Tadpole trike design ponderings...

Recumbents and all feet forward machines

Tadpole trike design ponderings...

Postby DentedHead » Tue Nov 20, 2012 9:11 pm

I've been umming and ahhing about how much camber to put into my third trike. Currently, it has next to none - a couple degrees at most (I lack a decent tool to measure the actual angle, though I can "eyeball" it pretty well), but it also has a narrower track than my first one, 32.5" from the hub centers. I've noticed many commercially built tadpoles have very little camber, and some have none. I understand what camber does, I'm simply pondering the importance of it.

Has anyone had a slightly or non-cambered wheel fail due to the lack of camber?
I'm about to go see what Tim Smiths, and Peter Elands sites have to say, but I'd appreciate any input/opinions.


Dent.
DentedHead
 
Posts: 187
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2012 9:23 pm

by BNA » Tue Nov 20, 2012 11:04 pm

BNA
 

Re: Tadpole trike design ponderings...

Postby RonK » Tue Nov 20, 2012 11:04 pm

Read this article.
Cycle touring blog and tour journals: whispering wheels...
User avatar
RonK
 
Posts: 4919
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 2:08 pm
Location: Brisbane, Queensland

Re: Tadpole trike design ponderings...

Postby DentedHead » Tue Nov 20, 2012 11:30 pm

Thanks RonK, I was looking for that article in vain. It was the one I read when designing my first trike, and I found it great.

Dent.
DentedHead
 
Posts: 187
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2012 9:23 pm


Return to Recumbents

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users



Support BNA
Click for online shops
Torpedo 7 Torpedo7 AU
Ground Effect Ground Effect NZ
Chain Reaction Cycles CRC UK
Wiggle Wiggle UK
Cycling Express Cycling Express
Ebay Ebay AU
ProBikeKit ProBikeKit UK
Evans Cycles Evans Cycles UK
JensonUSA Jenson USA
JensonUSA Competitive Cyclist