2017 Cycling fatalities

User avatar
queequeg
Posts: 5299
Joined: Thu Dec 17, 2009 10:09 am

Re: 2017 Cycling fatalities

Postby queequeg » Wed Jul 11, 2018 2:24 pm

Scott_C wrote:
queequeg wrote:What road shoulder?


That's where the car stopped. If we assume she was going 100kph the collision site would be ~100m before this point if she didn't start braking until after the collision, by my estimate that puts the collision on the other side of the curve where there might be more of a shoulder, the fact that the shoulder disappears could help an argument he was on the shoulder until it disappeared and had to move into the road.



A quick check on Google Street View, taken in May 2017, shows that for the most part, Sedgwick Rd does not have a shoulder, including the section where this happened

https://www.theland.com.au/story/520827 ... r/?cs=3372
'11 Lynskey Cooper CX, '00 Hillbrick Steel Racing (Total Rebuild '10), '15 Cervelo S5

warthog1
Posts: 7091
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 4:40 pm

Re: 2017 Cycling fatalities

Postby warthog1 » Wed Jul 11, 2018 7:25 pm

queequeg wrote:

A quick check on Google Street View, taken in May 2017, shows that for the most part, Sedgwick Rd does not have a shoulder, including the section where this happened

https://www.theland.com.au/story/520827 ... r/?cs=3372


You are correct.

AdelaidePeter
Posts: 342
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2017 11:13 am

Re: 2017 Cycling fatalities

Postby AdelaidePeter » Wed Jul 11, 2018 9:46 pm

antigee wrote:lets hope the Victoria Police have a strong well prepared case and the jury (if applicable?) don't choose the it could happen to any one of us verdict - the defence line described above was used in a UK teen cyclist death...apparently defence lawyers can choose to use it when the sun failed to shine at the time of the appalling driving:

http://www.kentonline.co.uk/deal/news/v ... ile-33310/

“At this point he said he was possibly 10 to 12 seconds away from the point of collision when he noticed the cyclist who he claimed rode off the pavement and onto the road without looking, “ the prosecutor said.

Mr Sullivan said it was then taken away for analysis where text messages were discovered between the driver and his partner......."

http://www.kentonline.co.uk/deal/news/v ... ing-33772/

shocking death and shocking outcome
\

What a disgrace. Texting up to 2 minutes before the ambulance was called, and lied to police about his phone. But one difference: over there, as far as I can tell from that second story, it isn't illegal to text and drive.

uart
Posts: 1436
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 9:15 pm
Location: Newcastle

Re: 2017 Cycling fatalities

Postby uart » Thu Jul 12, 2018 12:32 am

AdelaidePeter wrote:
antigee wrote:lets hope the Victoria Police have a strong well prepared case and the jury (if applicable?) don't choose the it could happen to any one of us verdict - the defence line described above was used in a UK teen cyclist death...apparently defence lawyers can choose to use it when the sun failed to shine at the time of the appalling driving:

http://www.kentonline.co.uk/deal/news/v ... ile-33310/

“At this point he said he was possibly 10 to 12 seconds away from the point of collision when he noticed the cyclist who he claimed rode off the pavement and onto the road without looking, “ the prosecutor said.

Mr Sullivan said it was then taken away for analysis where text messages were discovered between the driver and his partner......."

http://www.kentonline.co.uk/deal/news/v ... ing-33772/

shocking death and shocking outcome
\

What a disgrace. Texting up to 2 minutes before the ambulance was called, and lied to police about his phone. But one difference: over there, as far as I can tell from that second story, it isn't illegal to text and drive.


Yes, that jury decision is an absolute disgrace. For the guy to be not just using his phone, not even just reading texts, but actually trying to type in a text at the very time that he killed that poor cyclist. And then for the courts to find him guilty of absolutely nothing - that is just plain ridiculous! :(

Also, when I read that driver's pathetic excuses it really makes me mad.

“I was texting just using my left hand. When I pulled out onto the road I was trying to keep my attention on the road, so I typed without looking at the phone.”


“It was all very quick but it seemed to me he had adjacened (sic) out slightly from the lane he should have been on.”


So it was the cyclists fault because he wasn't where he "should have been". Is this guy serious? Take a look at the google street view of the area where it happened and tell me where else the cyclist could possibly have been. :?
https://www.google.com.au/maps/@51.1663 ... 6656?hl=en

warthog1
Posts: 7091
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 4:40 pm

Re: 2017 Cycling fatalities

Postby warthog1 » Sat Jul 14, 2018 7:09 pm

It must be hard to prove fault on the part of the driver.
Or disprove fault on the part of the cyclist.
https://www.bendigoadvertiser.com.au/st ... des-crash/

User avatar
queequeg
Posts: 5299
Joined: Thu Dec 17, 2009 10:09 am

Re: 2017 Cycling fatalities

Postby queequeg » Mon Jul 16, 2018 12:17 am

warthog1 wrote:It must be hard to prove fault on the part of the driver.
Or disprove fault on the part of the cyclist.
https://www.bendigoadvertiser.com.au/st ... des-crash/


I wonder if they plan to have a police driver follow a police cyclist while the driver taps away on facebook.

One wonders if they have Jason's GPS Data, so they'd have a pretty accurate record of what he was doing.
'11 Lynskey Cooper CX, '00 Hillbrick Steel Racing (Total Rebuild '10), '15 Cervelo S5

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AdelaidePeter, caneye