How not to run a road safety campaign
- Xplora
- Posts: 8272
- Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2010 12:33 am
- Location: TL;DR
Re: How not to run a road safety campaign
Postby Xplora » Mon Nov 19, 2012 8:18 pm
I've gone through a red. It was a day in hospital for my trouble. 4 months ago this week. I know the consequences... and I still think you're ridiculous. The Road Rules are a pitiful excuse for people to behave badly, and the obscenity that many riders have to endure from lawabiding bastards is disgusting. A heartfelt obsession with lights doesn't improve anything for anyone. If we stopped at every red, we'd be hogging the road going too slow, or dressing indecently in lycra. It's just an excuse.
- biker jk
- Posts: 7012
- Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 6:18 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: How not to run a road safety campaign
Postby biker jk » Mon Nov 19, 2012 8:35 pm
-
- Posts: 9810
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:48 am
Re: How not to run a road safety campaign
Postby human909 » Mon Nov 19, 2012 8:44 pm
Because dangerous driving/riding and breaking a road rule are two totally different things. I'm critical of behaviour that is unsafe and dangerous towards others. I'm not critical of breaking a road rule that doesn't endanger nor inconvenience anybody.biker jk wrote:How can I be critical of bad driving which risks injuring or killing cyclists if as a rider I regularly ride through red lights and break the law.
I'm not arguing that I don't "need" to obey the road rules (whatever "need" means). We all have the choice. If that choice is harmless then where is the objection?biker jk wrote:Once you argue that you don't need to obey the road rules due to x, y or z reason then Pandora's Box is opened. It's not a winning argument in any respect.
-
- Posts: 323
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2012 2:10 pm
Re: How not to run a road safety campaign
Postby LM324 » Mon Nov 19, 2012 9:03 pm
Another strawman comment. You just made that up because I made a point didn't I. You go on about safety so I say how does going through a red light to save time have anything to do with being safer for the cyclist?Xplora wrote:I feel sad that you are incapable of making a decision at an intersection with a traffic light... what are you supposed to do when the light is out? You proceed with caution. Just as you do any other time.
I feel sad as well. You have gone through a red light and have gotten hit... and yet you still go through red lights. I thought people were meant to learn from their mistakes...Xplora wrote: I've gone through a red. It was a day in hospital for my trouble. 4 months ago this week. I know the consequences... and I still think you're ridiculous. The Road Rules are a pitiful excuse for people to behave badly, and the obscenity that many riders have to endure from lawabiding bastards is disgusting. A heartfelt obsession with lights doesn't improve anything for anyone. If we stopped at every red, we'd be hogging the road going too slow, or dressing indecently in lycra. It's just an excuse.
I guess survival of the fittest and natural selection will kick in someday.
... and that's the last I'm posting in this thread. It's going no where.
- ldrcycles
- Posts: 9594
- Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 3:19 pm
- Location: Kin Kin, Queensland
Re: How not to run a road safety campaign
Postby ldrcycles » Mon Nov 19, 2012 10:06 pm
Or the other one where i just took the footpath around it, again perfectly within the law (at least in QLD). As i see it, if you're going hard enough you should see most red lights as a welcome opportunity to rest .
- Xplora
- Posts: 8272
- Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2010 12:33 am
- Location: TL;DR
Re: How not to run a road safety campaign
Postby Xplora » Tue Nov 20, 2012 12:04 am
If the aim was to make cyclists look good and lawabiding, this behaviour won't do it... most drivers would be spitting chips that you could do that and get away with it. They aren't interested in how much you obey the law. They are interested in how you damage their sense of entitlement.ldrcycles wrote: i just took the footpath around it, again perfectly within the law
Phil, you decided to play the man, and you are unlikely to win that way, because I look past the comments - you have a desperate need to obey the rules despite it achieving nothing.
You think that going through the red was the thing that undid me - that's the laughable thing, surely. Very poor decisionmaking undid me. The colour of the light is irrelevent if a car is in front of your bike at 40kmh. This is something that can happen at greens, and even intersections WITHOUT LIGHTS
I feel sorry that you lack such confidence on the roads. You must if you can't make a decision without a sign telling you what to do
Survival of the fittest does kick in. All the deadbeats who refuse to exercise end up dead about 30 years before I probably will. No fat 80 year olds.
-
- Posts: 1290
- Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 4:47 pm
- Location: Perth
Re: How not to run a road safety campaign
Postby GraemeL » Tue Nov 20, 2012 8:58 am
It's harmless because the rest of us abide by the current laws. If everyone took the same view what would happen?human909 wrote:Because dangerous driving/riding and breaking a road rule are two totally different things. I'm critical of behaviour that is unsafe and dangerous towards others. I'm not critical of breaking a road rule that doesn't endanger nor inconvenience anybody.biker jk wrote:How can I be critical of bad driving which risks injuring or killing cyclists if as a rider I regularly ride through red lights and break the law.
I'm not arguing that I don't "need" to obey the road rules (whatever "need" means). We all have the choice. If that choice is harmless then where is the objection?biker jk wrote:Once you argue that you don't need to obey the road rules due to x, y or z reason then Pandora's Box is opened. It's not a winning argument in any respect.
You think running a red is harmless, a driver thinks driving down the wrong side of the road is harmless, a pedestrian thinks walking down the middle of the road is harmless. It doesn't stop there, someone uses your lawnmower or your car or your bike, it's not hurting you because you werent using them at the time. Where does it end?
If everyone had your attitude there would be kaos.
