Beating the system - the cycling commuting section
21 posts • Page 1 of 1
I recently read an article about cyclists who ran red lights. The part of the article that got me was about cyclist who ran red lights where they couldn't trip the lights, implying that it was partially BS.
Yesterday I was waiting at a light sitting in the correct position to be detected (I could see the lines in the tarmac) and it went thru 2 complete sequences without detecting me.
To make matters worst, a car rolled up behind me, but rather than sitting the normal distance behind me, it sat way back, too far to provide detection. I've seen this many times, it seems that a small % of motorists like to exhibit extra perceived safety around cyclists, a pity that not all are like them but it doesn't help with cycle unfriendly lights.
A helmet saved my life
One of the reasons I will sit in front of the white line in the ped x area when the intersection is unlikely to be busy with peds. Technically illegal, yes, but having car drivers being comforrtable with coming up to the line helps trip the lights in all our favour more quickly. Also helps me feel less vulnerable to being hit from behind by someone coming up to the lights.
Last edited by trailgumby on Sat Apr 27, 2013 7:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"People have a right to their own opinions, but not their own facts. Evidence must be located, not created, and opinions not backed by evidence cannot be given much weight." -- James W Loewen
Do you have a lucky rabbit's foot to go with that - you have a common misunderstanding as to how the induction loop used on the majority of roads works
I go thru a quiet intersection 5 times a week. Up to a month ago it would trip within 20 seconds, now nothing. On the rare occasions a car comes in behind it trips almost immediately.
As I am on a steel frame I spoke to VicRoads ; I was given the mirror trick (they look into it).
As it relies on a changing magnetic flux nothing has changed regards the bike and I was told the sensitivity is preset. Cars still trip it so what/how/why has changed? Go figure.
Solution. Change route.
I have a few in the early hours that won't change and cars are few and far between at 4-5am on my route. I just treat the red lights like stop signs. Stop, give way and get going. Otherwise I could sit there for half hour some days I'm sure.
2012 Avanti Giro 3
2003 GT Palomar
That's it ... ?
Help me out, increase the inductance and the signals change ?
I heard the author speaking about the findings on the radio recently. Sounded as though most of those surveyed indicated they had a decent reason, ie lights won't change. I don't think it really addressed the main issue of perception of crazed rider flying through red lights without looking that gives cyclists a bad name. I didn't hear the whole interview though, it was background noise while otherwise occupied - I'm male, so can't do two things at once.
bychosis (bahy-koh-sis): A mental disorder of delusions indicating impaired contact with a reality of no bicycles.
The other week I waited at a set of busy lights with a button press, after two cycles without a turn I had to negotiate it on red. FYI the western side of Vincent St under the freeway in Leederville.
Have also not been detected numerous times outside the church at the start of Aberdeen St in Northbridge.
I read the article on The Conversation, I think it wasn't bad, but it missed one of the biggest reasons cyclists run red lights; because it saves time. And I don't have a problem with it, because a bicycle is a vastly different vehicle to a car/bus/truck that treating them the same is ludicrous and motor vehicle drivers are just jealous their mode of transport isn't so agile and safe for other road users.
Nope - it works by detecting a decrease in inductance
The source for this is the US Department publishes a Transport Traffic Detector Handbook, where chapter 2 sets out how inductive loop detectors work, including this
So if your magnet had any effect, it would be to reduce the possibility of you being detected.
Silly thing about this is that I sometimes filter to the lights in a bus lane and accidentally trip the bus light!
My understanding was that the rules let you proceed through a red if it was clear that they weren't functioning correctly (eg: you'd sat through two sequences without a green or similar).
here it is: NSW road rules. Of course the onus is on you to prove they were not functioning correctly.
That's interesting, I thought they designed to the bus lane detector to only pick up large vehicles, ie Bus's to stop cars using the Bus light, but clearly they are no different.
A helmet saved my life
me too.. which is why I was somewhat surprised... I'm very careful to stay off the loops on that intersection these days.
Don't these posts belong on the BNA Biggest Loser thread?
2012 Oppy A4 | 200x Hard tail Kona Blast Deluxe
I used to have a set of lights that didn't work on my commute. I used to push the pedestrian button then go back and wait.
Then I found another way to ride and don't have any lights at all on my commute now
I remember reading a post somewhere suggesting that you are more likely to trigger the induction loop at the edges - seems to work for me.
To complicate this further, some lights can be reprogrammed to have a longer delay between the loops being triggered and the lights changing. This occurred at an intersection I use early each morning, and initially I thought the loops had just stopped detecting me, but then found out that they still detect my bike, but there's a lag of about a minute between detection and the lights changing.
That is mostly true - for example the US Department of Transport handbook I quoted above states
[quote="Transport Traffic Detector Handbook Ch 2]When the cycle is directly over the loop wire, coupling between the inductive loop and the cycle is maximized.[/quote]
The reason I qualified this by saying "mostly" is that separated bike paths in Sydney tend to use a quadrupole-loop, in which case you maximise your detection by being directly over the loop wire in the centre.
Of course there are much better detector arrangements that don't matter where you position your bicycle, but it would appear that the RMS don't GAF
I went for a ride this morning and had to go through 2 sets of lights.
I pulled up at the red light and stopped right on the middle loop on the ground with my front wheel at the front of the loop.
Set off the lights immediately, they changed within a 10-15 seconds of me pulling up.
Find the traffic signal box at the intersection, note it's ID number, and then call the complaints line
(included on the standard sign on the box, IIRC 131 700). Report that the detector is faulty and needs adjustment.
Can usually do all this while waiting for the next failed cycle to run its course.
The detectors are supposed to pick-up bicycles (most CF ones have enough metal in the rims/spokes
to work). The sensitivity of the detectors is adjustable. And RMS (formerly RTA) signals staff should
be able to fix it. You've just got to tell them - and doing so has worked for me.
It might even work if you ring them now and tell them the crossroads or location of the lights.
Somebody has to do something, and it's just incredibly pathetic that it has to be us -Jerry Garcia
21 posts • Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users