twizzle wrote:Oh, O.K., I'll get in a last comment then.
If anyone wants to read up the input on my POV, read Joe Friel's stuff in "the cyclist training bible", Friel/Cordain's "The Paleo Diet for Athletes", "The Smarter Science of Slim" and "Breaking the vicious cycle". All point roughly in the same direction - a lot of what we eat is bad for us, because we don't process it well and it can lead to major health issues. What people eat is up to them, but having a general understanding of digestion can't hurt. And Cordain's view of "suitability of foods" makes sense to me, so I lean in that direction. I need around 16,000Kj's a day, it's pretty hard to achieve this without grains unless you eat a lot of meat as well.
Thanks Mods. I am LMAO here....everybody have a piece of fruit.
Twizz, if anyone wants to read up on my POV,
- go study what the AIS recommends to elite athletes, or go see an AIS trained dietitian. Is it ok to make that recommendation Mods? or is sports science consensus inferior to the views of populist diet authors?
The AIS publish a lot of info for free on the net, and to parallel several posters above in their criticism of John McDougall, are not out to make a million from book sales and outlandish and controversial statements, like Loren Cordain and whichever co-authors he partners with.
- then go read 50 years of diet literature, and take note of which groups have lower rates of the morbidity that plagues Western civilization.
Ah look....I realize I am being unreasonable Twiz in what my POV is based on....So let's say, just forget it....don't bother...let's just all do our own thing....and let Charlie Darwin sort it. Eat as many barbecued and grilled kangabangas as you like, and I'll do green smoothies and brown rice.