But others know the laws and instead offer elaborate rationalizations for their behavior. These are frequently variations upon the theme, “I’m actually being safer/smarter/helping traffic flow better.” It’s that smug ‘actually’ that galls, because buried therein is a root of bicyclists’ image problem: the perception that we think we know better. We reinforce it by reinterpreting laws to make our behavior appear safe or noble.
Well, sorry, that’s not how civilization works. And it contributes to a stressful street climate of vindictive, they-started-it behavior that gets people hurt.
Advocacy article: "We need to follow the rules of the road"
- Howzat
- Posts: 850
- Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2012 7:08 pm
Advocacy article: "We need to follow the rules of the road"
Postby Howzat » Wed Jan 30, 2013 1:24 pm
- find_bruce
- Moderator
- Posts: 10599
- Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 8:42 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: Advocacy article: "We need to follow the rules of the ro
Postby find_bruce » Wed Jan 30, 2013 2:09 pm
If you prefer anecdotal evidence, every day in the Sydney CBD I see pedestrians crossing against red lights
The double standard is the expectation that cyclists are somehow different to other people & need to be perfect in order to be considered legitimate. There is no evidence that, as a group, cyclists are any better or worse at following the road rules than the rest of the population
- outnabike
- Posts: 2455
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 2:53 pm
- Location: Melbourne Vic
Re: Advocacy article: "We need to follow the rules of the ro
Postby outnabike » Wed Jan 30, 2013 2:55 pm
You take a “person” out of his bed and put him onto a corner where that “person” can blindly walk on the left or right or cross over against the lights and call it a “pedestrian”...... A dumb pedestrian
You take that “pedestrian”, put it on a bike and is it suddenly imbued with superior brain power and has more privileges than the pedestrian? ...... Off course it has.
You take that “Cyclist”, put it in a car and its powers of perception double again. It becomes a legacy of, ..... “I own the road” Short cuts and speeding are ok,..... but not for cyclists!
So all facets of travel superiority grow with the power of the mode of transport, and whichever you are engaged in at the time. This becomes your world of law and its perception. That individual then righteously expounds on the right to do whatever is necessary to get where they are going.
The funny thing to me is that within these groups a few actually try to get along,....... so as not to get booked.
Seems to work out just fine.
But what is the answer to the problem of education? Well it’s pretty obvious!
No point punishing a person after he has done the wrong thing and either killed himself or others.
Get the mongrel while it is in it's bed, and beat it with a lead pipe...tell it to behave whilst walking, riding or driving. That folks, is an example of lateral thinking.
- Howzat
- Posts: 850
- Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2012 7:08 pm
Re: Advocacy article: "We need to follow the rules of the ro
Postby Howzat » Wed Jan 30, 2013 5:10 pm
It's not a double standard. It's a single standard. All road users are expecting to follow the rules - as the proliferation of red light and speed cameras catching drivers evidence.find_bruce wrote:The double standard is the expectation that cyclists are somehow different to other people & need to be perfect in order to be considered legitimate. There is no evidence that, as a group, cyclists are any better or worse at following the road rules than the rest of the population
- gorilla monsoon
- Posts: 3553
- Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 10:45 am
- Location: Lake Macquarie
Re: Advocacy article: "We need to follow the rules of the ro
Postby gorilla monsoon » Wed Jan 30, 2013 5:44 pm
- Mulger bill
- Super Mod
- Posts: 29060
- Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 2:41 pm
- Location: Sunbury Vic
Re: Advocacy article: "We need to follow the rules of the ro
Postby Mulger bill » Wed Jan 30, 2013 6:04 pm
The double standard is that such behaviour from other road users is hardly noticed by the other road users. Stand on any busy street corner and you'll see a distressingly high incidence of outlawed by all groups. but it seems that the only ones that get noticed and broadly condemned use wheels but no engine.Howzat wrote:It's not a double standard. It's a single standard. All road users are expecting to follow the rules - as the proliferation of red light and speed cameras catching drivers evidence.find_bruce wrote:The double standard is the expectation that cyclists are somehow different to other people & need to be perfect in order to be considered legitimate. There is no evidence that, as a group, cyclists are any better or worse at following the road rules than the rest of the population
London Boy 29/12/2011
- Mulger bill
- Super Mod
- Posts: 29060
- Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 2:41 pm
- Location: Sunbury Vic
Re: Advocacy article: "We need to follow the rules of the ro
Postby Mulger bill » Wed Jan 30, 2013 6:08 pm
London Boy 29/12/2011
- g-boaf
- Posts: 21456
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 6:11 pm
Re: Advocacy article: "We need to follow the rules of the ro
Postby g-boaf » Wed Jan 30, 2013 7:32 pm
Or Ron!gorilla monsoon wrote:I'm just waiting for human 909 to arrive...............
