The foundations for successful riding
This isn't intended to be rude, but I don't know how to be tactful about it...
What on earth do you eat as a vegan to be pushing that much weight? I've got visions of you sitting around with baguettes and olive oil?????
I have done another round of plyometrics on the stairs yesterday and I'm giving the core stability program from the Tom Danielson book a go. SHould go for a quick run right now actually.... efficiency
... just food, plenty of fruit and veg... not much else. I will survive the next ice age no problems!.
PS... didn't get out of entering this http://www.routesdubourbonnais.fr/ ... eek only 1 month away, better get over this cold so I can get some training in!
I started that program, then destroyed my elbow playing netball. Just come back good again so will be doing it again next week.
I was just doing the very basic program and it showed up some imbalances left to right.
I must admit I am not sure I was doing all of the exercises properly!
Don't play netball. Simple.
Make sure you get yourself a foam roller and smash out the areas of imbalance. You can't stretch a lot of areas by yourself. There is a reason why massage therapy is so important for athletes. It can't be done alone. A foam roller helps my mid back tightness enormously; when I go to do some stretches like the doorway stretches I can actually activate the right spots because I'm not carrying a large lordosis or kyphosis or scoliosis or whatever into the stretch. Just a minor one. Either way, I see Tommy's pics in the book and he has some really serious imbalances happening... no point trying to ruin your natural advantages!
I'm actually in the process of selling some drum cymbals right now because playing music creates such incredible imbalances for me (background in fast death metal) that it will ruin any hope I have of completing an Ironman next year. I think we occasionally don't realise how much strain we cause ourselves.
I did 5x5 intervals this morning. That was pretty good, I'm starting to feel and notice the improvements.
Just an update on the FTP, because of the ongoing questioning NP came back a fair bit higher for the race today, I've bumped FTP up 15W.
130km and 1700m done today solo as I had an unexpected day off.
Apart from a moment at 80km where I was feeling a bit iffy and I needed a sugar hit all good. Ended up riding some damn steep hills that I hadn't expected, right on the bottom end of my gearing on a standard crankset.
Averaged 211w with a weighted average of 234w, 28.9kmh.
Much better than last week when I was feeling gutless.
Will someone please explain the difference between average power and weighted average power.
Average power is a flat average, weighted average power will give extra watts for the higher levels of power, so your sprints will be worth much more so over say a five minute period you might have an average of 100W even though you didn't pedal at all in between two 30 second efforts at 1000W, yet the weighted average will give the power from the sprint much more value, maybe it stretches those 1000W over 2 minutes maybe it will pad out the average to 250W instead.
I thought weighted power, was the average power of the time you actually spent putting power down (i.e. after removing any 0 power values such as times descending/freeweeling )
So any tips of keeping watt fluctuations down and having a constant and consistent output? I've gone through a weeks worth of different riding and I've noticed that my wattage will be jumping around without my PE changing whatsoever. That is, the current power I feel like I'm putting down isn't changing between pedal strokes.
Nope. Weighted power is simply a calculation (equation) that smooths out the peaks and troughs, that attempts to provide a more useful idea of your power output. If you are doing steady state 2x20s at 300W, your weighted average within each interval should be almost the same as the average, because you aren't varying that pace. If you are riding up and down hills for 40 minutes, your power naturally goes up on the climbs to 500W and down to 150W on the descents, but your overall effort might be similar to that 300W 2x20. Perceived exertion is a reasonable predictor of this.
Ignoto, just practice a specific cadence if you're on the trainer. I don't try and maintain power, it's too hard. I try to spin at 93rpm exactly for the interval. Cadence is like an automatic 3s average, except it is never reported at 93.2 rpm or 93.7468 rpm. Makes it much easier to stay in the desired power range, because your power does report back those decimal places (its a bigger number, and more sensitive than most cadence sensors and head unit reporting). Goooood luck doing this on the open road. Sticking to your FTHR can be helpful, again slower moving targets are easier to hit.
Depends on the device too. I've noticed powertaps seem to jump around a bit less (side effect of measuring power further downstream?). I wouldn't mind trying a 5s rolling average but Garmins aren't very customisable.
Did 5x5's with a power meter for the first time tonight.
Should the average power be dropping off over the last 1 or 2 intervals, or was that pretty much spot on? HR was a fairly steady 185 throughout most of them, max I've ever hit is about 195, if that's any indication with 5m intervals...
Long 62km session on the trainer this morning: http://www.strava.com/activities/130987890
It was long intervals varying between 83% (the 5 minute blocks) and 120% (the short 30sec spikes). On the last block I ended up putting the load up to 275w and then 300w near the end. It was tough, but okay.
So is "Lap Power" on my Garmin 510 not accurate? I was doing some sharp pinch climbs this morning around Brisbane and my Lap Power on the Garmin was hovering around the 360w mark. But, looking at the lap I created on Strava, it has me at a lowly 220w average.
I can only think that Strava is counting the coasting/recovery time as 0 while my Garmin isn't?
It might be counting coasting time if you were coasting or going downhill. But Strava can be a mystery at times.
My Bryton would show instant power at 200W even though I stopped pedalling. I don't think it was a zero issue, just the way it failed to demonstrate a zero.
Bear in mind that the sensors send a signal of some kind, the head unit can do whatever it likes with that info, and tbh, power is the lowest of their priorities. People buy SRM PC7's for power, they buy Garmin's for Strava, maps, speed and heart rate. Some of us are different but I don't presume to be the target market
Similarly my Cyclops HRM would make my garmin display 255rpm cadence when coasting. Garmin connect, Strava and Training Peaks would read it as zero.
Sent from my C2105 using Tapatalk
My Training & Racing Blog -->http://mountainbikemediocrity.wordpress.com/
You're probably right. Whether to include zeroes or not is configurable. You generally want to for power and not for cadence. I believe this is what Strava does. Another clue is if average power is higher than NP, you're probably ignoring zeroes.
Fair call. I've changed my garmin to now include the zeros and it's now producing similar results to Strava. So that fixed it.
I may need to redo my FTP test earlier than I had planned. My original base 20 minute test on the flat produced a 277 average wattage. But on a climb this morning which took me 21 minutes I had a average power of 296
Admittedly, I find it easier to keep the power consisted and higher whilst climbing than on the flat, just without trying to push a certain wattage (more survive the 10% avg gradient) I blew out my possible FTP time.
Don't muck around with your FTP values based on different testing protocols. I tend to use 1 hour normalised power from races, which isn't perfect either, but it's a full hour of pain. Quite frankly, I seem to be able to inflate that figure with surges and sprinting. But then again, if I can pump out those numbers on the trainer, then why not use that? FTP testing sucks
As you have alluded to, be cautious with the impact of climbing efforts on your FTP. Most people find it easier to hold a higher power on a climb (versus on the flat) for a lot of different reasons. I would be using your timed efforts on the flat to inform your FTP but then remember to expect a little more from yourself when climbing.
Giant Trinity Composite 1
Can't see why I'm so damn sore
Turns out corrected elevation is 3,679m hahahahah
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users