Jockey wheels - need some

User avatar
mikesbytes
Super Mod
Super Mod
Posts: 22179
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:42 pm
Location: Tempe, Sydney
Contact:

Jockey wheels - need some

Postby mikesbytes » Sun Mar 08, 2009 10:28 am

Any suggestions on which jockey wheels to buy and where to get them from.

I need 2 sets, both for Tigra derailers.
If the R-1 rule is broken, what happens to N+1?

}SkOrPn--7
Posts: 2406
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2008 7:15 pm

Postby }SkOrPn--7 » Sun Mar 08, 2009 1:01 pm

Not sure if these fit that derailleur but for my last two sets I have purchased I have used them. I find that there cheaper than Shimano and last longer not too mention you get fully sealed ball bearings in both lower/upper pulleys.

http://www.bbbparts.com/pulleys.php

I purchased mine from

http://www.deanwoods.com.au/store/category410_1.htm

User avatar
mikesbytes
Super Mod
Super Mod
Posts: 22179
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:42 pm
Location: Tempe, Sydney
Contact:

Postby mikesbytes » Sun Mar 08, 2009 1:50 pm

}SkOrPn--7 wrote:Not sure if these fit that derailleur but for my last two sets I have purchased I have used them. I find that there cheaper than Shimano and last longer not too mention you get fully sealed ball bearings in both lower/upper pulleys.

http://www.bbbparts.com/pulleys.php

I purchased mine from

http://www.deanwoods.com.au/store/category410_1.htm
$20 ain't bad at all.

What's the difference between 10 and 11 ?
If the R-1 rule is broken, what happens to N+1?

User avatar
jasimon
Posts: 1330
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 9:56 am
Location: Riding

Postby jasimon » Sun Mar 08, 2009 3:08 pm

mikesbytes wrote:What's the difference between 10 and 11 ?
Tooth wear. Most newer ones are 11 tooth. An odd number of teeth evens out the tooth wear to make sure that the jockey wheel teeth are not always getting an inner or outer link.

User avatar
Kalgrm
Super Mod
Super Mod
Posts: 9653
Joined: Fri May 25, 2007 5:21 pm
Location: Success, WA
Contact:

Postby Kalgrm » Sun Mar 08, 2009 3:16 pm

Larger wheel also means the chain bends less, so theoretically, it should have a lower friction loss.

Cheers,
Graeme
Think outside the double triangle.
---------------------
Music was better when ugly people were allowed to make it ....

User avatar
il padrone
Posts: 22931
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
Location: Heading for home.

Postby il padrone » Sun Mar 08, 2009 3:21 pm

+1 on those BBB jockey wheels. I've used them as replacements, iirc they're sealed bearing pulleys.
Mandatory helmet law?
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."

User avatar
mikesbytes
Super Mod
Super Mod
Posts: 22179
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:42 pm
Location: Tempe, Sydney
Contact:

Postby mikesbytes » Sun Mar 08, 2009 4:08 pm

Thanks Guys, I'll order 2 sets of the 11's
If the R-1 rule is broken, what happens to N+1?

heavymetal
Super Mod
Super Mod
Posts: 1381
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2005 5:32 pm

Postby heavymetal » Sun Mar 08, 2009 6:09 pm

+1 on the BBB jockey wheels. I replaced the original shimano ones after the top one exploded (no bearings).

The good thing about the BBB ones is that they come in colours. :D

Kev.
There is only one BicycleWA.

User avatar
Mulger bill
Super Mod
Super Mod
Posts: 29060
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 2:41 pm
Location: Sunbury Vic

Postby Mulger bill » Sun Mar 08, 2009 8:12 pm

mikesbytes wrote:Thanks Guys, I'll order 2 sets of the 11's
You won't regret it Mike, but forget the colours, they all look the same after 1000kms :wink:

Shaun
...whatever the road rules, self-preservation is the absolute priority for a cyclist when mixing it with motorised traffic.
London Boy 29/12/2011

User avatar
mikesbytes
Super Mod
Super Mod
Posts: 22179
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:42 pm
Location: Tempe, Sydney
Contact:

Postby mikesbytes » Sun Mar 08, 2009 9:00 pm

Just one passing thought, will I have a size problem with using 11 on my Tigra derailiers?
If the R-1 rule is broken, what happens to N+1?

