Cycling Central wrote:It's multi-functionality gone mad in an increasingly politically correct world. As you know I prefer to call a spade a shovel and I'm telling you roads are for cars.
But that's not all the editorial notes, catering to cyclists is expensive business - in fact this writer thinks it may be cheaper to house them offshore, or better yet, send them back to Melbourne or Copenhagen for their protection
Cycle lights proposal in Sydney
- il padrone
- Posts: 22931
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
- Location: Heading for home.
Re: Cycle lights proposal in Sydney
Postby il padrone » Thu Dec 23, 2010 11:39 am
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."
- Nate
- Posts: 3209
- Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 8:49 pm
- Contact:
Re: Cycle lights proposal in Sydney
Postby Nate » Thu Dec 23, 2010 11:49 am
+1itsaghostcar wrote:I've got the privilege of riding along many of these cycle lanes each day on my route to and from work. Whilst I agree that the light phasing isn't the best, I don't understand the hate that cyclists have towards them.wombatK wrote:While bicycle boxes might have made it on the Staysafe recommendations list (and into the Aus Road Rules), there aren't any in the CBD - but they would probably do more to promote cyclists safety than all of Clover's half-baked bi-directional cycle lanes.
The light phasing is superb along Kent St though, at a gentle pace i have to stop ONCE between the harbour bridge & King st (at market), everywhere else it is Sync'd up
- CommuRider
- Posts: 5053
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 6:16 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: Cycle lights proposal in Sydney
Postby CommuRider » Thu Dec 23, 2010 11:53 am
The slower pace also reduces the sweat + smell factor once you arrive at the office. Especially when one is running lateNate wrote:+1itsaghostcar wrote: I've got the privilege of riding along many of these cycle lanes each day on my route to and from work. Whilst I agree that the light phasing isn't the best, I don't understand the hate that cyclists have towards them.
The light phasing is superb along Kent St though, at a gentle pace i have to stop ONCE between the harbour bridge & King st (at market), everywhere else it is Sync'd up
- Nate
- Posts: 3209
- Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 8:49 pm
- Contact:
Re: Cycle lights proposal in Sydney
Postby Nate » Thu Dec 23, 2010 11:53 am
Nate wrote:sorry - but unless i see a red light - then he didnt cross on the red.mikesbytes wrote:So this picture is actually supporting the need for the 'cycle first' lights
Odd how the red light somehow didnt make it into the photo
Just had another look at the photo... look at where the blue car is... the car is entirely in front of the end of the double whites (to the left of the car).
Which means the car is IN the intersection - i.e. the lights must have gone green as the car is moving into the intersection.
So the bike probably just took off quicker than the car!
-
- Posts: 3056
- Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 2:54 pm
Re: Cycle lights proposal in Sydney
Postby zero » Thu Dec 23, 2010 12:33 pm
There is no syncing between lights along Kent. Its easily provable by riding it at night, in which case you will have to stop for every light. Tested it once for a couple of laps, and I got 39 red lights, and 1 green. In 100% of the cases, the red light was demand based, ie I would NOT get a green until I went up to and sat on the detectors. If you get a rolling green its because of opposite direction bicycle traffic or a red light runner ahead of you, and the green period is only 5 seconds per 2-3 minute cycle too. I don't even know how we can reliably make a legal turn onto kent from king because the bicycle light goes red before the pedestrian light starts flashing - so if there are pedestrians, you can easily be blocked for the duration of your sequence.Nate wrote:+1itsaghostcar wrote:I've got the privilege of riding along many of these cycle lanes each day on my route to and from work. Whilst I agree that the light phasing isn't the best, I don't understand the hate that cyclists have towards them.wombatK wrote:While bicycle boxes might have made it on the Staysafe recommendations list (and into the Aus Road Rules), there aren't any in the CBD - but they would probably do more to promote cyclists safety than all of Clover's half-baked bi-directional cycle lanes.
The light phasing is superb along Kent St though, at a gentle pace i have to stop ONCE between the harbour bridge & King st (at market), everywhere else it is Sync'd up
Even during peak times, its easy to spend 2 or 3 minutes sitting there whilst cars travelling in your direction have a green light, and then cars not travelling in your direction have a green light, ie the wait time in the cycle lane is on average longer than in any other users - including pedestrians because the pedestrian lights frequently last longer than the bike lights.
