Are these parts considered retro?

User avatar
Velo13
Posts: 866
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2011 3:24 pm
Location: Lennox

Re: Are these parts considered retro?

Postby Velo13 » Tue Jul 16, 2013 10:45 am

Hmmm, no clues as to who made them. The MTB there seems about '90 vintage. What is the date on the mag?

dubrat
Posts: 453
Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2010 4:11 pm

Re: Are these parts considered retro?

Postby dubrat » Tue Jul 16, 2013 10:54 am

They were made in Melbourne by Ultralite but no futher info.... there is a heap of them in Rockhampton as they were supplied by Different Cycles

User avatar
rheicel
Posts: 2275
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 5:01 pm
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: Are these parts considered retro?

Postby rheicel » Tue Jul 16, 2013 11:31 am

Nice find dubrat.
It is maybe a good idea to keep this frame a long as I can.
Image
Image Image

User avatar
rheicel
Posts: 2275
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 5:01 pm
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: Are these parts considered retro?

Postby rheicel » Tue Jul 16, 2013 11:33 am

Velo13 wrote:Hmmm, no clues as to who made them. The MTB there seems about '90 vintage. What is the date on the mag?

Looks like vintage magazine.
Image
Image Image

User avatar
rheicel
Posts: 2275
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 5:01 pm
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: Are these parts considered retro?

Postby rheicel » Tue Jul 16, 2013 3:03 pm

dubrat, thanks mate. Frame arrived today. I will undress her tonight!

Image
Image
Image Image

User avatar
munga
Posts: 6929
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 3:17 pm
Location: wowe
Contact:

Re: Are these parts considered retro?

Postby munga » Tue Jul 16, 2013 5:06 pm

i don't see much retro in this thread. shiny alloy maketh not a retro ride.
however, i do see a very nice looking build about to take place. just flick that threadless cockpit. surely you can sell them online and find a decent cinelli cockpit for about the same money. ;)
biggest classic racing bicycle fb group in the world:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/classiccyclingworld/

User avatar
rheicel
Posts: 2275
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 5:01 pm
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: Are these parts considered retro?

Postby rheicel » Tue Jul 16, 2013 6:07 pm

munga wrote:i don't see much retro in this thread. shiny alloy maketh not a retro ride.
however, i do see a very nice looking build about to take place. just flick that threadless cockpit. surely you can sell them online and find a decent cinelli cockpit for about the same money. ;)

Fair comment munga, thanks.

Shifters arrive today, they look better than I expected.

Image
Image
Image Image

User avatar
Kermit TF
Posts: 368
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2012 8:52 pm
Location: Canbrrra

Re: Are these parts considered retro?

Postby Kermit TF » Tue Jul 16, 2013 7:02 pm

I hope those shifters arent indexed.....
Youve gotta have at least 1 item thats sort of retro. :mrgreen:
When in doubt......mumble.

User avatar
rheicel
Posts: 2275
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 5:01 pm
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: Are these parts considered retro?

Postby rheicel » Tue Jul 16, 2013 7:55 pm

Kermit TF wrote:I hope those shifters arent indexed.....
Youve gotta have at least 1 item thats sort of retro. :mrgreen:

Yes, they are index! Lol.
Image
Image Image

User avatar
rheicel
Posts: 2275
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 5:01 pm
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: Are these parts considered retro?

Postby rheicel » Tue Jul 16, 2013 7:58 pm

Here is how she looks:

Notes:
1. I still need to figure out how to insert the seatpost as it seems to be so tight.
2. Quill looks fugly, I need a 100mm quill stem with matching handlebar, sigh!

Image
Image
Image Image

User avatar
rheicel
Posts: 2275
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 5:01 pm
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: Are these parts considered retro?

Postby rheicel » Tue Jul 16, 2013 8:01 pm

I need help, please can someone tell me if I need to cut the steerer or I can buy a spacer? I prefer a spacer as I do not want to cut the steerer.

Image
Image
Image Image

User avatar
rheicel
Posts: 2275
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 5:01 pm
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: Are these parts considered retro?

Postby rheicel » Tue Jul 16, 2013 8:03 pm

Another dumby question, do i need to put these? (Parts came with the friction shifters)

Image
Image
Image Image

servicimo
Posts: 352
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2012 2:36 pm
Location: Maroochydore

Re: Are these parts considered retro?

Postby servicimo » Tue Jul 16, 2013 8:29 pm

The washers will stop your levers from travelling to far forward, they are stops. You should be able to get 1'' spacers. I may have a few here for you :wink:

BTW...it looks sick!
one nice bike.....

User avatar
RonK
Posts: 8135
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 2:08 pm
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
Contact:

Re: Are these parts considered retro?

Postby RonK » Tue Jul 16, 2013 8:33 pm

Are these parts considered retro?

Nope. But they are certainly shight and briney.
Cycle touring blog and tour journals: whispering wheels...

User avatar
rheicel
Posts: 2275
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 5:01 pm
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: Are these parts considered retro?

