Mandatory Helmet Laws & stuff (MHL discussion)

User avatar
im_no_pro
Super Mod
Super Mod
Posts: 6028
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 10:29 pm
Location: Geelong

Mandatory Helmet Laws & stuff (MHL discussion)

Postby im_no_pro » Fri Aug 20, 2010 5:02 pm

Update: New Sub Forum added to cater for cycling safety discussions, so no longer a 'one and only helmet thread'


Welcome to the helmet thread. All discussion relating to the use (mandatory or otherwise) of helmets belongs here. All other new MHL (or similar) threads will be closed and a link given redirecting members to this thread. Existing threads will eventually be redirected to here if they continue to get traffic.

If you feel your discussion warrants a seperate topic, please PM AU bicycles or a Moderator with details prior to posting your thread, or it will be locked. Obvious exceptions are in the Marketplace or Bike & Gear Review sections.

Standard forum guidelines apply in this thread, no flaming, no personal attacks etc etc. If you havent read the guidelines or need a refresher, you can find them here. If you feel a post has breached the guidelines, please do not respond as this is where flaming often begins. Instead, click on the report post Image button at the bottom of the post and the moderators will take appropriate action where required.

Note: Given how heated helmet threads have become in the past, breaches of the guidelines in this thread will be given very little tolerance. Please think before you post.

Edit: Also see Forum Announcement here
master6 wrote: Moderators are like Club Handicappers; I often think they are wrong, but I dont want the job.

User avatar
damhooligan
Posts: 3409
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 5:16 pm
Location: melbourne
Contact:

Re: The one (and only) HELMET THREAD

Postby damhooligan » Fri Aug 20, 2010 5:09 pm

good idea.

I wil start .
Helmet use should not be mandatory.
The dutch have one word to describe the aussie MHL, this word is ;
SCHIJNVEILIGHEID !!

}SkOrPn--7
Posts: 2406
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2008 7:15 pm

Re: The one (and only) HELMET THREAD

Postby }SkOrPn--7 » Fri Aug 20, 2010 5:45 pm

My parents took it upon them self so make Helmets Mandatory when I was born that was 50 years ago been wearing it since every day............................ :wink:

User avatar
damhooligan
Posts: 3409
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 5:16 pm
Location: melbourne
Contact:

Re: The one (and only) HELMET THREAD

Postby damhooligan » Fri Aug 20, 2010 5:53 pm

}SkOrPn--7 wrote:My parents took it upon them self so make Helmets Mandatory when I was born that was 50 years ago been wearing it since every day............................ :wink:
here is what a professor say about them mandatory laws..

ProfessorChrisRissel wrote:I do not advocate for repealing seat-belt legislation, because the evidence is very, very strong that they reduced head injuries in the community.

This is not the case with bicycle helmets. I agree that no one study answers all the questions one might have about the legislation, and my study did not attempt to do this.

I agree helmets offer some protection to the head at an individual level, but the evidence indicates that the effects of legislation are not apparent at the community level over time. A policy that affects the entire community should show effects at that level.

At the time Professor McDermott was with the Victorian Road Trauma Committee there were many serious problems with road injuries, and the desire to improve bicyclist safety was admirable. However, with hindsight, we can see that there were many other strategies and programs that improved the injury rates, but the helmet legislation was a negligible contribution.

At that time we didn't have the enormous problems with obesity, diabetes and renal failure that we do now. We know that helmets represent a barrier to people cycling and the health effects of more people cycling and being active far outweigh the injury.

One final point is about the way we talk about risk. The case-control studies that indicate that cyclists with head injuries admitted to hospital without helmets might have an increased-odds ratio of likelihood of injury of 20 or 30 per cent compared to wearing helmets make the risk seem higher than they really are.

The absolute risk of any individual on a bicycle getting a head injury might be in the order of one in a million, and even doubling the risk (an odds ratio of 2.0) to two in a million, it is still tiny. The known risks of getting overweight or developing diabetes from inactivity are many times more significant that the injury risk.