The "syncing" is done in the cross street direction so that each short street has a reasonable chance of being emptied of cars during its cycle.
To put things in perspective, in similar conditions (bugger all traffic), I averaged 8km/hr on the path system on a fast road bike, and 24km/hr onroad on a 15kg DS mountain bike. Matter of fact, even testing the onroad vs cycle path is difficult because I run out of CBD very quickly whilst onroad.
- Nate
- Posts: 3209
- Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 8:49 pm
- Contact:
Re: Cycle lights proposal in Sydney
Postby Nate » Thu Dec 23, 2010 12:37 pm
I only ride at peak times (8:15am & 4:45pm) & even without other cyclists waiting they've turned green - i'll have to have a close look. But they've been going well for me so far.zero wrote: There is no syncing between lights along Kent. Its easily provable by riding it at night, in which case you will have to stop for every light. Tested it once for a couple of laps, and I got 39 red lights, and 1 green. In 100% of the cases, the red light was demand based, ie I would NOT get a green until I went up to and sat on the detectors. If you get a rolling green its because of opposite direction bicycle traffic or a red light runner ahead of you, and the green period is only 5 seconds per 2-3 minute cycle too. I don't even know how we can reliably make a legal turn onto kent from king because the bicycle light goes red before the pedestrian light starts flashing - so if there are pedestrians, you can easily be blocked for the duration of your sequence.
Yeah King --> Kent is a bugger, best bet is to dismount, walk and rejoin the roadway on Kent.
- Nate
- Posts: 3209
- Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 8:49 pm
- Contact:
Re: Cycle lights proposal in Sydney
Postby Nate » Thu Dec 23, 2010 12:38 pm
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To: 'jonesg@dailytelegraph.com.au'; 'lentinir@dailytelegraph.com.au'
Gemma/Rosemarie,
I've got a few questions about the article in the telegraph the other day.
You've stated in your article:
Under a proposal from the powerful State Government StaySafe committee, cyclists would have their own green traffic signals to get a head start over vehicles
Where a quick read of the proposal states (p8 Recommendation #7):
should be trialled where appropriate.
So it seems you have mis-read the proposal, you have also completely missed recommendation #6 about bike boxes, which when preceding #7 puts it in a lot clearer context, and would mean it is no change in behaviour at the intersection, because bikes would be at the front of the queue anyway, due to the bike box.
Also you have actually mis-quoted section 4.125 as well, you stated:
to protect cyclists include putting airbags on the outside of cars
Where as 4.125 states:
"potential future developments"... pedestrian protection airbags, which will also assist cyclists
Given it is a POTENTIAL FUTURE development, they cannot really call for it to be installed, as they do not really exist in practice, and being a "pedestrian protection airbag" - I would confidently say that it is to protect pedestrians, it is the name that gives that away.
Also in regards to the photograph in the article, were either of you present when it was taken? Has it been cropped at all?
As you state: cyclist runs the red light
Conveniently there's no actual red light in the photograph, nor anything else that gives the indication he has run the red light.
In fact a keen eye would actually notice that the blue car behind the cyclist has proceeded into the intersection, as it is clearly past the double white lines to the left of the car (looking at the photo).
Which would mean that when the photo was taken - the lights were actually green.
Also you state it is to get in front of cars, given he is turning right at a busy intersection, and as above the lights turned green - do you have a preceding photograph showing that he was previously behind the line of cars that are turning right?
If you could please clarify those few things above - that would be really appreciated.
-
- Posts: 3056
- Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 2:54 pm
Re: Cycle lights proposal in Sydney
Postby zero » Thu Dec 23, 2010 12:49 pm
The worst thing I've videod is a bmw era mini (ie the not so small mini) tailbacking in the kent/king intersection and getting stuck in the bicycle area of the intersection. All the contra flow bikes on King went round the outside of him and into the oncoming traffic lane, because all the riders know they only have 5 seconds in the next 3 minutes to pass the intersection. To me, thats pretty much defeating the purpose of having the lanes and lights because the riders are riding head on into straight accelerating traffic from an invisible position... I had to ride between him and the peds, then push through the peds just to get through on my yellow.
