Normalised Power for a sub section of a Ride
-
- Posts: 1176
- Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2013 4:58 pm
Normalised Power for a sub section of a Ride
Postby vosadrian » Fri Feb 09, 2018 3:37 pm
I am not particularly (at all!!) serious about training, but I like to see how my riding is going, and one way may be to look at power meter data for a ride activity. One thing I do realise is often a fast pace-line ride with a cycle of high power on the front and recovery when out of the wind will feel harder then a ride with similar average power done solo at a constant level (and I do both regularly). So I realise that Normalised Power is one way to compensate for this effect.
I use a Garmin Edge 520 that I upload to Garmin Connect that pushes across to Strava. Both these platforms have a form of Normalised Power or equivalent, but it is a value given for the whole ride. Often my activities include a light ride to warm up or commute to the main event and same afterwards. I can easily determine average power for the main event using analysis on Strava to highlight the section of the ride. But I can't see a way to get NP for the main event part of the ride. I was just wondering if anyone here had found a simple and free way to do this. I am not looking to pay a subscription to a training service that offers this, as I don't need that. I am perfectly happy to just potter away at it myself... I just want a way to compare efforts of my rides. I realise I could split my rides into seperate activities for each part, but that is a pain to manage and I will forget to do it once out there. Prefer something that can be done easily afterwards. I could crop the ride, but I like to record the other bits also. Probably Garmin Connect can do it, but I just have not worked out how.
Cheers,
Adrian
- kb
- Posts: 2570
- Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2011 3:22 pm
Re: Normalised Power for a sub section of a Ride
Postby kb » Fri Feb 09, 2018 4:52 pm
- Alex Simmons/RST
- Expert
- Posts: 4997
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 3:51 pm
- Contact:
Re: Normalised Power for a sub section of a Ride
Postby Alex Simmons/RST » Fri Feb 09, 2018 8:35 pm
For free you'd need Golden Cheetah. It'll provide both Normalized Power and XPower, the Phil Skiba version of NP.
-
- Posts: 1176
- Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2013 4:58 pm
Re: Normalised Power for a sub section of a Ride
Postby vosadrian » Mon Feb 12, 2018 10:46 am
I run Stravistix, so checked that and found it can do a segment... so I can just create a segment for the section I am after. I also had a play with veloviewer which I also use. It can view activities and allows you to highlight a section of the ride, and it will show averages for all your data for that section. It turns out in the power section with the average it will also do NP, so that works also.
Thanks again for your help!
- kb
- Posts: 2570
- Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2011 3:22 pm
Re: Normalised Power for a sub section of a Ride
Postby kb » Mon Feb 12, 2018 12:23 pm
- Alex Simmons/RST
- Expert
- Posts: 4997
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 3:51 pm
- Contact:
Re: Normalised Power for a sub section of a Ride
Postby Alex Simmons/RST » Mon Feb 12, 2018 4:49 pm
I'd stick with 30+ minutes as a minimum duration for NP segments (20-min at a pinch depending on what sort of rider you are / sort of ride you did).
-
- Posts: 1176
- Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2013 4:58 pm
Re: Normalised Power for a sub section of a Ride
Postby vosadrian » Tue Feb 13, 2018 11:37 am
My interest in NP was more to compare efforts solo to fast bunches. I typically do most of my rides solo, and will try to do a quasi TT once a week at near max 1 hour effort for me. I also tend to do one fast bunch 1 hour ride a week (near my limit), and I was interested to compare them. I think my FTP is about 280W (Predicted from Strava power graph), and the NP (VV) and weighted average (Stravistix) for the fast bunch for an hour was around 270W (245W average). That kind of all makes sense, as the bunch did ease off a couple times for a minute or two, so that would have reduced NP (and I think 280W NP is achievable), so the numbers kind of add up to where I think I am which is what I was after!
I'm not really training for anything. And my training is a loose term. Not much structure to it. Just a couple hard rides and several soft rides plus commuting a week. But I typically ease off over winter, so good to see how I am going this year at peak compared to last.
Cheers guys!
