Dont forget to pack your chocolate

cludence
Posts: 1179
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 2:49 am
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Dont forget to pack your chocolate

Postby cludence » Sun Aug 19, 2007 1:43 am

I was reading through an old cycling magazine and found the following advert. I thought it might be a good reminder to make sure you pack a block of chocolate before heading out on your bike.

I think the quantity of almonds may be a little less thesedays but at least you have the raisins to quench your thirst. :wink:

Image

User avatar
cyclepathy
Posts: 66
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2007 8:25 pm
Location: Canberra, Australia

Re: Dont forget to pack your chocolate

Postby cyclepathy » Sun Aug 19, 2007 10:12 am

And a nice bowl of bovril after the ride! :lol: gotta love the straight-forward no nonsense copy writing & images, rare even in the 30s.

Is that the page number on the top right corner?? :shock: Or is it one of those annual compliations.

User avatar
mikesbytes
Super Mod
Super Mod
Posts: 16914
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:42 pm
Location: Tempe, Sydney
Contact:

Postby mikesbytes » Sun Aug 19, 2007 10:42 am

Interesting Karen.

Reminds me of a joke I made up.

"you can get your daily protein requirements from 14 box's of chocolates"
If the R-1 rule is broken, what happens to N+1?

cludence
Posts: 1179
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 2:49 am
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Postby cludence » Sun Aug 19, 2007 10:52 am

It's not a page number at the top. Not sure what it is, I will have to have another look.

I am scanning the magazine as it is on loan to me so I will have to post some of the other ads. It's funny to see the difference in cycling adverts.

I must go out now, I am off to the shops to stock up on chocolate!

User avatar
europa
Posts: 7333
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2006 10:51 am
Location: southern end of Adelaide - home of hills, fixies and drop bears

Postby europa » Sun Aug 19, 2007 11:09 am

Just looking for an excuse weren't you :wink:

Richard
I had a good bike ... so I fixed it

cludence
Posts: 1179
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 2:49 am
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Postby cludence » Sun Aug 19, 2007 11:11 am

Just looking for an excuse weren't you


Not at all. I am always concerned about dehydrating. :wink:

User avatar
cyclepathy
Posts: 66
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2007 8:25 pm
Location: Canberra, Australia

Postby cyclepathy » Sun Aug 19, 2007 11:56 am

cludence wrote:I am scanning the magazine as it is on loan to me so I will have to post some of the other ads. It's funny to see the difference in cycling adverts.


Neat. Vintage ads of anything are fun to look at. I've got a book on Victorian ads and there's a few cycling ones, here's one of the more bizarre c. 1880, still trying to figure out how it supposed to climb them there stairs though:

Image

User avatar
GaryF
Posts: 898
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 1:38 am
Location: Hervey Bay, Queensland.

Postby GaryF » Sun Aug 19, 2007 12:35 pm

cyclepathy wrote:
cludence wrote:I am scanning the magazine as it is on loan to me so I will have to post some of the other ads. It's funny to see the difference in cycling adverts.


Neat. Vintage ads of anything are fun to look at. I've got a book on Victorian ads and there's a few cycling ones, here's one of the more bizarre c. 1880, still trying to figure out how it supposed to climb them there stairs though:

I would like to see the Demon hill climber decend the hill!

Chocolate - Now that's a different slant on road sense not usually taught these days.

User avatar
cyclepathy
Posts: 66
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2007 8:25 pm
Location: Canberra, Australia

Postby cyclepathy » Sun Aug 19, 2007 7:06 pm

GaryF wrote:I would like to see the Demon hill climber decend the hill!

Chocolate - Now that's a different slant on road sense not usually taught these days.


Ha, didn't even think about that, maybe you just turn the seat around for downhill. :lol:

(Posh pommy accent) "I say, you there, street urchin, yes, you! cushion my fall won't you?"

Actually I think chocolate & candies are pretty good as quick energy sources, not nutritious or "healthy", but the cals are there :roll: Don't really like the more milky chocs though, too sweet. 85% Lindt is the way to go :twisted:

User avatar
mikesbytes
Super Mod
Super Mod
Posts: 16914
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:42 pm
Location: Tempe, Sydney
Contact:

Postby mikesbytes » Sun Aug 19, 2007 8:13 pm

cyclepathy wrote:Image


every time I look at that photo, I just see a stack in the making
If the R-1 rule is broken, what happens to N+1?

User avatar
sogood
Posts: 17153
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
Location: Sydney AU
Contact:

Postby sogood » Sun Aug 19, 2007 8:48 pm

I didn't know they had Photoshop in those days. Look at how they superimposed the rider and his bike on the stairs. Pretty good I'd say! :roll:
Bianchi, Ridley, Montague, GT, Garmin and All things Apple :)
RK wrote:And that is Wikipedia - I can write my own definition.

User avatar
cyclepathy
Posts: 66
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2007 8:25 pm
Location: Canberra, Australia

Postby cyclepathy » Sun Aug 19, 2007 9:29 pm

mikesbytes wrote:every time I look at that photo, I just see a stack in the making


A gentleman stacketh not, he merely congresses with the earth in manner far more gallant than what is perceived to be the plebeian norm. :lol:

sogood wrote:I didn't know they had Photoshop in those days. Look at how they superimposed the rider and his bike on the stairs. Pretty good I'd say! :roll:


How dare you sir, even consider the possibility of having the silightest predilection towards the contemplation of doubting the veracity of this exemplary statement of truth!

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users