Follow-up reporting on road deaths
-
- Posts: 1232
- Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2017 11:13 am
Follow-up reporting on road deaths
Postby AdelaidePeter » Tue Jun 12, 2018 2:29 pm
It seems to me that a small number go to court with a serious charge, and get relatively widespread media coverage. Every other one seems to sink without a trace. In particular, it seems the public never hears when it has been resolved that no charges are to be laid, or when minor charges are laid. Is this information just not released? And is there a reason?
p.s. Come to think of it, it's pretty well the same with workplace deaths.
-
- Posts: 9810
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:48 am
Re: Follow-up reporting on road deaths
Postby human909 » Tue Jun 12, 2018 4:14 pm
Recommendations often come out of that, but that doesn't mean police and politicians listen or act.
EDIT: looks like road deaths don't automatically get coronial inquestions.
I googled the James Cross case for a bit more background:
https://www.theage.com.au/national/vict ... 1z438.html
"Dr Cross said had he and his wife not pushed for a coronial inquest, their son's death would have been recorded that he crashed into traffic after he “came from nowhere”."
"James Cross's parents are dismayed that the car driver responsible for their son's death was never formally interviewed by police and never apologised."
- find_bruce
- Moderator
- Posts: 10599
- Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 8:42 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: Follow-up reporting on road deaths
Postby find_bruce » Tue Jun 12, 2018 6:02 pm
It is normally done prior to the criminal charges so is unlikely to contain those outcomes. Sadly you are correct that many sink without a trace.
- Tequestra
- Posts: 193
- Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2018 2:12 pm
Re: Follow-up reporting on road deaths
Postby Tequestra » Tue Jun 12, 2018 6:03 pm
THREE DEMERIT POINTS?human909 wrote: https://www.theage.com.au/national/vict ... 1z438.html
I am so angry!
I remember the one time I ever opened the door on my ute to do a job at the Parmeila Hilton in the centre of Perth and would have cleaned up a cyclist if he hadn't been lucky to swerve out the way to avoid my sudden door in his way. I still remember exactly how overcast the sky was that day just after midday in 1994. He survived and I never saw him again, but every time I reach for the door-handle when parked at the side of the road, that overcast sky in the picture in my mind comes back to haunt me. I wish I could post the print the photo I see in my mind, not just here, but on every school kid's bloody desk at their primary school.
This is why I firmly believe now that the one-metre distance passing law that has just been gifted to Western Australian cyclists last Christmas not only applies to cars passing bikes, but to bikes passing parked cars. I will write this on a piece of paper and keep it in my cargo box, so that if anyone runs into the back of me and 'knocks me off' because I am riding 1m away from parked cars, then the 'first-responders' will find my note and tell the killer why I was riding on that vector.
I am so angry! Three demerit points for killing an Australian citizen! Excuse my french but FFS!
-
- Posts: 1232
- Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2017 11:13 am
Re: Follow-up reporting on road deaths
Postby AdelaidePeter » Tue Jun 12, 2018 7:04 pm
So when charges are dropped, as they often are, does the media then report on it? After all, if the original death is newsworthy, so is the legal outcome. Or is there a reason not to report, e.g. privacy laws?
p.s. Ironically, one of the case I was thinking of actually did pop up in the news last week, I've just discovered. See my post here http://www.bicycles.net.au/forums/viewt ... 0#p1451380 So maybe I've got to (groan) buy the local rag instead of just skim the headlines.
- Tequestra
- Posts: 193
- Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2018 2:12 pm
Re: Follow-up reporting on road deaths
Postby Tequestra » Tue Jun 12, 2018 7:16 pm
I wonder why 'the media' (MSM) are not reporting on the end of the war in Syria now that the celebrations have begun. Hint: The USA lost.AdelaidePeter wrote:So when charges are dropped, as they often are, does the media then report on it?
The media's primary job is to soothe the citizens and make them believe that everything is fine in their world. Perhaps the commercial media are more able to be honest about the realities, but I don't like those commercials they use to fund themselves because they only encourage me to spend less money on my bike. I only watch the taxpayer-funded media on tv, so I have to get my reality news from more reliable sources on the web. My eldest son's birthday is October 22nd. What a coincidence.
-
- Posts: 325
- Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2018 5:36 pm
-
- Posts: 9810
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:48 am
Re: Follow-up reporting on road deaths
Postby human909 » Wed Jun 13, 2018 7:25 am
If that makes you angry in the case of James Cross. There was nothing. The constable was specifically by her senior officer not to pursue ANY charges.Tequestra wrote:THREE DEMERIT POINTS?human909 wrote: https://www.theage.com.au/national/vict ... 1z438.html
I am so angry!
I am so angry! Three demerit points for killing an Australian citizen! Excuse my french but FFS!
In a much publicised follow up situation after 'harsh' rules were put in place. The lady got $1000 fine for killing a cyclist, the maximum was $1500. Which always makes me wonder how many cyclists do you need to kill to get the maximum penalty.
