2x10 vs 3x10, discuss?

Mountainbiking central

2x10 vs 3x10, discuss?

Postby Jean » Tue Apr 10, 2012 9:51 pm

Hi,

There's a small thread on this (started by Mulger I think) in one of the other sub-forums, but I wanted to bring it up again as I'm mulling over this issue for my On-One build-up. I've gone to Sheldon's site and punched in lots of sprocket variables, and on paper there's not a lot of difference between the gear spread of a 2x10 vs 3x10, you really just lose a bit of the extremes at at either end - neither of which I think I ever use.

I play around with the odd MTB event, and while I'd like to get into marathon type events a bit more (and few local XC dashes too I think) I'm certainly no hard core XC racer. I'm a heavy rider (>100kg), and at 42 not getting any younger, but I must say I very rarely use my granny gear. Maybe the terrain around Canberra just doesn't require it, but I can only think of one short sharp rocky hill where I do drop to the granny, but otherwise I get pretty much anywhere on the back of my 32 middle ring (like lots of riders).

With 2x10 I guess I'd be shifting at the front more often. Maybe it's best to stick with a triple and be 'ready just in case', but something about 2x10 attracts me (probably ex 20-something road racer vanity as much as anything). I've got a mate who's just got a 2x10 (X-9) equipped trail bike and he's pretty keen on his drive train. I might ask him for spin to try it out, but I'd be keen to hear of people's experiences and/or views?

Cheers
User avatar
Jean
 
Posts: 1484
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2008 8:26 am
Location: Canberra

by BNA » Tue Apr 10, 2012 10:42 pm

BNA
 

Re: 2x10 vs 3x10, discuss?

Postby toolonglegs » Tue Apr 10, 2012 10:42 pm

I have gone 2 by 9 (26/38 11-34) ... mainly because my 48 XT big ring was making ground clearance a problem sometimes.
It works fine for me... all depends on what sort of rider you are.
100% I will go 2 by 10 next time round.
Image
User avatar
toolonglegs
 
Posts: 14405
Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 7:49 pm
Location: Somewhere with padded walls and really big hills!

Re: 2x10 vs 3x10, discuss?

Postby jules21 » Thu Apr 12, 2012 10:35 am

i have bikes with 2x10 and 3x9.

the 2x10 is slightly compromised on very steep pinches (26t chainring vs. 22 on my triple). i do use the 22x36 so it is a compromise, but only a small one. as TLL said, the better ground clearance is a bonus. there's also less "oops i thought i was on the bottom ring" sliding backwards (and flipping over) on steep pinches moments - but that could just be me :)
Image
User avatar
jules21
 
Posts: 8733
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 10:14 pm
Location: deep in the pain cave

Re: 2x10 vs 3x10, discuss?

Postby Mugglechops » Thu Apr 12, 2012 2:06 pm

I thought about it and decided I really wanted the lower gearing of 3x10. Some hills I climb need that 24-36, I just wish it was 22-36.

On my Reign I run 2x9 but that was easy as taking off the big ring. It's not built for speed and the extra clearance is great for riding over stuff.
User avatar
Mugglechops
 
Posts: 2365
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2011 5:51 pm
Location: Shoalhaven

Re: 2x10 vs 3x10, discuss?

Postby m@ » Thu Apr 12, 2012 3:10 pm

My 29er came with a 2x10 group (needs it for clearance due to the low BB)... I haven't run out of gears at either end of the spectrum at Bruce Ridge, Majura, Kowen etc - in fact the bike climbs better on the steep stuff than either of the 3x10 26" bikes I test rode before buying the 29er.
With 2x10 I guess I'd be shifting at the front more often.
My experience is the exact opposite - the straghter chainline lets me access almost every sprocket from either chainring so front shifts are rare unless the terrain undulates between steep uphill and steep downhill. The tradeoff is that the difference between chainrings is pretty large, so if you want a nearby gear and shift on the front you'll need to shift two or three sprockets at the back - but generally better to just shift at the back in this situation.
harmonix1234 wrote:Forecast for Hobart next week is rain, sleet, ice and all kinds of hell.
HTFU harmonix.
User avatar
m@
Super Mod
Super Mod
 
Posts: 4459
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 12:20 pm
Location: Northlandia

Re: 2x10 vs 3x10, discuss?

Postby skull » Thu Apr 12, 2012 8:23 pm

Skull rides 2 X 10 and you should too.

I have ridden some real steep climbs on the 2 X 10 and never run out of gears. It is by far superior than 3 X.
User avatar
skull
 
Posts: 1682
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 9:48 pm

Re: 2x10 vs 3x10, discuss?

Postby PaulMoran » Fri Apr 13, 2012 8:21 pm

Agree with the above - have just moved from 3 x to 2 x - range is still very rideable & you save weight not having the 3rd crank .....win-win!
PaulMoran
 
Posts: 67
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 7:33 am
Location: The Shire

2x10 vs 3x10, discuss?

Postby gassyndrome » Fri Apr 13, 2012 10:45 pm

Right now I have x.9 triple. If I was to move to 2x10 is there any part of the drivetrain that could be salvaged?
gassyndrome
 
Posts: 137
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 9:06 pm

Re: 2x10 vs 3x10, discuss?

Postby antipodean » Fri Apr 13, 2012 10:49 pm

24/38 - 11/36 2x10 combination on my 29er is perfect, have yet to find a situation where I need a lower gear.
2013 Oppy SL
2013 Boardman CX Pro
2012 KHS Yuma 29er
antipodean
 
Posts: 963
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2008 4:48 pm


Return to MTB

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users



Popular Bike Shops
Torpedo 7 Torpedo7 AU
Ground Effect Ground Effect NZ
Chain Reaction Cycles CRC UK
Wiggle Wiggle UK
Ebay Ebay AU

“Bicycles BNA Twitter
“Bicycles BNA Facebook
“Google+ BNA Google+
“Bicycles BNA Newsletter

> FREE BNA Stickers
> BNA Cycling Kit