/downhill, dropper, single). With race bikes being, like, bloody useless for anything other than racing, "hybrid" bikes evolved from MTBs.
This prompted a whole bunch of people to re-evaluate their biking needs, looking to Holland, Copenhagen & Tokyo and wondering about bikes for the rest of us. Small manufacturers proliferated and small businesses started importing stuff direct from Europe, Japan and Taiwan. The words "650B" were no longer just whispered in dark corners. The S24O takes off.
Grant Peterson says "I told you so".
The TdF is haunted by doping scandals. People ask: If we need MHLs, why aren't the Dutch dying in droves?
c) The MTB crowd discovered 650B and promptly renamed it 27.5. Rear cassette cogs start climbing above 40T, and MTBs grow clutched derailleurs, remote droppers and more. Bikepacking becomes a "thing" with yet more specialist brands and bloggers.
With the UCI minimising innovation (and thus reason to buy a new bike) the big brands and their associated advertising revenue start hunting other pastures. Suddenly, one needs disc brakes on road bikes to allow wide (28mm) tyres. One needs electric shifting and 11 speeds (that's 2 x11). Oh, and road tubeless is going to be mainstream this decade
Eventually someone in head office discovered that a) race bikes and MTBs aren't the whole world and b) market leadership had moved to a whole pile of upstarts. And so "The Industry" discovers "gravel grinders" and "heritage bikes" and "cruisers" and everything else. We now have new categories every week.
Meanwhile, the TdF is haunted by doping scandals. The British Medical Journal says MHLs don't work[1]. Australian bureaucrats aren't listening[2].
[1] Goldacre, B; Spiegelhalter, D (2013) Bicycle helmets and the law. BMJ (Clinical research ed), 346. f3817. ISSN 0959-8138 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.f3817
[2]Hansard, ECONOMICS REFERENCES COMMITTEE, "Personal choice and community impacts" Monday, 16 November 2015
(post script, please discuss MHLs in the MHL thread)
I'd add the following:
- Enduro was a real thing in MTB.
- This spread to road bikes that now do enduro geometries
- Tyres getting fatter in MTB
- Everyone claiming their bikes now are x% stiffer, but y % more compliant.
- Electric bikes.
High level categories for me are:
- Roadies
- Mountain bikers
- Downhill mountain bikers (otherwise known as teens)
- Mamils
- Strava warriors
- Weekend warriors
- Hipsters
Cushy dirt bike
Very cushy dirt bike
Bike crushed by car (RIP)
No brakes bike
Ebike
- RonK
- Posts: 11508
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 2:08 pm
- Location: If you need to know, ask me
- Contact:
Re: Terms which differentiate between cyclists
Postby RonK » Fri Jun 08, 2018 4:59 pm
Having ridden both types, I can only say how delighted I am that the bad old good ol’ days are in the past and I can now buy bikes that are specific to my requirements.
- DrShifty
- Posts: 187
- Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2016 4:58 pm
- Location: Lake Macquarie
Re: Terms which differentiate between cyclists
Postby DrShifty » Sat Jun 09, 2018 11:31 am
Bike packing (rare) or touring (common) are the terms used by my friends who do long trips. A mate recently rode solo from Broome to Perth and he used no terms like this at all, he just spoke of 'riding from Broome to Perth'.EvaTheDiscTrucker wrote:Hi BNA Think Tank!
... have been wondering if the pannier outback kinda touring cyclist has a more specific or succinct name.
Bicyclist is a non-word. I've never heard anyone ever say it, and only rarely seen it in print.EvaTheDiscTrucker wrote: Is there an easy way of talking about being a cyclist without always needing to say bicyclist so not to be confused with motor cyclists? Or is bicyclist a perfectly acceptable generic name to establish i am human-powered?
Cheers!
Cyclist covers anyone on a bicycle no matter what style of bike.
Cycle, cycling, cyclist etc are never used in the motorbike world (where I also live) unless talking about bicycles. The normal term for somebody on a motorbike is rider. Some people use bikie for 1% club members and biker for general motorbike riders.
I suspect that if you chase up other touring/cycling blogs you'll find out what is the most used terminology.
- ColinOldnCranky
- Posts: 6734
- Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 4:58 pm
Re: Terms which differentiate between cyclists
Postby ColinOldnCranky » Sat Jun 09, 2018 10:12 pm
Which is fine by me, it's sufficiently non-specific as to allow me to be part of the family.
