Cyclist NOT blamed for crash
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Re: Cyclist NOT blamed for crashSgt Wilson said
"Cyclists have to do the right thing as well, if they're obstructing traffic they need to think about whether they should be two abreast." So is Sgt Wilson also taking responsibility for the more deaths and injuries due to cars hitting cyclist who are riding single file? Not that I'm advocating riding two abreast all the time but the fact is that these sorts of accidents would be happening less if all cyclists in groups ride ride two abreast.
Re: Cyclist NOT blamed for crashFrom the same article......................never mind all the other severe injuries that occur when being hit by a car..........providing you are wearing a helmet everything is good
No Mr Tunks you have it wrong......................the most important thing is careful drivers that do not hit cyclists.
Re: Cyclist NOT blamed for crash
It is the context. In the event of an accident motorists have seatbelts, often airbags and are encased in a cabin designed to minimise injury to the occupants. I certainly agree that for cyclists (let alone all road users) that accident prevention is far better. BNA Feature: E-Bike Buyers Guide App on Now iTunes
Re: Cyclist NOT blamed for crash+1Driver Education.
Alot of drivers don't have a clue how to indicate through a round-a-bout let alone over take something as scary and as frightening to Nervous drivers as the dreaded "Cylcist".
Re: Cyclist NOT blamed for crashHe's a footballer so there's no question he would be blamed for anything. Hope he receovers well though.
Nice to see police with a grip on the rules and promoting them. The story might be more complete with a statement about whether the driver has been charged.
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Return to Cycling Safety and Advocacy Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users |
Top Bikes & Gear
Exclusive: BNA 10% discount for ProBikeKit |