If helmet legislation was such a good idea, why hasn't the rest of the world followed suit? The fact is that in the countries with high cycling rates, Australia's helmet legislation is a joke.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010 ... site=email
The dutch have one word to describe the aussie MHL, this word is ;
SCHIJNVEILIGHEID !!

}SkOrPn--7
Posts: 2406
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2008 7:15 pm

Re: The one (and only) HELMET THREAD

Postby }SkOrPn--7 » Fri Aug 20, 2010 6:04 pm

damhooligan wrote:
}SkOrPn--7 wrote:My parents took it upon them self so make Helmets Mandatory when I was born that was 50 years ago been wearing it since every day............................ :wink:
here is what a professor say about them mandatory laws..

Damhool my comment was below the belt humour it was a surgical decision I had no control over.................. :D

User avatar
damhooligan
Posts: 3409
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 5:16 pm
Location: melbourne
Contact:

Re: The one (and only) HELMET THREAD

Postby damhooligan » Fri Aug 20, 2010 6:19 pm

}SkOrPn--7 wrote:
damhooligan wrote:
}SkOrPn--7 wrote:My parents took it upon them self so make Helmets Mandatory when I was born that was 50 years ago been wearing it since every day............................ :wink:
here is what a professor say about them mandatory laws..

Damhool my comment was below the belt humour it was a surgical decision I had no control over.................. :D
I understand, i was trying to start a serous discussion here, sorry won't happen again..Image

Image


Image

Image

Image
The dutch have one word to describe the aussie MHL, this word is ;
SCHIJNVEILIGHEID !!

}SkOrPn--7
Posts: 2406
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2008 7:15 pm

Re: The one (and only) HELMET THREAD

Postby }SkOrPn--7 » Fri Aug 20, 2010 6:28 pm

Don't be sorry Damhool it's cool............ :D IDGARA about helmet discussions so I was simply placing some of my poor humour into a thread I don't care about so it's me that needs to keep out allowing folks to continue with the pages of dribble.

User avatar
damhooligan
Posts: 3409
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 5:16 pm
Location: melbourne
Contact:

Re: The one (and only) HELMET THREAD

Postby damhooligan » Fri Aug 20, 2010 6:36 pm

}SkOrPn--7 wrote:Don't be sorry Damhool it's cool............ :D IDGARA about helmet discussions so I was simply placing some of my poor humour into a thread I don't care about so it's me that needs to keep out allowing folks to continue with the pages of dribble.
nah it's ok i love humor.... :mrgreen:
And pineapple... :mrgreen:
The dutch have one word to describe the aussie MHL, this word is ;
SCHIJNVEILIGHEID !!

User avatar
open roader
Posts: 3642
Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2009 7:05 pm
Location: Dueling Banjo Country, Otway fringes, Victoria

Re: The one (and only) HELMET THREAD

Postby open roader » Fri Aug 20, 2010 6:44 pm

I think helmets should not be mandatory

BUT

I also think people should take responsibilty for thier own actions - I don't want to see any more 'work' for the legal fraternity

I also want to see Australia's capital cities (and others) having successful on street rental bike cultures - mandatory helmet laws are a major hindrance to the uptake by tourists and other visitors to CBD areas who want to hire a bike on impulse.