-
- Posts: 3056
- Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 2:54 pm
Re: Cycle lights proposal in Sydney
Postby zero » Thu Dec 23, 2010 12:49 pm
hehe, always good to catch them lying through their teeth.Nate wrote:Wonder if i'll get anything out of this:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To: 'jonesg@dailytelegraph.com.au'; 'lentinir@dailytelegraph.com.au'
- Nate
- Posts: 3209
- Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 8:49 pm
- Contact:
Re: Cycle lights proposal in Sydney
Postby Nate » Thu Dec 23, 2010 1:11 pm
Gemma/Rosemarie,
Just has another quick look through the article and you state:
speed limits dropped to 30km/h in CBD streets not yet torn up to accommodate cyclists
As per 5.24, they are identifying speed as a risk - and noting that action has been taken in the City of Sydney:
According to the City of Sydney submission: "…Lowering speed limits to 40 km/h, or preferably to 30 km/h, in central Sydney
If you ducked over to the City of Sydney website & had a quick look, you would find that 30km/h is again aimed at PEDESTRIANS:
http://www.cityofsydney.nsw.gov.au/comm ... heCity.asp
On Druitt Street a speed limit of 30km/h has been introduced to reduce pedestrian crashes.
Also you stated that Clover Moore told the committee...
There's not a single mention of Clover in the report, she's not even referenced as attending any meetings as per the agenda's at the end.
Can you please point me to where Clover "told" the committee?
- mikesbytes
- Super Mod
- Posts: 22183
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:42 pm
- Location: Tempe, Sydney
- Contact:
Re: Cycle lights proposal in Sydney
Postby mikesbytes » Thu Dec 23, 2010 1:29 pm
Yes the blue car has taken off from the lightsNate wrote:Nate wrote:sorry - but unless i see a red light - then he didnt cross on the red.mikesbytes wrote:So this picture is actually supporting the need for the 'cycle first' lights
Odd how the red light somehow didnt make it into the photo
Just had another look at the photo... look at where the blue car is... the car is entirely in front of the end of the double whites (to the left of the car).
Which means the car is IN the intersection - i.e. the lights must have gone green as the car is moving into the intersection.
So the bike probably just took off quicker than the car!
- Nate
- Posts: 3209
- Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 8:49 pm
- Contact:
Re: Cycle lights proposal in Sydney
Postby Nate » Fri Dec 24, 2010 4:41 pm
From: Jones, Gemma [mailto:jonesg@dailytelegraph.com.au]
Sent: Thursday, 23 December 2010 7:34 PM
To:
Subject: Re: Your article: city road plan gives green light to cyclists
Hi Nathan,
Thanks for your thoughts on this.
Regards,
Gemma
________________________________________
My reply:
Gemma,
You seem to have mis-read my email, I was not giving my thoughts on your article I was asking questions about it.
Can you also please provide the details of your editor so I can raise the issue with them also.
Regards,
- trailgumby
- Posts: 15469
- Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 5:30 pm
- Location: Northern Beaches, Sydney
- Contact:
Re: Cycle lights proposal in Sydney
Postby trailgumby » Fri Dec 24, 2010 5:01 pm
May I suggest you start blind cc'ing (bcc) mediawatch? mediawatch@your.abc.net.au
Ensure you include the full email trail.
- Nate
- Posts: 3209
- Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 8:49 pm
- Contact:
Re: Cycle lights proposal in Sydney
Postby Nate » Fri Dec 24, 2010 5:23 pm
of course!trailgumby wrote:Well done nate.
May I suggest you start blind cc'ing (bcc) mediawatch? mediawatch@your.abc.net.au
Ensure you include the full email trail.
next reply....
Hi Nathan,
I didn't misread your email. I didn't agree with the content but I did want to acknowledge receiving it. As you have asked for someone senior to raise this with, please send any further correspondence to my chief-of-staff lillian saleh at salehl@dailytelegraph.com.au . She is away until tuesday so it is unlikely you will get a response until then.
Regards,
Gemma
- Boognoss
- Super Mod
- Posts: 6879
- Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2007 11:45 am
- Location: Castle Hill, NSW
- Contact:
Re: Cycle lights proposal in Sydney
Postby Boognoss » Fri Dec 24, 2010 8:58 pm
You're going to have to lower the bar in dealing with Gemma I think Nate. To communicate with an idiot you will have to think like an idiot .Nate wrote:of course!trailgumby wrote:Well done nate.