- Alex Simmons/RST
- Expert
- Posts: 4997
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 3:51 pm
- Contact:
Re: Normalised Power for a sub section of a Ride
Postby Alex Simmons/RST » Tue Feb 13, 2018 3:46 pm
-
- Posts: 1176
- Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2013 4:58 pm
Re: Normalised Power for a sub section of a Ride
Postby vosadrian » Tue Feb 13, 2018 4:35 pm
I thought the idea of NP was meant to equate varying power to a constant average power (as would be used for FTP). Is the 5% higher because it does not do a great job of the approximation... or perhaps it is physiology dependant? I tend to be more of a punchy rider who can do short duration at high power but not great at sustained climbing. I guess that sort of physiology would do better on NP, so perhaps my FTP is less than I think. I am trying to avoid doing an actual FTP test... difficult to manage and sounds like pain. Climbs around me last about 10 mins, so that is my longer sustained efforts. I think Strava somehow estimates FTP from that.Alex Simmons/RST wrote:NP from a hard hour of riding can be up to 5% higher than FTP. For very occasional freaks with a specific combination of physiological characteristics it may be higher.
- Alex Simmons/RST
- Expert
- Posts: 4997
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 3:51 pm
- Contact:
Re: Normalised Power for a sub section of a Ride
Postby Alex Simmons/RST » Tue Feb 13, 2018 6:15 pm
Some reading:vosadrian wrote:I thought the idea of NP was meant to equate varying power to a constant average power (as would be used for FTP). Is the 5% higher because it does not do a great job of the approximation... or perhaps it is physiology dependant? I tend to be more of a punchy rider who can do short duration at high power but not great at sustained climbing. I guess that sort of physiology would do better on NP, so perhaps my FTP is less than I think. I am trying to avoid doing an actual FTP test... difficult to manage and sounds like pain. Climbs around me last about 10 mins, so that is my longer sustained efforts. I think Strava somehow estimates FTP from that.Alex Simmons/RST wrote:NP from a hard hour of riding can be up to 5% higher than FTP. For very occasional freaks with a specific combination of physiological characteristics it may be higher.
http://alex-cycle.blogspot.com.au/2008/ ... -sins.html
http://alex-cycle.blogspot.com.au/2013/ ... t-iii.html
- MichaelB
- Posts: 14781
- Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 9:29 am
- Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Re: Normalised Power for a sub section of a Ride
Postby MichaelB » Thu Feb 15, 2018 1:45 pm
Whilst my free trial of cycling analytics is about to expire, I had a quick look, and it seems that what you are after can be done here. I've posted a pic below showing the full ride, and how I've spilt a climb into time splits (of 1:00 each), but you can also do the splits into distance (I've done it for time), but as Alex mentioned, it may not be useful for any meaningful calc
It shows a whol;e pile of metrics, including average power and Effective Power (I guess this is CA's version of Normalised power).
I almost stumped up for a year of CA (AT) A$80, but went for Training Peaks as it does just a few more bits that I like. Another luxury on top of a PM that I don't use properly, but hey, just got paid.
Oh, and on the ride this morning, set a new FTP of 300W
-
- Posts: 1176
- Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2013 4:58 pm
Re: Normalised Power for a sub section of a Ride
Postby vosadrian » Fri Feb 16, 2018 10:39 am
Congrats!!.... that is a number I would like to reach at some point. Something about round number thresholds that is satisfying!MichaelB wrote:Oh, and on the ride this morning, set a new FTP of 300W
- g-boaf
- Posts: 21326
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 6:11 pm
Re: Normalised Power for a sub section of a Ride
Postby g-boaf » Fri Feb 16, 2018 10:50 am
Bonus!MichaelB wrote:Oh, and on the ride this morning, set a new FTP of 300W
- MichaelB
- Posts: 14781
- Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 9:29 am
- Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Re: Normalised Power for a sub section of a Ride
Postby MichaelB » Fri Feb 16, 2018 1:22 pm
I'll take it though
Now, to lose another 15kg ...
