Tadpole trike design ponderings...

Recumbents and all feet forward machines

Tadpole trike design ponderings...

Postby DentedHead » Tue Nov 20, 2012 9:11 pm

I've been umming and ahhing about how much camber to put into my third trike. Currently, it has next to none - a couple degrees at most (I lack a decent tool to measure the actual angle, though I can "eyeball" it pretty well), but it also has a narrower track than my first one, 32.5" from the hub centers. I've noticed many commercially built tadpoles have very little camber, and some have none. I understand what camber does, I'm simply pondering the importance of it.

Has anyone had a slightly or non-cambered wheel fail due to the lack of camber?
I'm about to go see what Tim Smiths, and Peter Elands sites have to say, but I'd appreciate any input/opinions.


Dent.
DentedHead
 
Posts: 187
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2012 9:23 pm

by BNA » Tue Nov 20, 2012 11:04 pm

BNA
 

Re: Tadpole trike design ponderings...

Postby RonK » Tue Nov 20, 2012 11:04 pm

Read this article.
Cycle touring blog and tour journals: whispering wheels...
User avatar
RonK
 
Posts: 5355
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 2:08 pm
Location: Brisbane, Queensland

Re: Tadpole trike design ponderings...

Postby DentedHead » Tue Nov 20, 2012 11:30 pm

Thanks RonK, I was looking for that article in vain. It was the one I read when designing my first trike, and I found it great.

Dent.
DentedHead
 
Posts: 187
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2012 9:23 pm


Return to Recumbents

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users



Popular Bike Shops
Torpedo 7 Torpedo7 AU
Ground Effect Ground Effect NZ
Chain Reaction Cycles CRC UK
Wiggle Wiggle UK
Ebay Ebay AU

“Bicycles BNA Twitter
“Bicycles BNA Facebook
“Google+ BNA Google+
“Bicycles BNA Newsletter

> FREE BNA Stickers
> BNA Cycling Kit