May I suggest you start blind cc'ing (bcc) mediawatch? mediawatch@your.abc.net.au
Ensure you include the full email trail.
next reply....
Hi Nathan,
I didn't misread your email. I didn't agree with the content but I did want to acknowledge receiving it. As you have asked for someone senior to raise this with, please send any further correspondence to my chief-of-staff lillian saleh at salehl@dailytelegraph.com.au . She is away until tuesday so it is unlikely you will get a response until then.
Regards,
Gemma
- Mulger bill
- Super Mod
- Posts: 29060
- Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 2:41 pm
- Location: Sunbury Vic
Re: Cycle lights proposal in Sydney
Postby Mulger bill » Fri Dec 24, 2010 9:35 pm
And risk being soundly thrashed by experience.Boognoss wrote:You're going to have to lower the bar in dealing with Gemma I think Nate. To communicate with an idiot you will have to think like an idiot .
London Boy 29/12/2011
-
- Posts: 9810
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:48 am
Re: Cycle lights proposal in Sydney
Postby human909 » Fri Dec 24, 2010 10:07 pm
Well that is the current law.wombatK wrote:. I'd be happy to see cyclists given the same green phase as cars, with the cars obligated to give way when turning across the bicycle lanes - just as cars must give way to vehicles in a lane they wish to cross.
- Nate
- Posts: 3209
- Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 8:49 pm
- Contact:
Re: Cycle lights proposal in Sydney
Postby Nate » Sat Dec 25, 2010 2:31 pm
No, what wombat is saying - is to have the green bike as long as the cars & for them to automatically give way.human909 wrote:Well that is the current law.wombatK wrote:. I'd be happy to see cyclists given the same green phase as cars, with the cars obligated to give way when turning across the bicycle lanes - just as cars must give way to vehicles in a lane they wish to cross.
Wont happen though - car sees green & will always hook it across regardless of the bike light.
Green bike & flashing yellow arrow would work well.
- il padrone
- Posts: 22931
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
- Location: Heading for home.
Re: Cycle lights proposal in Sydney
Postby il padrone » Sat Dec 25, 2010 2:41 pm
Ahhh..... speaking legally, any vehicle turning left from the traffic lane must give way to the bike lane traffic before doing their turn. This is all pretty clear in the road rules.Nate wrote:No, what wombat is saying - is to have the green bike as long as the cars & for them to automatically give way.human909 wrote:Well that is the current law.wombatK wrote:. I'd be happy to see cyclists given the same green phase as cars, with the cars obligated to give way when turning across the bicycle lanes - just as cars must give way to vehicles in a lane they wish to cross.
Wont happen though - car sees green & will always hook it across regardless of the bike light.
Victorian Road Rules wrote:148 Giving way when moving from one marked lane or line of traffic to another marked lane or line of traffic
(1) A driver who is moving from one marked lane (whether or not the lane is ending) to another marked lane must give way to any vehicle travelling in the same direction as the driver in the marked lane to which the driver is moving.
Penalty: 5 penalty units.
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."
- wombatK
- Posts: 5612
- Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2008 9:08 pm
- Location: Yagoona, AU
Re: Cycle lights proposal in Sydney
Postby wombatK » Sat Dec 25, 2010 6:44 pm
What I was really referring to was the situation which developed on the Bourke St cycleway, which has now got give way signs painted on the cycleway at every intersection. My concern is that it won't be long before they are all marked like this.il padrone wrote: Ahhh..... speaking legally, any vehicle turning left from the traffic lane must give way to the bike lane traffic before doing their turn. This is all pretty clear in the road rules.
Unless a lawyer can tell me otherwise, my guess is that clearly requires the cyclist to give way to everything, and puts the cyclist using the cycleways in a vastly inferior and more vulnerable unsafe position.
Somebody has to do something, and it's just incredibly pathetic that it has to be us -Jerry Garcia
-
- Posts: 9810
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:48 am
Re: Cycle lights proposal in Sydney
Postby human909 » Sat Dec 25, 2010 7:02 pm
I'm confused. Are you saying there is both a green light and a give way sign? That seems to be a contrary indications from the traffic control signals. Plainly unsafe if that is true.wombatK wrote:What I was really referring to was the situation which developed on the Bourke St cycleway, which has now got give way signs painted on the cycleway at every intersection. My concern is that it won't be long before they are all marked like this.il padrone wrote: Ahhh..... speaking legally, any vehicle turning left from the traffic lane must give way to the bike lane traffic before doing their turn. This is all pretty clear in the road rules.
