Petrol and Pedal – a cycling and cars video from RAA SA

Equipment and On Road Behaviour, Laws and Rules. Cycling Promotion and Advocacy

Petrol and Pedal – a cycling and cars video from RAA SA

Postby Aushiker » Tue Dec 21, 2010 10:10 am

Hi

THanks to Gusk at Adelaide Cyclist for this video

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8dE86UIWPcY&feature=player_embedded#![/youtube]

BTW if I remember correctly, at least in WA, passing on the left, a left turning vehicle as shown at 2:39 is illegal :wink:

Regards
Andrew
Last edited by Aushiker on Tue Dec 21, 2010 10:34 am, edited 1 time in total.
"Pedal-pounding pounce" - D. Fluellen - West Australian 13/1/14
Image
User avatar
Aushiker
 
Posts: 20106
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:55 pm
Location: Fremantle, WA

by BNA » Tue Dec 21, 2010 10:32 am

BNA
 

Re: Petrol and Pedal – a cycling and cars video from RAA SA

Postby simonn » Tue Dec 21, 2010 10:32 am

Aushiker wrote:BTW if I remember correctly, at least in WA, passing on the left a left turning vehicle as shown at 2:39 is illegal :wink:

:roll: (AT) RAA
Image
User avatar
simonn
 
Posts: 3585
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 10:46 am
Location: Sydney

Re: Petrol and Pedal – a cycling and cars video from RAA SA

Postby JKohn » Tue Dec 21, 2010 10:40 am

I'm in SA and have never heard of that rule. If there is a red light you area allowed to ride up to the line, then cars turning left give way to you if you are going straight.

Of course if they get a left turn arrow then you move far enough left to the kerb to enable them to get around without holding them up.
Image
JKohn
 
Posts: 37
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 3:25 pm

Re: Petrol and Pedal – a cycling and cars video from RAA SA

Postby russellgarrard » Tue Dec 21, 2010 10:41 am

I think this video has done more harm than good!
russellgarrard
 
Posts: 690
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2008 7:49 pm

Re: Petrol and Pedal – a cycling and cars video from RAA SA

Postby jules21 » Tue Dec 21, 2010 10:52 am

Aushiker wrote:BTW if I remember correctly, at least in WA, passing on the left, a left turning vehicle as shown at 2:39 is illegal :wink:

only if they're in the act of turning, according to BV. sitting at the lights doesn't qualify, i don't believe.

that was not a bad video - i thought it was pretty balanced and the advice fair.
Image
User avatar
jules21
 
Posts: 8644
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 10:14 pm
Location: deep in the pain cave

Re: Petrol and Pedal – a cycling and cars video from RAA SA

Postby Oxford » Tue Dec 21, 2010 11:07 am

Haven't watched the video yet, but passing a vehicle on its left whilst indicating a left turn is illegal, unless you are in a dedicated lane such as another lane for traffic or a bike lane. If you are in a bike lane and proceeding ahead and not turning, then the turning traffic should give way to you. But be careful not to get left hooked, they will not be looking for you and will believe they have right of way over you.
Building more roads to prevent congestion is like a fat man loosening his belt to prevent obesity.
- Lewis Mumford
User avatar
Oxford
 
Posts: 5015
Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2008 1:49 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: Petrol and Pedal – a cycling and cars video from RAA SA

Postby simonn » Tue Dec 21, 2010 11:12 am

JKohn wrote:I'm in SA and have never heard of that rule.


Best learn your road rules then...

http://www.legislation.sa.gov.au/LZ/C/R ... 219.UN.PDF

141—No overtaking etc to the left of a vehicle
(1) A driver (except the rider of a bicycle) must not overtake a vehicle to the left of the
vehicle unless:

...

(2) The rider of a bicycle must not ride past, or overtake, to the left of a vehicle that is
turning left and is giving a left change of direction signal.
Offence provision.
Note—
Left change of direction signal is defined in the dictionary.
Image
User avatar
simonn
 
Posts: 3585
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 10:46 am
Location: Sydney

Re: Petrol and Pedal – a cycling and cars video from RAA SA

Postby Aushiker » Tue Dec 21, 2010 11:20 am

JKohn wrote:I'm in SA and have never heard of that rule. If there is a red light you area allowed to ride up to the line, then cars turning left give way to you if you are going straight..


