Heart rate levels
The information / discussion in the Cycling Health Forum is not qualified medical advice. Please consult your doctor.
-
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Wed May 18, 2011 9:03 pm
Heart rate levels
Postby TrekStar » Sat May 21, 2011 6:37 pm
Are there any health professionals out there who can indicate whether this is within acceptable range, and the things I need to look out for? I know my heart rate goes down to 90-100 after 5-10 mins rest (those mid ride coffee breaks).
Thanks in advance.
- sogood
- Posts: 17168
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
- Location: Sydney AU
Re: Heart rate levels
Postby sogood » Sat May 21, 2011 7:04 pm
As for whether you are in the "acceptable range". That's a pretty meaningless question given HR response varies significantly with the individual. The only thing that can be said at present is that you are alive and your heart responds in the right direction to exercise/rest.
There are many past threads that discussed how to implement HR based training and how to determine HRmax correctly. Otherwise Google is your friend here.
RK wrote:And that is Wikipedia - I can write my own definition.
-
- Posts: 936
- Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 4:33 pm
Re: Heart rate levels
Postby you cannot be sirrus » Sat May 21, 2011 7:28 pm
My figures have always seemed high to me but my GP isn't concerned and all other medical checks are fine. As long as it keeps ticking I'm happy.
-
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Wed May 18, 2011 9:03 pm
Re: Heart rate levels
Postby TrekStar » Sat May 21, 2011 9:15 pm
you cannot be sirrus wrote:As sogood suggested "acceptable range" is a fairly loose measure. I was discussing this topic this morning with a 72yo who still races, his ave is 140 and max just over 160. I'm 50 and average 161 on all my rides this year with a max of 201.
My figures have always seemed high to me but my GP isn't concerned and all other medical checks are fine. As long as it keeps ticking I'm happy.
Reading was from my Garmin HRM during rides. The latest reading was this morning during my first time ever my climb up Mt Coo-tha, Brisbane - I think I pretty hit max there!
I know placement of the HRM can muck up readings - once I didn't fit it on properly and it slipped to my belly/waist level and my HRM was reading 250!
- sogood
- Posts: 17168
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
- Location: Sydney AU
Heart rate levels
Postby sogood » Sat May 21, 2011 10:24 pm
HRmax isn't calculated unless one isn't serious about HR zone training.Oxford wrote:books that will assist with calculating max HR and zones.
RK wrote:And that is Wikipedia - I can write my own definition.
- gururug
- Posts: 1531
- Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 12:05 am
Re: Heart rate levels
Postby gururug » Sat May 21, 2011 10:48 pm
under 175max or over 195max at your age i'd be wondering why.....
- sogood
- Posts: 17168
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
- Location: Sydney AU
Re: Heart rate levels
Postby sogood » Sat May 21, 2011 11:24 pm
Why?gururug wrote:under 175max or over 195max at your age i'd be wondering why.....
RK wrote:And that is Wikipedia - I can write my own definition.
- grantw
- Posts: 1792
- Joined: Mon Nov 09, 2009 11:22 am
- Location: Wollongong
Re: Heart rate levels
Postby grantw » Sun May 22, 2011 11:55 am
Based on the nominal Max HR calculation of 220 - age (44) my max HR should be 178 but if that's accurate I spent 2 hours anaerobically training this morning so clearly either the HR monitor isn't so accurate or the calculation isn't.
cheers
grant
- David_G
- Posts: 790
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2011 1:01 pm
- Location: Frankston Victoria
Re: Heart rate levels
Postby David_G » Sun May 22, 2011 12:28 pm
I'm 56 and I saw a cardiologist for the annual check up two weeks ago and said that my max HR was up around 178, he said no worries about that (I've got 3 stents in there and don't want any more). My average is 156 nearly every ride and my rides average out at 2hrs. He was also well pleased with that.
All that is what is the go for me, my tip is go and see a GP or Cardiologist and get some advice specific to you. It doesn't cost much and you'll be riding with a little more knowledge which is always a good thing.
- Alex Simmons/RST
- Expert
- Posts: 4997
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 3:51 pm
- Contact:
Re: Heart rate levels
Postby Alex Simmons/RST » Sun May 22, 2011 12:38 pm
1. Generic age based formula are only applied to populations, not individuals. It has a standard deviation of about 15 bpm.grantw wrote:Based on the nominal Max HR calculation of 220 - age (44) my max HR should be 178 but if that's accurate I spent 2 hours anaerobically training this morning so clearly either the HR monitor isn't so accurate or the calculation isn't.
Anyone giving specific HR range advice to an individual based on a formula doesn't know what they are on about.
2. Your HRmax is what it is. No formula will ever tell you what it is.
3. Your HR can never tell you that you are training "anaerobically".
4. HRMs are also often susceptible to invalid maximum readings due to a range of reasons. An inspection of a HR plot v time should make it easier to detect anomalous data.