- antigee
- Posts: 1034
- Joined: Sun Sep 01, 2013 10:58 am
- Location: just off the Yarra Trail but not lurking in the bushes
Re: Follow-up reporting on road deaths
Postby antigee » Wed Jun 13, 2018 11:06 am
think media is highly selective in what is reported because essentially they are either commercial businesses intent on maximising advertising revenue or government funded media that think it has to look like it is competing with commercial media and mimics their actions - don't have the figures but get impression once you move out of politics, sport, entertainment and business related news the content is mostly sourced from a handful or agencies not the media's own reporters - back when I was a youth I recall reading articles that carried the byline "by our court reporter" and I'm pretty sure that it was a normal part of any young journalists apprenticeship to spend a few years covering whatever went thru the local courts with their sub editors deciding what actually got published - think now deaths or serious injury have to have some so called "public interest" element or more likely they pass the "man bites dog" test of being newsworthy because are out of the norm to get an agency journalist to attend and write up.....AdelaidePeter wrote:Thanks for the feedback so far, but I was not asking about the (in)action of the police and courts - though of course that is a very important issue - but the (in)action of the media (including police media units). After all, one of the jobs of the media is to report on legal proceedings. And then, ideally, an informed public can decide whether laws are working correctly.
So when charges are dropped, as they often are, does the media then report on it? After all, if the original death is newsworthy, so is the legal outcome. Or is there a reason not to report, e.g. privacy laws?.........
"The journalists’ union, the MEAA, says that since 2011, more than 2,000 jobs have been lost in Australian media, or around a quarter of our journalists. That’s just the redundancies the union can keep track of – it’s not including people who have resigned and have not been replaced. At Fairfax alone, the union calculates that 474 journalists have been made redundant just at the city mastheads to date; there have been hundreds more at regional and suburban papers and elsewhere."
source https://www.theguardian.com/media/2017/ ... to-save-it
as to the impact of this on public interest in following up specific cases could put an argument forward that in the interests of "open government" and justice then with the technology that is available then documents like police incident reports, crash investigations, worksafe investigations, court proceedings records and documentary evidence could be available to be searched on line - there would be privacy issues but if the will was there then again suspect technology has relatively cheap answers....think point is the press (or media) no longer hold public bodies to account so can the public without access to information?
- familyguy
- Posts: 8381
- Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2008 2:30 pm
- Location: Willoughby, NSW
Re: Follow-up reporting on road deaths
Postby familyguy » Wed Jun 13, 2018 11:26 am
AdelaidePeter wrote:Does anyone know the protocol / convention for reporting convictions related to road deaths, in Australia? (I mean in general, not just cyclist deaths).
It seems to me that a small number go to court with a serious charge, and get relatively widespread media coverage. Every other one seems to sink without a trace. In particular, it seems the public never hears when it has been resolved that no charges are to be laid, or when minor charges are laid. Is this information just not released? And is there a reason?
p.s. Come to think of it, it's pretty well the same with workplace deaths.
I am coming to somewhat of a belief that in Australia, if you're kiled by a car whilst not in a car yourself (that's the key part) that you're not considered a victim, unless it can be categorically proven otherwise. The victim blaming is growing daily, whether pedestrians or riders (of powered or non-powered conveyance). The more I see of other countries the more we have become a society ruled by 'vehicles that can do no wrong in many eyes'.antigee wrote:think media is highly selective in what is reported because essentially they are either commercial businesses intent on maximising advertising revenue or government funded media that think it has to look like it is competing with commercial media and mimics their actions - don't have the figures but get impression once you move out of politics, sport, entertainment and business related news the content is mostly sourced from a handful or agencies not the media's own reporters - back when I was a youth I recall reading articles that carried the byline "by our court reporter" and I'm pretty sure that it was a normal part of any young journalists apprenticeship to spend a few years covering whatever went thru the local courts with their sub editors deciding what actually got published - think now deaths or serious injury have to have some so called "public interest" element or more likely they pass the "man bites dog" test of being newsworthy because are out of the norm to get an agency journalist to attend and write up.....AdelaidePeter wrote:Thanks for the feedback so far, but I was not asking about the (in)action of the police and courts - though of course that is a very important issue - but the (in)action of the media (including police media units). After all, one of the jobs of the media is to report on legal proceedings. And then, ideally, an informed public can decide whether laws are working correctly.
So when charges are dropped, as they often are, does the media then report on it? After all, if the original death is newsworthy, so is the legal outcome. Or is there a reason not to report, e.g. privacy laws?.........
Jim
- Tequestra
- Posts: 193
- Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2018 2:12 pm
Re: Follow-up reporting on road deaths
Postby Tequestra » Wed Jun 13, 2018 1:19 pm
Hello again Mr Human and thanks for your reply. I suppose on having calmed down a bit and thought more carefully about it, that car-dooring is not so much a driving offence, per se', because passengers in taxis have been reported to do it as well. They may have no demerit points to lose, so it is not really a matter of demerit points as I complained about yesterday. It's just plain old manslaughter. $1,500 maximum fine eh? Life is cheap thesedays.human909 wrote: In a much publicised follow up situation after 'harsh' rules were put in place. The lady got $1000 fine for killing a cyclist, the maximum was $1500. Which always makes me wonder how many cyclists do you need to kill to get the maximum penalty.