We could do with cycling clubs not doing sprinting on the roads in among traffic. That was quite bad not only for the unlucky guy who crashed - but it tarnishes the image of us all in the eyes of others.
Personally - I can't do much, I don't do much riding on the road like the commuters do, most of mine is on dedicated cycling tracks like M7.
If I am on the road, I try and do the right thing. Which is more than can be said for the Mr Ordinary on Merrylands Road this afternoon on his ordinary bike, wearing sandals and ordinary shorts and t-shirt, happily mixing it with traffic - with his helmet hanging from the left handlebar!!!! I kid you not! Later, he then took to the pedestrian only footpath - which is also illegal.
And another happens to be a nearby resident who is nearing 80 and cannot drive anymore. He rides his bicycle everywhere - on footpaths only, even where it is not allowed. So, breaking the law! Throw the book at him, hey Mr Scruby?
I use this example to show how the local area and parts of Sydney are not set up to cater for this kind of commuter who clearly isn't wanting to ride on the road for his old age frail nature and the fact he isn't very fast, of course.
-
- Posts: 9810
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:48 am
Re: Advocacy article: "We need to follow the rules of the ro
Postby human909 » Wed Jan 30, 2013 9:32 pm
You called?gorilla monsoon wrote:I'm just waiting for human 909 to arrive...............
It seems that somebody's understanding of "how civilization works" is a bit off. Not to mention failing to recognise that the perception that cyclists break rules isn't mirrored by the equally true statement that drivers break rules.Well, sorry, that’s not how civilization works. And it contributes to a stressful street climate of vindictive, they-started-it behavior that gets people hurt.
Personally, I will continue to break numerous laws whether it be on foot, bike, car or sitting on my couch. The laws I break almost universally are ones that do not harm others or damage society. I will not sit with smug superiority over others simply for stopping at a red light. This is about as absurd as being smug about having a bell attached.
But none of this discussion will affect the terrible ( ) law breaking behaviour of the young female commuter in a skirt on a 3-speed that I followed down St-Kilda Rd a few weeks ago. Her and others like her will continue to take up cycling in greater numbers and continue to recognises the absurdity of stopping for a red light on an empty pedestrian crossing. Fighting to stop such law breaking is a fight against common sense.
- martinjs
- Posts: 3402
- Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 8:54 pm
- Location: Fivebough, Leeton
- Contact:
Re: Advocacy article: "We need to follow the rules of the ro
Postby martinjs » Sun Feb 03, 2013 5:01 pm
And there in lies the problem, as usually it's you who doesn't get it. What's to stop cars drivers thinking the same way, fair dinkum you should move to somewhere that suits your style, all those Indian is a pretty good place for you. Road rules barely exist over there, it's riders like you and said mention female rider that gives Cyclist a bad name. The trouble is you in you arrogants don't seem to realize although you think no ones about there is always some looking out a Window, walking along the footpath, who see's what your doing and thinks "look another silly law breaking cyclist" Well from me at least THANKS FOR NOTHING CLOWN!human909 wrote:You called?gorilla monsoon wrote:I'm just waiting for human 909 to arrive...............
It seems that somebody's understanding of "how civilization works" is a bit off. Not to mention failing to recognise that the perception that cyclists break rules isn't mirrored by the equally true statement that drivers break rules.Well, sorry, that’s not how civilization works. And it contributes to a stressful street climate of vindictive, they-started-it behavior that gets people hurt.
Personally, I will continue to break numerous laws whether it be on foot, bike, car or sitting on my couch. The laws I break almost universally are ones that do not harm others or damage society. I will not sit with smug superiority over others simply for stopping at a red light. This is about as absurd as being smug about having a bell attached.