-
- Posts: 1176
- Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2013 4:58 pm
Re: Normalised Power for a sub section of a Ride
Postby vosadrian » Fri Feb 23, 2018 12:14 pm
Not so sure about the fast bunch NP for FTP. It is just unlikely that you could work in a bunch that pushed you to your threshold limit exactly. There is always something that happens that brings things off the boil for a few minutes even if the bunch is pushing you to your limit. I did a NP of 280W for an hour in a bunch this morning, but there was a time the bunch got split at lights and I got through and then soft pedalled a couple minutes for the bunch to regroup. I know I could have maintained the pace we were doing throughout that time and finished as strong, but that would have bought the NP down. There were times I felt at my limit and other times I thought I was well within it. Having said that the idea of doing any more than 280W on a climb for an hour seems to induce painful thoughts!! I think NP benefits my physiology more than constant power.Alex Simmons/RST wrote:Some reading:vosadrian wrote:I thought the idea of NP was meant to equate varying power to a constant average power (as would be used for FTP). Is the 5% higher because it does not do a great job of the approximation... or perhaps it is physiology dependant? I tend to be more of a punchy rider who can do short duration at high power but not great at sustained climbing. I guess that sort of physiology would do better on NP, so perhaps my FTP is less than I think. I am trying to avoid doing an actual FTP test... difficult to manage and sounds like pain. Climbs around me last about 10 mins, so that is my longer sustained efforts. I think Strava somehow estimates FTP from that.Alex Simmons/RST wrote:NP from a hard hour of riding can be up to 5% higher than FTP. For very occasional freaks with a specific combination of physiological characteristics it may be higher.
http://alex-cycle.blogspot.com.au/2008/ ... -sins.html
http://alex-cycle.blogspot.com.au/2013/ ... t-iii.html
- Alex Simmons/RST
- Expert
- Posts: 4997
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 3:51 pm
- Contact:
Re: Normalised Power for a sub section of a Ride
Postby Alex Simmons/RST » Fri Feb 23, 2018 12:20 pm
It needs to be a hard hour. e.g. I've raced many hard hour long crits and had NP at or a tick over FTP.vosadrian wrote:Not so sure about the fast bunch NP for FTP
- g-boaf
- Posts: 21326
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 6:11 pm
Re: Normalised Power for a sub section of a Ride
Postby g-boaf » Fri Feb 23, 2018 12:54 pm
I don't think a bunch ride would be much use for FTP either, there are always things happening, slow downs for corners, etc.vosadrian wrote:Not so sure about the fast bunch NP for FTP. It is just unlikely that you could work in a bunch that pushed you to your threshold limit exactly. There is always something that happens that brings things off the boil for a few minutes even if the bunch is pushing you to your limit. I did a NP of 280W for an hour in a bunch this morning, but there was a time the bunch got split at lights and I got through and then soft pedalled a couple minutes for the bunch to regroup. I know I could have maintained the pace we were doing throughout that time and finished as strong, but that would have bought the NP down. There were times I felt at my limit and other times I thought I was well within it. Having said that the idea of doing any more than 280W on a climb for an hour seems to induce painful thoughts!! I think NP benefits my physiology more than constant power.Alex Simmons/RST wrote:Some reading:vosadrian wrote:
I thought the idea of NP was meant to equate varying power to a constant average power (as would be used for FTP). Is the 5% higher because it does not do a great job of the approximation... or perhaps it is physiology dependant? I tend to be more of a punchy rider who can do short duration at high power but not great at sustained climbing. I guess that sort of physiology would do better on NP, so perhaps my FTP is less than I think. I am trying to avoid doing an actual FTP test... difficult to manage and sounds like pain. Climbs around me last about 10 mins, so that is my longer sustained efforts. I think Strava somehow estimates FTP from that.
http://alex-cycle.blogspot.com.au/2008/ ... -sins.html
http://alex-cycle.blogspot.com.au/2013/ ... t-iii.html
I'd like to just get out on Wyatt Park one week day morning early and just go around that and see what I get. It is smooth, flat and no interruptions. More fun as well, less hot than being indoor.
- Alex Simmons/RST
- Expert
- Posts: 4997
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 3:51 pm
- Contact:
Re: Normalised Power for a sub section of a Ride
Postby Alex Simmons/RST » Fri Feb 23, 2018 2:28 pm
But if it's just a basic endurance group run, then no.
-
- Posts: 1176
- Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2013 4:58 pm
Re: Normalised Power for a sub section of a Ride
Postby vosadrian » Fri Feb 23, 2018 2:52 pm
This was a hard bunch ride (for me!). Not many bunch rides have light riders like me (<70kg) putting out 250W average/ 280W NP for an hour.... but it was a bunch ride on public roads with interruptions. I have raced up to club level A grade (mostly B), and this bunch is harder than any crit I have done. Admittedly, in a race, I am not typically looking to bury myself for an hour, so I normally sit in the bunch unless I have a reason to work, but with the bunch ride we roll turns and I do my turns rather than hide in the bunch. So my power numbers are typically a fair bit higher than a race.Alex Simmons/RST wrote:Don't forget that time spent not pedalling or recovering means you are able to go harder at other times than you might ordinarily be able to if riding a hard quasi-steady state effort. So if the overall (approx 1 hour) ride was hard, even though there were sections in which it wasn't, you may still find the NP is getting up there towards FTP.
