Bicycle commuters need to own 2 bikes!
- mikedufty
- Posts: 788
- Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 5:52 pm
- Location: Western Australia, Bull Creek
Re: Bicycle commuters need to own 2 bikes!
Postby mikedufty » Thu Jun 04, 2009 7:01 pm
I prefer costs per km because it is easier to work out, both vehicles have an odometer. Also easier to apply to a particular journey. My motor vehicles in particular don't get used for commuting, so the km done varies a lot from month to month.
-
- Posts: 64
- Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 4:14 pm
Re: Bicycle commuters need to own 2 bikes!
Postby tinhorn » Fri Jun 05, 2009 2:46 pm
You have to remember you're saving on the cost of a possible gym membership or if not you can't argue that cycling is more beneficial for your health (providing you do it safely) and the environment.
- casual_cyclist
- Posts: 7758
- Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 11:41 am
- Location: Kewdale
Re: Bicycle commuters need to own 2 bikes!
Postby casual_cyclist » Fri Jun 05, 2009 3:37 pm
-1. For me: car = $2,500 per year to commute (minimum) and bus = $1,400 per year. I have spent less than $100 this year so far to commute, which includes clothing. For someone who is prepared to keep it simple, the cost savings can be significant.tinhorn wrote:If people only view cycling as a form of transport and that only then the cost savings will only be marginal - though still cheaper 99% of the time.
-
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 10:06 pm
Re: Bicycle commuters need to own 2 bikes!
Postby bantem » Fri Jun 05, 2009 7:57 pm
- VictorE
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 6:42 pm
- Location: St Kilda West, Melbourne
Re: Bicycle commuters need to own 2 bikes!
Postby VictorE » Fri Jun 19, 2009 8:26 pm
Not to mention all the indirect benefits and savings, such as:sogood wrote:It would be an interesting exercise to calculate the respective costs of the two modes of transport. One that considers,
- Same mileage traveled.
- Fuel/food usage.
- Time use, with factoring of time/money.
- Maintenance costs.
- Equipment costs eg. Special bike gears.
- Personal savings due to fewer doctor's bills
- Government savings on road maintenance due to less wear and tear on roads (so perhaps our taxes could be better directed? Yeah I know, I'm a dreamer)
- Others (I'm sure there are others, but can't be bothered thinking what they are right now - had a busy week)
All I know is bicycles cause less stress on our transport infrastructure, take up less room, etc. so there are heaps of indirect savings as well as the obvious ones.
- George Bernard Shaw.
(alas, how much has changed)
- casual_cyclist
- Posts: 7758
- Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 11:41 am
- Location: Kewdale
Re: Bicycle commuters need to own 2 bikes!
Postby casual_cyclist » Fri Jun 19, 2009 8:48 pm
And employer savings for less sick leave (for me anyway). I have now had 2 days sick leave since starting to cycle commute in February this year.VictorE wrote:Personal savings due to fewer doctor's bills
- Cranky Jim
- Posts: 296
- Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 1:08 pm
- Location: Bayswater, Vic
Re: Bicycle commuters need to own 2 bikes!
Postby Cranky Jim » Fri Jun 19, 2009 9:57 pm
It's not just petrol, servicing, rego, fines, car washing, insurance, depreciation, finance and other car related expenditure that makes the difference either. Depending on a bike changes the way you do things. Take shopping for instance. A whole industry has been built around the realisation that there is more margin for service stations in selling lollies, milk and bread than petrol ... and they charge what they like. Motorists stress out over the board price for petrol but once they are in the service station they barely seem to care about the price of whatever else they pick up when paying for the fuel. They regard this 'impulse buying' as convenience.
I haven't been in a service station (or 'convenience store') since I got rid of the car. And I don't habitually buy the stuff I would buy at a convenience store if I were driving a car either. No pineapple doughnuts and bad coffee for me. Nor have I been to a 'drive thru' either. Getting out of the car helped break my burger habit.
- justD
- Posts: 543
- Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 8:50 am
- Location: Auckland, New Zealand
- Contact:
Re: Bicycle commuters need to own 2 bikes!
Postby justD » Sat Jun 20, 2009 2:49 pm
Can't put a price to health. The comparison ends there as far as I'm concerned. However, if you do want to compare - do take medical bills in years to come into account. I wish I didn't wait till this late age to start cycling!!sogood wrote:It would be an interesting exercise to calculate the respective costs of the two modes of transport. One that considers,
- Same mileage traveled.