But none of this discussion will affect the terrible ( ) law breaking behaviour of the young female commuter in a skirt on a 3-speed that I followed down St-Kilda Rd a few weeks ago. Her and others like her will continue to take up cycling in greater numbers and continue to recognises the absurdity of stopping for a red light on an empty pedestrian crossing. Fighting to stop such law breaking is a fight against common sense.
Martin
-
- Posts: 82
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2012 10:09 am
Re: Advocacy article: "We need to follow the rules of the ro
Postby wilddemon » Sun Feb 03, 2013 5:58 pm
Now to take some acid and wait for xplora
- RonK
- Posts: 11508
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 2:08 pm
- Location: If you need to know, ask me
- Contact:
Re: Advocacy article: "We need to follow the rules of the ro
Postby RonK » Sun Feb 03, 2013 6:07 pm
Oh I don't know. Clearly there are plenty of others here with a working moral compass so no need for any additional comment from me.g-boaf wrote:Or Ron!gorilla monsoon wrote:I'm just waiting for human 909 to arrive...............
-
- Posts: 9810
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:48 am
Re: Advocacy article: "We need to follow the rules of the ro
Postby human909 » Sun Feb 03, 2013 10:38 pm
Nothing is stopping car drivers from thinking the same way. And if a car driver safely drives through and empty intersection against a red light I don't see that as the end of the world.martinjs wrote:And there in lies the problem, as usually it's you who doesn't get it. What's to stop cars drivers thinking the same way
Its not arrogance. Riding through an red light empty intersection at 4am when the sensor isn't working while nobody is looking isn't arrogant. Does it suddenly become arrogant if the sun is up and somebody is looking out a window?martinjs wrote:it's riders like you and said mention female rider that gives Cyclist a bad name. The trouble is you in you arrogants don't seem to realize
Many cyclists will continue to behave in a harmless way while breeching some innocuous laws. (I also don't have a bell on all my bikes.) If you want to cast judgement then so be it.martinjs wrote: although you think no ones about there is always some looking out a Window, walking along the footpath, who see's what your doing and thinks "look another silly law breaking cyclist" Well from me at least THANKS FOR NOTHING CLOWN!
I'd be interested to hear your "moral" justifications. This sounds a very curious take on morality.....RonK wrote:Oh I don't know. Clearly there are plenty of others here with a working moral compass so no need for any additional comment from me.
-
- Posts: 323
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2012 2:10 pm
Re: Advocacy article: "We need to follow the rules of the ro
Postby LM324 » Sun Feb 03, 2013 10:49 pm
IMO riding through an empty intersection because the sensor is not working is OK. However riding through an empty (or not empty) intersection where the sensor still works is Not Ok. These are two completely different things.human909 wrote: Riding through an red light empty intersection at 4am when the sensor isn't working while nobody is looking isn't arrogant.
-
- Posts: 9810
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:48 am
Re: Advocacy article: "We need to follow the rules of the ro
Postby human909 » Sun Feb 03, 2013 11:04 pm
So it seems breaking the law and going through red light is sometimes ok. I guess we just have different threshold of what makes it ok. I personally don't see what was wrong with the young lady going through a pedestrian crossing with not a pedestrian in sight.Philipthelam wrote:IMO riding through an empty intersection because the sensor is not working is OK. However riding through an empty (or not empty) intersection where the sensor still works is Not Ok. These are two completely different things.
-
- Posts: 1094
- Joined: Sat Nov 08, 2008 3:58 pm
Re: Advocacy article: "We need to follow the rules of the ro
Postby jcjordan » Mon Feb 04, 2013 6:17 am
+1Philipthelam wrote:IMO riding through an empty intersection because the sensor is not working is OK. However riding through an empty (or not empty) intersection where the sensor still works is Not Ok. These are two completely different things.human909 wrote: Riding through an red light empty intersection at 4am when the sensor isn't working while nobody is looking isn't arrogant.
The fact is every time a cyclists jumps a light it harms all of us.
It goes towards creating a sence of disregard towards all laws in the eyes of the majority. This then gives them the right (at least in their opinon) the right to treat us with less respect.
Veni, Vidi, Vespa -- I Came, I Saw, I Rode Home
- toolonglegs
- Posts: 15463
- Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 7:49 pm
- Location: Somewhere with padded walls and really big hills!
