Recumbents and all feet forward machines
by Forum Ads » Sun Feb 13, 2011 11:51 pm
-
Forum Ads
-
by Uncle Grumpy » Sun Feb 13, 2011 11:51 pm
Thank you Mr Garrison.
Grumps
You are very tedious, and grumpy. Stay at home and give advice from your armchair. - Stonedpirate, June 2010
-
Uncle Grumpy
-
- Posts: 1000
- Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2010 11:13 pm
by Myddraal » Mon Feb 14, 2011 9:15 am
Rear wheel steering doesn't work. Just so you know.
-
Myddraal
-
- Posts: 282
- Joined: Thu Jul 08, 2010 2:13 pm
by John Lewis » Tue Feb 15, 2011 7:52 pm
An interesting concept but unfortunately I feel doomed from the start.
Chain and pedal is way more efficient than the lever system and rear wheel steering except in one or two specific instances has been a failure. Don't believe me. Try driving a rear steer forklift at any speed.
Good to see people experimenting but it is probably better to design around what has been proven to work.
John
-
John Lewis
-
- Posts: 994
- Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2007 7:12 pm
- Location: Albany. 400km South of Perth
by Storm » Fri Feb 18, 2011 6:03 pm
You guys have it all wrong, he's ridding it backwards 
~~~~ ~ @_,~,- -_-’o,~~~ ~ @_,~,- -_-’o,
~~~ ~ (*)\____/(*)~~~ ~ (*)\____/(*)
-

Storm
-
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 11:40 am
- Location: Adelaide
by sunny_fruit » Mon Feb 21, 2011 3:26 pm
Yes ... now I know what you think and what are your worries
?? ... Rear-Wheel-Steering RWS
Ordinary road bike has some shortcomings that do not like ... they are:
... Not better aerodynamics ... non-comfortable seat ... inability to use the full force of the cyclist
These flaws are gone in this new species bicycle
... but the price is - RWS
... all say that this species bikes are awkward to manage ... and I knew about this flaw ...
what are the reasons RWS is unstable and difficult to manage:
... RWS - tadpole
... long-wheelbase (distance between the two big wheels) ... high center of gravity of the driver ... smaller wheels
It is a compromise between these three conditions:
.. the least possible distance between the wheels (- the radius) ... the lowest possible position of the cyclist (height diameter) .. possible large wheels (32 "- 37")
So this is the result ... ... and since no one has ever proven ... and do not share the experience of using this type of bike (with those dimensions and proportions) ... and in my search on the internet, I saw nothing like this bike
... and so I will not draw your attention to your comments .. and I will use RWS
-

sunny_fruit
-
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2011 3:52 am
- Location: on warm Earth ...on the coast _along the wild Forest ...there is my Sunny wandering Soul
-

sunny_fruit
-
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2011 3:52 am
- Location: on warm Earth ...on the coast _along the wild Forest ...there is my Sunny wandering Soul
by sunny_fruit » Mon Feb 21, 2011 3:31 pm
-

sunny_fruit
-
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2011 3:52 am
- Location: on warm Earth ...on the coast _along the wild Forest ...there is my Sunny wandering Soul
by janus77 » Mon Feb 28, 2011 11:47 am
Uncle Grumpy wrote:Thank you Mr Garrison.
Grumps
...then couldn't it work without going in and out of your ass?
-

janus77
-
- Posts: 798
- Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 3:09 pm
by sogood » Mon Feb 28, 2011 12:00 pm
A few observations,
1) Ideas and inventions come with out of the box thinking, and is often a gift. 2) There are way way more "inventions" than what's really practical in real life. 3) Making an invention work requires common sense. 4) Publication of this idea in an open forum has just turned it into public domain, and no longer patentable. 5) Without a patent, there'll be few financial backers willing to get involved. 6) Without financial backers, the project will likely stay to be a hack project and stay that way.
Bianchi, Ridley, Montague, GT, Garmin and All things Apple 
-