- Fuel/food usage.
- Time use, with factoring of time/money.
- Maintenance costs.
- Equipment costs eg. Special bike gears.
I can see a huge difference in outcome if one takes into account of traffic jams for short distance commutes vs long distance commutes with no congestion.
-
- Posts: 1122
- Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2009 5:50 pm
- Location: Melba, ACT
Re: Bicycle commuters need to own 2 bikes!
Postby Fletcher » Mon Aug 10, 2009 5:43 pm
Awesome post, Cranky Jim. Impressive stuff.I decided last year to do without a car. It's been the best decison I have made in a long while. I have lost 30kg. I am fitter than I have been for decades, and healthier than most of my middle aged peers ... and I have money. I always have money.
It's not just petrol, servicing, rego, fines, car washing, insurance, depreciation, finance and other car related expenditure that makes the difference either. Depending on a bike changes the way you do things. Take shopping for instance. A whole industry has been built around the realisation that there is more margin for service stations in selling lollies, milk and bread than petrol ... and they charge what they like. Motorists stress out over the board price for petrol but once they are in the service station they barely seem to care about the price of whatever else they pick up when paying for the fuel. They regard this 'impulse buying' as convenience.
I haven't been in a service station (or 'convenience store') since I got rid of the car. And I don't habitually buy the stuff I would buy at a convenience store if I were driving a car either. No pineapple doughnuts and bad coffee for me. Nor have I been to a 'drive thru' either. Getting out of the car helped break my burger habit.
- hartleymartin
- Posts: 5153
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 6:56 pm
- Location: Fairfield, NSW
Re: Bicycle commuters need to own 2 bikes!
Postby hartleymartin » Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:19 pm
This one hit home recently when I busted the rear wheel on my Elan X Country bike. I've been using the Malvern Star 3-speed for everything, and am constantly concerned because... lets just say it needs work and is NOT in prime mechanical condition at the moment.
http://raleightwenty.webs.com - the top web resource for the Raleigh Twenty
-
- Posts: 5131
- Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 10:41 pm
Re: Bicycle commuters need to own 2 bikes!
Postby rkelsen » Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:10 am
This number actually depends on lots of different factors.hartleymartin wrote:Apparently the real cost of operating a car is about 86c per kilometre that you drive it.
My current car cost me $0.57 per km in the first year of ownership for depreciation only. Add fuel, maintenance, rego, insurance and parking and the total came to about $1.25/km for that year (2004). It progressively got cheaper as the k's were racked up, but now the thing is mostly just sitting in my garage. Since May 2008, it's only done about 1,500 km.... costing me well over $1.00/km now in rego & insurance alone. I can't bring myself to sell it because in the current market I'll get nothing for it... but it breaks my heart to see it just sitting there unused. Quoting Natalie Imbruglia, "I'm torn." It's the first car I've owned since it was new. All previous cars have been 2nd hand.
As of this morning, my current bike has cost me a little bit over $2/km... but I've only had it since June... and that figure assumes that there's no resale value, since I'll be riding it until it falls apart.
-
- Posts: 1122
- Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2009 5:50 pm
- Location: Melba, ACT
Re: Bicycle commuters need to own 2 bikes!
Postby Fletcher » Sat Sep 19, 2009 8:46 am
- damhooligan
- Posts: 3409
- Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 5:16 pm
- Location: melbourne
- Contact:
Re: Bicycle commuters need to own 2 bikes!
Postby damhooligan » Sat Sep 19, 2009 10:17 am
I just can't help to think owning a second bike purely as a spare is insane.Fletcher wrote:There is some merit to this idea of owning two bikes. I would probably sulk like an infant if my bike was out of action for a week. Resorting to the car would be, well, just completely unacceptable.
For a week you can hire a bike , for a week you can go by public transport.
or even ask a colleague for a lift or...
There are probably more options....
The only time i 'loose' my bike for a few day's is for a service...
(and i do have sick-leave.....evil laughter; whoehaha )
SCHIJNVEILIGHEID !!
- Thoglette
- Posts: 6614
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 1:01 pm
Re: Bicycle commuters need to own 2 bikes!