Hi

From the Western Australian Road Code 2000 as amended November 14, 2009, Section 122(4)

The rider of a bicycle shall not ride past, or overtake, to the left of a vehicle that is making, or apparently about to make, a left turn, or is signalling a left turn


You might want to check the SA Road Code as the State codes are now pretty much based on the National Road Code.

Regards
Andrew
"Pedal-pounding pounce" - D. Fluellen - West Australian 13/1/14
Image
User avatar
Aushiker
 
Posts: 20106
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:55 pm
Location: Fremantle, WA

Re: Petrol and Pedal – a cycling and cars video from RAA SA

Postby Aushiker » Tue Dec 21, 2010 11:22 am

Hi

Whoops .. Simonn had already answered the point .. :oops:

Andrew
"Pedal-pounding pounce" - D. Fluellen - West Australian 13/1/14
Image
User avatar
Aushiker
 
Posts: 20106
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:55 pm
Location: Fremantle, WA

Re: Petrol and Pedal – a cycling and cars video from RAA SA

Postby jet-ski » Tue Dec 21, 2010 1:33 pm

I don't think it matters whether it's legal or not it's DANGEROUS!! :P
Xtracycle, Surly Long Haul Trucker, Bike Friday New World Tourist, Giant TCR, 9:zero:7
http://www.perthcyclist.net/blog
User avatar
jet-ski
 
Posts: 1404
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 4:51 pm
Location: Perth WA

Re: Petrol and Pedal – a cycling and cars video from RAA SA

Postby il padrone » Tue Dec 21, 2010 3:50 pm

jet-ski wrote:I don't think it matters whether it's legal or not it's DANGEROUS!! :P

+1

99% of the time I will overtake stationary traffic queues on the right side, one lane out. No concerns about left-turners and usually there is more space as drivers tend to keep further away from other cars than they do from the kerb. Also there's less chance of door swingers, no cr@ppy broken concrete, drain grills or broken glass. All good.
Riding bikes in traffic - what seems dangerous is usually safe; what seems safe is often more dangerous.
User avatar
il padrone
 
Posts: 18290
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
Location: Heading for home.

Re: Petrol and Pedal – a cycling and cars video from RAA SA

Postby Mulger bill » Tue Dec 21, 2010 7:53 pm

jules21 wrote:
Aushiker wrote:BTW if I remember correctly, at least in WA, passing on the left, a left turning vehicle as shown at 2:39 is illegal :wink:

only if they're in the act of turning, according to BV. sitting at the lights doesn't qualify, i don't believe.

that was not a bad video - i thought it was pretty balanced and the advice fair.


Thanks Jules, I've always slotted in behind the first lefty after filtering through the straights.

@00:45ish "Sometimes cyclists are just difficult to see."

Newsflash mate. ANYTHING is difficult to see if you're not looking. Your example was as blatantly stupid and irresponsible as the rider blasting the red.
...whatever the road rules, self-preservation is the absolute priority for a cyclist when mixing it with motorised traffic.
London Boy 29/12/2011
User avatar
Mulger bill
Super Mod
Super Mod
 
Posts: 25694
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 2:41 pm
Location: Sunbury Vic

Re: Petrol and Pedal – a cycling and cars video from RAA SA

Postby Quinns Rocks Roadie » Tue Dec 21, 2010 8:10 pm

....99% of the time I will overtake stationary traffic queues on the right side, one lane out.

Me too - I also do the same when approaching dual lane roundabouts - you oughta see my sprint off the line. :shock:

Andrew, in the video technically the rider is not overtaking the stopped car - notice the rider is stopped alongside the car and indeed looks around to make eye contact with the car driver.
It is fine to remain stopped while the car turns left.

Eric.
Newer does not automatically mean betterer.
User avatar
Quinns Rocks Roadie
 
Posts: 360
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 1:57 pm
Location: Perth, Quinns Rocks. 150m from the beach.

Re: Petrol and Pedal – a cycling and cars video from RAA SA

Postby il padrone » Tue Dec 21, 2010 8:23 pm

Quinns Rocks Roadie wrote:
....99% of the time I will overtake stationary traffic queues on the right side, one lane out.

