Equipment and On Road Behaviour, Laws and Rules. Cycling Promotion and Advocacy
Red lights and stop signs annoy me so much. They are an engineering mechanism for controlling the flow and movements of vehicles and allowing pedestrians to cross intersections in some instances.
If it is at a t-junction and there is no pedestrian crossing or pedestrians, I need no reason why a cyclist travelling in the cycle lane and going straight through (not turning right) should have to stop at the lights and then have to try and deal with all the roaring traffic behind them. I know it annoys motorists as they have to stop, but the reality is I am on a small vehicle weighing less than 80kg and I am in my own lane and able to go through safely without impeding anyone else. I still stop at the lights, but every time I do I wish that the road rules were updated to cater for these situations.
Same deal if you are at a t-junction with stop signs and turning left into the cycle lane. Technically it's illegal to just slow down and roll through, but we all know it's perfectly safe and practical to do so.
Check out my practical cycling and cycle touring website: VELOPHILE AUSTRALIA
this is getting off the topic, but while the High Court's role is certainly to interpret law, it spends most of its time with more principled law than prescriptive rules, such as the road rules. The Castle, in which they take the Barlow Group to court over the constitutionality (if that's a word) of their compulsory acquisition of Darryl's family's home is a good example - you can't just follow the Constitution to gain a simple understanding of the legality of that action - it requires a lot of interpretation by an authoritative body. the road rules, otoh, are pretty straightforward and road users are obliged to make their own interpretations of them (in the first instance at least).
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: greatscott