SMIDSY, an explanation, but hopefully not an excuse.

User avatar
trailgumby
Posts: 11925
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 5:30 pm
Location: Northern Beaches, Sydney

Re: SMIDSY, an explanation, but hopefully not an excuse.

Postby trailgumby » Tue Feb 28, 2012 1:47 pm

Oxford wrote:Saw this on another forum, not sure if its been highlighted before, but it is a good reason to "snake the lane". I do it on the moto, moving from side to side in the lane periodically, also did it when cycle commuting to give an impression of spatial requirements to other road users.
...
http://www.msf-usa.org/motion.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troxler's_fading

Bizarre! The three yellow dots disappeared either singly, in pairs or all together until I moved my eyes. Occasionally, one of the yellow dots became green as well, only to be restored when I moved my eyes.
When all else fails, persistence prevails -- Lew Hollander

User avatar
tallywhacker
Posts: 1660
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 3:21 pm
Location: on the road

Re: SMIDSY, an explanation, but hopefully not an excuse.

Postby tallywhacker » Tue Feb 28, 2012 3:28 pm

great, now they have a science backed excuse as to why they (can) hit us
Ever since the vasectomy...I mostly ride fixed.

User avatar
Lizzy
Posts: 788
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 3:04 pm
Location: Wild West

Re: SMIDSY, an explanation, but hopefully not an excuse.

Postby Lizzy » Tue Feb 28, 2012 3:48 pm

Holy living f ... :shock: :?
“Lexa”: 2012 Trek Lexa S; “Bluey”: 2006 Trek 7.0FX

User avatar
TimW
Posts: 1361
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 3:37 pm
Location: Near the M7C

Re: SMIDSY, an explanation, but hopefully not an excuse.

Postby TimW » Tue Feb 28, 2012 3:54 pm

That will be the next defence for the ambulance chasers(Solicitors) :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:
Image

zero
Posts: 3006
Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 2:54 pm

Re: SMIDSY, an explanation, but hopefully not an excuse.

Postby zero » Tue Feb 28, 2012 4:00 pm

I don't think you can explain smidsy via stationary eye sleight of hand tricks. I have never seen a motorist that I could believe lost track of me. Its not the thought process I go through when waiting to give way at all - ie I identify the thing that I have to give way to, and wait for it to cross my bows, and don't need to track it to do so. This I believe is normal for most road users.

SMIDSY is more often a euphamism for sorry mate, I couldn't work out that I had to give way to you there, or sorry mate I didn't look at all.

human909
Posts: 7371
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:48 am

Re: SMIDSY, an explanation, but hopefully not an excuse.

Postby human909 » Tue Feb 28, 2012 5:01 pm

That is an impressive and disturbing optical artifact.

Though I believe the dancing bear is more what is happening. If you aren't looking for a bicycle sized object then you aren't going to see one. I never fail to instantly spot a cyclist when I cross the Canning St bike boulevard (whether I'm in a bike or car), that's because I'm consciously looking for one. The other day I did briefly miss spotting a cyclist as a rapidly approach a roundabout with poor visibility. I did spot the cyclist and I had time to stop and wave at the cyclist. But I was still a little unsettled that I didn't immediately notice the cyclist. I too am not as conditioned for looking for cyclists as a good dutch driver.

User avatar
TimW
Posts: 1361
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 3:37 pm
Location: Near the M7C

Re: SMIDSY, an explanation, but hopefully not an excuse.

Postby TimW » Tue Feb 28, 2012 5:42 pm

For those that missed the dancing bear, it got me as well the first time, very well done.Tim
Image

User avatar
il padrone
Posts: 22738
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
Location: Heading for home.

Re: SMIDSY, an explanation, but hopefully not an excuse.

Postby il padrone » Tue Feb 28, 2012 8:37 pm

zero wrote:SMIDSY is more often a euphamism for sorry mate, I couldn't work out that I had to give way to you there, or sorry mate I didn't look at all.

SMIDGAF

:evil:
Mandatory helmet law?
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."

Nobody
Posts: 7707
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 12:10 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: SMIDSY, an explanation, but hopefully not an excuse.

Postby Nobody » Tue Feb 28, 2012 10:17 pm

human909 wrote:If you aren't looking for a bicycle sized object then you aren't going to see one.
I believe this to be true. I doubt anyone would fail to see a big truck and I don't think anyone has ever not seen me in my smallish white sports car which is below average height. But I've been missed/ignored on both bicycles and motorbikes over the years.

User avatar
The 2nd Womble
Posts: 3058
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2011 1:21 pm
Location: Brisbane
Contact:

Re: SMIDSY, an explanation, but hopefully not an excuse.

Postby The 2nd Womble » Tue Feb 28, 2012 10:30 pm

You cn experience a similar effect if you stare at floor tiles for long enough. After a while you can notice various grout lines vanish and reappear. You have to stare at exactly one spot though
The only good Cyclist is a Bicyclist

Huge fan of booted RGers who just can't help themselves

Downhill
Posts: 406
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 1:11 am
Location: WA

Re: SMIDSY, an explanation, but hopefully not an excuse.

Postby Downhill » Mon Mar 05, 2012 9:19 pm

SMIDSY works both ways.

The other day I was turning left at a T intersection. Bright sunlight. Flat, straight road. I checked right, nothing coming. Checked left, nothing coming. Checked right again before putting the pedal down and... Holy ....! Where did that come from? Black car... deep shaded background... no contrast ... no lateral movement ... no vertical movement ... you get the idea. If any one of a dozen factors had changed even slightly, the car would have been perceptible.
Today's effort = Tomorrows reward.
2010 Oppy C6

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users