Mounting B&M Bush & Muller Lumotec IQ Cyo on a Surly LHT
- Aushiker
- Posts: 22396
- Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:55 pm
- Location: Walyalup land
- Contact:
Mounting B&M Bush & Muller Lumotec IQ Cyo on a Surly LHT
Postby Aushiker » Sat Dec 03, 2011 6:00 pm
Working through the process of mounting my Bush & Muller Lumotec IQ Cyo Senso Plus to the Surly LHT and of course it ain't going to be simple task, so here I am seeking opinions/ideas.
I have taken two photos to show the issue and one possible temporarily fix.
and my temporary fix is ...
I am thinking of getting one of these brackets from SJS Cycles but if anyone has a better idea or can tell me if my plan is silly I am all ears.
I will probably switch over to v-brakes but even then suspect better clearance will be ideal and hence the bracket will still get used.
Thanks
Andrew
Aushiker.com
-
- Posts: 5470
- Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 2:23 pm
- Location: Yangebup
Re: Mouniting B&M Bush & Muller Lumotec IQ Cyo on a Surly LH
Postby Baalzamon » Sat Dec 03, 2011 6:24 pm
- il padrone
- Posts: 22931
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
- Location: Heading for home.
Re: Mouniting B&M Bush & Muller Lumotec IQ Cyo on a Surly LH
Postby il padrone » Sat Dec 03, 2011 7:31 pm
That bracket is what you need. It should work fine with V-brakes as well (it did on my Giant Sedona for many years), although there is the chance it may snag abit where the cable crosses it.Aushiker wrote:I am thinking of getting one of these brackets from SJS Cycles but if anyone has a better idea or can tell me if my plan is silly I am all ears.
I will probably switch over to v-brakes but even then suspect better clearance will be ideal and hence the bracket will still get used.
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."
- Aushiker
- Posts: 22396
- Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:55 pm
- Location: Walyalup land
- Contact:
Re: MounMounting B&M Bush & Muller Lumotec IQ Cyo on a Surly
Postby Aushiker » Sat Dec 03, 2011 10:42 pm
Andrew
Aushiker.com
- Wingnut
- Posts: 883
- Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 11:01 pm
- Location: Mornington Peninsula...
Mounting B&M Bush & Muller Lumotec IQ Cyo on a Surly LHT
Postby Wingnut » Sun Dec 04, 2011 9:19 pm
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk...
- Aushiker
- Posts: 22396
- Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:55 pm
- Location: Walyalup land
- Contact:
Re: Mounting B&M Bush & Muller Lumotec IQ Cyo on a Surly LHT
Postby Aushiker » Mon Dec 05, 2011 2:15 am
I went for a test run this evening. Very impressed by the whole setup and the functioning of this light. I can see two more bikes getting the treatment now
Andrew
Aushiker.com
-
- Posts: 5470
- Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 2:23 pm
- Location: Yangebup
Re: Mounting B&M Bush & Muller Lumotec IQ Cyo on a Surly LHT
Postby Baalzamon » Mon Dec 05, 2011 12:22 pm
Hooked heyAushiker wrote:
I went for a test run this evening. Very impressed by the whole setup and the functioning of this light. I can see two more bikes getting the treatment now
Andrew
- il padrone
- Posts: 22931
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
- Location: Heading for home.
Re: Mounting B&M Bush & Muller Lumotec IQ Cyo on a Surly LHT
Postby il padrone » Mon Dec 05, 2011 1:44 pm
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."
- Aushiker
- Posts: 22396
- Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:55 pm
- Location: Walyalup land
- Contact:
Re: Mounting B&M Bush & Muller Lumotec IQ Cyo on a Surly LHT
Postby Aushiker » Mon Dec 05, 2011 2:00 pm
Aushiker.com
-
- Posts: 5470
- Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 2:23 pm
- Location: Yangebup
Re: Mounting B&M Bush & Muller Lumotec IQ Cyo on a Surly LHT
Postby Baalzamon » Mon Dec 05, 2011 2:23 pm
- Aushiker
- Posts: 22396
- Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:55 pm
- Location: Walyalup land
- Contact:
Re: Mounting B&M Bush & Muller Lumotec IQ Cyo on a Surly LHT
Postby Aushiker » Mon Dec 05, 2011 2:37 pm
YepBaalzamon wrote:btw that is the new son28
Andrew
Aushiker.com
- il padrone
- Posts: 22931
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
- Location: Heading for home.
Re: Mounting B&M Bush & Muller Lumotec IQ Cyo on a Surly LHT
Postby il padrone » Sat Dec 10, 2011 8:10 pm
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."
