Postby atkms35 » Wed Dec 03, 2008 6:47 am
a little more history on the bike racks at Southbank and beauyboy's remarks. Please note the following comments are mine alone.
Thanks for seeking permission from the author before publishing my response letter to your continuing complaints about the location of bike racks within Southbank. And thanks for offering the right of reply by advising that you have started a blog on this subject.
I also notice you didn't submit a copy of your complaints? I'm wondering why, if you feel so justified in publishing my responses why you don't want your fellow cycling bloggers to know the content of your complaints. ?Curious.
But let me sum it up. You are submitting ongoing complaints about the location of the bike racks. You suggested in front of B Block, yet there was construction going on at the time with barely any walkway let alone any room for bike racks. So then you wanted them moved between B & H Blocks, at an intersection of 3 buildings that is a walkway and an outdoor eating area for students. Its not an area that is large (or safe) enough to hold all the bike racks. That doesn't mean there's not a bike rack within 3 second walk of that location, there is, at the back of A Block. The majority of the bike racks are next to C Block which is a central location of all the Institute buildings, and as I already added, its very much less than a 30 second walk, infact less than a 10 second walk from where you wanted the racks to be placed to where they are currently placed. In this location the racks are under the watchful eye of security and are in a central location for all students.
In relation to your next complaint about meeting govt. targets, the Institute has met the current target (and did two years before it was required), and has plans in place to meet the next target in 2010. It should also be noted that the student bike racks are never full.
The next complaint in your blog - "run over, it really got my back up" statement probably needs some clarification. Yes there has been students that have been struck by bike riders on the Institute grounds, blind students have injured themselves on bikes attached to poles, hand rails, etc (and bikes have been stolen from these locations). The Institute caters to a huge variety of students including differently abled students that have a right to walk around without suffering a preventable injury. Funny how WH&S issues are painful when they inhibit an individual, but when someone gets hurt at a workplace, where is the first place people go for information? All business and organisations have to meet WH&S obligations, its a mature fact of a working life.
As described in my letter, the Institute has had some major refurbishment and construction, has upgraded all of its facilities and is still in progress of completing a schedule of works that include more facilities for students. People have/are working extremely hard to provide fantastic facilities for all students, catering to a multitude of requirements and learning needs.
I invite you to have a good look around the Institute and see the works that have been completed, the level of educational resources that are in each building and the quality of these resources (that are first class). Note the difference in what this Tafe was before the upgrade - less than 2 years ago, the new learning environments now - the Creative Industries area alone is incredible, the nursing unit is so realistic, I felt ill walking into it. Its sporting facilities are nearly complete with a huge green area soon to come into use (a rarity this close to the city). When you're walking around, I'm hoping you remember that a lot of this was put together by very few people in a very short time with many, many restrictions.
Basically what I'm trying to get at is besides the wonderful facilities, besides all the new and extra resources, besides the greatly improved environment, besides the very long hours people have and continue to put into this Institute, its facilities, its students and its ability to make money stretch to buy wonderful resources, you want to 'bombard me with letters of complaint over a 3 to 10 second walk. Well, I suppose there's nothing I can do to stop you, but another avenue to take would be to form a Southbank cycle club, join the student body, engage with Institute management about cycle facilities and provide constructive information to both management and fellow cyclists. This would seem to be a more constructive, proactive and mutually beneficial way of getting what you and your fellow cyclists want. Just a suggestion.
I wonder, as moderator, if you're going to allow my response (or change it, so I've kept a copy). I have to state again, these comments are my personal opinion and not the opinion of the Institute. I also extend any help or assistance I can personally provide if you chose to form a cycle club here at the Institute. Crazy I know, but I do support the students and if people commit to a positive, constructive method information sharing I believe it makes a place that everyone can enjoy and benefit from.
The ball's in your court, you've got my email address, and this would be the preferred avenue of contact, as I don't believe I'll be back to this site anytime soon.
kindest regards
Angela