Postby rheicel » Tue Jul 16, 2013 8:36 pm

servicimo wrote:The washers will stop your levers from travelling to far forward, they are stops. You should be able to get 1'' spacers. I may have a few here for you :wink:

BTW...it looks sick!

Thank you servicimo. That is very kind of you offering the spacer. I will PM you if can't find anything around here.
Image
Image Image

User avatar
rheicel
Posts: 2275
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 5:01 pm
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: Are these parts considered retro?

Postby rheicel » Tue Jul 16, 2013 8:39 pm

RonK wrote:Are these parts considered retro?

Nope. But they are certainly shight and briney.

lol, I just thought I will be able to come up with a modern look retro (most likely a bad idea after all)
Image
Image Image

User avatar
rheicel
Posts: 2275
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 5:01 pm
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: Are these parts considered retro?

Postby rheicel » Tue Jul 16, 2013 8:39 pm

RonK wrote:Are these parts considered retro?

Nope. But they are certainly shight and briney.

lol, I just thought I will be able to come up with a modern look retro (most likely a bad idea after all)
Image
Image Image

servicimo
Posts: 352
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2012 2:36 pm
Location: Maroochydore

Re: Are these parts considered retro?

Postby servicimo » Tue Jul 16, 2013 9:07 pm

A quill stem and bars will do it I reckon ( I have something that will work if you need)....looks bloody great
one nice bike.....

User avatar
Kermit TF
Posts: 368
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2012 8:52 pm
Location: Canbrrra

Re: Are these parts considered retro?

Postby Kermit TF » Tue Jul 16, 2013 9:19 pm

Regarding the seatpost, just hit it hard with a 28oz hammer....then it should fit.
It will also end up with a retro look....or sell it to me.

invest in some digital measuring vernier calipers and just double check the post diameter..aldi sell them for $25. :D
When in doubt......mumble.

User avatar
RonK
Posts: 8135
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 2:08 pm
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
Contact:

Re: Are these parts considered retro?

Postby RonK » Tue Jul 16, 2013 9:20 pm

rheicel wrote:
RonK wrote:Are these parts considered retro?

Nope. But they are certainly shight and briney.

lol, I just thought I will be able to come up with a modern look retro (most likely a bad idea after all)

Nope again - not a bad idea at all.

BTW - lots of shight and briney retro-looking bits at Velo-Orange.
Cycle touring blog and tour journals: whispering wheels...

User avatar
jacob_T
Posts: 315
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 8:09 pm
Location: Sunshine Coast

Re: Are these parts considered retro?

Postby jacob_T » Tue Jul 16, 2013 10:21 pm

I've never managed to find a quill adaptor that suits threaded headsets. They just seem to look strange with the thinner headtubes.

But yeah, get some spacers and see how it goes.

It's looking great man.

I picked up my first titanium bike last week and I'm seriously in love with the thing. Such a nice ride!
Mine has a 1" head tube too. But with an older threadless headset and stem, which I'm enjoying. This is probably heresy in the retro forum, but I'm a fan of the threadless stem. Really stiff and responsive.

dubrat
Posts: 453
Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2010 4:11 pm

Re: Are these parts considered retro?

Postby dubrat » Wed Jul 17, 2013 6:50 am

The seat post that I had I there was 27.2..

Have you put grease on the post ?

User avatar
rheicel
Posts: 2275
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 5:01 pm
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: Are these parts considered retro?

Postby rheicel » Wed Jul 17, 2013 8:29 am

Hi dubrat, it is all good now. I managed to insert the 27.2 seat post with the help of sandpaper as I need to make sure I can easily remove it if I want to.

Test ride to work is full of joy this morning :lol:
Here is what it looks like now:

Image
Image
Image Image

User avatar
rheicel
Posts: 2275
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 5:01 pm
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: Are these parts considered retro?

Postby rheicel » Wed Jul 17, 2013 8:44 am

Kermit TF wrote:....or sell it to me.

:D let me use it for a few days and then PM me your offer.

RonK wrote:Nope again - not a bad idea at all..

Thanks, I am certainly open to all comments and idea.

jacob_T wrote:I've never managed to find a quill adaptor that suits threaded headsets. They just seem to look strange with the thinner headtubes.

But yeah, get some spacers and see how it goes.

It's looking great man.

I picked up my first titanium bike last week and I'm seriously in love with the thing. Such a nice ride!
Mine has a 1" head tube too. But with an older threadless headset and stem, which I'm enjoying. This is probably heresy in the retro forum, but I'm a fan of the threadless stem. Really stiff and responsive.

Great jacob_T. I did a test ride to work this morning and really a joy to ride bike.
And regarding the quill and threadless stems... this is a never ending argument, lol. If we all like the same thing, I guess we will all be fighting to mary the same woman, :lol:
Image
Image Image

dubrat
Posts: 453
Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2010 4:11 pm

Re: Are these parts considered retro?

Postby dubrat » Wed Jul 17, 2013 8:56 am

no worries but just make sure you head to your lbs and grab some Ti specific grease... The whole diameter should be covered in grease for installation


Also for the stem I would be looking for a Ibis or Litespeed Ti quill stem... would look awesome

Return to “Retro biking”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], mitchj