Me too - I also do the same when approaching dual lane roundabouts

Nup. Roundabouts = claim the lane. One lane or multi-lane

The only car that goes past me will be one lane out and by legal definition, going straight through or right.
Riding bikes in traffic - what seems dangerous is usually safe; what seems safe is often more dangerous.
User avatar
il padrone
 
Posts: 18290
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
Location: Heading for home.

Re: Petrol and Pedal – a cycling and cars video from RAA SA

Postby Aushiker » Tue Dec 21, 2010 9:00 pm

Mulger bill wrote:
jules21 wrote:
Aushiker wrote:BTW if I remember correctly, at least in WA, passing on the left, a left turning vehicle as shown at 2:39 is illegal :wink:

only if they're in the act of turning, according to BV. sitting at the lights doesn't qualify, i don't believe.

that was not a bad video - i thought it was pretty balanced and the advice fair.


Thanks Jules, I've always slotted in behind the first lefty after filtering through the straights.



Hi

Bicycle Victoria and/or Jules are wrong as I read it ... Section 141 (2) of the Victorian Road Safety Road Rules 2009 S.R. No. 94/2009 Version incorporating amendments as at 26 October 2010 clearly states in plain English ...

The rider of a bicycle must not ride past, or overtake, to the left of a vehicle that is turning left and is giving a left change of direction signal.


There is further specifics relevant to Victoria and its trams but the section above still stands and there is no mention variance for lights that I could find. Happy to stand corrected but if you can point to the relevant section(s).

Regards
Andrew
"Pedal-pounding pounce" - D. Fluellen - West Australian 13/1/14
Image
User avatar
Aushiker
 
Posts: 20106
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:55 pm
Location: Fremantle, WA

Re: Petrol and Pedal – a cycling and cars video from RAA SA

Postby il padrone » Tue Dec 21, 2010 9:11 pm

Aushiker wrote:Bicycle Victoria and/or Jules are wrong as I read it ... Section 141 (2) of the Victorian Road Safety Road Rules 2009 S.R. No. 94/2009 Version incorporating amendments as at 26 October 2010 clearly states in plain English ...

The rider of a bicycle must not ride past, or overtake, to the left of a vehicle that is turning left and is giving a left change of direction signal.


There is further specifics relevant to Victoria and its trams but the section above still stands and there is no mention of lights.

No, a common misconception on this rule. The action is illegal if the car is indicating left and actually turning. If the lights are red of course they're not turning. If you move through (to the front, subject to room) this will be legally OK. Recommend that you never sit alongside a car at the lights, left-indicating or otherwise.
Riding bikes in traffic - what seems dangerous is usually safe; what seems safe is often more dangerous.
User avatar
il padrone
 
Posts: 18290
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
Location: Heading for home.

Re: Petrol and Pedal – a cycling and cars video from RAA SA

Postby Aushiker » Tue Dec 21, 2010 9:39 pm

il padrone wrote:No, a common misconception on this rule. The action is illegal if the car is indicating left and actually turning. If the lights are red of course they're not turning. If you move through (to the front, subject to room) this will be legally OK. Recommend that you never sit alongside a car at the lights, left-indicating or otherwise.


Hi

I am interested in knowing of any case law that supports your interpretation ( I haven't been able to find any); it seems on the face of it a narrow interpretation of "to the left of a vehicle that is turning left" and without case law to the contrary I wouldn't be testing that interpretation and hence I will stick with my understanding of the regulation.

Queensland Transport and Main Roads seems to agree with my understanding when it says:

Bicycles can overtake to the left of a vehicle unless:
the vehicle is signalling to turn left
it is unsafe to do so.


Bicycle Victoria as previously alluded seems to interpret it differently and it seems to depend on the number of vehicles and if the first vehicle is moving... I would be interested in the legal advice that come up with this interpretation.

Cheers
Andrew
"Pedal-pounding pounce" - D. Fluellen - West Australian 13/1/14
Image
User avatar
Aushiker
 
Posts: 20106
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:55 pm
Location: Fremantle, WA

Re: Petrol and Pedal – a cycling and cars video from RAA SA

Postby Mulger bill » Tue Dec 21, 2010 9:56 pm

I agree with Pete having dug one paragraph out of 500 pages :o No wonder nobody knows the rules.