User avatar
munga
Posts: 7023
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 3:17 pm
Location: wowe
Contact:

Postby munga » Sun Mar 08, 2009 9:09 pm

*snickers*

heavymetal
Super Mod
Super Mod
Posts: 1381
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2005 5:32 pm

Postby heavymetal » Sun Mar 08, 2009 9:20 pm

mikesbytes wrote:Just one passing thought, will I have a size problem with using 11 on my Tigra derailiers?
When I brought mine they came with a bag loaded with all sorts of spacers for different derailleurs.

Kev.
There is only one BicycleWA.

User avatar
sogood
Posts: 17168
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
Location: Sydney AU

Postby sogood » Sun Mar 08, 2009 9:27 pm

heavymetal wrote:When I brought mine they came with a bag loaded with all sorts of spacers for different derailleurs.
Why would you need spacers? B/n the RD arms?
Bianchi, Ridley, Tern, Montague and All things Apple :)
RK wrote:And that is Wikipedia - I can write my own definition.

User avatar
mikesbytes
Super Mod
Super Mod
Posts: 22179
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:42 pm
Location: Tempe, Sydney
Contact:

Postby mikesbytes » Sun Mar 08, 2009 9:35 pm

heavymetal wrote:
mikesbytes wrote:Just one passing thought, will I have a size problem with using 11 on my Tigra derailiers?
When I brought mine they came with a bag loaded with all sorts of spacers for different derailleurs.

Kev.
Good point, I wasn't thinking of width.

What about if the teeth of the jockey or chain might hit due to the larger diameter ?
If the R-1 rule is broken, what happens to N+1?

heavymetal
Super Mod
Super Mod
Posts: 1381
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2005 5:32 pm

Postby heavymetal » Sun Mar 08, 2009 9:39 pm

sogood wrote:Why would you need spacers? B/n the RD arms?
I wondered the same myself and pulled out a few other RD from my collection. On some, the joining bolts have a wider part than the thread, resulting in a wobbly jockey wheel as the cage can't be closed to the width of the wheels.

A washer would probably do the same job, but the jockey wheels I brought came with little spacers instead. Luckily I didn't need them on my RD.

Kev.
There is only one BicycleWA.

heavymetal
Super Mod
Super Mod
Posts: 1381
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2005 5:32 pm

Postby heavymetal » Sun Mar 08, 2009 9:43 pm

mikesbytes wrote:What about if the teeth of the jockey or chain might hit due to the larger diameter ?
I'm not an expert, but I thought the diameters were the same, only more teeth.

I inadvertently changed mine from 10T to 11T and haven't had any problems, but the RD was a 9 speed to begin with, but fitted with 10T by the company when the bike was built to accommodate the 8 speed rear cluster.

Kev.
There is only one BicycleWA.

User avatar
Kalgrm
Super Mod
Super Mod
Posts: 9653
Joined: Fri May 25, 2007 5:21 pm
Location: Success, WA
Contact:

Postby Kalgrm » Sun Mar 08, 2009 10:37 pm

heavymetal wrote:I'm not an expert, but I thought the diameters were the same, only more teeth.
I'm not sure how that's possible. It implies the teeth would have a tighter spacing, meaning they would no longer mesh with the spacing on the chain links.

