Vote for Anna...

Equipment and On Road Behaviour, Laws and Rules. Cycling Promotion and Advocacy

Re: Vote for Anna...

Postby Comedian » Tue Mar 13, 2012 4:59 pm

Oxford wrote:
high_tea wrote:
Inwood wrote:Won't it be a step up from the current situation, where as long as the motorist doesn't hit you, or cause you to take action to avoid a collision, the police won't do anything apart from maybe speak to the driver? If there is a specific rule against reckless driving near cyclists, our video evidence may turn out to be a lot more effective.

I don't think there's any single magic bullet here. But surely a specific rule about driving recklessly near cyclists is one positive step in the right direction? On its own it won't make a significant difference but a combination of a whole lot of things (eg. such as better driver education/testing) can reduce the risks.


p7 of the policy document RonK linked to states:

we will amend the Criminal Code offence of Dangerous Driving to include a specific provision which will increase the penalty if the dangerous driving deliberately or recklessly endangers a cyclist. The penalties will increase from a maximum 200 penalty units ($20,000) or 3 years imprisonment to a
maximum penalty of 400 penalty units ($40,000) or 5 years imprisonment under the new provision.

I've noticed a real trend with this government on a range of issues... and that is to increase penalties massively and then not really enforce it. I think the idea is to make the penalty so utterly eye watering that people will avoid the behaviour... saving having to worry about enforcement. And if they do enforce it it's very very lucrative. I'm not a fan of that.

So, no specific offence, just a circumstance of aggravation to dangerous driving. Not a bad thing, but it doesn't change the standard of behaviour one bit. It just increases the penalties.

exactly and yours, mine, drivers, the police's version of what constitutes reckless endangerment will vary. going by past experience, unless the police think it is a lock if it goes to court, they do nothing.

sorry its just another law that would be enforced in retrospect (police either have to see it or you have to get hurt) rather than actively (cyclist makes complaint with supporting evidence or witnesses), so its a waste of time IMO.
Once you can climb hills on a bike it's all downhill. :mrgreen:

Hopefully I'll know what that's like..... one day. :shock: :lol:

Image
User avatar
Comedian
 
Posts: 4439
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 7:35 pm
Location: Brisbane

by BNA » Tue Mar 13, 2012 7:54 pm

BNA
 

Re: Vote for Anna...

Postby myforwik » Tue Mar 13, 2012 7:54 pm

high_tea wrote:
Inwood wrote:
we will amend the Criminal Code offence of Dangerous Driving to include a specific provision which will increase the penalty if the dangerous driving deliberately or recklessly endangers a cyclist. The penalties will increase from a maximum 200 penalty units ($20,000) or 3 years imprisonment to a
maximum penalty of 400 penalty units ($40,000) or 5 years imprisonment under the new provision.


So, no specific offence, just a circumstance of aggravation to dangerous driving. Not a bad thing, but it doesn't change the standard of behaviour one bit. It just increases the penalties.


Exactally. She has promised nothing. When was the last time someone got 3 years? PEOPLE KILL CYCLISTS AND DON'T EVEN GET 3 YEARS. *increasing* the maximum is a pathetic joke. The only possible situation this would apply is in a drunk driver who kills a cyclists (and who doesn't have mates where are barrasters).

Just another silly empty promise that she hopes people are to stupid to read the details of. Such a tiny amendment like that could have been put through at any time its not a 'policy' to take to an election....

Also $27m for cycling in a whole state is a joke, wow a whole $27m... meanwhile cars and trains are getting $6,000 million. The QLD government just gave 1.3million to a 200m stretch of bikeway near my house (they use the bicycle grants as an excuse to rebuild the road, cars parks and intersection, for cars). So most of that $27 million won't even be spent on bicycles - you just have to throw a bike lane in and you can get the grant to build pratically anything.
myforwik
 
Posts: 331
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2011 7:08 pm

Re: Vote for Anna...

Postby KonaCommuter » Tue Mar 13, 2012 8:06 pm

Just introduce a minimum custodial sentence if you are responsible for someone being unlawfully killed. The charge would cover everything from workplace accidents to murder. WH&S if you are told about a problem and don’t sort it you’re responsible. Same for licensed drivers. You passed the test, you should know the rules, ALL of them and you should be competent.
2012 Oppy A4
User avatar
KonaCommuter
 
Posts: 978
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2011 8:28 pm
Location: Brisbane Northside

Re: Vote for Anna...

Postby high_tea » Wed Mar 14, 2012 11:14 am

Another thing that irks me, apart from the ridiculous claim that this creates a new offence, is that this change is said to apply specifically to offences involving cyclists. This creates a disparity between cyclists and pedestrians (among others) that is stupid, pointless and divisive. Why not aim it at vulnerable road users? Dangerous driving involving a pedestrian (or WRD user or whatever) is every bit as bad as dangerous driving involving a cyclist.
high_tea
 
Posts: 1372
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 8:10 pm

Re: Vote for Anna...

Postby InTheWoods » Wed Mar 14, 2012 1:49 pm

Hmm ok I'll stand corrected I think. I should have read it a bit closer.
Image
User avatar
InTheWoods
 
Posts: 1607
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2011 2:34 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: Vote for Anna...

Postby high_tea » Wed Mar 14, 2012 3:01 pm

That wasn't a dig at you, Inwood, and I'm sorry if it came across that way. It was aimed at the ALP. Their own policy contradicts their claim that there will be a new offence!
high_tea
 
Posts: 1372
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 8:10 pm

Re: Vote for Anna...

Postby The 2nd Womble » Wed Mar 14, 2012 5:45 pm

high_tea wrote:That wasn't a dig at you, Inwood, and I'm sorry if it came across that way. It was aimed at the ALP. Their own policy contradicts their claim that there will be a new offence!

+1. I'm with you too Inwood in that I misread a fair bit of this too. Yup, Labor sucks at pulling the Wool over seeing things in head socket stuff thingos. Half arsed and counterproductive in the extreme!
The only good Cyclist is a Bicyclist

Huge fan of booted RGers who just can't help themselves
User avatar
The 2nd Womble
 
Posts: 3058
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2011 1:21 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: Vote for Anna...

Postby PawPaw » Wed Mar 14, 2012 10:10 pm

http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/political-news/labor-in-28m-vow-to-cyclists-20120310-1urup.html

Ah, I get it now. Anna had a personal experience of road rage when on a bike, so that's the motive for her election promise.
Maybe instead of the self referent anecdote, she could have been motivated by and mentioned the trends in cyclist injuries and deaths.
But then, knowing Anna, no she couldn't.

Never mind, they're all more equal in the Bligh/Withers household. Anna can change bike laws, whenever she so chooses.
And Mr Withers can change the climate (as head of the Qld Dept of Climate Change).
User avatar
PawPaw
 
Posts: 1244
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2011 6:53 am
Location: Brisbane

Previous

Return to Cycling Safety and Advocacy

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: caneye, jimbo33



Popular Bike Shops
Wiggle Wiggle UK
Ground Effect Ground Effect NZ
Ebay Ebay AU
Chain Reaction Cycles CRC UK

“Bicycles BNA Twitter
“Bicycles BNA Facebook
“Google+ BNA Google+
“Bicycles BNA Newsletter
“Bicycles BNA on Strava

> FREE BNA Stickers

cron