But if it's just a basic endurance group run, then no.
I agree that the interruptions make it easier to do higher power afterwards due to the recovery they offer. It probably balances out in the wash.
At the end of the day, I did 280W NP for an hour. This is what I have thought my FTP is. I suspect if the bunch had not been interrupted I could have pushed that up to 285-290W NP, but I doubt very much that I could do more than 280W constant output on a climb for an hour. Typically I max out at around 300-320W average on the 10 minute climbs local to me. I am more of a roller who likes higher output for a minute or two and then some recovery time. I struggle more with sustained efforts.
-
- Posts: 572
- Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2015 5:13 pm
Re: Normalised Power for a sub section of a Ride
Postby madmacca » Tue Feb 27, 2018 10:42 am
Garmin itself will provide NP per lap. So turning off autolap, and manually starting and ending a "lap" for the main portion of your ride should do it. Free, but remembering to hit the lap button again after an hour around FTP might not be "easy".vosadrian wrote:Hi All,
I am not particularly (at all!!) serious about training, but I like to see how my riding is going, and one way may be to look at power meter data for a ride activity. One thing I do realise is often a fast pace-line ride with a cycle of high power on the front and recovery when out of the wind will feel harder then a ride with similar average power done solo at a constant level (and I do both regularly). So I realise that Normalised Power is one way to compensate for this effect.
I use a Garmin Edge 520 that I upload to Garmin Connect that pushes across to Strava. Both these platforms have a form of Normalised Power or equivalent, but it is a value given for the whole ride. Often my activities include a light ride to warm up or commute to the main event and same afterwards. I can easily determine average power for the main event using analysis on Strava to highlight the section of the ride. But I can't see a way to get NP for the main event part of the ride. I was just wondering if anyone here had found a simple and free way to do this. I am not looking to pay a subscription to a training service that offers this, as I don't need that. I am perfectly happy to just potter away at it myself... I just want a way to compare efforts of my rides. I realise I could split my rides into seperate activities for each part, but that is a pain to manage and I will forget to do it once out there. Prefer something that can be done easily afterwards. I could crop the ride, but I like to record the other bits also. Probably Garmin Connect can do it, but I just have not worked out how.
Cheers,
Adrian
Alternatively you could leave autolap on and just look at the relevant laps, although these won't be aligned with the start and finish of the main part of the ride.
- General Australian Cycling Topics
- Info / announcements
- Buying a bike / parts
- General Cycling Discussion
- The Bike Shed
- Cycling Health
- Cycling Safety and Advocacy
- Women's Cycling
- Bike & Gear Reviews
- Cycling Trade
- Stolen Bikes
- Bicycle FAQs
- The Market Place
- Member to Member Bike and Gear Sales
- Want to Buy, Group Buy, Swap
- My Bikes or Gear Elsewhere
- Serious Biking
- Audax / Randonneuring
- Retro biking
- Commuting
- MTB
- Recumbents
- Fixed Gear/ Single Speed
- Track
- Electric Bicycles
- Cyclocross and Gravel Grinding
- Dragsters / Lowriders / Cruisers
- Children's Bikes
- Cargo Bikes and Utility Cycling
- Road Racing
- Road Biking
- Training
- Time Trial
- Triathlon
- International and National Tours and Events
- Cycle Touring
- Touring Australia
- Touring Overseas
- Touring Bikes and Equipment
- Australia
- Western Australia
- New South Wales
- Queensland
- South Australia
- Victoria
- ACT
- Tasmania
- Northern Territory
- Country & Regional
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
- All times are UTC+11:00
- Top
- Delete cookies
About the Australian Cycling Forums
The Australian Cycling Forums is a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.
Bicycles Network Australia
Forum Information
Connect with BNA
This website uses affiliate links to retail platforms including ebay, amazon, proviz and ribble.