There must be something special in the water at BNSW HQ- the latest email came addressed to "Dear First Name".
Sure it's a simple mistake, but it doesn't fill you with confidence re their organizational abilities.
Bicycle NSW fail to meet low standards
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Bicycle NSW fail to meet low standardsThere must be something special in the water at BNSW HQ- the latest email came addressed to "Dear First Name".
Sure it's a simple mistake, but it doesn't fill you with confidence re their organizational abilities. I was going to buy a fast, stylish bike, but I looked in the mirror & thought "you're not fooling anyone, you know"
Bicycle NSW fail to meet low standardsI wouldn't hold a mail merge issue against them. Mail merge is a pain
Until Alex Unwin disappears they'll not see my coin again though. Cheers, Simon Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Avanti Quantum, Salsa Casseroll, Specialized Tricross
Re: Bicycle NSW fail to meet low standards
Shows how valuable you are as a member. At least they didn't cc every member. Amateur oenologist and green-friendly commuter.
Re: Bicycle NSW fail to meet low standards
+1 The best one I heard of was a job applicant receiving an empty email back with an attachment "reject applicant.doc". Not really necessary to open that one
+2 2011 Orbea Onix | Giant Defy Commuter | Giant XTC 29er
Re: Bicycle NSW fail to meet low standardsAs an ex-member Dear First Name convinced me I had made the right decision in becoming an 'ex'
Re: Bicycle NSW fail to meet low standardsWell they haven't updated their facebook page since tghe 23rd january and I haven't heard them mentioned in any news or current affairs since Omar left...
What are they doing? I'm moving to BSA when my membership expires. 2010 BMC SLC01
Re: Bicycle NSW fail to meet low standardsFragmentation of the cycling community in NSW will just further weaken any lobbying position for the cause. Get involved and not desert may be the better strategy. United we stand... How can anyone influence the board and management when one is not a member?
Bianchi, Ridley, Montague, GT, Garmin and All things Apple
Re: Bicycle NSW fail to meet low standards
+1
Re: Bicycle NSW fail to meet low standards
I despertely want to agree with you. All it would take is some evidence that BNSW was lobbying for the cause & I would support them. I sent the membership address an email last Wednesday outling my concerns. Next day I got a reply saying my email had been forwarded to Alex Uniwin. What I have got from the panther is nothing. I don't expect a quick response, after all BFV was told to wait 9 months to find out. What the debacle of the last AGM demonstrated is that the constitution is set up to resist change - special majority of 75% required to carry resolutions, only 6 board members elected by the membership, 2 per year to 3 year terms. The other 3 are appointed by the board, again to 3 year terms. If you want to have a laugh, in their reasons for not posting the complete documentation of the resolution proposal at the lat AGM, the Board response was
They've done a great job of that haven't they I was going to buy a fast, stylish bike, but I looked in the mirror & thought "you're not fooling anyone, you know"
Re: Bicycle NSW fail to meet low standards"going forward"
Again? Btw, am now on CA's mailing list and their newsletters strike me as relevant. Any chance they could do a takeover of BNSW? The only good thing about BNSW is their HQ is in SOP. Amateur oenologist and green-friendly commuter.
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users |
Bikes & Gear Online:
|