It's an interesting challenge, something anyone who uses Strava must contemplate from time to time as they hack their way around their local riverloop.
Wind speeds and directions for specific areas are perhaps the low hanging fruit in realising the dream of deriving power output from a gps track. Road surface is mentioned, but have they talked to Jan Heine? You'll need to know about tyre width if you're going to get into road surface. And bicycle+rider weight? The differences in drivetrain efficiency between a '92 Tommasini (my daily driver) and a contemporary roadie are significant. They also need to consider whether you are riding solo or in a bunch, and, if in a bunch when you're at the front and when you're being sucked along.
Strava's best guesses of power output are correctly ignored. The technology noted in the patent is a reasonable attempt to improve it.
The one obvious way to improve this data would be the ability to compare performance with riders who are using power meters. Apple already uses this sort of technology to refine positioning of lost or stolen devices; the IP of a device gives a rough location, wifi signals from nearby Apple mobile devices are used to refine the position. The more Apple mobile devices your lost or stolen device sees, the better the definition of it's location.
Imagine you're in a bunch with someone who has a power meter, or you pass through an area just before or after a power meter user. That data connected with your weight and speed would up the quality of an estimated power output heaps.
Apple applies for patent to calculate cyclists' power from wind resistance and other factors
- hiflange
- Posts: 1939
- Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 9:27 pm
- Location: Perth
- Contact:
- Alex Simmons/RST
- Expert
- Posts: 4997
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 3:51 pm
- Contact:
Re: Apple applies for patent to calculate cyclists' power from wind resistance and other factors
Postby Alex Simmons/RST » Fri May 19, 2017 8:08 am
Your optimism in the ability of such a device to come anywhere near to accurately providing power output is, well, unjustified. It'll be not a lot more than a light comic relief random number generator.RobertFrith wrote:It's an interesting challenge, something anyone who uses Strava must contemplate from time to time as they hack their way around their local riverloop.
Wind speeds and directions for specific areas are perhaps the low hanging fruit in realising the dream of deriving power output from a gps track. Road surface is mentioned, but have they talked to Jan Heine? You'll need to know about tyre width if you're going to get into road surface. And bicycle+rider weight? The differences in drivetrain efficiency between a '92 Tommasini (my daily driver) and a contemporary roadie are significant. They also need to consider whether you are riding solo or in a bunch, and, if in a bunch when you're at the front and when you're being sucked along.
Strava's best guesses of power output are correctly ignored. The technology noted in the patent is a reasonable attempt to improve it.
The one obvious way to improve this data would be the ability to compare performance with riders who are using power meters. Apple already uses this sort of technology to refine positioning of lost or stolen devices; the IP of a device gives a rough location, wifi signals from nearby Apple mobile devices are used to refine the position. The more Apple mobile devices your lost or stolen device sees, the better the definition of it's location.
Imagine you're in a bunch with someone who has a power meter, or you pass through an area just before or after a power meter user. That data connected with your weight and speed would up the quality of an estimated power output heaps.
Using your power meter using ride buddy as a guide is completely useless - the power demand for two riders riding next to each other not only is quite variable rider to rider (e.g. for one of my mates his power riding next to me on flat road is ~35% less than mine), not to mention the simple act of riding next to someone actually changes the power required compared with riding by yourself at the same velocity (because of the complexity of aerodynamics - the pressure differential on each rider is affected by the location of the other rider - I've even tested it experimentally and it's not insignificant).
Another example, there is a ~10% difference in power required to ride along a flat road at 30km/h between a head and tailwind of just 1km/h (a wind speed rated calm, low enough that we cannot even feel it when standing still and anemometers cannot register it).
The various energy demand factors are just too complex and are highly variable, especially aerodynamics (which represents over 75% of the energy demand for most rides/riders). That's why we have devices already which directly measure the forces and velocities applied to relevant bicycle components (e.g. pedals, cranks, spiders, hubs). These have been shown, when good models are used correctly, to be reliable, accurate and precise.
Devices that attempted to measure the energy demand components and estimate power from that are not new nor novel, ibike have done this for a long time. Measurement of air movement and resulting pressure differentials however is very complex.