Graeme
* Bicycle Camera FAQ's *** Mounting FAQ’s & DIY Mounts *
-
- Posts: 9810
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:48 am
Re: How not to run a road safety campaign
Postby human909 » Tue Nov 20, 2012 9:34 am
No it is harmless because going through a red light when nobody is around doesn't harm anybody.GraemeL wrote:It's harmless because the rest of us abide by the current laws.
Um, people would get home quicker? In fact it does seem like a fair sized proportion DO take the same view when their pedestrians.GraemeL wrote:If everyone took the same view what would happen?
I KNOW running a red light when there is not a person/vehicle around is harmless.GraemeL wrote:You think running a red is harmless
Oh "the old running a red light at night leads to theft argument".GraemeL wrote:a driver thinks driving down the wrong side of the road is harmless, a pedestrian thinks walking down the middle of the road is harmless. It doesn't stop there, someone uses your lawnmower or your car or your bike, it's not hurting you because you werent using them at the time. Where does it end?
And if everybody had your attitude there would be CONTROL.GraemeL wrote:If everyone had your attitude there would be kaos.
- Xplora
- Posts: 8272
- Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2010 12:33 am
- Location: TL;DR
Re: How not to run a road safety campaign
Postby Xplora » Tue Nov 20, 2012 10:00 am
- Lukeyboy
- Posts: 3622
- Joined: Tue May 29, 2012 2:38 am
Re: How not to run a road safety campaign
Postby Lukeyboy » Wed Nov 21, 2012 12:01 am
Russia. Proof: Youtubewellington_street wrote:You can say the same about any road rule for any type of vehicle at some point in time. The point of rules is to ensure predictable behaviour on the roads and avoid the creation of ambiguous or dangerous situations.human909 wrote:Regarding running red lights.... Its not a safety campaign, it is an obedience campaign.
If I drive a car through a red light when there's no other traffic, is that OK? How about drive down the wrong side of the road at 2am when there's nobody around? Or go the wrong way around the roundabout? Or drive 60km/h over the speed limit on the freeway when I'm the only vehicle in sight?
All perfectly 'safe' behaviour that is very much illegal for a reason.
-
- Posts: 9810
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:48 am
Re: How not to run a road safety campaign
Postby human909 » Wed Nov 21, 2012 1:37 am
I have no problems with any of those activities. I would hope by now everybody has realised that.wellington_street wrote:If I drive a car through a red light when there's no other traffic, is that OK? How about drive down the wrong side of the road at 2am when there's nobody around? Or go the wrong way around the roundabout? Or drive 60km/h over the speed limit on the freeway when I'm the only vehicle in sight?
Driving on the "wrong side of the road", ie not keeping left as practicable. That sounds like an excellent example of a law that I expect everyone breaks quite often when there is not another car in sight. Have you ever not been "as left a practical while cycling down a suburban street? Yep, you are breaking a law.
Lets not get all righteous. If your actions illegal are harmless then what is the issue?
-
- Posts: 1290
- Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 4:47 pm
- Location: Perth
Re: How not to run a road safety campaign
Postby GraemeL » Wed Nov 21, 2012 9:52 am
It's not theft, I think theft is a stupid law. You aren't using your car, lawnmower, bike etc I haven't harmed you or inconvenienced you at all, so no harm done.human909 wrote:Oh "the old running a red light at night leads to theft argument".GraemeL wrote:a driver thinks driving down the wrong side of the road is harmless, a pedestrian thinks walking down the middle of the road is harmless. It doesn't stop there, someone uses your lawnmower or your car or your bike, it's not hurting you because you werent using them at the time. Where does it end?
If you ignore the law and think running a red is ok, then others should be allowed to choose what laws they want to ignore.
Graeme
* Bicycle Camera FAQ's *** Mounting FAQ’s & DIY Mounts *
-
- Posts: 9810
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:48 am
Re: How not to run a road safety campaign
Postby human909 » Wed Nov 21, 2012 10:06 am
That is an odd position to take Graeme. Personally I think it is good that theft and running red lights is against the law.GraemeL wrote:It's not theft, I think theft is a stupid law.
Others are allowed to choose what laws they ignore. But we have a justice system in place to punish that.GraemeL wrote:If you ignore the law and think running a red is ok, then others should be allowed to choose what laws they want to ignore.
Return to “Cycling Safety and Advocacy”
- General Australian Cycling Topics
- Info / announcements
- Buying a bike / parts
- General Cycling Discussion
- The Bike Shed
- Cycling Health
- Cycling Safety and Advocacy
- Women's Cycling
- Bike & Gear Reviews
- Cycling Trade
- Stolen Bikes
- Bicycle FAQs
- The Market Place
- Member to Member Bike and Gear Sales
- Want to Buy, Group Buy, Swap
- My Bikes or Gear Elsewhere
- Serious Biking
- Audax / Randonneuring
- Retro biking
- Commuting
- MTB
- Recumbents
- Fixed Gear/ Single Speed
- Track
- Electric Bicycles
- Cyclocross and Gravel Grinding
- Dragsters / Lowriders / Cruisers
- Children's Bikes
- Cargo Bikes and Utility Cycling
- Road Racing
- Road Biking
- Training
- Time Trial
- Triathlon
- International and National Tours and Events
- Cycle Touring
- Touring Australia
- Touring Overseas
- Touring Bikes and Equipment
- Australia
- Western Australia
- New South Wales
- Queensland
- South Australia
- Victoria
- ACT
- Tasmania
- Northern Territory
- Country & Regional
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
- All times are UTC+10:00
- Top
- Delete cookies
About the Australian Cycling Forums
The Australian Cycling Forums is a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.
Bicycles Network Australia
Forum Information
Connect with BNA
This website uses affiliate links to retail platforms including ebay, amazon, proviz and ribble.