Postby Thoglette » Sat Sep 19, 2009 6:51 pm
No, the spare is there because it is different in some special way. As is the other spare. And the other spare.damhooligan wrote:I just can't help to think owning a second bike purely as a spare is insane.
More seriously, a spare set of wheels seems to make some sense as pretzelled wheels are my #1 can't-ride-that-bike reason
"People are worthy of respect, ideas are not." Peter Ellerton, UQ
- beauyboy
- Posts: 1337
- Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 9:45 pm
- Location: New Farm, Brisbane
Re: Bicycle commuters need to own 2 bikes!
Postby beauyboy » Sun Sep 20, 2009 12:10 pm
- you have no spare tubes
- you have no spare brake
- your main bike is in the shop for work
- etc
Your spare bike should really be your old bike or in my case my old bike that is the spouses bike.
As for comparing cost
these really need to be compared using both the per-km and per-week cost
My cost is when only using commuting is 15c per km
and
cost of it's life so far $8.96 per week
Both of these have included maintance, accessiories and the replacement cost.
when using both it would be impossible to compare with a motor vehicle that is barely nearing three years of age.
Donald
Upgrade the NCL now QR!!!!!!
http://nakedcyclistbrissy.blogspot.com/
My views do not represent any organisation I may be apart of unless otherwise stated
- damhooligan
- Posts: 3409
- Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 5:16 pm
- Location: melbourne
- Contact:
Re: Bicycle commuters need to own 2 bikes!
Postby damhooligan » Sun Sep 20, 2009 4:24 pm
Ahum , i am sure you can convince yourself that you need a spare bike,beauyboy wrote:I do believe it is handy to have a spare bike for the times your main bike is out of action. Time like this can include when you ware something out
- you have no spare tubes
- you have no spare brake
- your main bike is in the shop for work
- etc
but please don't use ; I have no spare tubes as an excuse...
Evrybody should always have them , no excuses there...it just takes a bit of organising to have them in stock.
Not that difficult
SCHIJNVEILIGHEID !!
- beauyboy
- Posts: 1337
- Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 9:45 pm
- Location: New Farm, Brisbane
Re: Bicycle commuters need to own 2 bikes!
Postby beauyboy » Sun Sep 20, 2009 5:40 pm
My main point is that when you replace your first bike ( as most of us do) keep it for the times when you do not have spare parts.
Donald
Upgrade the NCL now QR!!!!!!
http://nakedcyclistbrissy.blogspot.com/
My views do not represent any organisation I may be apart of unless otherwise stated
- damhooligan
- Posts: 3409
- Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 5:16 pm
- Location: melbourne
- Contact:
Re: Bicycle commuters need to own 2 bikes!
Postby damhooligan » Sun Sep 20, 2009 7:01 pm
+1beauyboy wrote: Buying a bike for simply the perpose to have a spare is wasteful.
Seriously ?beauyboy wrote: but many do not keep spares.
Why not ?
SCHIJNVEILIGHEID !!
- beauyboy
- Posts: 1337
- Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 9:45 pm
- Location: New Farm, Brisbane
Re: Bicycle commuters need to own 2 bikes!
Postby beauyboy » Sun Sep 20, 2009 7:16 pm
Donald
Upgrade the NCL now QR!!!!!!
http://nakedcyclistbrissy.blogspot.com/
My views do not represent any organisation I may be apart of unless otherwise stated
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 10:13 pm
Re: Bicycle commuters need to own 2 bikes!
Postby artificial life » Thu Oct 22, 2009 11:35 pm
I had a realisation one day that:
1. While I love my MX5 for weekends away, it's a crap car for parramatta road (especially once I've set up the suspension how I like it)
2. The drive from home (Newtown) to work (Homebush, atm.) takes me about 50 minutes at peak hour, and more to get home.
3. Assuming no major wind, it's the same time or FASTER to ride a bike to work as to drive, but I arrive feeling awake and ready to go, rather than frustrated.