Unless a lawyer can tell me otherwise, my guess is that clearly requires the cyclist to give way to everything, and puts the cyclist using the cycleways in a vastly inferior and more vulnerable unsafe position.
- ghettro
- Posts: 960
- Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 9:38 am
- Location: London, UK
Re: Cycle lights proposal in Sydney
Postby ghettro » Sat Dec 25, 2010 11:55 pm
Just another example of how the RTA has munted the cycle paths to make them more convenient for motorists.
-
- Posts: 9810
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:48 am
Re: Cycle lights proposal in Sydney
Postby human909 » Sun Dec 26, 2010 2:43 am
I'm glad I don't live in Sydney! Though Melbourne had a similar situation with their Fitzroy St cycle path. However they came (partially) to their senses and removed them. Still it is safer and faster to ride on the road which is flat and 40kph limit.ghettro wrote:On the bourke st cycleway anytime a street intersects it (for example a T junction) the cycle lane has a give way sign - yes even if the cycle lane is travelling straight. This is ridiculous and against convention for a T-Junction where traffic travelling straight always has right of way over traffic turning left or right.
Just another example of how the RTA has munted the cycle paths to make them more convenient for motorists.
- Nate
- Posts: 3209
- Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 8:49 pm
- Contact:
Re: Cycle lights proposal in Sydney
Postby Nate » Tue Jan 04, 2011 9:27 pm
gemma wrote: Hi Nathan,
I didn't misread your email. I didn't agree with the content but I did want to acknowledge receiving it. As you have asked for someone senior to raise this with, please send any further correspondence to my chief-of-staff lillian saleh at ???@dailytelegraph.com.au . She is away until tuesday so it is unlikely you will get a response until then.
Regards,
Gemma
me wrote: Thanks for the clarification Gemma.
I assume you're not providing your source/a reference where Clover Moore made her statements to the committee?
Also you won't answer if you were present when the photo was taken? or specify who was actually there?
gemma wrote: Hi Nathan,
At your request, I have already sent you the name and contact details of someone senior. I asked then that you direct all correspondence to that person.
Regards,
Gemma
- Nate
- Posts: 3209
- Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 8:49 pm
- Contact:
Re: Cycle lights proposal in Sydney
Postby Nate » Mon Feb 14, 2011 1:15 pm
Thought i'd let the columnist know it might be her....
---------------------
Gemma,
Not too sure if you watch it, but it might be worth a look tonight as there's a bit of an inside tip that there's an anti-cycling Daily Telegraph feature & its possible that your article might be it!
Return to “Cycling Safety and Advocacy”
- General Australian Cycling Topics
- Info / announcements
- Buying a bike / parts
- General Cycling Discussion
- The Bike Shed
- Cycling Health
- Cycling Safety and Advocacy
- Women's Cycling
- Bike & Gear Reviews
- Cycling Trade
- Stolen Bikes
- Bicycle FAQs
- The Market Place
- Member to Member Bike and Gear Sales
- Want to Buy, Group Buy, Swap
- My Bikes or Gear Elsewhere
- Serious Biking
- Audax / Randonneuring
- Retro biking
- Commuting
- MTB
- Recumbents
- Fixed Gear/ Single Speed
- Track
- Electric Bicycles
- Cyclocross and Gravel Grinding
- Dragsters / Lowriders / Cruisers
- Children's Bikes
- Cargo Bikes and Utility Cycling
- Road Racing
- Road Biking
- Training
- Time Trial
- Triathlon
- International and National Tours and Events
- Cycle Touring
- Touring Australia
- Touring Overseas
- Touring Bikes and Equipment
- Australia
- Western Australia
- New South Wales
- Queensland
- South Australia
- Victoria
- ACT
- Tasmania
- Northern Territory
- Country & Regional
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
- All times are UTC+10:00
- Top
- Delete cookies
About the Australian Cycling Forums
The Australian Cycling Forums is a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.
Bicycles Network Australia
Forum Information
Connect with BNA
This website uses affiliate links to retail platforms including ebay, amazon, proviz and ribble.