sogood
-
- Posts: 16046
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
- Location: Sydney AU
by trailgumby » Mon Feb 28, 2011 1:24 pm
Sunny Froot Loop wrote:what are the reasons RWS is unstable and difficult to manage:
The reason they are unstable is that the centrifugal forces acting on the centre of mass in a turn tend to force a RWS vehicle into ever-tighter circles of oversteer. Front-wheel steer vehicles are dynamically stable as the centrifugal forces acting on the centre of mass tend to force the vehicle straight... unless you lose grip at the rear. Losing grip at the rear (oversteer), a situation analogous to rear wheel steer, is far more difficult to recover from than understeer and usually requires very quick reflexes to successfully control. Let it get past a certain point, and it doesn't matter how good you are, you've lost control. Given that you don't have the front wheel steering on your vehicle to enable recovery, your bicycle design is dangerous and a potential fatality waiting to happen. Do not build it. Any second year automotive engineering student would be able tell you this. You may find the following useful: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bicycle_an ... e_dynamics
Last edited by trailgumby on Thu Mar 03, 2011 9:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"People have a right to their own opinions, but not their own facts. Evidence must be located, not created, and opinions not backed by evidence cannot be given much weight." -- James W Loewen http://www.facebook.com/Drive2WorkDay
-

trailgumby
-
- Posts: 8384
- Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 4:30 pm
- Location: Northern Beaches, Sydney
by raptordesigns » Thu Mar 03, 2011 6:48 pm
Methinks Sunny Froot Loop is a good name.  There are lots of "Sunny"s out there. Usually thinking they have a "new" idea, then rush to tell everyone about it without bothering to do basic research first, build a prototype or protect their intellectual property. Anyone can post a few drawings on line and ask someone else to do the real work of making it work. IMHO, it's just another form of trolling.
-

raptordesigns
-
- Posts: 119
- Joined: Sun May 18, 2008 12:59 pm
by Rando » Thu Mar 03, 2011 8:26 pm
This is obviously someone who doesn't ride much.
Bacchetta Strada Dahon Speed 7 folder Copenhagen Pedersen '49 Super Elliot flat tracker
-

Rando
-
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 12:13 pm
by ldrcycles » Fri Mar 04, 2011 9:33 pm
Interesting thinking, and i like to see people exercising their minds, but the problem with these kinds of pedalling systems is they put a lot more stress on the joints, instead of a continuous smooth motion as with normal cranks, you would have to suddenly stop and then reverse the motion of your leg.
Personally i think sunny is showing some good thinking, just needs to look into the realities of the interaction between human and machine. A simpler form of recumbent is a good thing i feel (looking at making my own and baulking a bit at the long and convoluted chainline).
When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments- Elizabeth West.
-

ldrcycles
-
- Posts: 3695
- Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 2:19 pm
- Location: Kin Kin, Queensland
by sunny_fruit » Sat Apr 16, 2011 2:29 am
sogood - A few observations: †1) Ideas and inventions come with out of the box thinking, and is often a giftâ€
- this is a Gift.
†2) There are way way more "inventions" than what's really practical in real lifeâ€
- In real life, sometimes people are accustomed to their "darlings " ... and refuse to take another ... even if it is more practical
†3) Making an invention work requires common sense.â€
- same ... is required to figure out
†4) Publication of this idea in an open forum has just turned it into public domain, and no longer patentable.†- Public ... this is it
†5) Without a patent, there'll be few financial backers willing to get involved.â€
- useful stuff in our lives …must be up for general use
†6) Without financial backers, the project will likely stay to be a hack project and stay that way.â€
- when a project is useful and is interested ... no way to stay that way
-

sunny_fruit
-
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2011 3:52 am
- Location: on warm Earth ...on the coast _along the wild Forest ...there is my Sunny wandering Soul
by sunny_fruit » Sat Apr 16, 2011 2:31 am
Sunny Froot Loop wrote:what are the reasons ... - I do not understand English well ... and I do not know how to read what you wrote ... it seems to me like ... some kind of appetizer ...maybe trailgumby wrote: The reason they are unstable is .. Front-wheel steer vehicles are dynamically stable as the... Losing grip at the rear (oversteer), a situation analogous to re... Given that you don't have the front wheel steering on your vehicle to enable recovery, your bicycle design is dangerous and a potential fatality waiting to happen. Do not build it. Any second year automotive engineering student would be able tell you this. - this idea came to me accidentally "inter alia", and felt obliged to share it. This is my attempt to make a rear steering front wheel drive bike ... and this is the best structure for now that invented
-