-
- Posts: 825
- Joined: Sun Jun 28, 2015 10:57 am
Re: Terms which differentiate between cyclists
Postby Trevtassie » Sun Jun 10, 2018 1:13 am
Looks like you have a a pwoblem wif your esses...ColinOldnCranky wrote:Leaving aside "leach" and "effing arrogant MAMIL" and the like, about the most common term I hear these dayw iw wimply cyclist.
Which is fine by me, it's sufficiently non-specific as to allow me to be part of the family.
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Mon May 07, 2018 7:19 pm
Cyclist ≠ Bike Rider
Postby CrankNFurter » Sun Jun 10, 2018 1:41 pm
-
- Posts: 1703
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 3:08 pm
- Location: Brisbane
Re: Terms which differentiate between cyclists
Postby RobertL » Mon Jun 11, 2018 9:28 am
High level categories for me are:
- Roadies
- Mountain bikers
- Downhill mountain bikers (otherwise known as teens)
- Mamils
- Strava warriors
- Weekend warriors
- Hipsters
I'd add:
- Commuters
- Tourers
- Poor people - whose clapped-out 26er hardtail is their only form of transport.
I know that last category is a negative stereotype, but I still see quite a few people in that category around the place.
- RonK
- Posts: 11508
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 2:08 pm
- Location: If you need to know, ask me
- Contact:
Re: Cyclist ≠ Bike Rider
Postby RonK » Mon Jun 11, 2018 10:22 am
So a complete novice - somebody who has never even ridden a bike before could buy a touring bike with bar end shifters and a Brooks saddle and achieve instant recognition?CrankNFurter wrote:Every time I see bar-end shifters and Brooks saddle on a parked machine I know the owner is a cyclist.
-
- Posts: 406
- Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2018 12:33 am
- Location: Remote NT
Re: Terms which differentiate between cyclists
Postby BobtheBuilder » Mon Jun 11, 2018 10:26 am
- rich people - people who buy really expensive bikes to show off, but never use for any practical purpose. They usually have a really expensive bike rack so they can drive their bike to wherever they're going. They barely even bother getting it serviced, it just gets stodgy and they buy another one.
I know that category is a negative stereotype, but I still see quite a few people in that category around the place.
-
- Posts: 1703
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 3:08 pm
- Location: Brisbane
Re: Terms which differentiate between cyclists
Postby RobertL » Mon Jun 11, 2018 10:35 am
Absolutely.BobtheBuilder wrote:You could also add:
- rich people - people who buy really expensive bikes to show off, but never use for any practical purpose. They usually have a really expensive bike rack so they can drive their bike to wherever they're going. They barely even bother getting it serviced, it just gets stodgy and they buy another one.
I know that category is a negative stereotype, but I still see quite a few people in that category around the place.
-
- Posts: 524
- Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2009 5:45 pm
Re: Terms which differentiate between cyclists
Postby redned » Mon Jun 11, 2018 11:08 am
Or the opposite (like me): not-so-rich but with a sub $1,000 MTB that has taken it to tour Tasmania, Spain, Ireland, Scotland and recently Brittany, plus thousands of kilometres locally.BobtheBuilder wrote:You could also add:
- rich people - people who buy really expensive bikes to show off, but never use for any practical purpose. They usually have a really expensive bike rack so they can drive their bike to wherever they're going. They barely even bother getting it serviced, it just gets stodgy and they buy another one.
I know that category is a negative stereotype, but I still see quite a few people in that category around the place.
I think we are all cyclists.
- Thoglette
- Posts: 6605
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 1:01 pm
Re: Cyclist ≠ Bike Rider
Postby Thoglette » Mon Jun 11, 2018 2:47 pm
Only if the Brooks is suitably run in. This can be rapidly ascertained from the owner's gait after dismountingRonK wrote:So a complete novice - somebody who has never even ridden a bike before could buy a touring bike with bar end shifters and a Brooks saddle and achieve instant recognition?CrankNFurter wrote:Every time I see bar-end shifters and Brooks saddle on a parked machine I know the owner is a cyclist.
"People are worthy of respect, ideas are not." Peter Ellerton, UQ
- skull
- Posts: 2087
- Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 9:48 pm
Re: Terms which differentiate between cyclists
Postby skull » Tue Jun 12, 2018 6:55 pm
This was just after he rubbished cyclists riding on the roads and doing pack rides.