- hiflange
- Posts: 1939
- Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 9:27 pm
- Location: Perth
- Contact:
Re: Apple applies for patent to calculate cyclists' power from wind resistance and other factors
Postby hiflange » Fri May 19, 2017 11:03 am
You're right, the variables involved are many and and the interactions so complex that it's likely that measuring power directly will remain the only accurate method forever. My point is just that deriving an estimated power from speed and weight alone is so wildly inaccurate that any attempt to improve it will likely yield big gains.
Presumably you can account for the difference? If you can account for it then it's entirely conceivable that a system can as well. Whether any system can improve accuracy enough to compete with power meters is another matterUsing your power meter using ride buddy as a guide is completely useless - the power demand for two riders riding next to each other not only is quite variable rider to rider (e.g. for one of my mates his power riding next to me on flat road is ~35% less than mine)
- Alex Simmons/RST
- Expert
- Posts: 4997
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 3:51 pm
- Contact:
Re: Apple applies for patent to calculate cyclists' power from wind resistance and other factors
Postby Alex Simmons/RST » Fri May 19, 2017 3:17 pm
No, you can't. Unless you think a wristwatch has the ability to know the precise air movement, what you are wearing, your position on the bike and CdA data for each bit of clothing and kit set up and position and yaw angle, as well as know the relative location of everyone and everything in proximity to impact airflow, then I very much doubt it. The level of imprecision in such an approach is greater than the normal seasonal variation in human performance (power) for an experienced regular rider. IOW it's pretty pointless aside from the gimmick factor that might motivate some people to move more than they do now (but the exercise industry is littered with unused devices).RobertFrith wrote:Presumably you can account for the difference? If you can account for it then it's entirely conceivable that a system can as well. Whether any system can improve accuracy enough to compete with power meters is another matter
- Comedian
- Posts: 9166
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 7:35 pm
- Location: Brisbane
Re: Apple applies for patent to calculate cyclists' power from wind resistance and other factors
Postby Comedian » Sun May 21, 2017 9:41 am
I reckon this is a pretty interesting development by Apple. I reckon it could lead to athletes monitoring blood sugar while training..
https://www.macrumors.com/2017/05/18/ti ... e-monitor/
It also clearly has weight loss potential.
https://www.macrumors.com/2017/05/18/ti ... e-monitor/
It also clearly has weight loss potential.
Jump to
- General Australian Cycling Topics
- Info / announcements
- Buying a bike / parts
- General Cycling Discussion
- The Bike Shed
- Cycling Health
- Cycling Safety and Advocacy
- Women's Cycling
- Bike & Gear Reviews
- Cycling Trade
- Stolen Bikes
- Bicycle FAQs
- The Market Place
- Member to Member Bike and Gear Sales
- Want to Buy, Group Buy, Swap
- My Bikes or Gear Elsewhere
- Serious Biking
- Audax / Randonneuring
- Retro biking
- Commuting
- MTB
- Recumbents
- Fixed Gear/ Single Speed
- Track
- Electric Bicycles
- Cyclocross and Gravel Grinding
- Dragsters / Lowriders / Cruisers
- Children's Bikes
- Cargo Bikes and Utility Cycling
- Road Racing
- Road Biking
- Training
- Time Trial
- Triathlon
- International and National Tours and Events
- Cycle Touring
- Touring Australia
- Touring Overseas
- Touring Bikes and Equipment
- Australia
- Western Australia
- New South Wales
- Queensland
- South Australia
- Victoria
- ACT
- Tasmania
- Northern Territory
- Country & Regional
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
- All times are UTC+10:00
- Top
- Delete cookies
About the Australian Cycling Forums
The Australian Cycling Forums is a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.
Bicycles Network Australia
Forum Information
Connect with BNA
Brought to you by Bicycles Network Australia | © 1999 - 2024 | Powered by phpBB ®
This website uses affiliate links to retail platforms including ebay, amazon, proviz and ribble.
This website uses affiliate links to retail platforms including ebay, amazon, proviz and ribble.