Vote for Anna...

Equipment and On Road Behaviour, Laws and Rules. Cycling Promotion and Advocacy

Vote for Anna...

Postby RonK » Sat Mar 10, 2012 10:10 pm

Premier Anna Bligh today promised to introduce a new dangerous driving law for the protection of cyclists if re-elected.

Would like to see a similar commitment from the other side...
Cycle touring blog and tour journals: whispering wheels...
User avatar
RonK
 
Posts: 5211
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 2:08 pm
Location: Brisbane, Queensland

by BNA » Sun Mar 11, 2012 7:07 am

BNA
 

Re: Vote for Anna...

Postby Rhubarb » Sun Mar 11, 2012 7:07 am

Do you have any more info on that, eg link to the quote or policy detail etc?
Rhubarb
 
Posts: 849
Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 8:42 pm

Re: Vote for Anna...

Postby RonK » Sun Mar 11, 2012 8:38 am

Rhubarb wrote:Do you have any more info on that, eg link to the quote or policy detail etc?

Nope, just her utterances on the news last night...

Edit: Well it wasn't hard to find. Here is the media release.

Here is the policy statement.

And here is the announcement:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BB3fXPIZtuM&feature=player_embedded[/youtube]
Last edited by RonK on Sun Mar 11, 2012 8:45 am, edited 1 time in total.
Cycle touring blog and tour journals: whispering wheels...
User avatar
RonK
 
Posts: 5211
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 2:08 pm
Location: Brisbane, Queensland

Re: Vote for Anna...

Postby Comedian » Sun Mar 11, 2012 8:45 am

Here is the link to the whole story.

I applaud the change to legislation but I think strict liability would be far more effective, and is what is needed. Motorists need to know that if they kill someone with a car they are guilty and will go to gaol just like any other murder.
Once you can climb hills on a bike it's all downhill. :mrgreen:

Hopefully I'll know what that's like..... one day. :shock: :lol:

Image
User avatar
Comedian
 
Posts: 4401
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 7:35 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: Vote for Anna...

Postby high_tea » Sun Mar 11, 2012 1:15 pm

Not that strict liability means anything of the sort, but yeah, this does nothing to solve the problem of the police being unwilling or unable to make out this sort of offence.

BTW there's a specific offence: causing death by dangerous driving. Something like that.
high_tea
 
Posts: 1263
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 8:10 pm

Vote for Anna...

Postby Max » Sun Mar 11, 2012 3:39 pm

I'd like to see current laws enforced before getting excited about a new law that won't be enforced.

Max


----------
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk. All typos are Auto-Correct's fault, not mine ;)
One of the best things about bicycle commuting is that it can mitigate the displeasure of having to go to work. - BikeSnobNYC
Cycling is sometimes like bobbing for apples in a bucket full of dicks. - SydGuy
User avatar
Max
 
Posts: 2895
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2008 1:29 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: Vote for Anna...

Postby find_bruce » Sun Mar 11, 2012 4:35 pm

Gee, a politician who has been in parliament since 1995, Premier of Qld since 2007, promises just before an election that if you vote for me, life will be better for you ...

How many bridges, railways, airports & other infrastructure have been promised in the lead-up to an election that never happen ?

Colour me cynical, but I will believe it when, or should I say if, it ever happens.
Image
User avatar
find_bruce
 
Posts: 3537
Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 8:42 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: Vote for Anna...

Postby Oxford » Sun Mar 11, 2012 5:20 pm

Max wrote:I'd like to see current laws enforced before getting excited about a new law that won't be enforced.

Max


----------
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk. All typos are Auto-Correct's fault, not mine ;)

my thoughts too. don't introduce a new law until you can commit to enforcing the current laws. bugger that, how about some real punishments for offences that really hurt, that will make a motorist think.

all I heard was blah blah blah blah blah.
Life is not about waiting for the rain to pass.....it's about learning to dance (or ride) in the rain.
- anonymous
User avatar
Oxford
 
Posts: 4714
Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2008 1:49 pm
Location: Brisbane

Vote for Anna...

Postby RonK » Sun Mar 11, 2012 5:38 pm

Perhaps, but what will the other side do to protect cyclists and promote safe cycling? Do they even have a policy?

Campbell Newman has always found votes in building roads and tunnels to funnel even more traffic into the city. The only politician from the right I've seen on a bike was Bruce Flegg.

I'm all ears Campbell.


Posted via Tapatalk
Cycle touring blog and tour journals: whispering wheels...
User avatar
RonK
 
Posts: 5211
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 2:08 pm
Location: Brisbane, Queensland

Re: Vote for Anna...

Postby ekib » Sun Mar 11, 2012 7:01 pm

Comments,

as per previous posters,
- Election time promise, ...
- Weekend before Bike Week ...
and questions,
when and if the new law were introduced,

would it actually achieve anything ?
and
would it make cycling any better or safer?
and would it encourage more people to cycle?

Ekib
The End.
User avatar
ekib
 
Posts: 89
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 12:52 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: Vote for Anna...