- recumbenteer
- Posts: 641
- Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 4:36 pm
- Location: Fairfield 2165
Re: Terms which differentiate between cyclists
Postby recumbenteer » Tue Jun 12, 2018 7:57 pm
RobertL wrote:High level categories for me are:
- Roadies
- Mountain bikers
- Downhill mountain bikers (otherwise known as teens)
- Mamils
- Strava warriors
- Weekend warriors
- Hipsters
I'd add:
- Commuters
- Tourers
- Poor people - whose clapped-out 26er hardtail is their only form of transport.
I know that last category is a negative stereotype, but I still see quite a few people in that category around the place.
Velonauts.....
everybody else is a Pleb you're all commoners!
Rotovelo Across Australia
-
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Mon May 28, 2018 8:30 pm
- Location: Instagram Terra Roams
- Contact:
Re: Terms which differentiate between cyclists
Postby EvaTheDiscTrucker » Sun Jun 24, 2018 2:56 pm
Very helpful, informative and entertaining.
This will be a useful reference as I become a cyclist, blogging and vlogging the transition from touring on foot to bike.
Understanding bias will help as I ride through cities and off road
When I do a maintenance refresher I'll know what they're talking about now
Cheers!
-
- Posts: 461
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2016 9:12 pm
Re: Terms which differentiate between cyclists
Postby Ivanerrol » Sun Jun 24, 2018 10:13 pm
The everyday transport daily rider. Not hipster.
These are those people - often inner city dwellers who don't own a car.
It's public transport or the bicycle.
You see them every where in the northern Melbourne inner suburbs. Kids are transported in seats in a cargo bike.
They don't have a car because :
(a) The don't want one
(b) Refuse to drive
(c) Have never bothered to get a drivers license
(d) There accommodation has no provision for car parking
(e) The accommodation rental or mortgage payments are so high they can't afford a car.
When I was young (50+ years ago)there were three major types of bikes.
(a) roadster - heavy bike with wide wheels and tyres. Sturney Archer three speed hub gears or single speed. Rear foot operated brake.
(b) Semi racer - lighter bike, single speed, thinner tyres and drop bars. Lever brakes
(c) Racer - same as a semi racer but with (exotic at the time) Chain gears and maybe even thinner tyres.
My uncle worked for Healings. They would box up the bikes and label them as roadster, semi race or race.
Roadsters had Northroad bars, low lift flat bars or upturned drop bars. Northroad bars were for girls - a boy wouldn't be seen dead with these. Front wheel brakes were the work of the devil - all the older riders said so. Guaranteed to send you over the handlebars at the first application.
Return to “General Cycling Discussion”
- General Australian Cycling Topics
- Info / announcements
- Buying a bike / parts
- General Cycling Discussion
- The Bike Shed
- Cycling Health
- Cycling Safety and Advocacy
- Women's Cycling
- Bike & Gear Reviews
- Cycling Trade
- Stolen Bikes
- Bicycle FAQs
- Serious Biking
- Audax / Randonneuring
- Retro biking
- Commuting
- MTB
- Recumbents
- Fixed Gear/ Single Speed
- Track
- Electric Bicycles
- Cyclocross and Gravel Grinding
- Dragsters / Lowriders / Cruisers
- Children's Bikes
- Cargo Bikes and Utility Cycling
- Road Racing
- Road Biking
- Training
- Time Trial
- Triathlon
- International and National Tours and Events
- Cycle Touring
- Touring Australia
- Touring Overseas
- Touring Bikes and Equipment
- Australia
- Western Australia
- New South Wales
- Queensland
- South Australia
- Victoria
- ACT
- Tasmania
- Northern Territory
- Country & Regional
- The Market Place
- Member to Member Bike and Gear Sales
- Want to Buy, Group Buy, Swap
- My Bikes or Gear Elsewhere
- Cycling Brands
- Cannondale
- Garmin
- Giant
- Shimano
- Trek
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
- All times are UTC+11:00
- Top
- Delete cookies
About the Australian Cycling Forums
The Australian Cycling Forums is a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.
Bicycles Network Australia
Forum Information
Connect with BNA
This website uses affiliate links to retail platforms including ebay, amazon, proviz and ribble.