I'm so indoctriated in helmet wearing now that I reckon I'd feel vulnerable on my bike/s without one.......... :|
Last edited by open roader on Sat Aug 21, 2010 1:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
3rd class cycling is always better than 1st class walking

User avatar
Spork!
Posts: 624
Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2010 4:50 pm

Re: The one (and only) HELMET THREAD

Postby Spork! » Fri Aug 20, 2010 6:45 pm

Humor, pineapples and helmets?
Hmmm....
Image
:P

User avatar
mikesbytes
Super Mod
Super Mod
Posts: 22143
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:42 pm
Location: Tempe, Sydney
Contact:

Re: The one (and only) HELMET THREAD

Postby mikesbytes » Fri Aug 20, 2010 6:52 pm

damhooligan wrote:here is what a professor say about them mandatory laws..
ProfessorChrisRissel wrote:I do not advocate for repealing seat-belt legislation, because the evidence is very, very strong that they reduced head injuries in the community.
This is not the case with bicycle helmets.....
This is what Chris Rissel said earlier this year after trying to hold my wheel on the mad mile;
ProfessorChrisRissel wrote:Boy can you sprint Mike
I've ridden off and on with Chris over the last few years and I've never seen him ride a bike without a helmet on.
If the R-1 rule is broken, what happens to N+1?

User avatar
il padrone
Posts: 22931
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
Location: Heading for home.

Re: The one (and only) HELMET THREAD

Postby il padrone » Fri Aug 20, 2010 6:57 pm

mikesbytes wrote:I've ridden off and on with Chris over the last few years and I've never seen him ride a bike without a helmet on.
Well of course. I don't know him but he's a Professor and I'm sure is law-abiding. As it's been the law for 20 years you'd kind of expect that he does wear a helmet.
Mandatory helmet law?
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."

User avatar
Zynster
Posts: 1102
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 5:50 pm
Location: West End, Brisbane

Re: The one (and only) HELMET THREAD

Postby Zynster » Fri Aug 20, 2010 7:40 pm

Whether or not helmets are mandatory doesn't bother me. I'd wear one anyway. I can't get helmet hair cause I got no hair. :D

I can't understand people who are pro-helmet laws though. A dead cyclist doesn't cost the gov as much as one who survived cause he was wearing a helmet. I'm all for Darwinian evolution doing it's job.
Last edited by Zynster on Fri Aug 20, 2010 7:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Fausto Coppi Reparto Corse | Giant Farrago Cross

damonik
Posts: 365
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 2:11 pm
Location: Perth

Re: The one (and only) HELMET THREAD

Postby damonik » Fri Aug 20, 2010 7:41 pm

In before it turns nasty.

Image

Image

Image

Stop looking at me like that, they're wearing helmet, it's topical!

Edit: First page still, YES!

FIST PUMP

Image
Specialized S-Works Roubaix (With electronic Ultegra, oooo the boogey man)

User avatar
Kalgrm
Super Mod
Super Mod
Posts: 9653
Joined: Fri May 25, 2007 5:21 pm
Location: Success, WA
Contact:

Re: The one (and only) HELMET THREAD

Postby Kalgrm » Fri Aug 20, 2010 8:34 pm

I'll sum up the arguments here:

1 - Helmets protect the head during a fall and thus make riding safer.

2 - Helmets are a barrier which deters people from riding, and since cycling is good for general health, mandatory helmet laws are bad for people in general.

3 - Helmet threads make people angry.

Cheers,
Graeme
Think outside the double triangle.
---------------------
Music was better when ugly people were allowed to make it ....

User avatar
Mulger bill
Super Mod
Super Mod
Posts: 29060
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 2:41 pm
Location: Sunbury Vic

Re: The one (and only) HELMET THREAD

Postby Mulger bill » Fri Aug 20, 2010 8:38 pm

[mod helmet]I'm glad this idea is up and running, it will make life a lot easier for everyone who cares little for the topic, myself included.

I would request that since this is serious thread for serious posters that only serious posts be posted, seriously.

Also, I doubt that many of the mod squad will spend much time here, therefore any participants should kindly self moderate and if anything should slip through that participants notify the moderators by means of the "report post" button.

Finally, who thinks this thread should be stickied?