- greyhoundtom
- Posts: 3023
- Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 6:28 am
- Location: Wherever the sun is shining
- Contact:
Re: Heart rate levels
Postby greyhoundtom » Sun May 22, 2011 2:04 pm
The problem being that at 67 years of age I suffer ectopic heart beats during strenuous exercise, and this completely throws the heart rate monitor readings out of kilter.
It kind of makes you worry when your monitor shows you that your maximum heart rate was 220.
- sogood
- Posts: 17168
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
- Location: Sydney AU
Heart rate levels
Postby sogood » Sun May 22, 2011 2:27 pm
Be thankful you only have ectopics!greyhoundtom wrote:The problem being that at 67 years of age I suffer ectopic heart beats during strenuous exercise...
Go by perceived effort or a PM if you want to dent your CC.
RK wrote:And that is Wikipedia - I can write my own definition.
- grantw
- Posts: 1792
- Joined: Mon Nov 09, 2009 11:22 am
- Location: Wollongong
Re: Heart rate levels
Postby grantw » Sun May 22, 2011 3:47 pm
Fair enough. I was only trying to illustrate the problem with using the calculated maximum from my own experience this morning.Alex Simmons/RST wrote:1. Generic age based formula are only applied to populations, not individuals. It has a standard deviation of about 15 bpm.grantw wrote:Based on the nominal Max HR calculation of 220 - age (44) my max HR should be 178 but if that's accurate I spent 2 hours anaerobically training this morning so clearly either the HR monitor isn't so accurate or the calculation isn't.
Anyone giving specific HR range advice to an individual based on a formula doesn't know what they are on about.
2. Your HRmax is what it is. No formula will ever tell you what it is.
3. Your HR can never tell you that you are training "anaerobically".
4. HRMs are also often susceptible to invalid maximum readings due to a range of reasons. An inspection of a HR plot v time should make it easier to detect anomalous data.
Moving on then, is there actually a purpose of knowing your maximum Heart Rate, especially if you are like me, reasonably active recreational cyclist? And really any point in wearing the HR monitor?
cheers
grant
- Alex Simmons/RST
- Expert
- Posts: 4997
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 3:51 pm
- Contact:
Re: Heart rate levels
Postby Alex Simmons/RST » Sun May 22, 2011 4:51 pm
The primary purpose for knowing MHR (through actually performing an effort to elicit MHR) is for setting of training levels, which are HR ranges based on a various %'s of MHR.grantw wrote:Moving on then, is there actually a purpose of knowing your maximum Heart Rate?
e.g.
< 70% - recovery rides
75-78% - quality endurance rides
78-85% - core endurance / high tempo
85-93% - time trial efforts / long hill climbs
92-100% - maximal aerobic / short hill climbs (< 5-min)
One can also do a similar thing using a "threshold" HR, which is the average HR from a well paced maximal effort lasting about 30-60 minutes. HR training level % ranges are adjusted accordingly using threshold HR as the anchor point.
Only reasons for knowing your HR are if:grantw wrote:especially if you are like me, reasonably active recreational cyclist? And really any point in wearing the HR monitor?
1. you have a medical reason for keeping an eye on it
2. you want to use it (along with perceived exertion) to help guide the intensity of effort during sub-maximal / relatively steady state riding (based on the training levels as calculated and based on your individual HR response). This then is only of interest if you are riding with the specific purpose of improving fitness (i.e. want to make sure you are riding at an appropriate effort level in order to elicit the desired physiological adaptations).
Whether or not either apply to you, I can't really say. I'm a recreational cyclist too, but my recreation involves racing up to and including at world/international level.
Hope that helps!
-
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Wed May 18, 2011 9:03 pm
Re: Heart rate levels
Postby TrekStar » Sun May 22, 2011 5:31 pm
Fair enough. I was only trying to illustrate the problem with using the calculated maximum from my own experience this morning.
Moving on then, is there actually a purpose of knowing your maximum Heart Rate, especially if you are like me, reasonably active recreational cyclist? And really any point in wearing the HR monitor?
cheers
grant[/quote]
I'm monitoring my heart rate to make sure I am riding within the zones where I can build endurance and also do intervals to increase VO2Max. I know I don't have fancy lab readings and I might be doing this recreationally, but I feel better that I am doing what I can to improve my fitness and conditioning.
- sogood
- Posts: 17168
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
- Location: Sydney AU
Re: Heart rate levels
Postby sogood » Sun May 22, 2011 6:45 pm
Unless you have an accurate HRmax, only God knows what zone you've been riding in. Then it becomes more of a motivator and gadget to keep you interested rather than a true training tool. One can feel better through placebo too.TrekStar wrote:I'm monitoring my heart rate to make sure I am riding within the zones where I can build endurance and also do intervals to increase VO2Max. I know I don't have fancy lab readings and I might be doing this recreationally, but I feel better that I am doing what I can to improve my fitness and conditioning.
RK wrote:And that is Wikipedia - I can write my own definition.