sunny_fruit
-
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2011 3:52 am
- Location: on warm Earth ...on the coast _along the wild Forest ...there is my Sunny wandering Soul
by sunny_fruit » Sat Apr 16, 2011 2:32 am
raptordesigns wrote:Methinks Sunny Froot Loop is a good name.  There are lots of "Sunny"s out there. Usually thinking they have a "new" idea, then rush to tell everyone about it without bothering to do basic research first, build a prototype or protect their intellectual property. Anyone can post a few drawings on line and ask someone else to do the real work of making it work. IMHO, it's just another form of trolling.
Rando wrote:This is obviously someone who doesn't ride much. - yes, that is ... someone who doesn't ride much
also someone who doesn't like to do drawings ... someone who doesn't own intellectual property and have to create more useful other ideas...
this new type of bicycle is not completed…
…I see you are a designer and you obviously easier to complete the drawing
last lever drive system for this bike has no steel Power Cable, without cable reels, without Freewheel mechanisms …double shorter crank arm - (it simpler constructions, lighter weight, more comfortable for joints) spokes will have oval section ... two opposite spokes will be attached to the hub in a socket with a rubber pad and metal holder ... and top cap - (for easy replacement, softer ride, break-resistant)
Energy saving brake ...on front wheel ... it is a roll creating pressure in the frame - (energy from braking ...to be used for departure)
recumbent trike (for two people) ... with two rear-drive-wheel and front control ... and is collapsible ... as folding pram ... to 12 kg (expensive model) ... up to 20kg. (cheaper model)
RaptorDesigns ...good luck to you … with this easy pursuit ...
-

sunny_fruit
-
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2011 3:52 am
- Location: on warm Earth ...on the coast _along the wild Forest ...there is my Sunny wandering Soul
by raptordesigns » Sat Apr 16, 2011 4:08 pm
sunny_fruit wrote:RaptorDesigns ...good luck to you … with this easy pursuit ...
No thanks. I have to shampoo my goldfish this week.
-

raptordesigns
-
- Posts: 119
- Joined: Sun May 18, 2008 12:59 pm
by sunny_fruit » Sat Apr 16, 2011 6:34 pm
 ...
-

sunny_fruit
-
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2011 3:52 am
- Location: on warm Earth ...on the coast _along the wild Forest ...there is my Sunny wandering Soul
by greenwaynegreen » Thu Dec 01, 2011 7:49 pm
Ok - Love all the comments - Nothing much constructive - Lets try this from another perspective. Rear Wheel - think unicycle bottom bracket. That way you can have direct drive to the back wheel. (now the front wheel) Don't know if I would want to ride one of these though. Not in traffic. Maybe in the circus where I normally ride this sort of bike. I love your lateral thinking - Keep up the good work. Wayne
-
greenwaynegreen
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2011 8:15 pm
by sunny_fruit » Wed Jun 27, 2012 5:47 am
looks "good work" by others - final look of this bicycle
-

sunny_fruit
-
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2011 3:52 am
- Location: on warm Earth ...on the coast _along the wild Forest ...there is my Sunny wandering Soul
by stevecassidy » Wed Jun 27, 2012 7:18 am
Interesting, lever drives like this predate the chain drive see Wikipedia on the Treadle Bicycle. There's another thread here about another similar idea. We shouldn't be too down on new ideas but there is a history of re-invention in bike design, we should all be aware of the history. Steve
-

stevecassidy
-
- Posts: 170
- Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 10:42 pm
- Location: Telopea, Sydney
-
by dynamictiger » Wed Jun 27, 2012 7:34 am
sunny_fruit wrote: †2) There are way way more "inventions" than what's really practical in real lifeâ€
- In real life, sometimes people are accustomed to their "darlings " ... and refuse to take another ... even if it is more practical
Do you want to explain this to my Mrs? I am sure there is a more practical model available somewhere
No one...Not the Prime Minister...Not The American President...Not an Astronaut...works as hard as my Mrs.
-
dynamictiger
-
- Posts: 421
- Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 2:08 pm
- Location: Victoria Park, WA
by sunny_fruit » Fri Aug 24, 2012 6:49 am
note of what suggest now A the alternative that presented earlier .... just unfortunate history explanation is ... joint between the two parts of the bicycle frame is a little more specific ... when cornering, the front wheel tilt ... so both tires move after another ... ... This makes STABLE AND PRACTICAL ... 
-

sunny_fruit
-
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2011 3:52 am
- Location: on warm Earth ...on the coast _along the wild Forest ...there is my Sunny wandering Soul
Return to Recumbents
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
|
|