Re: Advocacy article: "We need to follow the rules of the ro
Postby toolonglegs » Mon Feb 04, 2013 6:35 am
There would be riots on the streets if all cyclists suddenly started stopping at every red light holding up traffic .
-
- Posts: 1094
- Joined: Sat Nov 08, 2008 3:58 pm
Re: Advocacy article: "We need to follow the rules of the ro
Postby jcjordan » Mon Feb 04, 2013 7:10 am
You are lucky enough to live somewhere where more people ride and see the bike as a transport tool rather than a kids toy. This is not the case in Australia.toolonglegs wrote:I am glad I live somewhere where commonsense prevails... well at least when it comes to riding a bike.
There would be riots on the streets if all cyclists suddenly started stopping at every red light holding up traffic .
We also have a much greater sence of entitlement by our road users. This is not just reflected in how cyclists are treated but other road users.
Personally I see the cause is our weak driver training requirements and slack enforcement of laws.
Veni, Vidi, Vespa -- I Came, I Saw, I Rode Home
- il padrone
- Posts: 22931
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
- Location: Heading for home.
Re: Advocacy article: "We need to follow the rules of the ro
Postby il padrone » Mon Feb 04, 2013 8:57 am
The fact is every time a motorist runs a light/speeds/fails to stop at stop sign it harms all of us motorists.jcjordan wrote:The fact is every time a cyclists jumps a light it harms all of us.
It goes towards creating a sence of disregard towards all laws in the eyes of the majority. This then gives them the right (at least in their opinon) the right to treat us with less respect.
Why does this not work?
Rule-breaking cyclists harming me, a law-abiding cyclist is just a huge load of bollocks. You are only responsible for your own actions. If you get some flack from work colleagues or friends, deal with it. Don't feel responsible unless your actions are irresponsible.
Like human909, I don't regard crossing through a failed red signal as being irresponsible. It can be done perfectly safely,if you use your eyes and judgement well. Even some real red signals are questionable. For example near me we have pedestrian lights that often trigger when there is no-one within cooee. I think there is some link with traffic from a side street, but often they will go red and hold up traffic for 20-30 seconds and no person crosses, nor do any vehicles turn out. In the car I am sorely tempted to ignore them (but I don't). The same would apply on the bike.
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."
-
- Posts: 1094
- Joined: Sat Nov 08, 2008 3:58 pm
Re: Advocacy article: "We need to follow the rules of the ro
Postby jcjordan » Mon Feb 04, 2013 9:38 am
It may not harm you in a physical since but it harms us as a group in terms of how we are perseved. You only need to see the comments made by so many. They all have a comment about how we are all law breakers because a minority break the law.il padrone wrote:The fact is every time a motorist runs a light/speeds/fails to stop at stop sign it harms all of us motorists.jcjordan wrote:The fact is every time a cyclists jumps a light it harms all of us.
It goes towards creating a sence of disregard towards all laws in the eyes of the majority. This then gives them the right (at least in their opinon) the right to treat us with less respect.
Why does this not work?
Rule-breaking cyclists harming me, a law-abiding cyclist is just a huge load of bollocks. You are only responsible for your own actions. If you get some flack from work colleagues or friends, deal with it. Don't feel responsible unless your actions are irresponsible.
.
The reason that you doubt see it as much about motorists in general is that you don't normally generalise blame on a group in which you belong as this would lay blame on yourself. You can see something similar within subsets of the motorists community in how they see P platers and fancy cars
Veni, Vidi, Vespa -- I Came, I Saw, I Rode Home
- il padrone
- Posts: 22931
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
- Location: Heading for home.
Re: Advocacy article: "We need to follow the rules of the ro
Postby il padrone » Mon Feb 04, 2013 9:55 am
Words! Meh!jcjordan wrote:You only need to see the comments made by so many. They all have a comment about how we are all law breakers because a minority break the law.
I ride my bike in a safe, confident, reasonable and legal manner. As long as drivers treat me with the legally required care, overtake safely and give way where required, I care little what words they are muttering behind the wheel.
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."
-
- Posts: 1094
- Joined: Sat Nov 08, 2008 3:58 pm
Re: Advocacy article: "We need to follow the rules of the ro
Postby jcjordan » Mon Feb 04, 2013 11:23 am
The fact is that as they are muttering those words they don’t feel the need, but do feel justified, in not giving way to cyclist as they should, coming to close to them and similar actions.il padrone wrote:Words! Meh!jcjordan wrote:You only need to see the comments made by so many. They all have a comment about how we are all law breakers because a minority break the law.