- Aushiker
- Posts: 22396
- Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:55 pm
- Location: Walyalup land
- Contact:
Re: Mounting B&M Bush & Muller Lumotec IQ Cyo on a Surly LHT
Postby Aushiker » Sun Dec 11, 2011 12:08 pm
Nice and tidy for sure, but the price!il padrone wrote:If you are still looking for a bracket for your B&M iQ Cyo, St John Street Cycles do this one
Andrew
Aushiker.com
- il padrone
- Posts: 22931
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
- Location: Heading for home.
Re: Mounting B&M Bush & Muller Lumotec IQ Cyo on a Surly LHT
Postby il padrone » Sun Dec 11, 2011 1:27 pm
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."
- Aushiker
- Posts: 22396
- Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:55 pm
- Location: Walyalup land
- Contact:
Re: Mounting B&M Bush & Muller Lumotec IQ Cyo on a Surly LHT
Postby Aushiker » Sun Dec 11, 2011 1:30 pm
Good idea. Ideas on tubing?il padrone wrote:Yeah, pretty expensive. You're probably just as well to stick with your improvised one - almost the same. But one thing to strengthen it could be to get a section of tubing to go over the bolt you use, compressed between the washer and another washer at the nut on the fork crown.
Andrew
Aushiker.com
-
- Posts: 5470
- Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 2:23 pm
- Location: Yangebup
Re: Mounting B&M Bush & Muller Lumotec IQ Cyo on a Surly LHT
Postby Baalzamon » Sun Dec 11, 2011 1:36 pm
The spacers you get with the Tubus racks? Got any of them spare. Whatever your solution I would end up putting heat shrink over it to tidy it up as well.Aushiker wrote:Good idea. Ideas on tubing?il padrone wrote:Yeah, pretty expensive. You're probably just as well to stick with your improvised one - almost the same. But one thing to strengthen it could be to get a section of tubing to go over the bolt you use, compressed between the washer and another washer at the nut on the fork crown.
Andrew
- Aushiker
- Posts: 22396
- Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:55 pm
- Location: Walyalup land
- Contact:
Re: Mounting B&M Bush & Muller Lumotec IQ Cyo on a Surly LHT
Postby Aushiker » Sun Dec 11, 2011 5:08 pm
Can't remember if I have any of those, but whilst in Bunnings I did look at using straight connectors for poly tube. They might do the trick. Just need to check the length requirements.Baalzamon wrote:The spacers you get with the Tubus racks? Got any of them spare. Whatever your solution I would end up putting heat shrink over it to tidy it up as well.
Andrew
Aushiker.com
- rifraf
- Posts: 3851
- Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2011 5:55 pm
- Location: Two Rocks, WA
Re: Mounting B&M Bush & Muller Lumotec IQ Cyo on a Surly LHT
Postby rifraf » Sun Dec 11, 2011 5:39 pm
great to see you've now "proper" lighting
Good on you for stepping away from the "dark side".
Hey with regards having your headlight in that position, what was the reason you didnt lengthen your brake
straddle cable and shorten your brake cable to lift it up without having to use the extended bolt to
mount it.
I'm not saying it was possible but curious as to why?
Cheers
Aidan
- il padrone
- Posts: 22931
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
- Location: Heading for home.
Re: Mounting B&M Bush & Muller Lumotec IQ Cyo on a Surly LHT
Postby il padrone » Sun Dec 11, 2011 6:32 pm
Not sure of Andrew's reasons, but beware - such a change to cantilever brake straddle cables will reduce the brake's effectiveness. You will need to pull more cable to actuate the brakes. It is one of the traps involved in setting up cantilevers, and the reason that V-brakes are more fool-proof for less mechanically-aware cyclists.rifraf wrote:Hey with regards having your headlight in that position, what was the reason you didnt lengthen your brake
straddle cable and shorten your brake cable to lift it up without having to use the extended bolt to
mount it.
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."
- Aushiker
- Posts: 22396
- Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:55 pm
- Location: Walyalup land
- Contact:
Re: Mounting B&M Bush & Muller Lumotec IQ Cyo on a Surly LHT
Postby Aushiker » Sun Dec 11, 2011 6:56 pm
That was one of the reasons I didn't gone down this path plus I didn't have a longer cable plus I will be going over to v-brakes so the approach taken was an easier immediate solution, at least in the short term.il padrone wrote:Not sure of Andrew's reasons, but beware - such a change to cantilever brake straddle cables will reduce the brake's effectiveness. You will need to pull more cable to actuate the brakes. It is one of the traps involved in setting up cantilevers, and the reason that V-brakes are more fool-proof for less mechanically-aware cyclists.
