Californian Assembly passes ammended 3ft Bill

User avatar
The 2nd Womble
Posts: 3058
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2011 1:21 pm
Location: Brisbane
Contact:

Californian Assembly passes ammended 3ft Bill

Postby The 2nd Womble » Tue Aug 28, 2012 11:16 am

We just heard that the Californian Assembly passed SB1464 by a vote of 50-16. If Governer Jerry Brown signs off on the amended senate Bill 1464, history tells us that the majority of America's States will follow suit. This will strengthen Australian group's calls for minimum safe passing distances as a result.
http://twitter.com/CalBike/statuses/239018720201154563
The only good Cyclist is a Bicyclist

Huge fan of booted RGers who just can't help themselves

User avatar
greyhoundtom
Posts: 3016
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 6:28 am
Location: Wherever the sun is shining
Contact:

Re: Californian Assembly passes ammended 3ft Bill

Postby greyhoundtom » Tue Aug 28, 2012 4:37 pm

I'm not really sure as to how much help this will be in regard to a SAFE passing distance.

3 ft is still 4 inches less than 1 metre, and in some instances 1 metre can be cutting it a little close as in high speed semi's or buses.

User avatar
il padrone
Posts: 22491
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
Location: Heading for home.

Re: Californian Assembly passes ammended 3ft Bill

Postby il padrone » Tue Aug 28, 2012 4:52 pm

3 ft is still a stating point as a minimum, better than the current nothing.... "6 inches is quite OK as long as I don't hit you". Australian groups are campaigning for 1m for urban areas and 1.5m for roads >80kmh.


Of course their next step is to get the law enforced :|
Mandatory helmet law?
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."

User avatar
The 2nd Womble
Posts: 3058
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2011 1:21 pm
Location: Brisbane
Contact:

Re: Californian Assembly passes ammended 3ft Bill

Postby The 2nd Womble » Tue Aug 28, 2012 5:01 pm

The 3ft rule is essentially the same thing for all intents and purposes Greyhound. Metric folk use the 1m rule, cavemen folk like the yanks and poms use a 3 ft rule. Don't concentrate on the mm in between.
The only good Cyclist is a Bicyclist

Huge fan of booted RGers who just can't help themselves

User avatar
Mulger bill
Super Mod
Super Mod
Posts: 28147
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 2:41 pm
Location: Sunbury Vic

Re: Californian Assembly passes ammended 3ft Bill

Postby Mulger bill » Tue Aug 28, 2012 5:09 pm

il padrone wrote:3 ft is still a stating point as a minimum, better than the current nothing.... "6 inches is quite OK as long as I don't hit you". Australian groups are campaigning for 1m for urban areas and 1.5m for roads >80kmh.


Of course their next step is to get the law enforced :|



This. Not ideal but a least a standard for reference, if Mr Plod can be made to give a rats. (Does not apply if overtaking vehicle is speeding.)
...whatever the road rules, self-preservation is the absolute priority for a cyclist when mixing it with motorised traffic.
London Boy 29/12/2011

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users