Postby Comedian » Sun Mar 11, 2012 7:13 pm

ekib wrote:Comments,

as per previous posters,
- Election time promise, ...
- Weekend before Bike Week ...
and questions,
when and if the new law were introduced,

would it actually achieve anything ?
and
would it make cycling any better or safer?
and would it encourage more people to cycle?

Ekib

I know there are issues with strict liability. None the less, if it's out there then people just know if they whack a ped or biker they are in trouble. Now they just SMIDSY their way out. :(
Once you can climb hills on a bike it's all downhill. :mrgreen:

Hopefully I'll know what that's like..... one day. :shock: :lol:

Image
User avatar
Comedian
 
Posts: 4401
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 7:35 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: Vote for Anna...

Postby PawPaw » Sun Mar 11, 2012 7:39 pm

The timing is a gutter level insult to every cyclist who has been seriously injured or killed since she has been Premier.
If she just woke up that cyclists need protection, and that now is a good time to maybe act, well make a "promise", like no carbon tax, then she is the callous opportunistic wnkr I've always thought since she married her partner of 20+ years when Beattie made it clear he would stepping down.
User avatar
PawPaw
 
Posts: 1244
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2011 6:53 am
Location: Brisbane

Re: Vote for Anna...

Postby Comedian » Sun Mar 11, 2012 7:42 pm

PawPaw wrote:The timing is a gutter level insult to every cyclist who has been seriously injured or killed since she has been Premier.
If she just woke up that cyclists need protection, and that now is a good time to maybe act, well make a "promise", like no carbon tax, then she is the callous opportunistic wnkr I've always thought since she married her partner of 20+ years when Beattie made it clear he would stepping down.


So mate, can you tell us what you really think about her? :shock: Don't hold back. :mrgreen: :mrgreen:
Once you can climb hills on a bike it's all downhill. :mrgreen:

Hopefully I'll know what that's like..... one day. :shock: :lol:

Image
User avatar
Comedian
 
Posts: 4401
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 7:35 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: Vote for Anna...

Postby martinjs » Sun Mar 11, 2012 8:02 pm

Seems to be a bit of Politics being discussed here! :lol:

Martin
Image
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity!
User avatar
martinjs
 
Posts: 3387
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 7:54 pm
Location: Fivebough, Leeton

Re: Vote for Anna...

Postby Mulger bill » Sun Mar 11, 2012 8:06 pm

I'll vote for Anna.

Problem is, I've been ineligible to vote up there since Joh left the building...

Ity mightn't be much and it might be late but at least it's something that might be able to be hawked around the other states.
...whatever the road rules, self-preservation is the absolute priority for a cyclist when mixing it with motorised traffic.
London Boy 29/12/2011
User avatar
Mulger bill
Super Mod
Super Mod
 
Posts: 25538
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 2:41 pm
Location: Sunbury Vic

Re: Vote for Anna...

Postby high_tea » Sun Mar 11, 2012 8:41 pm

The best thing about this announcement is that it suggests that cyclists have become electorally significant. The actual substance: not much there, for mine. Hey, you've got to start somewhere. I wonder what BQ,AGF,SCA etc make of this. Did any of them suggest it, for that matter?
high_tea
 
Posts: 1263
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 8:10 pm

Re: Vote for Anna...

Postby heanous » Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:37 am

^^^ I don't think so, seems like an opportunistic feel good announcement conveniently delivered on the commencement of Bike Week here in Brisbane. Call me cynical, but I've heard enough 'announcements' and 'commitments' and 'delivering' from the current state govt to last me another lifetime.
heanous
 
Posts: 68
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2011 2:12 pm
Location: balwyn

Re: Vote for Anna...

Postby grasshopper » Mon Mar 12, 2012 11:05 am

high_tea wrote:The best thing about this announcement is that it suggests that cyclists have become electorally significant. The actual substance: not much there, for mine. Hey, you've got to start somewhere. I wonder what BQ,AGF,SCA etc make of this. Did any of them suggest it, for that matter?

MUARC suggested a look at strict liability a couple of years ago, and AGF got on board last month, when it was discussed here. Even BV begrudgingly acknowledged a need for more legal protection last week, so I think you're right; the ground is shifting and the wheels are groaning in to action. Even the discussion canvases the revolutionary concept that drivers might have responsibilities, as well as rights. :wink:
User avatar
grasshopper
 
Posts: 331
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2009 7:04 pm
Location: Melbourne

Re: Vote for Anna...

Postby Oxford » Mon Mar 12, 2012 8:18 pm

funny how this is suddenly an issue now, its been an issue for a long time.

I hate how elections bring out the desperation in politicians. and what's worse is the way they all weasel out of these promises post election. there should be a law that election promises are personally binding, we'd see a different landscape on the hustings then.

would this law if brought in, change the mind of my wife and make her happy that its now safe for me to cycle commute? absolutely not! so would this law work? absolutely not! so is it worth anything to me. absolutely not!
Life is not about waiting for the rain to pass.....it's about learning to dance (or ride) in the rain.
- anonymous
User avatar
Oxford
 
Posts: 4714
Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2008 1:49 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: Vote for Anna...

