Mountainbiking central
by LoveB » Sat Jun 11, 2011 1:19 pm
yeah its an old 2005 fork... but I've currently got an rst gila with 100mm travel and was looking for a cheap 140 travel fork to use on the new frame for now.
Is it worth getting an old 2005 fork for 100$? apparently just ovrehauled then stored. Or am I better off saving up for a more modern forK?
-
LoveB
-
- Posts: 533
- Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 5:33 pm
by Forum Ads » Sat Jun 11, 2011 8:32 pm
-
Forum Ads
-
by Mulger bill » Sat Jun 11, 2011 8:32 pm
Depends on the condition of the internals.
Hang on, what frame? If it aint designed for 140ish mm forks then you'll have handling issues and possibly snap the head tube off.
...whatever the road rules, self-preservation is the absolute priority for a cyclist when mixing it with motorised traffic. London Boy 29/12/2011
-

Mulger bill
- Super Mod

-
- Posts: 22801
- Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 2:41 pm
- Location: Sunbury Vic
by LoveB » Sun Jun 12, 2011 2:15 am
The frame is an xtension xplore.. 140-160 is fine i was told
-
LoveB
-
- Posts: 533
- Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 5:33 pm
by alchemist » Sun Jun 12, 2011 9:11 am
Not sure I'd want to run a 100mm fork on that frame, so for $100 it's probably better than the RST.
-
alchemist
-
- Posts: 780
- Joined: Thu May 17, 2007 6:59 pm
by Mulger bill » Sun Jun 12, 2011 4:58 pm
Just Googled it, the fork travel looks ideal for the frame, just make sure its in good nick.
...whatever the road rules, self-preservation is the absolute priority for a cyclist when mixing it with motorised traffic. London Boy 29/12/2011
-

Mulger bill
- Super Mod

-
- Posts: 22801
- Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 2:41 pm
- Location: Sunbury Vic
by LoveB » Sun Jun 12, 2011 6:06 pm
for 200$ more I'm being offered a fox vanilla 36 though... and for 100$ more a bnew whitebrothers fluid 120. Oh what to choose!
-
LoveB
-
- Posts: 533
- Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 5:33 pm
by Mulger bill » Sun Jun 12, 2011 10:27 pm
Again, condition dependant. Fox is niiice.
...whatever the road rules, self-preservation is the absolute priority for a cyclist when mixing it with motorised traffic. London Boy 29/12/2011
-

Mulger bill
- Super Mod

-
- Posts: 22801
- Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 2:41 pm
- Location: Sunbury Vic
by LoveB » Sun Jun 12, 2011 11:58 pm
Fox is in fantastic condition. Lowered to 140 from 160mm. Guy selling it is the guy i bought the frame from and he used to be a bike parts dealer so I reckon hes taken care of them. no scratches etc and his other bikes still look fantastic. Now the only problem is getting the extra 200$ up for it! lol
-
LoveB
-
- Posts: 533
- Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 5:33 pm
by Mulger bill » Mon Jun 13, 2011 11:08 am
Save now, save HARD! Even if you have to live on two minute noodles and spam for a week. 
...whatever the road rules, self-preservation is the absolute priority for a cyclist when mixing it with motorised traffic. London Boy 29/12/2011
-

Mulger bill
- Super Mod

-
- Posts: 22801
- Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 2:41 pm
- Location: Sunbury Vic
by trailgumby » Mon Jun 13, 2011 12:59 pm
Sounds like a good deal. I'll kick your butt climbing hills though 
"People have a right to their own opinions, but not their own facts. Evidence must be located, not created, and opinions not backed by evidence cannot be given much weight." -- James W Loewen http://www.facebook.com/Drive2WorkDay
-

trailgumby
-
- Posts: 8349
- Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 4:30 pm
- Location: Northern Beaches, Sydney
by LoveB » Tue Jun 14, 2011 2:09 am
trailgumby wrote:Sounds like a good deal. I'll kick your butt climbing hills though 
Even if I had a better bike you probably still would anyway lol He's got it lowered down to 140.. Now I found a marzocchi 66 for less than the fox but I think they are 180mm travel. Too much for what I need im pretty sure
-
LoveB
-
- Posts: 533
- Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 5:33 pm
Return to MTB
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
|
|