It all hinges on the word "and". the rule would be read completely differently thus

(2) The rider of a bicycle must not ride past, or
overtake, to the left of a vehicle that is turning left
OR is giving a left change of direction signal.

Semantics? maybe. But I'm sure BV would have had their legal peoples toothcomb it before publishing?

Find a precedant? You go for it, you've got more time to surf than me.
...whatever the road rules, self-preservation is the absolute priority for a cyclist when mixing it with motorised traffic.
London Boy 29/12/2011
User avatar
Mulger bill
Super Mod
Super Mod
 
Posts: 25694
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 2:41 pm
Location: Sunbury Vic

Re: Petrol and Pedal – a cycling and cars video from RAA SA

Postby jules21 » Tue Dec 21, 2010 10:03 pm

Mulger bill wrote:Semantics? maybe.

it's not semantics Shaun, the wording of legal provisions is always read literally. sometimes it's not what they intended it to mean, but that's academic - it is what it says.
Image
User avatar
jules21
 
Posts: 8644
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 10:14 pm
Location: deep in the pain cave

Re: Petrol and Pedal – a cycling and cars video from RAA SA

Postby Mulger bill » Tue Dec 21, 2010 10:09 pm

No contest then, I overtake on the left until I get to the front. OR the traffic starts moving whereby I get back into the line.

Thanks Jules :D
...whatever the road rules, self-preservation is the absolute priority for a cyclist when mixing it with motorised traffic.
London Boy 29/12/2011
User avatar
Mulger bill
Super Mod
Super Mod
 
Posts: 25694
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 2:41 pm
Location: Sunbury Vic

Re: Petrol and Pedal – a cycling and cars video from RAA SA

Postby Aushiker » Tue Dec 21, 2010 10:21 pm

jules21 wrote:
Mulger bill wrote:Semantics? maybe.

it's not semantics Shaun, the wording of legal provisions is always read literally. sometimes it's not what they intended it to mean, but that's academic - it is what it says.


Hi

From the High Court of Australia ...

The High Court is the highest court in the Australian judicial system. It was established in 1901 by Section 71 of the Constitution. The functions of the High Court are to interpret and apply the law of Australia; to decide cases of special federal significance including challenges to the constitutional validity of laws and to hear appeals, by special leave, from Federal, State and Territory courts.

The seat of the High Court is in Canberra, where it is located in its own building within the Parliamentary Triangle. The High Court building houses three courtrooms, Justices' chambers, and the Court's main registry, library, and corporate services facilities. In addition, there are offices of the High Court Registry in Sydney and Melbourne, staffed by officers of the High Court. In Adelaide, Brisbane, Darwin and Perth, registry functions are performed on behalf of the High Court by officers of the Federal Court of Australia, and in Hobart they are performed by officers of the Supreme Court of Tasmania.


Key word in this context: interpret

Then there is the question of Common Law and the its role ...

Then there is the role of the State's Supreme Courts ....

Andrew
"Pedal-pounding pounce" - D. Fluellen - West Australian 13/1/14
Image
User avatar
Aushiker
 
Posts: 20106
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:55 pm
Location: Fremantle, WA

Re: Petrol and Pedal – a cycling and cars video from RAA SA

Postby Mulger bill » Tue Dec 21, 2010 10:50 pm

Waaaay more time :roll:
...whatever the road rules, self-preservation is the absolute priority for a cyclist when mixing it with motorised traffic.
London Boy 29/12/2011
User avatar
Mulger bill
Super Mod
Super Mod
 
Posts: 25694
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 2:41 pm
Location: Sunbury Vic

Re: Petrol and Pedal – a cycling and cars video from RAA SA

Postby russellgarrard » Tue Dec 21, 2010 11:33 pm

il padrone wrote:
Aushiker wrote:Bicycle Victoria and/or Jules are wrong as I read it ... Section 141 (2) of the Victorian Road Safety Road Rules 2009 S.R. No. 94/2009 Version incorporating amendments as at 26 October 2010 clearly states in plain English ...

The rider of a bicycle must not ride past, or overtake, to the left of a vehicle that is turning left and is giving a left change of direction signal.