Shaun
[/mod helmet]
...whatever the road rules, self-preservation is the absolute priority for a cyclist when mixing it with motorised traffic.
London Boy 29/12/2011

Baldy
Posts: 1669
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 4:55 pm

Re: The one (and only) HELMET THREAD

Postby Baldy » Fri Aug 20, 2010 9:13 pm

Kalgrm wrote: 2 - Helmets are a barrier which deters people from riding, and since cycling is good for general health, mandatory helmet laws are bad for people in general.
[flameproof helmet on]
Is that a chicken or the egg kinda deal? What came first, the diabetes or the acquired brain injury.

I think the only way that argument would make sense would be if riding a bike was the only possible form of exercise available to the people who dont like wearing a helmet.
[flameproof helmet off]

whitey
Posts: 414
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 10:30 pm
Location: East Sydney

Re: The one (and only) HELMET THREAD

Postby whitey » Fri Aug 20, 2010 10:14 pm

This helmet thread ROCKS. Much better than all the other crap ones. Keep em coming....

Oh yeah, I dont have an issue with helmets being mandatory. They keeps the brains in when you fall over. Massive win IMO.

whitey
Posts: 414
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 10:30 pm
Location: East Sydney

Re: The one (and only) HELMET THREAD

Postby whitey » Fri Aug 20, 2010 10:17 pm

I mean who wants this to happen when they fall over.

Image

User avatar
drubie
Posts: 4714
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 11:12 am
Location: New England
Contact:

Re: The one (and only) HELMET THREAD

Postby drubie » Fri Aug 20, 2010 10:40 pm

I forgot which thread I was in re: capslock.

Image

How about this one? It has a safety light!
So we get the leaders we deserve and we elect, we get the companies and the products that we ask for, right? And we have to ask for different things. – Paul Gilding
but really, that's rubbish. We get none of it because the choices are illusory.

msn
Posts: 345
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 4:03 pm
Location: Quakers Hill, NSW

Re: The one (and only) HELMET THREAD

Postby msn » Fri Aug 20, 2010 10:46 pm

Y' know, the mods seem to have such a serious job to do here. Sometimes I think they'd like an each way bet.
Mulger bill wrote:[Compulsory mod helmet]I'm ......
....stickied?
Shaun
[/Voluntary mod helmet]
Fixed it for you Shaun :wink:

leeh
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2010 10:25 pm

Re: The one (and only) HELMET THREAD

Postby leeh » Fri Aug 20, 2010 10:51 pm

A helmet is a device that has the function of reducing injuries. Would it be satisfactory (or even better) if another device, that even more efectively prevents injury, was worn instead? For example, a fluoro vest as worn by EVERY person who works near a roadside. Truck drivers, local government workers, postal service etc etc. It's compulsory. It's probably been found, by the workers compensation insurance companies to be conclusively effective too. How about scrapping the Compulsory Helmet law and introducing a Compulsory High Visibility Clothing Law. For everyone within 1 metre of a road.

User avatar
rustguard
Posts: 1415
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2008 2:31 am
Location: Perth, WA
Contact:

Re: The one (and only) HELMET THREAD

Postby rustguard » Fri Aug 20, 2010 11:37 pm

Baldy wrote:I think the only way that argument would make sense would be if riding a bike was the only possible form of exercise available to the people who dont like wearing a helmet.
[flameproof helmet off]
you imply in this statement that cycling is only for exercise

User avatar
The Womble
Posts: 3395
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2010 6:46 pm
Location: Brisbane QLD
Contact:

Re: The one (and only) HELMET THREAD

Postby The Womble » Sat Aug 21, 2010 12:04 am

No worse than some implying that cycling is limited primarily to commuting

User avatar
rustguard
Posts: 1415
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2008 2:31 am
Location: Perth, WA
Contact:

Re: The one (and only) HELMET THREAD

Postby rustguard » Sat Aug 21, 2010 12:10 am

The Womble wrote:No worse than some implying that cycling is limited primarily to commuting
well if you left out the word primarily it would be no worse but as it stands it is worse.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users