I ride my bike in a safe, confident, reasonable and legal manner. As long as drivers treat me with the legally required care, overtake safely and give way where required, I care little what words they are muttering behind the wheel.
As long as their opinion is that we are a nuisance on the road and not law abiding they will see no reason to obey those laws that relate to us.
Veni, Vidi, Vespa -- I Came, I Saw, I Rode Home
-
- Posts: 9810
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:48 am
Re: Advocacy article: "We need to follow the rules of the ro
Postby human909 » Mon Feb 04, 2013 11:31 am
Haters will hate. If they choose to hate for a unjust reason then that is no reason to change behaviour. Tour'd'france wantabes, hipsters, overweight people in Lycra, MAMILS, bearded recumbent, unicyclists, BMX riders with low seats or 3 speed riders trundling safely through a red light. Many of these are perceived by others as being stupid behaviour.jcjordan wrote:It may not harm you in a physical since but it harms us as a group in terms of how we are perseved.
I'm not going to shout out and complain about all these groups harm others perception of cyclist. That is not my problem nor is it any of my business how others if they are not harming others.
Common sense seems to prevail most of the time where I ride too.toolonglegs wrote:I am glad I live somewhere where commonsense prevails... well at least when it comes to riding a bike.
Can we please stop this notion that if EVERY cyclist obeyed EVERY rule then suddenly everything will be rosy! How about simply holding everyone responsible for their own actions, and not holding people responsible for OTHER people's actions!jcjordan wrote:The fact is that as they are muttering those words they don’t feel the need, but do feel justified, in not giving way to cyclist as they should, coming to close to them and similar actions.
As long as their opinion is that we are a nuisance on the road and not law abiding they will see no reason to obey those laws that relate to us.
- il padrone
- Posts: 22931
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
- Location: Heading for home.
Re: Advocacy article: "We need to follow the rules of the ro
Postby il padrone » Mon Feb 04, 2013 11:32 am
In general, I have little concern with the problem you refer to. At least 99.5% of drivers give way to me where required.jcjordan wrote: they will see no reason to obey those laws that relate to us.
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."
- The 2nd Womble
- Posts: 3058
- Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2011 1:21 pm
- Location: Brisbane
- Contact:
Re: Advocacy article: "We need to follow the rules of the ro
Postby The 2nd Womble » Mon Feb 04, 2013 2:51 pm
And yes, every day I drive AND ride I do my utmost to obey the road rules. Why? Because its one less Richardhead for everyone else to contend with. Shock horror if everyone did likewise we'd all be fine.
Duh.
Huge fan of booted RGers who just can't help themselves
Return to “Cycling Safety and Advocacy”
- General Australian Cycling Topics
- Info / announcements
- Buying a bike / parts
- General Cycling Discussion
- The Bike Shed
- Cycling Health
- Cycling Safety and Advocacy
- Women's Cycling
- Bike & Gear Reviews
- Cycling Trade
- Stolen Bikes
- Bicycle FAQs
- The Market Place
- Member to Member Bike and Gear Sales
- Want to Buy, Group Buy, Swap
- My Bikes or Gear Elsewhere
- Serious Biking
- Audax / Randonneuring
- Retro biking
- Commuting
- MTB
- Recumbents
- Fixed Gear/ Single Speed
- Track
- Electric Bicycles
- Cyclocross and Gravel Grinding
- Dragsters / Lowriders / Cruisers
- Children's Bikes
- Cargo Bikes and Utility Cycling
- Road Racing
- Road Biking
- Training
- Time Trial
- Triathlon
- International and National Tours and Events
- Cycle Touring
- Touring Australia
- Touring Overseas
- Touring Bikes and Equipment
- Australia
- Western Australia
- New South Wales
- Queensland
- South Australia
- Victoria
- ACT
- Tasmania
- Northern Territory
- Country & Regional
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
- All times are UTC+10:00
- Top
- Delete cookies
About the Australian Cycling Forums
The Australian Cycling Forums is a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.
Bicycles Network Australia
Forum Information
Connect with BNA
This website uses affiliate links to retail platforms including ebay, amazon, proviz and ribble.