Are these parts considered retro?

User avatar
Mulger bill
Super Mod
Super Mod
Posts: 29060
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 2:41 pm
Location: Sunbury Vic

Re: Are these parts considered retro?

Postby Mulger bill » Mon Sep 23, 2013 10:51 pm

Dan wrote:Surely you would have had your rim decals reading driveside, Josh ;)
That front wheel's in backward isn't it? :?
...whatever the road rules, self-preservation is the absolute priority for a cyclist when mixing it with motorised traffic.
London Boy 29/12/2011

User avatar
Dan
Posts: 3289
Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 1:32 pm
Location: Vegas, baby

Postby Dan » Tue Sep 24, 2013 6:32 am

Hub is reading front on, and aligned with rim decals, however they are the wrong way around, not that it makes any difference.

In my experience with Josh's builds, he pays much more attention to details like that.

So, in my self proclaimed capacity as 'did Velo13 build these wheels in the 90s' adjudicator, I find in the negative.

User avatar
Velo13
Posts: 898
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2011 3:24 pm
Location: Lennox

Re: Are these parts considered retro?

Postby Velo13 » Wed Sep 25, 2013 11:41 am

Good point. I just thought about the rarity of DA hubs on Opens laced radial circa 1993!

Unlikely I would have laced them with labels to the offside.

Other thing to check, are the hub logos visible through the valve hole?

User avatar
rheicel
Posts: 2303
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 5:01 pm
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: Are these parts considered retro?

Postby rheicel » Wed Sep 25, 2013 11:50 am

Velo13 wrote: Other thing to check, are the hub logos visible through the valve hole?
Yes they are.
Image

User avatar
Velo13
Posts: 898
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2011 3:24 pm
Location: Lennox

Re: Are these parts considered retro?

Postby Velo13 » Wed Sep 25, 2013 12:17 pm

Then whomever built them was paying attention to the details somewhat .... still, nice wheels and a great score (even if I didn't build them :wink:).

User avatar
rheicel
Posts: 2303
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 5:01 pm
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: Are these parts considered retro?

Postby rheicel » Wed Sep 25, 2013 4:58 pm

Velo13 wrote:Then whomever built them was paying attention to the details somewhat .... still, nice wheels and a great score (even if I didn't build them :wink:).
Yep, half attention to details :lol:
Image
Image

User avatar
rheicel
Posts: 2303
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 5:01 pm
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: Are these parts considered retro?

Postby rheicel » Fri Sep 27, 2013 9:49 pm

With the noodle. Let's go touring?
ImageImage
Image

User avatar
Dan
Posts: 3289
Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 1:32 pm
Location: Vegas, baby

Re: Are these parts considered retro?

Postby Dan » Sat Sep 28, 2013 5:40 am

With that much seatpost and stem, I'm gonna say that frame is too small for you...

User avatar
rheicel
Posts: 2303
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 5:01 pm
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: Are these parts considered retro?

Postby rheicel » Sat Sep 28, 2013 5:45 am

Dan wrote:With that much seatpost and stem, I'm gonna say that frame is too small for you...
Hard to find a 54 frame with 52 T-T.
Image

User avatar
munga
Posts: 7023
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 3:17 pm
Location: wowe
Contact:

Re: Are these parts considered retro?

Postby munga » Sat Sep 28, 2013 8:11 am

reminds me of my position on that Alan i had earlier this year. just missing the big boots and plastic nose.

User avatar
singlespeedscott
Posts: 5510
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2008 4:35 pm
Location: Elimbah, Queensland

Re: Are these parts considered retro?

Postby singlespeedscott » Sat Sep 28, 2013 12:06 pm

Dan wrote:With that much seatpost and stem, I'm gonna say that frame is too small for you...
its good to see I have converted you Dan :)
Image

User avatar
Dan
Posts: 3289
Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 1:32 pm
Location: Vegas, baby

Re: Are these parts considered retro?

Postby Dan » Sat Sep 28, 2013 12:31 pm

singlespeedscott wrote:
Dan wrote:With that much seatpost and stem, I'm gonna say that frame is too small for you...
its good to see I have converted you Dan :)
:D After a year of riding bikes too small for me, I'm a convert.

User avatar
rheicel
Posts: 2303
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 5:01 pm
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: Are these parts considered retro?