I think there needs to be a major rethink about behaviours that cause deaths on our roads. The media have proven their power to convince the general public to support various minority groups in recent years. This has trickled down to the legislation eventually in some areas. It is up to the media to change peoples' attitudes towards cyclist killers, and I suppose it is up to people like us to change the media's attitude. I hope that I might help undo my damage yesterday and bring Peter's thread back on topic again.
-
- Posts: 361
- Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 7:06 am
Re: Follow-up reporting on road deaths
Postby hunch » Thu Jun 14, 2018 8:42 pm
-
- Posts: 1232
- Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2017 11:13 am
Re: Follow-up reporting on road deaths
Postby AdelaidePeter » Fri Jun 15, 2018 8:58 am
The most recent news item I can find is from 2017 https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/newsl ... eee95fc7ea .hunch wrote:I've often wondered what happened with Dr Sueke crushed by a dog trailer on New South Head Rd. Should have been some sort of inquest/result by now after 3(?) years surely? Last heard the police were appealing for witnesses a few days after the incident, but fear it's a case of dead men tell no tales.
That last sentence is frustrating. The news article is nearly 2 years after the crash and no findings released. Do the findings ever get released?A spokesman for the police wrote: A spokesman for the police said the matter has been referred to the Coroner.
“But as always, we encourage anyone with information who has not yet spoken to police to come forward,” he said.
“No charges have been laid at this stage.”
He would not say how many witnesses police had interviewed or release any findings from the crash investigation unit.
-
- Posts: 9810
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:48 am
Re: Follow-up reporting on road deaths
Postby human909 » Fri Jun 15, 2018 9:20 am
Not to my knowledge. FOI could get it but I suspect it would be blocked by the police for privacy of those involved and general police ass covering reasons.AdelaidePeter wrote:That last sentence is frustrating. The news article is nearly 2 years after the crash and no findings released. Do the findings ever get released?
Coronial report I believe are publicly available, (I would expect them to be as that is the point). However as discussed coroners have seemed to have given up running inquests on the MANY road deaths.
(Such reports can often take a long time to be released. I'm waiting on a coronial report from NZ that is over 2 years ago. The information is freely available once it is complete.)
- find_bruce
- Moderator
- Posts: 10599
- Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 8:42 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: Follow-up reporting on road deaths
Postby find_bruce » Fri Jun 15, 2018 3:18 pm
In NSW coroners reports are available from 2012 here. As far as I can tell, only 1 in that time has involved a bicycle - James Ciappara who was riding a bike modified with a petrol engine.human909 wrote:Not to my knowledge. FOI could get it but I suspect it would be blocked by the police for privacy of those involved and general police ass covering reasons.AdelaidePeter wrote:That last sentence is frustrating. The news article is nearly 2 years after the crash and no findings released. Do the findings ever get released?
Coronial report I believe are publicly available, (I would expect them to be as that is the point). However as discussed coroners have seemed to have given up running inquests on the MANY road deaths.
(Such reports can often take a long time to be released. I'm waiting on a coronial report from NZ that is over 2 years ago. The information is freely available once it is complete.)
I can't find anything about Dr Sueke
Return to “Cycling Safety and Advocacy”
- General Australian Cycling Topics
- Info / announcements
- Buying a bike / parts
- General Cycling Discussion
- The Bike Shed
- Cycling Health
- Cycling Safety and Advocacy
- Women's Cycling
- Bike & Gear Reviews
- Cycling Trade
- Stolen Bikes
- Bicycle FAQs
- The Market Place
- Member to Member Bike and Gear Sales
- Want to Buy, Group Buy, Swap
- My Bikes or Gear Elsewhere
- Serious Biking
- Audax / Randonneuring
- Retro biking
- Commuting
- MTB
- Recumbents
- Fixed Gear/ Single Speed
- Track
- Electric Bicycles
- Cyclocross and Gravel Grinding
- Dragsters / Lowriders / Cruisers
- Children's Bikes
- Cargo Bikes and Utility Cycling
- Road Racing
- Road Biking
- Training
- Time Trial
- Triathlon
- International and National Tours and Events
- Cycle Touring
- Touring Australia
- Touring Overseas
- Touring Bikes and Equipment
- Australia
- Western Australia
- New South Wales
- Queensland
- South Australia
- Victoria
- ACT
- Tasmania
- Northern Territory
- Country & Regional
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
- All times are UTC+10:00
- Top
- Delete cookies
About the Australian Cycling Forums
The Australian Cycling Forums is a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.
Bicycles Network Australia
Forum Information
Connect with BNA
This website uses affiliate links to retail platforms including ebay, amazon, proviz and ribble.