Postby il padrone » Mon Mar 12, 2012 8:24 pm

What's your view on this, Womble ?? Is it a good step in your view? (Not your 1m rule I know)
Riding bikes in traffic - what seems dangerous is usually safe; what seems safe is often more dangerous.
User avatar
il padrone
 
Posts: 18139
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
Location: Heading for home.

Re: Vote for Anna...

Postby InTheWoods » Mon Mar 12, 2012 9:49 pm

Won't it be a step up from the current situation, where as long as the motorist doesn't hit you, or cause you to take action to avoid a collision, the police won't do anything apart from maybe speak to the driver? If there is a specific rule against reckless driving near cyclists, our video evidence may turn out to be a lot more effective.

I don't think there's any single magic bullet here. But surely a specific rule about driving recklessly near cyclists is one positive step in the right direction? On its own it won't make a significant difference but a combination of a whole lot of things (eg. such as better driver education/testing) can reduce the risks.
Image
User avatar
InTheWoods
 
Posts: 1376
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2011 2:34 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: Vote for Anna...

Postby The 2nd Womble » Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:55 pm

high_tea wrote:The best thing about this announcement is that it suggests that cyclists have become electorally significant. The actual substance: not much there, for mine. Hey, you've got to start somewhere. I wonder what BQ,AGF,SCA etc make of this. Did any of them suggest it, for that matter?

Yes, yes we did. Hopefully it's the safe passing/strictish liability legislation we've been pushing for but who knows? No detail. SCA IS 50/50 here:
Yea's-better late than never if (if) you win Anna
Nay's-9 Queenslanders lost in the 12 months leading up to the election everyones been talking about,
cheap vote grab and from a cyclist of all people(!)
no content whatsoever as yet despite us asking repeatedly (says dodgy to us),
and as said yet again here, enforce the current laws so everyone takes you seriously!

Mind you, Campbell seems to gold cyclists in about as much contempt as Queenslanders do for his deranged wife. And no policy oitline from them at all regarsing anything road related that I know of.
The only good Cyclist is a Bicyclist

Huge fan of booted RGers who just can't help themselves
User avatar
The 2nd Womble
 
Posts: 3058
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2011 1:21 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: Vote for Anna...

Postby The 2nd Womble » Mon Mar 12, 2012 11:09 pm

Provided Labor wins - and Can botch Campbell is doing all he can to help them do so - and the QPS play ball, (2 mighty big if's) we'll be going nuts on the sofa in the Womble's warren. The enforcement is a huge concern. And what guidelines for constituting an offence without video footage if a cyclist wants to report an act of aggression. We want to see details people!
The only good Cyclist is a Bicyclist

Huge fan of booted RGers who just can't help themselves
User avatar
The 2nd Womble
 
Posts: 3058
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2011 1:21 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: Vote for Anna...

Postby high_tea » Tue Mar 13, 2012 10:32 am

Inwood wrote:Won't it be a step up from the current situation, where as long as the motorist doesn't hit you, or cause you to take action to avoid a collision, the police won't do anything apart from maybe speak to the driver? If there is a specific rule against reckless driving near cyclists, our video evidence may turn out to be a lot more effective.

I don't think there's any single magic bullet here. But surely a specific rule about driving recklessly near cyclists is one positive step in the right direction? On its own it won't make a significant difference but a combination of a whole lot of things (eg. such as better driver education/testing) can reduce the risks.


p7 of the policy document RonK linked to states:

we will amend the Criminal Code offence of Dangerous Driving to include a specific provision which will increase the penalty if the dangerous driving deliberately or recklessly endangers a cyclist. The penalties will increase from a maximum 200 penalty units ($20,000) or 3 years imprisonment to a
maximum penalty of 400 penalty units ($40,000) or 5 years imprisonment under the new provision.


So, no specific offence, just a circumstance of aggravation to dangerous driving. Not a bad thing, but it doesn't change the standard of behaviour one bit. It just increases the penalties.
high_tea
 
Posts: 1263
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 8:10 pm

Re: Vote for Anna...

Postby molly » Tue Mar 13, 2012 10:51 am

Great choice we have, both Bligh and Newman waste obscene amounts of money on stuff-ups (Queensland Health, Traverston Dam, Clem 7, Go-Between Bridge) and neither will do anything about real issues (public transport/moving away from car-centric Brisbane, Great Barrier Reef, protecting farmers/mining issues etc)

I am just wondering what I can do to oppose this stupid system of unaccountability, complete backflips and essentially lying/skirting the truth, while slinging mud at any opposition.

Voting based on any one pre-election promise (in light of all australian policians performances lately) is strange to me.
molly
 
Posts: 40
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 8:08 pm
Location: Brisbane

Next

Return to Cycling Safety and Advocacy

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users



Popular Bike Shops
Torpedo 7 Torpedo7 AU
Ground Effect Ground Effect NZ
Chain Reaction Cycles CRC UK
Wiggle Wiggle UK
Ebay Ebay AU



InTouch with BNA
“Bicycles BNA Twitter
“Bicycles BNA Facebook
“Google+ BNA Google+
“Bicycles BNA Newsletter