Cheers,
Graeme
Think outside the double triangle.
---------------------
Music was better when ugly people were allowed to make it ....

heavymetal
Super Mod
Super Mod
Posts: 1381
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2005 5:32 pm

Postby heavymetal » Sun Mar 08, 2009 10:47 pm

Kalgrm wrote:
heavymetal wrote:I'm not an expert, but I thought the diameters were the same, only more teeth.
I'm not sure how that's possible. It implies the teeth would have a tighter spacing, meaning they would no longer mesh with the spacing on the chain links.
You're right, hence I said I'm no expert. I don't have the old ones to compare with as one exploded into a million bits and the other got thrown in a rage of disgust after I discovered they were made out of compressed horse manure and had no bearings. :shock:

There's probably not much of difference in diameter, and if there is, don't tell mike anyway :D Let him find out and tell us the answer :lol:

Kev.
There is only one BicycleWA.

User avatar
sogood
Posts: 17168
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
Location: Sydney AU

Postby sogood » Sun Mar 08, 2009 11:07 pm

I have seen some huge after market jockey wheels fitted on standard road RDs. Supposedly they reduce transmission friction but sounded like good gimmics to me.

Image
Bianchi, Ridley, Tern, Montague and All things Apple :)
RK wrote:And that is Wikipedia - I can write my own definition.

Nobody
Posts: 10330
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 12:10 pm
Location: Sydney

Postby Nobody » Mon Mar 09, 2009 5:42 am

heavymetal wrote:You're right, hence I said I'm no expert. I don't have the old ones to compare with as one exploded into a million bits and the other got thrown in a rage of disgust after I discovered they were made out of compressed horse manure and had no bearings. :shock:
Good to see Shimano is recycling. :lol:

Nobody
Posts: 10330
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 12:10 pm
Location: Sydney

Postby Nobody » Mon Mar 09, 2009 5:48 am

sogood wrote:I have seen some huge after market jockey wheels fitted on standard road RDs. Supposedly they reduce transmission friction but sounded like good gimmics to me.

Image
I see these on cheaper bikes. I think one of the bikes in my family has one. Might take a look. I think they do this to run even cheaper (or no) bushes. The weight weenies wouldn't like them either as they look heavy regardless of what they weigh.

User avatar
sogood
Posts: 17168
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
Location: Sydney AU

Postby sogood » Mon Mar 09, 2009 10:24 am

Nobody wrote:I see these on cheaper bikes. I think one of the bikes in my family has one. Might take a look. I think they do this to run even cheaper (or no) bushes. The weight weenies wouldn't like them either as they look heavy regardless of what they weigh.
The one in the photo is made of CF and is fitted to a DA RD. It ain't cheap that's for sure. :wink:
Bianchi, Ridley, Tern, Montague and All things Apple :)
RK wrote:And that is Wikipedia - I can write my own definition.

User avatar
mikesbytes
Super Mod
Super Mod
Posts: 22179
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:42 pm
Location: Tempe, Sydney
Contact:

Postby mikesbytes » Mon Mar 09, 2009 2:19 pm

I've heard that a fixie has a 99% efficient chain drive where a derailier style geard bike is 98%. So what happens to the 1% ?
If the R-1 rule is broken, what happens to N+1?

Nobody
Posts: 10330
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 12:10 pm
Location: Sydney

Postby Nobody » Mon Mar 09, 2009 8:33 pm

mikesbytes wrote:I've heard that a fixie has a 99% efficient chain drive where a derailier style geard bike is 98%. So what happens to the 1% ?
Heat due to more friction and noise.

User avatar
sogood
Posts: 17168
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
Location: Sydney AU

Postby sogood » Mon Mar 09, 2009 8:47 pm

mikesbytes wrote:I've heard that a fixie has a 99% efficient chain drive where a derailier style geard bike is 98%. So what happens to the 1% ?
Cross chaining, extra bearings, poor derailleur trim etc. However, the gears makes the bike more rideable on climbs and descents, more than make up that 1% deficiency. A better tuck would also give you more than 1%.
Bianchi, Ridley, Tern, Montague and All things Apple :)
RK wrote:And that is Wikipedia - I can write my own definition.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users