There is further specifics relevant to Victoria and its trams but the section above still stands and there is no mention of lights.

No, a common misconception on this rule. The action is illegal if the car is indicating left and actually turning. If the lights are red of course they're not turning. If you move through (to the front, subject to room) this will be legally OK. Recommend that you never sit alongside a car at the lights, left-indicating or otherwise.


Sorry, I actually got something wrong for once!

My apologies! I mis-read Torum...whoopsie!
Last edited by russellgarrard on Wed Dec 22, 2010 9:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
russellgarrard
 
Posts: 690
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2008 7:49 pm

Re: Petrol and Pedal – a cycling and cars video from RAA SA

Postby il padrone » Tue Dec 21, 2010 11:49 pm

Aushiker wrote:From the High Court of Australia ...

The High Court is the highest court in the Australian judicial system. It was established in 1901 by Section 71 of the Constitution. The functions of the High Court are to interpret and apply the law of Australia; to decide cases of special federal significance including challenges to the constitutional validity of laws and to hear appeals, by special leave, from Federal, State and Territory courts.

The seat of the High Court is in Canberra, where it is located in its own building within the Parliamentary Triangle. The High Court building houses three courtrooms, Justices' chambers, and the Court's main registry, library, and corporate services facilities. In addition, there are offices of the High Court Registry in Sydney and Melbourne, staffed by officers of the High Court. In Adelaide, Brisbane, Darwin and Perth, registry functions are performed on behalf of the High Court by officers of the Federal Court of Australia, and in Hobart they are performed by officers of the Supreme Court of Tasmania.


Key word in this context: interpret

Then there is the question of Common Law and the its role ...

Then there is the role of the State's Supreme Courts ....


Case law..... common law :? .... High Court judgements :shock: ......

I would love to see a left side overtake TIN get to the High Court :lol: :lol: :lol:

It could happen of course, but some people would have to be seriously principled and have way too much coin to spare.
Riding bikes in traffic - what seems dangerous is usually safe; what seems safe is often more dangerous.
User avatar
il padrone
 
Posts: 18290
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
Location: Heading for home.

Re: Petrol and Pedal – a cycling and cars video from RAA SA

Postby Aushiker » Tue Dec 21, 2010 11:58 pm

il padrone wrote:
Aushiker wrote:From the High Court of Australia ...

The High Court is the highest court in the Australian judicial system. It was established in 1901 by Section 71 of the Constitution. The functions of the High Court are to interpret and apply the law of Australia; to decide cases of special federal significance including challenges to the constitutional validity of laws and to hear appeals, by special leave, from Federal, State and Territory courts.

The seat of the High Court is in Canberra, where it is located in its own building within the Parliamentary Triangle. The High Court building houses three courtrooms, Justices' chambers, and the Court's main registry, library, and corporate services facilities. In addition, there are offices of the High Court Registry in Sydney and Melbourne, staffed by officers of the High Court. In Adelaide, Brisbane, Darwin and Perth, registry functions are performed on behalf of the High Court by officers of the Federal Court of Australia, and in Hobart they are performed by officers of the Supreme Court of Tasmania.


Key word in this context: interpret

Then there is the question of Common Law and the its role ...

Then there is the role of the State's Supreme Courts ....


Case law..... common law :? .... High Court judgements :shock: ......

I would love to see a left side overtake TIN get to the High Court :lol: :lol: :lol: .


The posting wasn't specific to this particular law .. it was in response to the statement about the law which BTW I quoted to give my comment context. I would have thought that with your powers of interpretation that would have been clear :)

Andrew
"Pedal-pounding pounce" - D. Fluellen - West Australian 13/1/14
Image
User avatar
Aushiker
 
Posts: 20106
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:55 pm
Location: Fremantle, WA

Next

Return to Cycling Safety and Advocacy

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users



Popular Bike Shops
Torpedo 7 Torpedo7 AU
Ground Effect Ground Effect NZ
Chain Reaction Cycles CRC UK
Wiggle Wiggle UK
Ebay Ebay AU

“Bicycles BNA Twitter
“Bicycles BNA Facebook
“Google+ BNA Google+
“Bicycles BNA Newsletter

> FREE BNA Stickers
> BNA Cycling Kit