However, I would say that running a bike isn't particularly cheap. In the beginning at least while you acquire a floor pump, lights, lock, helmet, shoes, more shorts, etc. it's even more expensive than the normal car associated costs. That said, the cost of owning a car has to include the depreciation involved in owning it. So even if you completely write off the cost of buying the bike as soon as you get it from your LBS it's still WAY cheaper than the 5k+ p.a. it costs just to own a newish car. Then factor in that most cars are purchased using finance, where as bikes you can generally stump up the cash for and the gap is even wider. For me, the benefits to health and life style are easily worth the sunk cost of the bike itself, and the convenience factor of the bike as personal transport in my area far outweigh the cost of the bike by themselves.
So based on the economics, I think I will probably end up getting a better bike later (if i stick with it, all signs point to yes!) and keeping the existing one, since even in the short period I've had it I've managed 2 punctures; 1 completely shredded tyre; and 2 wheels in need of truing up. The last bit kept me in the car when I would much rather have been on the saddle.
Now if only there was a good way of attaching a bike to an MX5!
- Thoglette
- Posts: 6614
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 1:01 pm
Re: Bicycle commuters need to own 2 bikes!
Postby Thoglette » Fri Oct 23, 2009 12:14 pm
RAC WA's magazine current issue has a per-week cost of ownership for a range of new vehicles. As well as running expenses, the costs include depreciation and interest (based on a personal loan).artificial life wrote:However, I would say that running a bike isn't particularly cheap.
..... That said, the cost of owning a car has to include the depreciation involved in owning it.
In a nutshell, a small fourseat buzzbox costs around $120 per week, every week for it's four year life.
A large 4WD or lux sedan costs nearly three time that.
The suprise for me was how relatively expensive the people movers were.
"People are worthy of respect, ideas are not." Peter Ellerton, UQ
-
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 6:21 pm
- Location: Kangaroo Point Qld
Re: Bicycle commuters need to own 2 bikes!
Postby peddlepower » Fri Oct 23, 2009 12:27 pm
OK i'll probably hop back into the Kombi on wet nights....
-
- Posts: 551
- Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2008 10:38 am
- Location: East Victoria Park,Perth
Re: Bicycle commuters need to own 2 bikes!
Postby toofat » Fri Oct 23, 2009 2:52 pm
If you can give up the second car you can buy 3 bikes and still be way in front
- Mulger bill
- Super Mod
- Posts: 29060
- Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 2:41 pm
- Location: Sunbury Vic
Re: Bicycle commuters need to own 2 bikes!
Postby Mulger bill » Sat Oct 24, 2009 6:43 pm
There is but you'll have to search through the place. Anyone remember which member ran an MX5?artificial life wrote:Now if only there was a good way of attaching a bike to an MX5!
Shaun
London Boy 29/12/2011
- hartleymartin
- Posts: 5153
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 6:56 pm
- Location: Fairfield, NSW
Re: Bicycle commuters need to own 2 bikes!
Postby hartleymartin » Sat Oct 31, 2009 11:48 pm
http://raleightwenty.webs.com - the top web resource for the Raleigh Twenty
- General Australian Cycling Topics
- Info / announcements
- Buying a bike / parts
- General Cycling Discussion
- The Bike Shed
- Cycling Health
- Cycling Safety and Advocacy
- Women's Cycling
- Bike & Gear Reviews
- Cycling Trade
- Stolen Bikes
- Bicycle FAQs
- The Market Place
- Member to Member Bike and Gear Sales
- Want to Buy, Group Buy, Swap
- My Bikes or Gear Elsewhere
- Serious Biking
- Audax / Randonneuring
- Retro biking
- Commuting
- MTB
- Recumbents
- Fixed Gear/ Single Speed
- Track
- Electric Bicycles
- Cyclocross and Gravel Grinding
- Dragsters / Lowriders / Cruisers
- Children's Bikes
- Cargo Bikes and Utility Cycling
- Road Racing
- Road Biking
- Training
- Time Trial
- Triathlon
- International and National Tours and Events
- Cycle Touring
- Touring Australia
- Touring Overseas
- Touring Bikes and Equipment
- Australia
- Western Australia
- New South Wales
- Queensland
- South Australia
- Victoria
- ACT
- Tasmania
- Northern Territory
- Country & Regional
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
- All times are UTC+10:00
- Top
- Delete cookies
About the Australian Cycling Forums
The Australian Cycling Forums is a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.
Bicycles Network Australia
Forum Information
Connect with BNA
This website uses affiliate links to retail platforms including ebay, amazon, proviz and ribble.