-
- Posts: 936
- Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 4:33 pm
Re: Heart rate levels
Postby you cannot be sirrus » Sun May 22, 2011 6:55 pm
My theory is to find true MHR one has to push ever further until one has a heart attack, then deduct 1 bpm. Not game to go to that extreme just yet.
-
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 3:33 pm
- Location: Canberra
Re: Heart rate levels
Postby WhoRoo » Sun May 22, 2011 6:58 pm
- sogood
- Posts: 17168
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
- Location: Sydney AU
Re: Heart rate levels
Postby sogood » Sun May 22, 2011 7:21 pm
That's not correct for a heathy individual. You may not feel comfortable at HRmax, but the heart can and will keep pumping at HRmax without complaint. It's the rest of the body that'll eventually stop you through pain or fatigue. The heart does not fatigue as long as there's a normal supply of O2 and glucose.you cannot be sirrus wrote:My theory is to find true MHR one has to push ever further until one has a heart attack, then deduct 1 bpm. Not game to go to that extreme just yet.
RK wrote:And that is Wikipedia - I can write my own definition.
- Alex Simmons/RST
- Expert
- Posts: 4997
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 3:51 pm
- Contact:
Re: Heart rate levels
Postby Alex Simmons/RST » Sun May 22, 2011 7:34 pm
+1sogood wrote:That's not correct for a heathy individual. You may not feel comfortable at HRmax, but the heart can and will keep pumping at HRmax without complaint. It's the rest of the body that'll eventually stop you through pain or fatigue. The heart does not fatigue as long as there's a normal supply of O2 and glucose.you cannot be sirrus wrote:My theory is to find true MHR one has to push ever further until one has a heart attack, then deduct 1 bpm. Not game to go to that extreme just yet.
The heart in a healthy individual will take whatever is thrown at it.
-
- Posts: 936
- Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 4:33 pm
Re: Heart rate levels
Postby you cannot be sirrus » Sun May 22, 2011 7:50 pm
- grantw
- Posts: 1792
- Joined: Mon Nov 09, 2009 11:22 am
- Location: Wollongong
Re: Heart rate levels
Postby grantw » Mon May 23, 2011 5:51 am
Yes, that does clear up quite a bit. ThanksAlex Simmons/RST wrote:
Hope that helps!
Cheers
grant
- Sweeper59
- Posts: 826
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 1:37 pm
- Location: Port Macquarie NSW
Re: Heart rate levels
Postby Sweeper59 » Mon May 23, 2011 1:41 pm
So, like others have suggested, I went hard doing a few reps of a steep hill near my place (Lighthouse Beach, Pt Macquarie) and checked my maximum. I now use 190 bpm as my max - not too bad for a 51 y.o.
I also wore my HRM when I went out for a morning of paintball recently. One of the exercises involved setting an ambush for our opponents, who had to get at least 1 member of their group to the end of a 400m bush track. I noticed that even though I was lying as still as possible in long grass for a couple of minutes, waiting for the opposing group, my heart rate was over 140 bpm - so obviously adrenalin has a big impact on your heart rate!
Nobody looks back on their life....and remembers the nights they got plenty of sleep !!
- sogood
- Posts: 17168
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
- Location: Sydney AU
Heart rate levels
Postby sogood » Mon May 23, 2011 2:51 pm
RK wrote:And that is Wikipedia - I can write my own definition.
- General Australian Cycling Topics
- Info / announcements
- Buying a bike / parts
- General Cycling Discussion
- The Bike Shed
- Cycling Health
- Cycling Safety and Advocacy
- Women's Cycling
- Bike & Gear Reviews
- Cycling Trade
- Stolen Bikes
- Bicycle FAQs
- Serious Biking
- Audax / Randonneuring
- Retro biking
- Commuting
- MTB
- Recumbents
- Fixed Gear/ Single Speed
- Track
- Electric Bicycles
- Cyclocross and Gravel Grinding
- Dragsters / Lowriders / Cruisers
- Children's Bikes
- Cargo Bikes and Utility Cycling
- Road Racing
- Road Biking
- Training
- Time Trial
- Triathlon
- International and National Tours and Events
- Cycle Touring
- Touring Australia
- Touring Overseas
- Touring Bikes and Equipment
- Australia
- Western Australia
- New South Wales
- Queensland
- South Australia
- Victoria
- ACT
- Tasmania
- Northern Territory
- Country & Regional
- The Market Place
- Member to Member Bike and Gear Sales
- Want to Buy, Group Buy, Swap
- My Bikes or Gear Elsewhere
- Cycling Brands
- Cannondale
- Garmin
- Giant
- Shimano
- Trek
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
- All times are UTC+11:00
- Top
- Delete cookies
About the Australian Cycling Forums
The Australian Cycling Forums is a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.
Bicycles Network Australia
Forum Information
Connect with BNA
This website uses affiliate links to retail platforms including ebay, amazon, proviz and ribble.