Postby rheicel » Sat Sep 28, 2013 1:49 pm

Dan wrote:
singlespeedscott wrote:
Dan wrote:With that much seatpost and stem, I'm gonna say that frame is too small for you...
its good to see I have converted you Dan :)
:D After a year of riding bikes too small for me, I'm a convert.
I used to ride a medium and now enjoying a smaller one.
1. My knee have clear clearance and not bumping the T-T
2. I am on the bike, not in the bike
3. I ride medium on MTB, so I can use shorter stem. Small on Road bike so I can use 90++ mm stem.
Here is what I have been riding before-with 70mm stem, short handlebar. I always find myself sitting on the front edge of the saddle trying to reach the levers.
Image
Like I have said before, if 54/56 frame with 51/53 T-T is readily available, that will work for me so I can use shorter seat-post. I appreciate your critique by the way, thanks.
Last edited by rheicel on Sat Sep 28, 2013 6:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image

User avatar
Velo13
Posts: 898
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2011 3:24 pm
Location: Lennox

Re: Are these parts considered retro?

Postby Velo13 » Sat Sep 28, 2013 2:21 pm

Ever the gentleman Rheicel!

User avatar
Mulger bill
Super Mod
Super Mod
Posts: 29060
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 2:41 pm
Location: Sunbury Vic

Re: Are these parts considered retro?

Postby Mulger bill » Sun Sep 29, 2013 11:08 am

Looks sweet Rheicel, did you find the Nitto stem you were after?

re The sizing, if the five points of contact are in the right points in space, does it really matter how they got there and the rider feels comfortable?

Shaun
...whatever the road rules, self-preservation is the absolute priority for a cyclist when mixing it with motorised traffic.
London Boy 29/12/2011

User avatar
rheicel
Posts: 2303
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 5:01 pm
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: Are these parts considered retro?

Postby rheicel » Sun Sep 29, 2013 1:41 pm

Mulger bill wrote:Looks sweet Rheicel, did you find the Nitto stem you were after?

re The sizing, if the five points of contact are in the right points in space, does it really matter how they got there and the rider feels comfortable?

Shaun
Thanks Shaun. I am using Cinelli at the moment while I am still looking for Nitto Quill.

Ridden the bike yesterday for 6 hours with no numbness or any discomfort. This is my only working bike at the moment so I am trying to make it comfortable as possible to cater both commute and weekend rides. While look is also important to me, comfort is my priority as I sometimes ride a lot.
Image

User avatar
ldrcycles
Posts: 9594
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 3:19 pm
Location: Kin Kin, Queensland

Re: Are these parts considered retro?

Postby ldrcycles » Sun Sep 29, 2013 1:58 pm

rheicel wrote: Like I have said before, if 54/56 frame with 51/53 T-T is readily available, that will work for me so I can use shorter seat-post. I appreciate your critique by the way, thanks.
I'm in the same boat, but more like 58 seat tube with 55 top.
"I must be rather keen on cycling"- Sir Hubert Opperman.

Road Record Association of Australia

User avatar
singlespeedscott
Posts: 5510
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2008 4:35 pm
Location: Elimbah, Queensland

Re: Are these parts considered retro?

Postby singlespeedscott » Sun Sep 29, 2013 3:39 pm

ldrcycles wrote:
rheicel wrote: Like I have said before, if 54/56 frame with 51/53 T-T is readily available, that will work for me so I can use shorter seat-post. I appreciate your critique by the way, thanks.
I'm in the same boat, but more like 58 seat tube with 55 top.
What's wrong with a 58 with a 56-57 top tube? Just run a shorter stem.
Image

User avatar
Mulger bill
Super Mod
Super Mod
Posts: 29060
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 2:41 pm
Location: Sunbury Vic

Re: Are these parts considered retro?

Postby Mulger bill » Sun Sep 29, 2013 9:17 pm

rheicel wrote:
Mulger bill wrote:Looks sweet Rheicel, did you find the Nitto stem you were after?

re The sizing, if the five points of contact are in the right points in space, does it really matter how they got there and the rider feels comfortable?

Shaun
Thanks Shaun. I am using Cinelli at the moment while I am still looking for Nitto Quill.
I'll MMS you a pic of my Nitto if you like, if suitable we could swap...
100mm wasn't it?

Shaun
...whatever the road rules, self-preservation is the absolute priority for a cyclist when mixing it with motorised traffic.
London Boy 29/12/2011

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot]