Low, Medium, High. How do they ride?

Recumbents and all feet forward machines

What recumbent would you ride in Time Trials and Audax?

Poll ended at Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:47 pm

Low Racer (seat height less than 40cm)
1
33%
Medium Racer (seat height around 40cm)
0
No votes
High Racer (seat height of more than 70cm)
2
67%
 
Total votes : 3

Low, Medium, High. How do they ride?

Postby bradwoodbr » Thu Aug 28, 2008 12:47 pm

I currently ride a beautiful M5 Shockprook (406rims) which is a medium racer with seat height of 40cm. Now that I want to do more time trialling and audax, the bike is on the heavy side at 15kg. So it is a perfect bike except for its weight.

What experiences or advice can you give about the different SWB recumbents and Trikes. Low, medium or high for time trialling and audax?
What are the advantages to each?


I am thinking of upgrading and don't know which way to go yet.

Thanks in advance
Brad
User avatar
bradwoodbr
 
Posts: 392
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2008 1:12 pm
Location: Perth Western Australia

by BNA » Thu Aug 28, 2008 5:45 pm

BNA
 

Postby Low Racer » Thu Aug 28, 2008 5:45 pm

Hi Brad,
The weight of a trike would be in the same territory as your beautiful M5 shockproof, or even heavier for some models. You will be disappointed with trike if speed is what you are after. So you can scratch that off your list.

I have a Greenspeed trike and no way it can match my swb low racer in speed. My low racer is also on the heavy side (approx 14kg). I will be receiving my M5 Carbon High Racer soon and would be able to compare the two. I am sure the M5 would be faster uphill as it is much lighter than my low racer. The low racer does give me very sweet, fast and comfortable ride.

In general, high racers would be better than low racers in hilly terrains. If there are a lot of sharp turnings in the course, low racer with a dropped chain would be at a disadvantage due to steering lock.

Hope that help.

Regards

Chong
Low Racer
 
Posts: 347
Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 7:04 pm
Location: Coffs Harbour

Postby Kalgrm » Thu Aug 28, 2008 8:27 pm

I can answer from the perspective of a rider who has only ridden a high racer.

I like the format because

* the larger wheels have a lower rolling resistance than small wheels
* it's possible to make them quite light without being overly expensive (Corsa SS is about 10.5kg stock and about $4000)
* higher seating position means there is no need for a flag (less wind resistance and lower dork factor ;))

Low-racers are better into headwinds because they take advantage of the lower wind speed at less than one metre (boundary layer effect).

Cheers,
Graeme
Think outside the double triangle.
---------------------------------------
My web site: www.scenebyhird.com
---------------------------------------
The Bicycle Transportation Alliance
User avatar
Kalgrm
Super Mod
Super Mod
 
Posts: 9236
Joined: Fri May 25, 2007 5:21 pm
Location: Spearwood, 9km SE of Fremantle, WA


Return to Recumbents

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users



Popular Bike Shops
Torpedo 7 Torpedo7 AU
Ground Effect Ground Effect NZ
Chain Reaction Cycles CRC UK
Wiggle Wiggle UK
Ebay Ebay AU



InTouch with BNA
“Bicycles BNA Twitter
“Bicycles BNA Facebook
“Google+ BNA Google+
“Bicycles BNA Newsletter