my turn for stupid questions

User avatar
munga
Posts: 7023
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 3:17 pm
Location: wowe
Contact:

my turn for stupid questions

Postby munga » Thu Nov 11, 2010 7:51 pm

selling this. already fixed a price, so theres no confusion. any info would be good before the braze-on's get filed off and it gets a lime green powdercoat.

Grayson 'track' frame. Not really, but it has track ends. 56cm seat tube c-c, 57cm top tube c-c. 120mm spacing. 25.4mm seatpost (included). Takes 28" wheels? (27" looks small). Tapered seatstays. Cable guides, drilled brake bridge. frame weighs 2280g, fork weighs 745g.

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

so how old is it, where's it from, who made it?
need any more info?

rkelsen
Posts: 5131
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 10:41 pm

Re: my turn for stupid questions

Postby rkelsen » Thu Nov 11, 2010 9:46 pm

munga wrote:Grayson 'track' frame. Not really, but it has track ends. 56cm seat tube c-c, 57cm top tube c-c. 120mm spacing. 25.4mm seatpost (included). Takes 28" wheels? (27" looks small). Tapered seatstays. Cable guides, drilled brake bridge. frame weighs 2280g, fork weighs 745g.
I think that it is a 27" frame. Most of them had huge clearances. I've never seen a 27" frame which has the same low clearances as a 700c frame, but I might be wrong.

The rear-facing ends and fancy lugs make me think that this is a bike from the days before the 10-speed boom, so you might be right about the wheel size.

Are you as confused as me? :lol: Why did I bother posting this? I dunno. Good luck with the sale, she's a beaut! 8)

User avatar
munga
Posts: 7023
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 3:17 pm
Location: wowe
Contact:

Re: my turn for stupid questions

Postby munga » Thu Nov 11, 2010 10:20 pm

yes i'm confuzzled. too old for a beginner such as myself. i'm gunna throw 1970 out there and see if it sticks.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users