Workshop tales, trials and disasters. Maintenance tips, techniques and myths. Technical discussion, description and outright lies
by eucryphia » Fri Apr 04, 2008 10:02 pm
Even the cheapest bikes have built in screw mounts for bottle cages, how come the frame and component manufacturers haven't provided mounts for bike computer sensors?
You fork out $$$$ for some ultra lightweight CF frame with top of the range components only to vandalise it by strapping on black plastic bits with cable ties.
Surely it's not too much for all left hand cranks to have a tiny embedded magnet in the right spot?
Is someone sitting on the patent?
-

eucryphia
-
- Posts: 335
- Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 6:05 pm
- Location: Queanbeyan
by BNA » Mon Apr 07, 2008 10:53 pm
-
BNA
-
by Hawkeye » Mon Apr 07, 2008 10:53 pm
eucryphia wrote:Even the cheapest bikes have built in screw mounts for bottle cages, how come the frame and component manufacturers haven't provided mounts for bike computer sensors?
You fork out $$$$ for some ultra lightweight CF frame with top of the range components only to vandalise it by strapping on black plastic bits with cable ties.
Surely it's not too much for all left hand cranks to have a tiny embedded magnet in the right spot?
Is someone sitting on the patent?
Probably more to do with the fact that the sensors are all sorts of different shapes and sizes, and have differing requirements for the magnet-to-sensor gap.
-
Hawkeye
-
by sogood » Tue Apr 08, 2008 6:33 am
That's competition...
Bianchi, Ridley, Montague, GT, Garmin and All things Apple 
-

sogood
-
- Posts: 16051
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
- Location: Sydney AU
by winona_rider » Tue Apr 08, 2008 8:11 pm
my trek 1.7 has a pad designed to accommodate a "trek" computer on it's right fork. is this what you are talking about?
-

winona_rider
-
- Posts: 1076
- Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 4:26 pm
- Location: Brisbane
by toolonglegs » Tue Apr 08, 2008 9:14 pm
nice mount...

-

toolonglegs
-
- Posts: 13027
- Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 7:49 pm
- Location: Somewhere with padded walls and really big hills!
by toolonglegs » Tue Apr 08, 2008 9:16 pm
also i think zipp cranks and wheels have embedded magnets 
-

toolonglegs
-
- Posts: 13027
- Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 7:49 pm
- Location: Somewhere with padded walls and really big hills!
by Mulger bill » Wed Apr 09, 2008 1:44 am
toolonglegs wrote:nice mount...
Good bit o' McGyver that is. What's that hanging off it?
Shaun
...whatever the road rules, self-preservation is the absolute priority for a cyclist when mixing it with motorised traffic. London Boy 29/12/2011
-

Mulger bill
- Super Mod

-
- Posts: 23039
- Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 2:41 pm
- Location: Sunbury Vic
by HAKS » Mon Apr 14, 2008 7:03 pm
Cool idea..........but as mentioned then all the manufacturers would have to adapt a common standard which they may not be willing to do in a real hurry.
-

HAKS
-
- Posts: 2211
- Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2008 10:28 pm
- Location: Canberra, AUS
by eucryphia » Mon Apr 14, 2008 10:00 pm
HAKS wrote:Cool idea..........but as mentioned then all the manufacturers would have to adapt a common standard which they may not be willing to do in a real hurry.
And once that standard came out there'd be this undignified scramble to comply.
Couldn't some German/EU bike quango just issue a standard?
i.e. small tapped lug 164.5 mm from crank centreline, etc, etc...
Then just stand back...
-

eucryphia
-
- Posts: 335
- Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 6:05 pm
- Location: Queanbeyan
by kukamunga » Mon May 05, 2008 10:52 pm
Just picked this up off a Huffy today:-
Integrated or wot!!! 
God save the ABC & SBS.....
-

kukamunga
-
- Posts: 3473
- Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2007 9:12 am
- Location: SE Melburbs, on a bike, on a train......
by eucryphia » Mon May 05, 2008 10:54 pm
Is that a little compass at the bottom... 
-

eucryphia
-
- Posts: 335
- Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 6:05 pm
- Location: Queanbeyan
by Caelum » Mon May 05, 2008 10:59 pm
kukamunga wrote:Just picked this up off a Huffy today:-  Integrated or wot!!! 
See, if a high quality brand like Huffy can do it, surely it wouldn't take much for a lower quality Giant, Canondale, Scott, etc could do the same.... maybe a little less aggressively styled, however 
-

Caelum
-
- Posts: 838
- Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 8:25 pm
- Location: Perth, WA
by kukamunga » Mon May 05, 2008 11:02 pm
eucryphia wrote:Is that a little compass at the bottom... 
'Ken oath mate! "You'll never get lost on a Huffy" they used to say..... Why do you think I grabbed 'em? 
God save the ABC & SBS.....
-

kukamunga
-
- Posts: 3473
- Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2007 9:12 am
- Location: SE Melburbs, on a bike, on a train......
by MichaelB » Tue May 06, 2008 8:38 am
kukamunga wrote:Just picked this up off a Huffy today:-  Integrated or wot!!! 
Until it stops working ....
-

MichaelB
-
- Posts: 6694
- Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 8:29 am
- Location: Adelaide, South Australia
by sogood » Tue May 06, 2008 8:46 am
The other way to look at this is, cycle computer is a piece of electronic gadgetry and is subjected to a much shorter life cycle. It would be a pain to have to upgrade the bar/stem every time a cycle computer gets upgraded. And we all know, companies can't stay on a same standard for long ie. No permanent standard. Just look at the computer industry. Standards fly out the door before they are even in the door.
So I am not whinging about the present arrangement.
Bianchi, Ridley, Montague, GT, Garmin and All things Apple 
-

sogood
-
- Posts: 16051
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
- Location: Sydney AU
Return to The Shed
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Mark Kelly, Wakatuki
|
|