redsonic wrote:I am not belittling the offence, but have never heard of it, and I imagine that those of us who have been deliberately harassed, swerved at, or had objects thrown at us are wondering why the police didn't suggest this charge be brought.
Simple: you're wearing the wrong shirt.
No smiley.
In WA the police believed that without actual contact they couldn't lay the equivalent charge, even with video evidence of collision avoidance by the cyclist (IIRC aushiker posted transcripts of his attempts to get charges laid). This was not, to my knowledge, supported by case law.
This refusal to use the existing laws was one of the main drivers for the meter passing laws.
Likewise much of this sort of behaviour is covered by existing assault laws: if you create a belief that you will cause an injury that's (prima face) assault. Again, to my knowledge, never laid for throwing bottles or swerving passes. (Stopping and waving a knife around in front of a camera does seem to do it)