Andrew
Aushiker.com
- rifraf
- Posts: 3851
- Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2011 5:55 pm
- Location: Two Rocks, WA
Re: Mounting B&M Bush & Muller Lumotec IQ Cyo on a Surly LHT
Postby rifraf » Sun Dec 11, 2011 7:21 pm
il padrone wrote: Not sure of Andrew's reasons, but beware - such a change to cantilever brake straddle cables will reduce the brake's effectiveness. You will need to pull more cable to actuate the brakes. It is one of the traps involved in setting up cantilevers, and the reason that V-brakes are more fool-proof for less mechanically-aware cyclists.
Thanks IP!
So just to clarify, a longer straddle cable usually has a negative impact on brake effectiveness
The shorter the straddle cable, generally, the more effective .
I like my XTR V-brakes and find them generally easy to set up to be an effective unit.
So much better than the ineffectual factory tektro units my bike came with.
I do currently have an issue with them, being, the rear not releasing well.
I can track the dragging cable to a guide just south of my Moulton frame joiner link.
It doesn't appear squashed or damaged in any way but as soon as I utilise the guide my brakes need
me to physically tweak the cable south of said guide and joiner to correctly release and not rub.
I've lubed, I've replaced cables (I use stainless XTR), I've used the brakes tightest spring tension via the set of three
spring mount holes by the brake bosses (bosses greased)
Theres no apparent visual clue.
I've made the cable loop between frame sections (my bike being dual suspension), main and rear, longer in case the cable was too tight.
All to no avail. The other day I stripped it down yet again to make sure it wasn't something I'd missed the first dozen times.
The brakes pull way superior to the original and if the choice is going back to factory or tweaking/pull, lift and release a cable, I'll stick to the tweak and release as I now actually like my stopping power rather then dreading it.
Cheers
Aidan
- rifraf
- Posts: 3851
- Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2011 5:55 pm
- Location: Two Rocks, WA
Re: Mounting B&M Bush & Muller Lumotec IQ Cyo on a Surly LHT
Postby rifraf » Sun Dec 11, 2011 7:30 pm
Hi Andrew,Aushiker wrote: That was one of the reasons I didn't gone down this path plus I didn't have a longer cable plus I will be going over to v-brakes so the approach taken was an easier immediate solution, at least in the short term.
Andrew
I noticed you had a couple of inches excess of straddle cable as well as some excess on your brake cable (main)
so it got me wondering when you used the long bolt to mount with.
I was unaware that it would change the effectiveness of the front brake.
Cheers
Aidan
- il padrone
- Posts: 22931
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
- Location: Heading for home.
Re: Mounting B&M Bush & Muller Lumotec IQ Cyo on a Surly LHT
Postby il padrone » Sun Dec 11, 2011 7:33 pm
Not the complete story. The longer the straddle cable, the longer the cable pull but the greater the leverage. Short straddle cable has much less cable pull needed, but lower leverage (ie. harder to pull on the brake). I believe the ideal is a cable set up pretty much like Aushiker's, with the straddle cable, cantilever arms and pivot points forming a rough pentagon shape when viewed from in front/behind.rifraf wrote:So just to clarify, a longer straddle cable usually has a negative impact on brake effectiveness
The shorter the straddle cable, generally, the more effective .
Shimano used an indicator on the connector for their modified straddle cable.
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."
- rifraf
- Posts: 3851
- Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2011 5:55 pm
- Location: Two Rocks, WA
Re: Mounting B&M Bush & Muller Lumotec IQ Cyo on a Surly LHT
Postby rifraf » Sun Dec 11, 2011 9:38 pm
- General Australian Cycling Topics
- Info / announcements
- Buying a bike / parts
- General Cycling Discussion
- The Bike Shed
- Cycling Health
- Cycling Safety and Advocacy
- Women's Cycling
- Bike & Gear Reviews
- Cycling Trade
- Stolen Bikes
- Bicycle FAQs
- The Market Place
- Member to Member Bike and Gear Sales
- Want to Buy, Group Buy, Swap
- My Bikes or Gear Elsewhere
- Serious Biking
- Audax / Randonneuring
- Retro biking
- Commuting
- MTB
- Recumbents
- Fixed Gear/ Single Speed
- Track
- Electric Bicycles
- Cyclocross and Gravel Grinding
- Dragsters / Lowriders / Cruisers
- Children's Bikes
- Cargo Bikes and Utility Cycling
- Road Racing
- Road Biking
- Training
- Time Trial
- Triathlon
- International and National Tours and Events
- Cycle Touring
- Touring Australia
- Touring Overseas
- Touring Bikes and Equipment
- Australia
- Western Australia
- New South Wales
- Queensland
- South Australia
- Victoria
- ACT
- Tasmania
- Northern Territory
- Country & Regional
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
- All times are UTC+10:00
- Top
- Delete cookies
About the Australian Cycling Forums
The Australian Cycling Forums is a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.
Bicycles Network Australia
Forum Information
Connect with BNA
This website uses affiliate links to retail platforms including ebay, amazon, proviz and ribble.